Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Focused CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis

  • Hollow Organ GI
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT as a feasible alternative to the standard CT of the abdomen and pelvis (CT-AP) in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Methods

Retrospective review of 200 adults with suspected acute appendicitis between January and October 2016 were included in this study. Each patient underwent CT-AP with oral and intravenous (IV) contrast. A subset of axial images starting at the top of L4 vertebral body to the roof of the acetabula were obtained from each study which served as the focused appendiceal CT. After review of the focused CTs, the non-focused CT-AP scans were reviewed, each patient acting as their own control. Images were assessed for ability to identify the appendix, assess for appendicitis, or identify alternative diagnoses that could account for the presenting symptoms.

Results

Of 200 cases, the appendix was visualized in the focused CT in 191 patients. In nine studies, the appendix was not visualized in focused or standard CT-AP. Using focused CT, 42 cases were positive for acute appendicitis. This result was identical when reviewing standard CT-AP. Alternative diagnoses were present in 38 patients. Using focused CT, 14 of these were not fully covered but the readers were able to make the diagnoses confidently on the focused CTs. Only one patient had acute non-appendiceal pathology mostly outside of the field of view.

Conclusions

Focused appendiceal CT with IV and oral contrast in the setting of clinically suspected appendicitis is a suitable alternative to conventional CT-AP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coward S, Kareemi H, Clement F, Zimmer S, Dixon E, Ball C. Incidence of appendicitis over time: a comparative analysis of an administrative healthcare database and a pathology-proven appendicitis registry. PLoS ONE 2016;11(11):e0165161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennington EC, Burke PA. Chapter 28: Appendix. In G. M. Doherty (Ed.). Current diagnosis & treatment: Surgery. 14th ed. 2015;651-656.

  3. Eko FN, Ryb GE, Drager L, Goldwater E, Wu JJ, Counihan TC. Ideal timing of surgery for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013;5:22-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC, Oyetunji TA, Greene WR, Frederick W, et al. Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg. 2011;201:433-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drake FT, Florence MG, Johnson MG, Jurkovich GJ, Kwon S, Schmidt Z, et al. Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 2012;256:586-94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Beyene J, Schuh S, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? a meta-analysis. Radiology 2006;241:83-94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;190:31-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med 2011;154:789-96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA, Baker ME, Cash BD, Fidler JL, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain—Suspected Appendicitis. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2011;8:749-55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, Megibow AJ, Israel G, Maki DD, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT Diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 2001;220:683-90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 1999;229:344-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, et al. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997;202:139-44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fefferman NR, Roche KJ, Pinkney LP, Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB. Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation. Radiology 2001;220:691-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT--review of 100 cases. Radiology 2000;217:159-63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Number of all-listed procedures for discharges from short-stay hospitals, by procedure category and age, N.H.D. Survey, editor, 2010: United States.

  16. Al-Omran M, Mamdani M, McLeod R. Epidemiologic features of acute appendicitis in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2003;46:263-8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Detmer D, Nevers L, Sikes E. Regional results of acute appendicitis care. JAMA 1981;246:1318-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flum D, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: Nationwide analysis. Archives of Surgery 2002;137:799-804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Drake FT, Flum DR. Improvement in the Diagnosis of Appendicitis. Adv Surg 2013;47:299-328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, Zane RD, Schiff GD, Hanson R, et al. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 2010;256:460-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Armstrong C. ACEP releases guidelines on evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis. Am Fam Physician 2010;15:1043–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hershko DD, Sroka G, Bahouth H, Ghersin E, Mahajna A, Krausz MM. The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis. Am Surg 2002;68:1003-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Raman SS, Lu DSK, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178(6):1319-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Randen A, Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Ubbink DT, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of CT and graded compression US related to prevalence of disease. Radiology 2008;249:97-106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R, Pinto P, Sirlin C. CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:406-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Paulson EK, Coursey CA. CT Protocols for acute appendicitis: time for change. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1268-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Nawfel RD, Hanson R, et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009;251:175-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004;363:345-51.

  29. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:887-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 1999;213:341-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wijetunga R, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither G, Doust BD. Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. Radiology 2001;221:747-53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Halverson M, Delgado J, Mahboubi S. Extra-appendiceal findings in pediatric abdominal CT for suspected appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44:816-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:763-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008;248:254-63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 1998;338:141-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Imaging, St Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada

    Massimo Tarulli & Paraskevi A. Vlachou

  2. Division of General Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada

    Joao Rezende-Neto

Authors
  1. Massimo Tarulli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joao Rezende-Neto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paraskevi A. Vlachou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paraskevi A. Vlachou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarulli, M., Rezende-Neto, J. & Vlachou, P.A. Focused CT for the evaluation of suspected appendicitis. Abdom Radiol 44, 2081–2088 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01942-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01942-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation