Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transabdominal Anastomosis After Low Anterior Resection: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Long-Term Results Between Side-to-End Anastomosis and Colonic J-Pouch

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

An Erratum to this article was published on 17 January 2006

PURPOSE

Colonic J-pouch has been constructed to overcome reservoir dysfunction after restorative rectal surgery, whereas no effort has been made for sphincter dysfunction. We conducted a prospective, randomized study comparing surgical and functional outcomes between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch after low anterior resection in which the anastomosis was constructed from the abdomen.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive patients with middle-to-low rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection were randomly assigned to side-to-end or colonic J-pouch group preoperatively. Surgical outcomes of all the patients were recorded. Patients underwent functional evaluation, including anorectal manometry and functional assessment, preoperatively and then 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients in each group completed the study. The demographic data and preoperative functional assessment did not differ between the two groups. There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes with regard to anastomotic height (5 cm), blood loss, protective colostomy, operative time, complications, and adjuvant therapy. Anal pressures showed no significant change postoperatively and during the follow-up period; there were no differences between the two groups. Temporal minor fecal incontinence was noted in the early postoperative period in both groups. With regard to bowel function, a significant reduction of volume of urgency and maximal tolerable volume was found postoperatively in both groups; however, a faster recovery was noted in the colonic J-pouch group. Stool frequency increased significantly after surgery in both groups; however, in contrast to rectal volume, a faster recovery was noted in the side-to-end group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anastomosis after low anterior resection for middle to low rectal cancer could be performed safely from the abdomen. It minimized sphincter injury and showed good continence preservation. On the other hand, the surgical outcomes and long-term functional results of side-to-end anastomosis were comparable with colonic J-pouch. Side-to-end anastomosis provides an easier, alternative way for reconstruction after restorative rectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

To the Article

  1. NS Williams D Johnston (1984) ArticleTitleSurvival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum Br J Surg 71 278–82 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiuC2MrjsFw%3D Occurrence Handle6704679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. NS Williams P Durdey D Johnston (1985) ArticleTitleThe outcome following sphincter-saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer Br J Surg 72 595–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB1c7hsFM%3D Occurrence Handle4027528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JK MacFarlane RD Ryall RJ Heald (1993) ArticleTitleMesorectal excision for rectal cancer Lancet 341 457–60 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC28vnslc%3D Occurrence Handle8094488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. SN Fain CS Patin L Morgenstern (1975) ArticleTitleUse of a mechanical suturing apparatus in low colorectal anastomosis Arch Surg 110 1079–82 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSqB38vhtFM%3D Occurrence Handle1098615

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. ND Karanjia DJ Schache WR North RJ Heald (1990) ArticleTitle“Close shave” in anterior resection Br J Surg 77 510–2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB1czms1I%3D Occurrence Handle2354332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. G Batignani I Monaci F Ficari F Tonelli (1991) ArticleTitleWhat affects continence after anterior resection of the rectum? Dis Colon Rectum 34 329–35 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02050593 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2snotFc%3D Occurrence Handle2007350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. EC Jehle T Haehnel MJ Starlinger HD Becker (1995) ArticleTitleLevel of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer Am J Surg 169 147–53 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80124-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC3MjnsVM%3D Occurrence Handle7817985

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. WG Lewis IG Martin ME Williamson et al. (1995) ArticleTitleWhy do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 38 259–63 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02055598 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC1cfmsFM%3D Occurrence Handle7882788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AS Miller WG Lewis ME Williamson et al. (1995) ArticleTitleFactors that influence functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 82 1327–30 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD1MjotFA%3D Occurrence Handle7489154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JA Carmona H Ortiz I Perez-Cabanas (1991) ArticleTitleAlterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum Int J Colorectal Dis 6 108–10 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00300205 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6A2c7jsV0%3D Occurrence Handle1875118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. IC Otto K Ito C Ye et al. (1996) ArticleTitleCauses of rectal incontinence after sphincter-preserving operations for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 39 1423–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02054533 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC38vltVQ%3D Occurrence Handle8969670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. F Lazorthes P Fages P Chiotasso et al. (1986) ArticleTitleResection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 73 136–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC3s3jslI%3D Occurrence Handle3947904

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R Parc E Tiret P Frileux et al. (1986) ArticleTitleResection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma Br J Surg 73 139–41 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimC3s3jslM%3D Occurrence Handle3947905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J Hida M Yasutomi K Fujimoto et al. (1996) ArticleTitleFunctional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch. Prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size Dis Colon Rectum 39 986–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA1M%2Fmslc%3D Occurrence Handle8797646

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. F Lazorthes R Gamagami P Chiotasso et al. (1997) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 40 1409–13 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02070703 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FmvFyltw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9407976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. YH Ho S Yu ES Ang et al. (2002) ArticleTitleSmall colonic J-pouch improves colonic retention of liquids–randomized, controlled trial with scintigraphy Dis Colon Rectum 45 76–82 Occurrence Handle11786768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JK Jiang JK Lin (1999) ArticleTitleAnorectal function following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: a comparison between handsewn and stapled anastomosis Colorectal Dis 1 73–9 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.1999.00034.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. WO Kirwan B Rupert B Turnbull SuffixJr VW Fazio FL Weakley (1978) ArticleTitlePull through operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer Br J Surg 65 695–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSaD2c3nvFI%3D Occurrence Handle709078

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. N Iwai K Hashimoto T Yamane et al. (1982) ArticleTitlePhysiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection for carcinoma of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 25 652–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyD38nnsVQ%3D Occurrence Handle7128365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. RG Molloy KT Moran J Coulter et al. (1992) ArticleTitleMechanism of sphincter impairment following low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 35 462–4 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02049403 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3szns1c%3D Occurrence Handle1568397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. ME Williamson WG Lewis PJ Finan et al. (1995) ArticleTitleRecovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 38 411–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqB3snoslU%3D Occurrence Handle7720451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MG O'Riordain RG Molloy P Gillen et al. (1992) ArticleTitleRectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 35 874–8 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02047876 Occurrence Handle1511649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. K Z'graggen CA Maurer S Birrer et al. (2001) ArticleTitleA new surgical concept for rectal replacement after low anterior resection: the transverse coloplasty pouch Ann Surg 234 780–7 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200112000-00009 Occurrence Handle11729384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. YH Ho S Brown SM Heah et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates Ann Surg 236 49–55 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200207000-00009 Occurrence Handle12131085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. JW Baker (1950) ArticleTitleLow end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis: description of the technique Arch Surg 61 143–57 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Cy%2BD3snhvVI%3D Occurrence Handle15426554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. M Adloff JP Arnaud S Beeharry JM Turbelin (1980) ArticleTitleSide-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection with the EEA stapler Dis Colon Rectum 23 456–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6D28nitV0%3D Occurrence Handle7438946 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02987074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. R Farouk GS Duthie PW Lee JR Monson (1998) ArticleTitleEndosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up Dis Colon Rectum 41 888–91 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czktFGitw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9678375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. YH Ho C Tsang CL Tang et al. (2000) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry Dis Colon Rectum 43 169–73 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lvF2lsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10696889

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. M Machado J Nygren S Goldman O Ljungqvist (2003) ArticleTitleSimilar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 238 214–20 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200308000-00009 Occurrence Handle12894014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. E Rullier C Laurent JL Garrelon et al. (1998) ArticleTitleRisk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer Br J Surg 85 355–8 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ptVaruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9529492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. ND Karanjia AP Corder P Bearn RJ Heald (1994) ArticleTitleLeakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum Br J Surg 81 1224–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2c7hs1A%3D Occurrence Handle7953369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. A Furst K Burghofer L Hutzel KW Jauch (2002) ArticleTitleNeorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis Dis Colon Rectum 45 660–7 Occurrence Handle12004217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. O Hallbook L Pahlman M Krog et al. (1996) ArticleTitleRandomized comparison of straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection Ann Surg 224 58–65 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199607000-00009 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB1cbkslM%3D Occurrence Handle8678619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

To the Invited Commentary

  1. RJ Heald BJ Moran RD Ryall R Sexton (1998) ArticleTitleMacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997 Arch Surg 133 894–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cznsFOrsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9711965

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. A Martling B Cedermark H Johansson LE Rutqvist T Holm (2002) ArticleTitleThe surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer Br J Surg 89 1008–13 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02151.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vgsVaquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12153626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Y-H Ho J Wong HS Goh (1993) ArticleTitleLevel of anastomosis and anorectal manometry in predicting function following anterior resection for adenocarcinoma Int J Colorectal Dis 8 170–4 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00341193 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD28rksVI%3D Occurrence Handle8245675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Y-H Ho C Tsang CL Tang D Nyam KW Eu F Seow-Choen (2000) ArticleTitleAnal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally. Randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry Dis Colon Rectum 43 169–73 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lvF2lsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10696889

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. YH Ho S Yu ES Ang F Seow-Choen F Sundram (2002) ArticleTitleSmall colonic J-pouch improves colonic retention of liquids–randomized, controlled trial with scintigraphy Dis Colon Rectum 45 76–82 Occurrence Handle11786768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. JS Joo JF Latulippe O Alabaz EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1998) ArticleTitleLong-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 41 740–6 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02236262 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czgslKktg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9645742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. YH Ho S Brown SM Heah et al. (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates Ann Surg 236 49–55 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200207000-00009 Occurrence Handle12131085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JW Baker (1950) ArticleTitleLow end to side rectosigmoidal anastomosis: description of the technique Arch Surg 61 143–57 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Cy%2BD3snhvVI%3D Occurrence Handle15426554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. M Machado J Nygren S Goldman O Ljungqvist (2003) ArticleTitleSimilar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial Ann Surg 238 214–20 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200308000-00009 Occurrence Handle12894014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. FT Huber B Herter JR Siewert (1999) ArticleTitleColonic pouch vs. side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 42 896–902 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzjslansQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10411436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Epidemiology in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1987

  12. FD Griffen CD Knight SuffixSr JM Whitaker CD Knight SuffixJr (1990) ArticleTitleThe double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications and observations Ann Surg 211 745–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By%2BB1M%2FjtFI%3D Occurrence Handle2357137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    Jeng-Kai Jiang M.D., Ph.D., Shung-Haur Yang M.D. & Jen-Kou Lin M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Jeng-Kai Jiang M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shung-Haur Yang M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jen-Kou Lin M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeng-Kai Jiang M.D., Ph.D..

Additional information

Supported by Taipei Veterans General Hospital Research Fund (VGH 90-B-262).

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0207-5.

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, JK., Yang, SH. & Lin, JK. Transabdominal Anastomosis After Low Anterior Resection: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Long-Term Results Between Side-to-End Anastomosis and Colonic J-Pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 2100–2110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0139-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0139-0

Key words

Search

Navigation