Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnosis and Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer by L6 Blood Serum Polymerase Chain Reaction Is Superior to Carcinoembryonic Antigen–Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare carcinoembryonic antigen levels with detection of messenger ribonucleic acid coding for the tumor-associated antigen L6 in patients with colorectal cancer. Not only are carcinoembryonic antigens expressed by the corresponding tumor cell, but the messenger ribonucleic acid of tumor-associated antigens, in contrast, is produced exclusively by viable tumor cells. METHODS: L6 messenger ribonucleic acid was determined by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Carcinoembryonic antigen was measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique, with a cutoff value of 40 μg/l. Blood serum was sampled from 187 patients with colorectal cancer. Statistical significance was calculated with the McNemar chi-squared test. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 79 percent of patients in all stages were positive for L6 messenger ribonucleic acid, whereas only 35 percent had elevated carcinoembryonic antigen titers (P < 0.001). In Dukes A tumors, 84.9 percent of patients were positive for L6 messenger ribonucleic acid, whereas carcinoembryonic antigen was elevated in only 16.9 percent of patients. Only in Dukes D tumors did the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for carcinoembryonic antigen exhibit the same sensitivity as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for L6 messenger ribonucleic acid. Recurrence was detected significantly earlier by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for L6 messenger ribonucleic acid than by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for carcinoembryonic antigen. CONCLUSION: L6 is more sensitive and precise than carcinoembryonic antigen in diagnosing and monitoring colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Chapter © 2017

References

  1. E Soeth C Roder H Juhl U Kruger B Kremer H Kalthoff (1996) ArticleTitleThe detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from colorectal-cancer patients by a cytokeratin-20-specific nested reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain reaction is related to the stage of disease Int J Cancer 69 278–282

    Google Scholar 

  2. G Schlimok I Funke B Bock B Schweiberer J Witte G Riethmuller (1990) ArticleTitleEpithelial tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with colorectal cancer J Clin Oncol 8 831–837

    Google Scholar 

  3. R Broll U Windhovel T Schiedeck M Duchrow HP Bruch (1999) ArticleTitleImmunocytochemical and molecular proof of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow, peritoneal lavage, blood and regional lymph nodes. A review of the literature and own results [in German] Zentralbl Chir 124 286–291

    Google Scholar 

  4. R Broll C Mahlke R Best et al. (1998) ArticleTitleAssessment of the proliferation index in gastric carcinomas with the monoclonal antibody MIB 1 J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 124 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  5. M Tempero J Anderson (1994) ArticleTitleProgress in colon cancer N Engl J Med 331 267–268

    Google Scholar 

  6. LA Carriquiry A Pineyro (1999) ArticleTitleShould carcinoembryonic antigen be used in the management of patients with colorectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 42 921–929

    Google Scholar 

  7. AM Abbasi KA Chester AJ MacPherson GM Boxer RH Begent AD Malcolm (1992) ArticleTitleLocalization of CEA messenger RNA by in situ hybridization in normal colonic mucosa and colorectal adenocarcinomas J Pathol 168 405–411

    Google Scholar 

  8. B Smith P Selby J Southgate K Pittman C Bradley GE Blair (1991) ArticleTitleDetection of melanoma cells in peripheral blood by means of reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reaction Lancet 338 1227–1229

    Google Scholar 

  9. SA Burchill MF Bradbury K Pittman J Southgate B Smith P Selby (1995) ArticleTitleDetection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction Br J Cancer 71 278–281

    Google Scholar 

  10. JS Marken GL Schieven I Hellstrom KE Hellstrom A Aruffo (1992) ArticleTitleCloning and expression of the tumor-associated antigen L6 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 3503–3507

    Google Scholar 

  11. JS Marken J Bajorath CP Edwards et al. (1994) ArticleTitleMembrane topology of the L6 antigen and identification of the protein epitope recognized by the L6 monoclonal antibody J Biol Chem 269 7397–7401

    Google Scholar 

  13. E Beutler T Gelbart W Kuhl (1990) ArticleTitleInterference of heparin with the polymerase chain reaction Biotechniques 9 166–7401

    Google Scholar 

  14. DW Taylor NJ Marchette WA Siddiqui (1978) ArticleTitleLymphocyte isolation, rosette formation, and mitogen stimulation in Rhesus monkeys Dev Comp Immunol 2 539–546

    Google Scholar 

  15. TH Schiedeck S Christoph M Duchrow HP Bruch (1998) ArticleTitleDetection of hL6-mRNA Zentralbl Chir 123 159–162

    Google Scholar 

  16. P Chomczynski N Sacchi (1987) ArticleTitleSingle-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction Anal Biochem 162 156–159

    Google Scholar 

  17. JY Wang R Tang JM Chiang (1994) ArticleTitleValue of carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 37 272–277

    Google Scholar 

  18. GI Meling TO Rognum OP Clausen et al. (1992) ArticleTitleSerum carcinoembryonic antigen in relation to survival, DNA ploidy pattern, and recurrent disease in 406 colorectal carcinoma patients Scand J Gastroenterol 27 1061–1068

    Google Scholar 

  19. PA Lucha SuffixJr L Rosen JA Olenwine et al. (1997) ArticleTitleValue of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in curative surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 40 145–149

    Google Scholar 

  20. W Reiter P Stieber C Reuter et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePreoperative serum levels of CEA and CA 19-9 and their prognostic significance in colorectal carcinoma Anticancer Res 17 2935–2938

    Google Scholar 

  21. JN Vauthey PS Dudrick DS Lind EM Copeland SuffixIII (1996) ArticleTitleManagement of recurrent colorectal cancer Dig Dis 14 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. T Nakayama M Watanabe T Teramoto M Kitajima (1997) ArticleTitleSlope analysis of CA19-9 and CEA for predicting recurrence in colorectal cancer patients Anticancer Res 17 1379–1382

    Google Scholar 

  23. V Le Maire JP Sales P Wind et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEvaluation and interest in new molecular markers in colon cancer [in French] Ann Pharm Fr 56 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  24. P Nollau R Jung M Neumaier C Wagener (1995) ArticleTitleTumour diagnosis by PCR-based detection of tumour cells Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 221 116–121

    Google Scholar 

  25. M Gerhard H Juhl H Kalthoff HW Schreiber C Wagener M Neumaier (1994) ArticleTitleSpecific detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumor cells in bone marrow aspirates by polymerase chain reaction J Clin Oncol 12 725–729

    Google Scholar 

  26. S Jonas S Windeatt A O-Boateng C Fordy TG Allen-Mersh (1996) ArticleTitleIdentification of carcinoembryonic antigen-producing cells circulating in the blood of patients with colorectal carcinoma by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction Gut 39 717–721

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y Ko M Klinz G Totzke I Gouni-Berthold A Sachinidis H Vetter (1998) ArticleTitleLimitations of the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen-positive tumor cells in peripheral blood Clin Cancer Res 4 2141–2146

    Google Scholar 

  28. R Jung W Kruger S Hosch et al. (1998) ArticleTitleSpecificity of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays designed for the detection of circulating cancer cells is influenced by cytokines in vivo and in vitro Br J Cancer 78 1194–1198

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Surgical Research Laboratory, University Hospital Luebeck, Germany, and the Department of Oncology and Pathology, Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Thomas H. K. Schiedeck M.D., Carsten Wellm, Uwe J. Roblick M.D., Rainer Broll M.D., Ph.D. & Hans-Peter Bruch M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Thomas H. K. Schiedeck M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carsten Wellm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Uwe J. Roblick M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rainer Broll M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hans-Peter Bruch M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Schiedeck, T.H., Wellm, C., Roblick, U.J. et al. Diagnosis and Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer by L6 Blood Serum Polymerase Chain Reaction Is Superior to Carcinoembryonic Antigen–Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 818–825 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6662-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6662-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation