Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy has been accepted slowly despite potential advantages because of the perceptions of a steep learning curve and increased operative times and costs. The purpose of this article is to review the outcome of a standardization of all the intraoperative and postoperative processes used in our department for the performance of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients requiring laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy from March 1999 through December 2001 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, was analyzed. Patients requiring sigmoid or rectosigmoid resection for all colonic pathologies were included. Criteria for exclusion from an attempted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy were body mass index >35 and prior major abdominal surgeries (exclusive of hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, or appendectomy). Data collected included age, gender, indication for surgery, American Society of Anesthesiology class, body mass index, operative duration, length of hospital stay, complications, mortality, and 30-day readmission. The operative steps for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy were as follows: 1) open insertion of the umbilical port; 2) placement of three operating ports; 3) dissection/division of the vascular pedicle after identification of the left ureter; 4) mobilization of the sigmoid and descending colon; 5) rectal mobilization/division; 6) exteriorization of the specimen; and 7) circular stapled anastomosis. Instrumentation for the procedure was standardized. Conversion was performed when a sequential step could not be completed in a reasonable time frame. A standard perioperative care plan was used. RESULTS: From March 1999 through December 2001, the primary surgeon performed 207 sigmoid colectomies, including 181 (87.4 percent) attempted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies and 22 (12.1 percent) conversions. Indications for the laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies were diverticular disease (115), colonic neoplasia (32), prolapse (14), endometriosis (10), and other (10). The male/female ratio was 85:96, and the mean body mass index was 27.3 ± 5.6. Mean operative time was 119 ± 35 minutes. Mean length of stay was 2.9 ± 1.2 days for completed cases and 6.4 ± 1.4 days for converted cases. Anastomotic leaks occurred in two patients (1.1 percent), one of whom died of multisystem organ failure, yielding an operative mortality of 0.6 percent. The overall complication rate was 6.6 percent, and the 30-day readmission rate was 8 percent. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a structured approach to laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy provides the surgeon with objective measures of operative progress that limit unduly long operations without increasing conversion rates and that control resource utilization. This approach provides a potential guideline for teaching and mastering laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy, reducing the learning curve, and optimizing results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M Faynsod MJ Stamos T Arnell C Borden S Udani H Vargas (2000) ArticleTitleA case-control study of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis Am Surg 66 841–843
C Smadja IM Sbai M Tahrat et al. (1999) ArticleTitleElective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Results of a prospective study Surg Endosc 13 645–648
KL Leung SP Kwok WY Lau WC Meng (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma. Immediate and medium-term results Arch Surg 132 761–764
G Plasencia M Jacobs JC Verdeja M Viamonte SuffixIII (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy and low anterior resection Dis Colon Rectum 37 829–833
PM Falk RW Beart SuffixJr SD Wexner et al. (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy Dis Colon Rectum 36 28–34
R Bergamaschi JP Arnaud (1997) ArticleTitleImmediately recognizable benefits and drawbacks after laparoscopic colon resection for benign disease Surg Endosc 11 802–804
K Slim D Pezet Y Riff E Clark J Chipponi (1995) ArticleTitleHigh morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery Br J Surg 82 1406–1408
M Fodera MJ Pello U Atabek RK Spence JB Alexander RC Camishion (1995) ArticleTitleTrocar site tumor recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy J Laparoendosc Surg 5 259–262
JW Fleshman H Nelson WR Peters et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEarly results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 39 53–58
MA Liberman EH Phillips BJ Carroll M Fallas R Rosenthal (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs Surg Endosc 10 15–18
HD Vargas RT Ramirez GC Hoffman et al. (2000) ArticleTitleDefining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis Dis Colon Rectum 43 1726–1731
R Bergamaschi JJ Tuetch P Pessaux JP Arnaud (2000) ArticleTitleIntracorporeal vs laparoscopic-assisted resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid Surg Endosc 14 520–523
F Kockerling C Schneider MA Reymond et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group Surg Endosc 13 567–571
ME Franklin GB Kazantsev D Abrego E Diaz J Balli JL Glass (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer Surg Endosc 14 612–616
YC Goh KW Eu F Seow-Choen (1997) ArticleTitleEarly postoperative results of a prospective series of laparoscopic vs. open anterior resections for rectosigmoid cancers Dis Colon Rectum 40 776–780
HP Bruch A Herold T Schiedeck O Schwandner (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction Dis Colon Rectum 42 1189–1194
R Baker AJ Senagore MA Luchtefeld (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection Dis Colon Rectum 38 199–201
F Agachan JS Joo M Sher EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11 331–335
AJ Senagore MA Luchtefeld JM Mackeigan (1995) ArticleTitleWhat is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy? Am Surg 61 681–685
AJ Simons GJ Anthone AE Ortega et al. (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy learning curve Dis Colon Rectum 38 600–603
CL Bennet SJ Stryker MR Ferreira J Adams RW Beart SuffixJr (1997) ArticleTitleThe learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic assisted colectomies Arch Surg 132 41–44
J Rosser SuffixJr M Wood J Payne et al. (1997) ArticleTitleTelementoring J Assoc Acad Minor Phys 8 11–15
TM Young-Fadok H Nelson (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic right colectomy Dis Colon Rectum 43 267–273
SG Ferzli P Sayad RN Cacchione (2001) ArticleTitleThe lateral approach to laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection J Am Coll Surg 193 105–108
J Monson (1999) ArticleTitleTechnique of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy Int J Surg Investigation 1 249–250
F Marusch I Gastinger C Schneider et al. (2001) ArticleTitleImportance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery Dis Col Rectum 44 207–216
K Slim D Pezet Y Riff E Clark J Chipponi (1995) ArticleTitleHigh morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery Br J Surg 82 1406–1408
O Schwandner TH Schiedeck H Bruce (1999) ArticleTitleThe role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery Surg Endosc 13 151–156
MA Bernstein JW Dawson P Reissman EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1996) ArticleTitleIs complete laparoscopic colectomy superior to laparoscopic assisted colectomy? Am Surg 62 507–511
A Darzi P Super PJ Guillou JR Monson (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic sigmoid colectomy Dis Colon Rectum 37 268–271
R Bergamaschi JJ Tuech C Cervi JP Arnaud (2000) ArticleTitleRe-establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection? Randomized trial Dis Colon Rectum 43 771–774
EL Bokey PH Chapuis C Fung et al. (1995) ArticleTitlePostoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 38 480–487
BG Bradshaw SS Liu RC Thirlby (1998) ArticleTitleStandardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery J Am Coll Surg 186 501–506
L Basse D Hjort Jakobsen P Billesbolle M Werner H Kehlet (2000) ArticleTitleA clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection Ann Surg 232 51–57
W Schwenk B Bohm O Haase T Junghans JM Muller (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection Langenbecks Arch Surg 383 49–55
AJ Senagore MJ Kilbride MA Luchtefeld JM MacKeigan AT Davis JD Moore (1995) ArticleTitleSuperior nitrogen balance after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy Ann Surg 221 171–175
L Bardram P Funch-Jensen P Jensen ME Crawford H Kehlet (1995) ArticleTitleRecovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilization Lancet 345 763–764
SN Hochwald LE Harrison MJ Heslin ME Burt MF Brennan (1997) ArticleTitleEarly postoperative enteral feeding improves whole body protein kinetics in upper gastrointestinal cancer patients Am J Surg 174 325–330
MJ Mooney PL Elliott DB Galapon LK James LJ Lilac MJ O’Reilly (1998) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis Dis Colon Rectum 41 630–635
WA Bemelman J Ringers DW Meijer WC de Wit JJ Bannenberg (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted colectomy with the dexterity pneumo sleeve Dis Colon Rectum 39 59–61
A Darzi (2000) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery Surg Endosc 14 999–1004
DE Litwin A Darzi J Jakimowicz et al. (2000) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system Ann Surg 231 715–723
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Senagore, A.J., Duepree, H.J., Delaney, C.P. et al. Results of a Standardized Technique and Postoperative Care Plan for Laparoscopic Sigmoid Colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 46, 503–509 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6590-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6590-5