Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with improved postoperative pain control, earlier return to work, and shorter hospital stays compared to open colectomy. However, there are varied technical approaches to laparoscopic resections. We therefore sought to determine whether the straight laparoscopic approach was associated with shorter length of stay compared to hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted techniques for sigmoid colectomies.

Methods

A retrospective review of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies performed by five colorectal surgeons from 2010 to 2014 was performed. Approaches were defined as: (1) straight laparoscopic if colon mobilization, inferior mesenteric artery transection and intra-corporeal anastomosis were performed laparoscopically, (2) hand assisted if a hand port was utilized to assist with mobilization and vessel transection, and (3) laparoscopic assisted if only the colon mobilization was performed intra-corporeally. Poisson regression was performed to determine the impact of surgical technique on LOS while controlling for differences in patient factors.

Results

A total of 191 patients were identified with 71 straight laparoscopic, 57 hand-assisted, and 63 laparoscopic-assisted cases. Substantial variability in choice of surgical technique was seen across surgeons. Patient populations were similar, with the exception of hand-assisted procedures being more often used in obese patients. Unadjusted average postoperative days to discharge were 3.6 days for straight laparoscopic and 4.1 and 4.0 days for hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted approaches, respectively. While controlling for factors associated with longer hospital stay, the straight laparoscopic approach was associated with a 14 % shorter stay compared to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy and a 15 % shorter stay compared to hand-assisted colectomy. The straight laparoscopic approach was also associated with earlier return of bowel function compared to other approaches.

Conclusions

The straight laparoscopic approach to sigmoid colectomy is associated with substantially shorter postoperative stay and earlier return of bowel function when compared to hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted techniques. When technically feasible, the straight laparoscopic approach is preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(3):1–89

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: evolution to a clinically useful technique. Dis Colon Rectum 47:753–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi DH, Jeong WK, Lim SW, Chung TS, Park JI, Lim SB, Choi HS, Nam BH, Chang HJ, Jeong SY (2009) Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 23:622–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reichenbach DJ, Tackett AD, Harris J, Camacho D, Graviss EA, Dewan B, Vavra A, Stiles A, Fisher WE, Brunicardi FC, Sweeney JF (2006) Laparoscopic colon resection early in the learning curve: what is the appropriate setting? Annals of surgery 243:730–735

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, Tang WL, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Li MK (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson J, Luchtefeld M, Dujovny N, Hoedema R, Kim D, Butcher J (2007) A comparison of laparoscopic, hand-assist and open sigmoid resection in the treatment of diverticular disease. Am J Surg 193:400–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, van Deventer SJ, van Bodegraven AA, Bemelman WA (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 240:984–991

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ou H (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted mini laparotomy with colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:324–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bemelman WA, Ringers J, Meijer DW, de Wit CW, Bannenberg JJ (1996) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with the dexterity pneumo sleeve. Dis Colon Rectum 39:S59–S61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aalbers AG, Doeksen A, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA (2010) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol Great Br Irel 12:287–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Samalavicius NE, Gupta RK, Dulskas A, Kazanavicius D, Petrulis K, Lunevicius R (2013) Clinical outcomes of 103 hand-assisted laparoscopic surgeries for left-sided colon and rectal cancer: single institutional review. Ann Coloproctol 29:225–230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Naitoh T, Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A, Heniford BT, Ise H, Matsuno S (1999) Hand-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery provides safety and tactile sensation for malignancy or obesity. Surg Endosc 13:157–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Darzi A (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 14:999–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Memon MA, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (1998) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a useful technique for complex laparoscopic abdominal procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8:143–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ng LW, Tung LM, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Chung CC, Li MK (2012) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus total laparoscopic right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol Great Br Irel 14:e612–e617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heneghan HM, Martin ST, Kiran RP, Khoury W, Stocchi L, Remzi FH, Vogel JD (2013) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for obese patients: decreased conversions with the hand-assisted technique. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 17:548–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, Read TE, Arnell TD, Birnbaum EH, Feingold DL, Lee SW, Mutch MG, Sonoda T, Yan Y, Whelan RL (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:818–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hassan I, You YN, Cima RR, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Barnes SA, Pemberton JH (2008) Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice. Surg Endosc 22:739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pendlimari R, Touzios JG, Azodo IA, Chua HK, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Larson DW (2011) Short-term outcomes after elective minimally invasive colectomy for diverticulitis. Br J Surg 98:431–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. HALS Study Group (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 14:896–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Moloo H, Haggar F, Coyle D, Hutton B, Duhaime S, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Boushey RP, Grimshaw J (2010) Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH (2008) Laparoscopic- vs. hand-assisted ultralow anterior resection: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jadlowiec CC, Mannion EM, Thielman MJ, Bartus CM, Johnson KH, Sardella WV, Vignati PV, Cohen JL (2014) Evolution of technique in performance of minimally invasive colectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1090–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cima RR, Pattana-arun J, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH (2008) Experience with 969 minimal access colectomies: the role of hand-assisted laparoscopy in expanding minimally invasive surgery for complex colectomies. J Am Coll Surg 206:946–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, Foglia C, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2004) Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique. Surg Endosc 18:582–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA (2008) Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:1769–1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, Martinez-Bru C, Cortes M, Boluda R, Lerma L, Trias M (2002) Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc 16:234–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson BL 3rd, Davis BR, Rafferty JF, Paquette IM (2015) Postoperative predictors of early discharge following laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:703–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJ, Michigan Bariatric Surgery C (2013) Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 369:1434–1442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA

    Emily F. Midura, Dennis J. Hanseman, Bradley R. Davis, Bobby L. Johnson, Joshua W. Kuethe, Janice F. Rafferty & Ian M. Paquette

  2. Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA

    Emily F. Midura, Dennis J. Hanseman & Ian M. Paquette

Authors
  1. Emily F. Midura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis J. Hanseman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bradley R. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bobby L. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joshua W. Kuethe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Janice F. Rafferty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ian M. Paquette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian M. Paquette.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Midura, Hanseman, Johnson, Kuethe, and Rafferty have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Drs. Davis and Paquette are both consultants for Ethicon for laparoscopic instruments.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Midura, E.F., Hanseman, D.J., Davis, B.R. et al. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?. Surg Endosc 30, 3567–3572 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4654-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4654-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation