Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding the 2004 glacier detachment in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, via multi-phase modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glacial detachment is a newly emerged glacial hazard type, and more than 20 cases have been identified worldwide. The Xiao Ma Glacier in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, experienced an intensive detachment of the terminal low-slope glacier in 2004, forming a large dammed lake downstream and burying 2.27 km2 of grassland. An advanced multi-phase r.avaflow model was used to simulate this glacier detachment event to reconstruct its slide mechanism and dynamic process. In total, 9.77 × 106 m3 mass detached were categorized into three different phases according to their properties: the old ice remaining in the middle layer following the 1988–1997 glacier surge (47% of total volume), new ice in the upper layer originating from the 2003–2004 surge, which directly caused the 2004 detachment (48%), and subglacial water trapped in the bedrock (5%). The modeling results showed that the glacier detachment–induced debris flow reached a peak discharge of 0.25 × 106 m3/s at 40 s at the mouth of the Xiao Ma Valley, and the entire propagation process was completed within 140 s. The initially trapped meltwater dominated the debris flow state, with a maximum velocity of 103 m/s. The underlying old glacial ice was pushed and deposited to the front of the fan, and the new ice in the upper layer was primarily deposited over the middle fan. Additionally, several important parameters in the r.avaflow model were recommended for the optimal interval of values via optimality analysis, and the potential of the model to be extensively applied for large-scale risk assessment was discussed under relatively simple settings. The modeling of the 2004 Amney Machen glacier detachment has resulted in a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic processes of such events, which is significant for future glacier disaster simulation and assessment thereby improving regional strategies in hazard early warning, prevention, and mitigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the reviewers and the editor for their constructive comments and suggestions. We would also like to thank Dr. Martin Mergili for his assistance in the modeling works.

Funding

This study was supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (2019QZKK0201), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA20100300), and the International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (131C11KYSB20200029).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weicai Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 5313 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Wang, W., Shen, Z. et al. Understanding the 2004 glacier detachment in the Amney Machen Mountains, northeastern Tibetan Plateau, via multi-phase modeling. Landslides 20, 315–330 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01989-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01989-2

Keywords

Navigation