Skip to main content
Log in

A method to assess the probability of thickness and volume estimates of small and shallow initial landslide ruptures based on surface area

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 February 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

A new inventory of 66 small and shallow landslides within six pilot areas was created based on a high-resolution digital elevation model in the canton of Vaud in Switzerland. The geometrical characteristics of the landslides were recorded (i.e. surface area, maximum thickness and length), and the volumes were estimated. These data permitted the development of a model that provides the probability for a landslide to possess a maximum thickness or volume smaller than a given value based on the landslide horizontal surface area. The results are compared with three existing power-law relationships of surface area–volumes. This new approach constitutes a way to improve the quantification of the uncertainty of volume and maximum depth estimations for small and shallow landslides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Change history

  • 07 February 2020

    The published version of this article, unfortunately, contained error. Authors found out that in equation 5, two deltas (Δ) were missing. Given in this article is the correct equation.

References

  • Chatfield C, Collins AJ (1980) Introduction to multivariate analysis. Chapman & Hall, London and New York, p 246

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chigira M, Duan F, Yagi H, Furuya T (2004) Using an airborne laser scanner for the identification of shallow landslides and susceptibility assessment in an area of ignimbrite overlain by permeable pyroclastics. Landslides 3:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-004-0029-x

  • Corominas J (1996) The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides. Can Geotech J 33(2):260–271. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-005

  • Cruden D. M., Varnes D. J. (1996) Landslide types and processes, in landslides: investigation and mitigation, In Turner A. K., Schuster R.L. (eds), Special report 247, National Academy of Sciences: Washington D.C, Transp Res Board, 247: 36–75

  • Dahl M-PJ, Mortensen LE, Veihe A, Jensen NH (2010) A simple qualitative approach for mapping regional landslide susceptibility in the Faroe Islands. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:159–170. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-159-2010

  • Davies C. D. (1986) Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. (2nd edition), 646 p

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap, 1st edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, p 456

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M, Reichenbach P, Rossi M (2008) Distribution of landslides in the Upper Tiber River basin, central Italy. Geomorphology 96(1):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Rossi M, Valigi D (2009) Landslide volumes and landslide mobilization rates in Umbria, central Italy. Earth Planet Sci Lett 279(3–4):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaboyedoff M, Derron M-H (2005) A new method to estimate the infilling of alluvial sediment of glacial valleys using a sloping local base level. Geogr Fis Din Quat 28:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaboyedoff M, Chigira M, Arai N, Derron MH, Rudaz B, Tsou CY (2019a) Testing a failure surface prediction and deposit reconstruction method for a landslide cluster that occurred during Typhoon Talas (Japan). Earth Surf Dynam 7(2):439–458. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-439-2019

  • Jaboyedoff M, Carrea D, Derron M-H, Oppikofer T, Penna IM, Rudaz B (2019b) A review of methods used to estimate failure surface depths and volumes. Eng Geol [in press].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105478

  • Jakob M (2005) A size classification for debris flows. Eng Geol 79(3):151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Stein D, Ulmi M (2012) Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact. Nat Hazards 60(2):241–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen IJ, Montgomery DR, Korup O (2010) Landslide erosion controlled by hillslope material. Nature Geo:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO776

  • Rickli C, Graf F (2009) Effects of forests on shallow landslides – case studies in Switzerland. For Snow Landsc Res 82(1):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickli C, Bucher H-U, Böll A, Raetzo H (2004) Untersuchungen zu oberflächennahen Rutschungen des Jahres 2002 im Napfgebiet und in der Region Appenzell [in German] (Analysis of shallow landslides in Napf and Appenzell area from the year 2002). Bull Angew Geol 9(1):37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Saporta G. (2006) Probability and statistical data analysis. Technical Edition (in French)

  • Tseng C-M, Lin C-W, Stark CP, Liu J-K, Fei L-Y, Hsieh Y-C (2013) Application of a multi-temporal, LiDAR-derived, digital terrain model in a landslide-volume estimation. Earth Surf Process Landf 38:1587–1601

    Google Scholar 

  • von Ruette J, Papritz A, Lehmann P, Rickli C, Or D (2011) Spatial statistical modelling of shallow landslides – validating predictions for different landslide inventories and rainfall events. Geomorphology 133:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.010

  • von Ruette J, Lehmann P, Or D (2016) Linking rainfall-induced landslides with predictions of debris flow runout distances. Landslides 13(5):1097–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Canton de Vaud (Switzerland).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Jaboyedoff.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: The published version of this article, unfortunately, contained error. Authors found out that in equation 5, two deltas (Δ) were missing. Given in this article is the correct equation.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meier, C., Jaboyedoff, M., Derron, MH. et al. A method to assess the probability of thickness and volume estimates of small and shallow initial landslide ruptures based on surface area. Landslides 17, 975–982 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01347-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01347-0

Keywords

Navigation