Skip to main content
Log in

Local and seasonal variations of roe deer diet in relation to food resource availability in a Mediterranean environment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feeding behaviour patterns of European roe deer are well known but not in their southern range, where in contrast to Central and northern Europe the climate is characterised by mild winters, but hot and dry summer months. Spatial and temporal variations of the roe deer diet were investigated by analyses of 597 faecal samples in a coastal area in Italy. The aim was to evaluate the adaptive strategies of dietary intake to seasonal availability of different forage types in areas of fairly natural Mediterranean scrubwood and different areas dominated by agricultural habitats. A wide range of plant taxa (151 species/genera) was used, belonging to eight categories. A gradient was found from a diet dominated by woody plants and fruits in natural habitats to one characterised by cultivated plants in the agricultural areas. Usage of forage categories in areas dominated by woodland was proportional to their availability, whereas diet selection was found in the agricultural habitats, particularly marked in summer, the time at which food quantity and quality decreased due to harvest and drought. As to seasonal variation, the summer and autumn diets included more deciduous browse, whereas the winter diet was characterised by an increasing use of cereals and grass. In most areas, half-woody browse and fruit were preferred; grass and cereals were used less than expected by their availability. Most probably, selective behaviour patterns are linked to the difference of quality between plants together with their variable abundance, which is more evident in agricultural areas than in the woodland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrigoni PV (1996) A classification of plant growth forms applicable to the floras and vegetation types of Italy. Webbia 50:193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrigoni PV (2003) La flora vascolare del Parco della Maremma (Toscana Italia centrale). Webbia 58:151–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomé J, Rosell C, Bassols E (2002) Diet composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the natural park of the Garrotxa volcanic zone (Catalonia Spain). Pirineos 157:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börger L, Franconi N, Ferretti F, Meschi F, De Michele G, Gantz A, Coulson T (2006) An integrated approach to identify spatio-temporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. Am Nat 168:471–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bos DG, Carthew SM (2003) The influence of behaviour and season on habitat selection by a small mammal. Ecography 26:810–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower J, Zar J, Von Ende C (1990) Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. Wm.C. Brown, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugalho MN, Milne JA (2003) The composition of the diet of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Mediterranean environment: a case of summer nutritional constraint? For Ecol Manag 181:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cibien C, Bideau E, Boisaubert B, Biran H, Angibault JM (1995) Seasonal diet and habitat use in field roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Picardie region. Gib Faun Sauv 12:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis J, Casaer J, Hermy M (1999) Impact of season habitat and research techniques on diet composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a review. J Zool (Lond) 248:195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cransac N, Cibien C, Angibault J-M, Morellet N, Vincent J-P, Hewison AJM (2001) Variation saisonnières du régime alimentaire du chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) selon le sexe en milieu forestier à forte densité (forêt domaniale de Dourdan). Mammalia 65:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danilkin A (1996) Behavioural ecology of Siberian and European roe deer. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 http://www.R-project.org

  • Duncan P, Tixier H, Hofmann RR, Lechner-Doll M (1998) Feeding strategies and the physiology of digestion in roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 91–116

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Shatnawi MKJ, Saoub HM, Haddad NI (2004) Growth and chemical composition of wild oat (Avena fatua) under Mediterranean conditions. Grass Forage Sci 59:100–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzinga CL, Salzer DW, Willoughby JW, Gibbs JP (2001) Monitoring plant and animal populations. Blackwell Science, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preferences. Am Nat 100:611–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser W (1958) Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Äsung des Rehwildes. Z Jagdwiss 4:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fandos P, Martínez T, Palacios F (1987) Estudio sobre la alimentacion del corzo (Capreolus capreolus L. 1758) en España. Ecología 1:161–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti F, Sforzi A, Lovari S (2008) Intolerance among deer species at feeding: roe deer are uneasy banqueters. Behav Process 78:487–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franconi N, Ferretti F, Börger L, Meschi F, De Michele G, Lovari S (2005) Effetti della composizione e struttura dell’habitat su uso dello spazio e socialità in maschi di capriolo. V Congresso Italiano di Teriologia (Arrezzo 10–12 November 2005) Hystrix. It J Mamm Suppl 66:135

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigorov GR (1976) Studies on the feeding of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in winter in the Lgt hunting area Gabrovo region. Gorskostopanska Nauka 13:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilhem C, Bideau E, Gérard JF, Khazraie K, Mechkour F (1995) Ecologie alimentaire d’une population de chevreuils (Capreolus capreolus (L.)) introduite en milieu méditerranéen. Rev Ecol (Terre Vie) 50:69–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins KF, Oldemeyer JL, Jenkins KJ, Clambey GK, Harlow RF (1996) Vegetation sampling and measurement. In: Bookhout TA (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp 567–590

  • Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR, Stewart DRM (1972) Grazer or browser: a classification based on the stomach structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants. Mammalia 36:226–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holišová V, Obrtel R, Kožená I (1982) The winter diet of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Southern Moravian agricultural landscape. Folia Zool 31:209–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Holišová V, Obrtel R, Kožená I (1986) Seasonal variation in the diet of field roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Southern Moravia. Folia Zool 35:97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufthammer AK, Aaris-Sørensen K (1998) Late- and post-glacial European roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 47–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 6:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MK, Wofford H, Pearson HA (1983) Microhistological techniques for food habits analyses. Res. Pap. SO-199. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  • Kałuziński J (1982) Composition of the food of roe deer living in fields and the effects of their feeding on plant production. Acta Theriol 27:457–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Klötzli F (1965) Qualität und Quantität der Rehäsung. Hans Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossak S (1983) Trophic relations of roe deer in a fresh deciduous forest. Acta Theriol 28:83–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt F (1991) Das Reh in der Kulturlandschaft. Sozialverhalten und Ökologie eines Anpassers. Parey, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnell JDC, Duncan P, Andersen R (1998) The European roe deer: a portrait of a successful species. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Maizeret C, Tran Manh Sung D (1984) Étude du régime alimentaire et recherche du déterminisme fonctionnel de la sélectivité chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) des Landes de Gascogne. Gib Faun Sauv 3:63–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Maizeret C, Boutin JM, Sempéré A (1986) Intérêt de la méthode micrographique d’analyse des fèces pour l’étude du régime alimentaire du chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus). Gib Faun Sauv 3:159–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser B, Schütz M, Hindenlang KE (2006) Importance of alternative food resources for browsing by roe deer on deciduous trees: the role of food availability and species quality. For Ecol Manag 226:248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa PP, Aceto P, Abba C, Sterpone L, Meineri G (2003) Preliminary study on the feeding habits of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the western Alps. J Anim Physiol An N 87:105–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perco F (2003) Capreolus capreolus. In: Boitani L, Lovari S, Vigna Taglianti A (eds) Fauna d’Italia, Mammalia III, Carnivora–Artiodactyla. Calderoni, Bologna, pp 305–342

  • Pignatti S (1994) Ecologia del paesaggio. UTET, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser DB (1981) Nutritional value of Mediterranean pastures. In: Morley FHW (ed) Grazing animals. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 159–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman RJ (1984) Facts from faeces. Mamm Rev 14:79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putman RJ (1986) Foraging by roe deer in agricultural areas and impact on arable crops. J Appl Ecol 23:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schär C, Vidale PL, Lüthi D, Frei C, Häberli C, Liniger MA, Appenzeller C (2004) The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature 427:332–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senft RL, Coughenour MB, Bailey DW, Rittenhouse LR, Sala OE, Swift DM (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Landscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory. Bioscience 37:789–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DRM (1967) Analysis of plant epidermis in faeces: a technique for studying the food preferences of grazing herbivores. J Appl Ecol 4:33–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellería JL, Virgós E (1997) Distribution of an increasing roe deer population in a fragmented Mediterranean landscape. Ecography 20:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DL, Tayler EJ (1990) Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. J Wildl Manage 54:322–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier H, Duncan P (1996) Are European roe deer browsers? A review of variations in the composition of their diets. Rev Ecol (Terre Vie) 51:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tixier H, Duncan P, Guillon N, Guillon N (1997) Sélection alimentaire chez le chevreuil influence des caractéristiques physiques et chimiques de la végétation. Bull Mens Off Natl Chasse 220:10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ury HK (1976) A comparison of four procedures for multiple comparisons among means (pairwise contrasts) for arbitrary sample sizes. Technometrics 18:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varva M, Holechek JL (1980) Factors influencing microhistological analysis of herbivore diets. J Range Manag 33:371–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the administration of the Maremma Regional Park, the Agenzia Agricola di Alberese and private landowners for permissions and logistic support.

I wish to thank S. Lovari for the supervision of my study and revision of the draft. Many thanks to I. Campana for her help in the field and in analyses of faecal samples of the woodland site.

Special thanks goes to B. Moser of the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL and F. Korner of Oikostat for statistical advice, as well as to members of the Plant Ecology and Systematics Section of the University of Siena, Department of Environmental Sciences, and to members of the Animal Science Department of the University of Florence for technical support and advice, in particular A. Chiarucci, C. Angiolini, F. Casini, C. Riccucci, F. Frignani, G. Bacaro, M.P. Ponzetta and F. Sacconi.

I wish to thank F. Ferretti, F. Meschi, L. Börger, N. Franconi and A. Gantz, who studied the spatial behaviour of roe deer in the Maremma Regional Park, for precious suggestions. I gratefully acknowledge L. Fattorini and A. Sforzi for help in the sampling design.

The suggestions and comments of two anonymous reviewers helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.

This study was financed by the Italian Ministry of Environment and the University of Siena to S. Lovari.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Minder.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minder, I. Local and seasonal variations of roe deer diet in relation to food resource availability in a Mediterranean environment. Eur J Wildl Res 58, 215–225 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0566-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0566-2

Keywords

Navigation