Skip to main content
Log in

The oak browsing index correlates linearly with roe deer density: a new indicator for deer management?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing populations of large herbivores during the last decades have had a major impact on vegetation. While several studies have looked for quantifying this impact in terms of plant biomass, plant survival or financial costs, the potential benefit of using the response of the vegetation to changes in browsing pressure by large herbivores to monitor their populations has been poorly investigated. As getting accurate estimates of density in populations of large herbivores is problematic, the use of indicators measuring the intensity of browsing might offer reliable alternative to managers. From the intensive monitoring of a roe deer population subject to an experimental manipulation of density, we looked for assessing the response of oak to changes of roe deer population size. Using a simple browsing index calculated from field data over 10 years, we found that this oak browsing index linearly increased with increasing population size of roe deer. This suggests that such an oak browsing index might be a reliable “indicator of ecological change” for monitoring roe deer populations in oak forests with natural regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (2010) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (1998) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Barancekova M, Krojerova-Prokesova J, Homolka M (2007) Impact of deer browsing on natural and artificial regeneration in floodplain forest. Folia Zool 56:354–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Bary Lenger A, Nebout JP (1993) Les chênes pédonculé et sessile en France et en Belgique: écologie, économie, histoire, sylviculture. Editions du Perron, Alleur-Liège, p 604

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist J, Orlander G (1998) Browsing damage by roe deer on Norway spruce seedlings planted on clearcuts of different ages—1. Effect of slash removal, vegetation development, and roe deer density. For Ecol Manage 105:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J, McCormick PV, Niederlehner BR (1993) A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 263:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazettes A, Morel M, Jean R (2003) Statistiques forestières 2002. AGRESTE: chiffres et données agriculture 152, 84 p

  • Chevallier-Redor N, Verheyden-Tixier H, Verdier M, Dumont B (2001) Foraging behaviour of red deer Cervus elaphus as a function of the relative availability of two tree species. Anim Res 50:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danell K, Utsi PM, Palo T, Eriksson O (1994) Food plant selection by reindeer during winter in relation to plant quality. Ecography 17:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Saïd S, Débias F (2008) Spatial ordination of vegetation data using a generalization of Wartenberg’s multivariate spatial correlation. J Veg Sci 19:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P, Tixier H, Hofmann RR, Lechner-Doll M (1998) Feeding strategies and the physiology of digestion in roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 91–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B, Pradel R (1993) Roe deer survival patterns—a comparative analysis of contrasting populations. J Anim Ecol 62:776–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Andersen R, Delorme D, Linnell JDC (1998) Family effects on growth and survival of juvenile roe deer. Ecology 79:2878–2889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Duncan P, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Pettorelli N, Maillard D, Renaud G (2003a) Effects of hurricane Lothar on the population dynamics of European roe deer. J Wildl Manage 67:767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1996) Body mass of roe deer fawns during winter in 2 contrasting populations. J Wildl Manage 60:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Loison A, Toïgo C (2003b) Variation in life history traits and realistic population models for wildlife management: the case of ungulates. In: Festa-Bianchet M, Apollonio M (eds) Animal behavior and wildlife conservation. Island, Washington, DC, pp 115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Garel M, Bonenfant C, Hamann JL, Klein F, Gaillard JM (2010) Are abundance indices derived from spotlight counts reliable to monitor red deer Cervus elaphus populations? Wildlife Biol 16:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill RMA (1990) Monitoring the status of European and north American cervids. The global environment monitoring system (GEMS). UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill RMA (1992) A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1 deer. Forestry 65:145–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Vincent JP, Bideau E, Angibault JM, Putman RJ (1996) Variation in cohort mandible size as an index of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) densities and population trends. J Zool 239:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs NT, Baker DL, Gill RB (1983) Comparative nutritional ecology of montane ungulates during winter. J Wildl Manage 47:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFN (2006) La forêt française—Les résultats de la campagne 2005. IFN, Nogent-sur-Vernisson, 113 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyser PD, Guynn DC, Hill HS, Knox WM (2006) Relative density-physical condition models: a potential application for managing white-tailed deer populations. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1113–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiters AT, Mohren GMJ, Van Wieren SE (1996) Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 88:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillard D, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM, Ballon P, Duncan P, Loison A, Toïgo C, Baubet E, Bonenfant C, Garel M, Saint-Andrieux C (2010) Ungulates and their management in France. In: Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R (eds) European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 441–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DL, Smeins FE, Webb JW (1998) Response of a Texas Distichlis spicata coastal marsh following lesser snow goose herbivory. Aquat Bot 61:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel MP (2006) La forêt et les industries du bois 2006 (données disponibles au 1er septembre 2005). Ministère de l'agriculture et de la pêche—Service central des enquêtes et études statistiques, Paris, 180 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Morellet N, Champely S, Gaillard JM, Ballon P, Boscardin Y (2001) The browsing index: new tool uses browsing pressure to monitor deer populations. Wildl Soc Bull 29:1243–1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Morellet N, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM, Ballon P, Boscardin Y, Duncan P, Klein F, Maillard D (2007) Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. J Appl Ecol 44:634–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A (2006) The concept of overgrazing and its role in management of large herbivores. Wildlife Biol 12:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Askilsrud H, Loe LE, Veiberg V (2010) Spatial patterns of accumulated browsing and its relevance for management of red deer Cervus elaphus. Wildlife Biol 16:162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen EB, Gaillard JM, Andersen R, Odden J, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Linnell JDC (2009) A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations. J Anim Ecol 78:585–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellerin M, Calenge C, Saïd S, Gaillard JM, Fritz H, Duncan P, Van Laere G (2010) Habitat use by female western roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): influence of resource availability on habitat selection in two contrasting years. Can J Zool 88:1052–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Mysterud A, Duncan P, Stenseth NC, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Toïgo C, Klein F (2006) Using a proxy of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer. Oikos 112:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard JF, Boisaubert B, Maillard D, Maire MH (1993) Dynamique de l’abroutissement du au chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus L.) dans une hêtraie-chênaie calcicole (Forêt de Haye, Meurthe-et-Moselle). Rev For Fr 45:525–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org

  • Saint-Andrieux C (1994) Dégâts forestiers et grand gibier—Techniques de relevés dans les peuplements forestiers. Fiche Technique 81, Bull Mens Off Nat Chasse 195

  • Strandgaard H (1972) The roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population at Kalo and the factors regulating its size. Dan Rev Game Biol 7:1–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland BK, Demarais S (2000) Age and regional differences in antlers and mass of white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manage 64:903–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toïgo C, Gaillard JM, Van Laere G, Hewison AJM, Morellet N (2006) How does environmental variation influence body mass, body size and body condition? Roe deer as a case study. Ecography 29:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JP, Gaillard JM, Bideau E (1991) Kilometric index as biological indicator for monitoring forest roe deer populations. Acta Theriol 36:315–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren RJ (1997) The challenge of deer overabundance in the 21st century. Wildl Soc Bull 25:213–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch D, Scott D, Staines BW (1995) Survival rates and performance of multi-trunked trees in even-aged stands of Sitka spruce in Western Scotland. Forestry 68:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer O, Saïd S, Miroir J, Duncan P, Gaillard JM, Klein F (2004) The effects of hurricane Lothar on habitat use of roe deer. For Ecol Manage 195:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was initiated by François Klein in 1995, and we would like to thank him for having made this study possible. Data were collected by teams of the Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage and of the Office National des Forêts. We would like to thank Eric Baubet, François Klein, Bruno Chopard, Philippe Ballon and three anonymous referees for valuable discussions and for useful comments on previous drafts of that work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Michel Gaillard.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Acevedo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chevrier, T., Saïd, S., Widmer, O. et al. The oak browsing index correlates linearly with roe deer density: a new indicator for deer management?. Eur J Wildl Res 58, 17–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0535-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0535-9

Keywords

Navigation