Abstract
In mixed-species forests, tree species composition can affect nutrient return through litter fall. This in turn is expected to have an effect on soil available nutrients, which could influence the nutrient status at the local tree level. Using ion-exchange resins, we estimated resin available soil nutrients at two depths beneath target trees of sessile oak and beech in the Belgian Ardennes. First we tested whether resin available nutrients were related to tree nutrition, using foliar nutrient concentrations as a proxy. In a second step, we tested whether local litter fall, through total nutrient return or litter species composition, affected resin available nutrients. In a final stage, we tested the impacts of local stand composition, as an integrated proxy of above- and belowground processes, and compared them to those of litter composition. With the exception of P for oak, nutrient supply was only poorly related to foliar nutrient concentrations for both target species. The effects of litter fall on nutrient supply were driven by litter species composition and not by total nutrient inputs. Litter composition and local stand composition effects were in close agreement. Our results show that nutrient supply to target trees in mixed-species stands is affected by local neighbourhoods, yet to a limited extent. Direct translation of resin available nutrients into foliar concentrations is probably hampered by complex capture patterns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams MM, Jarrel WM (1992) Bioavailability index for phosphorus using ion exchange resin impregnated membranes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1532–1537
Achat DL, Bakker MR, Augusto L et al (2009) Evaluation of the phosphorus status of P-deficient podzols in temperate pine stands: combining isotopic dilution and extraction methods. Biogeochemistry 92:183–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9283-7
Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449
Ainsworth EA, Rogers A (2007) The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ 30:70–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x
Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study: studies in the organic production, structure, increment, and yield of forest stands. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Attiwill PM, Adams MA (1993) Tansley nutrient review No. 50. Nutrient cycling in forests. New Phytol 124:561–582
Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, Rothe A (2002) Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann For Sci 59:233–253. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest
Berg B, McClaugherty C (2014) Plant litter, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
Bigelow S, Canham C (2017) Neighborhood-scale analyses of non-additive species effects on cation concentrations in forest soils. Ecosystems 1–13:1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0116-1
Binkley D (1984) Does forest removal increase rates of decomposition and nitrogen release? For Ecol Manag 8:229–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(84)90055-0
Binkley D, Giardina C (1998) Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry 42:89–106
Brunel C, Gros R, Ziarelli F, Farnet Da Silva AM (2017) Additive or non-additive effect of mixing oak in pine stands on soil properties depends on the tree species in Mediterranean forests. Sci Total Environ 590–591:676–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.023
Burkhart HE, Tham A (1992) Predictions from growth and yield models of the performance of mixed species stands. In: Cannell MGR, Malcolm DC, Robertson PA (eds) The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees, British Ec. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 21–34
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, second. Springer, Berlin
Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter DW et al (2001) Net primary production in tropical forests: an evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecol Appl 11:371–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/3060895
Cremer M, Prietzel J (2017) Soil acidity and exchangeable base cation stocks under pure and mixed stands of European beech, Douglas fir and Norway spruce. Plant Soil 415:393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3177-1
Curtin D, Syers JK, Smillie GW (1987) The importance of exchangeable cations and resin-sink characteristics in the release of soil phosphorus. J Soil Sci 38:711–716
Ellsworth DS, Reich PB, Naumburg ES et al (2004) Photosynthesis, carboxylation and leaf nitrogen responses of 16 species to elevated pCO2 across four free-air CO2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert. Glob Chang Biol 10:2121–2138
Finzi AC, Canham CD, Van Breemen N (1998) Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on pH and cations. Ecol Appl 8:447–454. https://doi.org/10.2307/2641084
Fischer R, Waldner P, Carnicer J, et al (2012) The condition of forests in Europe. 2012 executive report. Hamburg
Forrester DI, Bauhus J (2016) A review of processes behind diversity—productivity relationships in forests. Curr For Rep 2:45–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2
Frivold LH, Kolström T (1999) Yield and treatment of mixed stands of boreal tree species in Fennoscandia. In: Olsthoorn AFM, Bartelink HH, Gardiner JJ et al (eds) Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics. Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Wageningen, pp 98–117
Garbeva P, Postma J, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD (2006) Effects of agronomical measures on the microbial diversity of soils as related to the suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens. Environ Microbiol 8:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016393915414
Gartner TB, Cardon ZG (2004) Decomposition dynamics in mixed-species leaf litter. Oikos 104:230–246
Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK et al (2010) Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol 25:372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.010
Guckland A, Jacob M, Flessa H et al (2009) Acidity, nutrient stocks, and organic-matter content in soils of a temperate deciduous forest with different abundance of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:500–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200800072
Hättenschwiler S (2005) Effects of tree species diversity on litter quality and decomposition. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze E-D (eds) Forest diversity and function. Temperate and boreal systems, ecological. Springer, Berlin, pp 149–164
Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218
Hobbie SE (2015) Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends Ecol Evol 30:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.015
Hobbie SE, Reich PB, Oleksyn J et al (2006) Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology 87:2288–2297
Ilek A, Kucza J, Szostek M (2015) The effect of stand species composition on water storage capacity of the organic layers of forest soils. Eur J For Res 134:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0842-2
Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L et al (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137:253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003
Jonard M, Andre F, Ponette Q (2008) Tree species mediated effects on leaf litter dynamics in pure and mixed stands of oak and beech. Can J For Res 38:528–538
Jonard M, Fürst A, Verstraeten A et al (2014) Tree mineral nutrition is deteriorating in Europe. Glob Chang Biol 21:418–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12657
Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K et al (2004) Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agric For Meteorol 121:19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.027
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375
Jucker T, Bouriaud O, Coomes DA (2015) Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests. Funct Ecol 29:1078–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12428
Kelty MJ (1992) Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty MJ, Larson BC, Oliver CD (eds) The ecology and silviculture of mixed-species forests, forestry. S. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 125–142
Kooch Y, Tarighat FS, Hosseini SM (2016) Tree species effects on soil chemical, biochemical and biological features in mixed Caspian lowland forests. Trees 31:863–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1511-5
Kucera CL (1959) Weathering characteristics of deciduous leaf litter. Ecology 40:485–487
Langenbruch C, Helfrich M, Flessa H (2012) Effects of beech (Fagus sylvatica), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and lime (Tilia spec.) on soil chemical properties in a mixed deciduous forest. Plant Soil 352:389–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1004-7
Liu W, Fox JED, Xu Z (2003) Litterfall and nutrient dynamics in a montane moist evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountains, SW China. Plant Ecol 164:157–170
Logan TJ, Chaney RL (1983) Metals. In: Page AL, Gleason TL, Smith JE et al (eds) Utilization of municipal wastewater and sludges on land. University of California, Riverside, pp 235–326
Loladze I (2002) Rising atmospheric CO2 and human nutrition: toward globally imbalanced plant stoichiometry? Trends Ecol Evol 17:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02587-9
Lukac M, Calfapietra C, Lagomarsino A, Loreto F (2010) Global climate change and tree nutrition: effects of elevated CO2 and temperature. Tree Physiol 30:20–1209
Luke SG (2017) Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behav Res Methods 49:1494–1502. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y
Marcos E, Calvo L, Marcos JA et al (2010) Tree effects on the chemical topsoil features of oak, beech and pine forests. Eur J For Res 129:25–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-008-0248-0
McLaughlin SB, Wimmer R (1999) Tansley review No. 104 calcium physiology and terrestrial ecosystem processes. New Phytol 142:373–417
Meentemeyer V (1978) Macroclimate and Lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59:465–472. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2294.1
Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936780
Melillo JM, Aber JD, Linkins AE et al (1989) Carbon and nitrogen dynamics along the decay continuum: plant litter to soil organic matter. Plant Soil 115:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202587
Menon RG, Hammond LL, Sissingh H (1988) Determination of plant-available phosphorus by iron-impregnated filter paper (Pi) soil test. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:110–115
Nickmans H, Verheyen K, Guiz J et al (2015) Effects of neighbourhood identity and diversity on the foliar nutrition of sessile oak and beech. For Ecol Manag 335:108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.025
Nickmans H, Jonard M, Verheyen K, Ponette Q (2018) Modelling leaf dispersal and nutrient return in tree species mixtures (submitted)
Ohta T, Niwa S, Agetsuma N, Hiura T (2014) Calcium concentration in leaf litter alters the community composition of soil invertebrates in warm-temperate forests. Pedobiologia (Jena) 57:257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2014.07.003
Osman KT (2013) Forest soils. Springer, Berlin
Parfitt RL (1979) Anion adsorption by soil and soil material. Adv Agron 30:1–50
Pearson PN, Palmer MR (2000) Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years. Nature 406:695–699
Piene H, Van Cleve K (1978) Weight loss of litter and cellulose bags in a thinned white spruce forest in interior Alaska. Can J For Res 8:42–46
Prescott CE (2002) The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling. Tree Physiol 22:1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1193
Prescott CE (2005) Do rates of litter decomposition tell us anything we really need to know? For Ecol Manag 220:66–74
Prescott CE, Vesterdal L (2013) Tree species effects on soils in temperate and boreal forests: emerging themes and research needs. For Ecol Manag 309:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.042
Pretzsch H (2014) Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. For Ecol Manag 327:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.027
Qian P, Schoenau JJ (2002) Practical applications of ion exchange resins in agricultural and environmental soil research. Can J For Res 82:9–21
Ranger J, Nys C (1992) Effects of spruce plantation (Picea abies Karst.) On the soil function of a previous broad-leaved ecosystem: analytical and experimental investigations. In: Teller A, Mathy P, Jeffers J (eds) Responses of forest ecosystems to environmental changes. Elsevier, London, pp 784–785
Reich PB, Frelich L (2002) Temperate Deciduous Forests. In: Mooney HA, Canadell JG, Munn T (eds) Encyclopedia of global environmental change, vol 2. The earth system: biological and ecological dimensions of global environmental change. Wiley, Chichester, pp 565–569
Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J et al (2005) Linking litter calcium, earthworms and soil properties: a common garden test with 14 tree species. Ecol Lett 8:811–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00779.x
Richards AE, Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2010) The influence of mixed tree plantations on the nutrition of individual species: a review. Tree Physiol 30:208–1192. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq035
Rothe A, Binkley D (2001) Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Can J For Res 31:1855–1870
Satterthwaite FE (1941) Synthesis of variance. Psychometrika 6:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288586
Scherer-Lorenzen M, Luis Bonilla J, Potvin C (2007) Tree species richness affects litter production and decomposition rates in a tropical biodiversity experiment. Oikos 116:2108–2124
Schmidt M, Veldkamp E, Corre MD (2015) Tree species diversity effects on productivity, soil nutrient availability and nutrient response efficiency in a temperate deciduous forest. For Ecol Manag 338:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.021
Schume H, Jost G, Hager H (2004) Soil water depletion and recharge patterns in mixed and pure forest stands of European beech and Norway spruce. J Hydrol 289:258–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.11.036
Setiawan NN, Vanhellemont M, De Schrijver A et al (2016) Mixing effects on litter decomposition rates in a young tree diversity experiment. Acta Oecol 70:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2015.12.003
Skogley EO, Dobermann A (1996) Synthetic ion-exchange resins: soil and environmental studies. J Environ Qual 25:13–24
Stachurski A, Zimka JR (1975) Leaf fall and the rate of litter decay in some forest habitats. Ekol Pol 23:103–108
Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Callesen I et al (2008) Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species. For Ecol Manag 255:35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.015
Virzo De Santo A, Berg B, Rutigliano FA et al (1993) Factors regulating early-stage decomposition of needle litters in five different coniferous forests. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1423–1433
Weihermüller L, Siemens J, Deurer M et al (2007) In situ soil water extraction: a review. J Environ Qual 36:48–1735. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0218
Weissen F, Hambuckers A, Van Praag HJ, Remacle J (1990) A decennial control of N-cycle in the Belgian Ardenne forest ecosystems. Plant Soil 128:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00009396
Xu X, Shibata H, Enoki T (2006) Decomposition patterns of leaf litter of seven common canopy species in a subtropical forest: dynamics of mineral nutrients. J For Res 17:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-8069-5
Yatso KN, Lilleskov EA (2016) Effects of tree leaf litter, deer fecal pellets, and soil properties on growth of an introduced earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris): implications for invasion dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 94:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.030
Acknowledgements
Hans Nickmans obtained a Ph.D. Grant from the ‘Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique’ (FNRS-FRIA). We thank Bernd Zeller and Séverine Bienaimé from INRA for their input on the use of the resin capsules. For their help with the construction of the capsules, we would like to thank René Nickmans and Olivier Bouchez. We would like to thank Sébastien François, François Plume, Olivier Bouchez and Thibaut Thyrion for their help with the placement and recovery of the capsules in the field and Astrid Vannoppen and Jorgen Opdebeeck for the soil analysis and dendrometric measurements. For help and input with the development and execution of the laboratory extractions, we thank Karine Henin, Jean-Charles Bourgeois, Florent Thyrion, Nathan Hesbois and Brecht Herman. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and constructive feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Agustín Merino.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nickmans, H., Titeux, H., Verheyen, K. et al. Nutrient supply at the local tree level in mixed forests of sessile oak and beech. Eur J Forest Res 137, 807–817 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1141-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1141-0