Skip to main content

Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands

  • Chapter
The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 40))

Abstract

Ecological theory suggests that there is a potential productivity advantage to be gained by designing managed forest stands to contain more than one tree species. The basis for this advantage, as noted by Ewel (1986) and Vandermeer (1989) is rooted in fundamental niche theory—two or more species must use resources differently if they are to coexist on a site. Differential resource use among species suggests that the species in a mixture may utilize the resources of a site more completely than any single species would be able to do, leading to greater overall productivity. However, the link between differential resource use among species and greater total resource use does not necessarily exist in all cases. For example, it is possible that a mixture of species may simply subdivide the total resource base that one highly efficient species may completely use on its own. In addition to niche separation, which potentially applies to all species in mixture, certain specific combinations of species may exist in which one species may directly benefit from the presence of another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Assmann, E. 1970. The principles of forest yield study. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 506 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berish, C.W., and J.J. Ewel. 1988. Root development in simple and complex tropical successional ecosystems. Plant and Soil 106: 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, D. 1983. Ecosystem production in Douglas-fir plantations: interactions of red alder and site fertility. For. Ecol. Manage. 5: 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, D., J.D. Lousier, and K. Cromack, Jr. 1984. Ecosystem effects of sitka alder in a Douglas-fir plantation. For. Sci. 30: 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman,N.K. 1977. Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annual Rev. Plant Physiol. 28: 355–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burschel, P., and J. Huss. 1987. Grundriss des Waldbaus: Ein Leitfaden fur Studium und Praxis. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin. 352 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G.E., and J.O. Dawson. 1989. Growth, yield, and value projections for black walnut interplantings with black alder and autumn olive. North. J. Appl. For. 6: 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M.E. 1975. Effects of removing understory on growth of upland oak. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NE-321. 10 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBell, D.S., C.D. Whitesell, and T.H. Schubert. 1985. Mixed plantations of Eucalyptus and leguminous trees enhance biomass production. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. PSW-175. 6 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBell, D.S., C.D. Whitesell, and T.B. Crabb. 1988. Benefits of Eucalyptus-Albizia mixtures vary by site on Hawaii Island. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. PSW-187. 6 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBell, D.S., C.D. Whitesell, and T.H. Schubert. 1989. Using N2-fixing Albizia to increase growth of Eucalyptus plantations in Hawaii. For. Sci. 35: 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, I.L. 1983. Nitrogen fixation in Southeast Asian forestry: research and practice. Pp. 295–315, in Gordon and Wheeler (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellem, S.J.,J.L. Harper, and G.R. Sagar. 1970. A comparative study of the distribution of roots of Avena fatua and A. strigosa in mixed stands using a 14C labelling technique. J. Ecol. 58: 865–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enright, N.J. 1982. Does Araucaria hunsteinii compete with its neighbors? Austral. J. Ecol. 7: 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J.J. 1986. Designing agricultural systems for the humid tropics. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 245–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givnish, T.J. 1988. Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole-plant perspective. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15: 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J.C. 1983. Silvicultural systems and biological nitrogen fixation. Pp. 1–6, in Gordon and Wheeler (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J.C., and C.T. Wheeler, eds. 1983. Biological nitrogen fixation in forest ecosystems: foundations and applications. Martins Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague. 342 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J.L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New York. 892 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, C.A., and R.L. Deal. 1982. Sitka alder-a candidate for mixed stands. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., and Y. Shimamato. 1973. Methods of analysing competition with special reference to herbage plants. I. Establishment. J. Agric. Sci. 81: 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara,T., and K. Yamamoto. 1982. [Studies on mixed stands of akamatsu (Pinar densiflora) and hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) (I) Productivity and decomposition rate of organic mauer.] J. Jap. For. Soc. 64: 331–339. (in Japanese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, T., and K. Yamamoto. 1986. [Studies on mixed stands of akamatsu (Pinus densjora) and hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtura) (III) Stem volume of mixed stands.] J. Jap. For. Soc. 68: 327–332. (in Japanese, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelty, M.J. 1989. Productivity of New England hemlock/hardwood stands as affected by species composition and canopy structure. For. Ecol. Manage. 28: 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M.J., E.M. Gould, Jr., and M.J. Twery. 1987. Effects of understory removal in hardwood stands. North. J. Appl. For. 4: 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyford, W.H. 1980. Development of the root system of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L). Harvard Forest Pap. No. 21. 30 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J.D. 1989. Silvicultural systems. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 284 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikola, P., P. Uomola, and E. Malkonen. Application of biological nitrogen fixation in European silviculture. Pp. 279–294, in Gordon and Wheeler (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.E., and M.D. Murray. 1978. The effects of red alder on growth of Douglas-fir. In: D.G. Briggs, D.S. DeBell, and W.A. Atkinson (eds.), Utilization and management of alder. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-70, p. 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsi, M., Z. Uchijima, and T. Oikawa. 1973. Structure of foliage canopies and photosynthesis. Annual. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 301–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, J. 1986. Additive basal area, regeneration, and self-thinning in populations of kauri (Agathis australis) growing in mixed conifer-angiosperm forest in New Zealand. Unpubl. manuscript, Auckland Univ., Auckland, N.Z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poleno,Z. 1981. Vyvoj smisenych porostu. [Development of mixed forest stands.] Prace VULHM 59: 179–202. (in Czech, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop’ev,M.N. 1976. [Mixed plantings of pine and spruce]. Lesnoe Khozyaistvo 5: 37–41. (in Russian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop’ev, M.N. 1978. [The creation of mixed pine/birch plantations]. Lesnoe Khozyaistvo 1:53–57. (in Russian, with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, S.H., and B.V. Barnes. 1980. Forest ecology. Third ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 687 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath, B.R. 1974. Biomass productivity of mixtures. Adv. Agron. 26: 177–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath, B.R. 1981. Light-use efficiency of crops and the potential for improvement through intercropping. In: Willey, R.W., (ed.), Proceedings of the international workshop on intercrop-ping. ICRISTAT, Hyderabad, India, p. 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath, B.R., and J.L. Harper. 1973. Neighbour effects in the genus Avena. I. Comparison of crop species. J. Appl. Ecol. 10: 379–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, N.D., and PJ. Smethurst. Nitrogen fixing plants in forest plantation management. Pp. 233–259, in Gordon and Wheeler (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J. 1989. The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 237 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, K.A., R.L. Edmonds, and C.C. Grier. 1981. Seasonal changes in biomass and vertical distribution of mycorrhizal and fibrous-textured conifer fine roots in 23- and 180-year-old subalpine Abies amabilis stands. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, R.H., and W.H. Schlesinger. 1985. Forest ecosystems: concepts and management. Academic Press, New York. 340 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierman, C.A., and C.D. Oliver. 1979. Crown stratification by species in even-aged mixed stands of Douglas-fir-western hemlock. Can. J. For. Res. 9: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelty, M.J. (1992). Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty, M.J., Larson, B.C., Oliver, C.D. (eds) The Ecology and Silviculture of Mixed-Species Forests. Forestry Sciences, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8052-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8052-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4135-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8052-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics