Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physiological Influences of Solid and Transparent Foliar Reflective Material Treatments in Almond Trees

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Applied Fruit Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of reflective materials has become commonplace in agriculture as the negative effects of drought, high temperature limitation, and solar radiation on plant physiology have been better understood. This study was conducted to compare the effects of different reflective materials on some physiological characteristics of almond trees. For this purpose, a method was developed in which two solid and two transparent reflective materials were foliar sprayed at two different doses in two different deficit irrigated almond orchards (cv. ‘Ferragnes’) in 2021. Net photosynthesis rate, stomatal conductance (gS), leaf temperature (Tleaf), relative water content (RWC), SPAD chlorophyll index, proline (P), malondialdehyde (MDA), as well as some macro- and micro-nutrient contents of leaf samples taken from the treated trees were examined. The applications reduced Tleaf from 2.7 to 7.9 °C. Generally, titanium dioxide (TiO2) 0.50% and 0.25% doses consistently reduced Tleaf. The effect of reflective materials on photosynthesis was not clear. TiO2 0.25% consistently increased gS irrigated with ET75 (irrigated at %75 crop evapotranspiration, full season). The RWC of TiO2 0.25% and 0.50% treatments was the highest in the first and second measurements. Micronized calcite (CaCO3) 2.5% and 1.25% had a negative effect on RWC after the second treatment in severe drought conditions. However, there was no difference in ET75. The treatments had a significant effect on SPAD. The results of kaolin (KAO) 5% and CaCO3 1.25% treatments were significant, but the result was not clear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The study was funded by the Southeast Anatolia Project Regional Development Administration. All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Denizhan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H. Denizhan, A. İkinci and F.E. Karaat declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denizhan, H., İkinci, A. & Karaat, F.E. Physiological Influences of Solid and Transparent Foliar Reflective Material Treatments in Almond Trees. Applied Fruit Science (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01059-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01059-y

Keywords

Navigation