Abstract
In the study entitled “Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: Implementation of the Partial Concurrent Thinking Aloud technique” (Federici et al. 2010), we have proposed a modified protocol of usability evaluation technique for blind users, which integrates the features of the concurrent and the retrospective techniques. This new technique, called partial concurrent thinking aloud (PCTA), while respecting the properties of classic verbal protocols, overcomes the structural interference and the limits of concurrent and retrospective protocols when used with screen reader users. In order to facilitate understanding and acquisition of the PCTA’s technique for practitioners and researchers, we have video recorded three different verbal protocols by visualizing five experimental sections. In the first two videos, we have compared a concurrent with a retrospective’s verbal protocol of a sighted user, showing the difference of the verbalizations provided by the user in these two conditions. The third video shows the structural interference of the screen reader, during a blind user concurrent thinking aloud. In the last two videos, we show the difference of a blind user behaviour when PCTA or retrospective protocol is adopted. The videos clearly visualize the advantage of the PCTA use in respect of the two other protocols. In conclusion, the visualization of the PCTA technique confirms that this new verbal protocol promotes and guarantees a more user-driven usability assessment with disabled people, by better involving screen reader users, overcoming the structural interference and the limits of the concurrent and retrospective protocols.
References
Borsci S, Federici S (2009) The partial concurrent thinking aloud: a new usability evaluation technique for blind users. In: Emiliani PL, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen A-L (eds) Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments—AAATE 2009. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 421–425
Bowers VA, Snyder HL (1990) Concurrent versus retrospective verbal protocols for comparing window usability. Human Factors Society 34th Meeting, 8–12 October 1990 HFES, Santa Monica, pp 1270–1274
Cherry EC (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J Acoust Soc Am 25:975–979
Ericsson KA, Kintsch W (1995) Long-term working memory. Psychol Rev 102:211–245
Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, Revised edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Federici S, Borsci S, Stamerra G (2010) Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: Implementation of the Partial Concurrent Thinking Aloud technique, Cognitive processing 11 (3). doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0347-y
Guan Z, Lee S, Cuddihy E, Ramey J (2006) The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1253–1262
Hannu K, Pallab P (2000) A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am J Psychol 113:387–404
Hoc JM, Leplat J (1983) Evaluation of different modalities of verbalization in a sorting task. Int J Man-Mach Stud 18:283–306
Kemper S, Herman RE, Lian CHT (2003) The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. Psychol Aging 18:181–192
Strain P, Shaikh AD, Boardman R (2007) Thinking but not seeing: think-aloud for non-sighted users. CHI ‘07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York
Takagi H, Saito S, Fukuda K, Asakawa C (2007) Analysis of navigability of web applications for improving blind usability. Comput-Hum Interact 14:13–37
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Giammario Mascolo—psychotechnologist and assistant chair of Psychotechnologies for Adaptation and Integration at “Sapienza” University of Rome—and Domenico Polimeno—web and software developer, expert in the usability evaluation and design research—for their participation to the video realization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 29934 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 35734 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 43436 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (MPG 59020 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (MPG 59676 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Federici, S., Borsci, S. & Mele, M.L. Usability evaluation with screen reader users: a video presentation of the PCTA’s experimental setting and rules. Cogn Process 11, 285–288 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-010-0365-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-010-0365-9