Skip to main content
Log in

Usability evaluation with screen reader users: a video presentation of the PCTA’s experimental setting and rules

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the study entitled “Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: Implementation of the Partial Concurrent Thinking Aloud technique” (Federici et al. 2010), we have proposed a modified protocol of usability evaluation technique for blind users, which integrates the features of the concurrent and the retrospective techniques. This new technique, called partial concurrent thinking aloud (PCTA), while respecting the properties of classic verbal protocols, overcomes the structural interference and the limits of concurrent and retrospective protocols when used with screen reader users. In order to facilitate understanding and acquisition of the PCTA’s technique for practitioners and researchers, we have video recorded three different verbal protocols by visualizing five experimental sections. In the first two videos, we have compared a concurrent with a retrospective’s verbal protocol of a sighted user, showing the difference of the verbalizations provided by the user in these two conditions. The third video shows the structural interference of the screen reader, during a blind user concurrent thinking aloud. In the last two videos, we show the difference of a blind user behaviour when PCTA or retrospective protocol is adopted. The videos clearly visualize the advantage of the PCTA use in respect of the two other protocols. In conclusion, the visualization of the PCTA technique confirms that this new verbal protocol promotes and guarantees a more user-driven usability assessment with disabled people, by better involving screen reader users, overcoming the structural interference and the limits of the concurrent and retrospective protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Borsci S, Federici S (2009) The partial concurrent thinking aloud: a new usability evaluation technique for blind users. In: Emiliani PL, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen A-L (eds) Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments—AAATE 2009. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 421–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers VA, Snyder HL (1990) Concurrent versus retrospective verbal protocols for comparing window usability. Human Factors Society 34th Meeting, 8–12 October 1990 HFES, Santa Monica, pp 1270–1274

  • Cherry EC (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J Acoust Soc Am 25:975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Kintsch W (1995) Long-term working memory. Psychol Rev 102:211–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, Revised edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici S, Borsci S, Stamerra G (2010) Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: Implementation of the Partial Concurrent Thinking Aloud technique, Cognitive processing 11 (3). doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0347-y

  • Guan Z, Lee S, Cuddihy E, Ramey J (2006) The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 1253–1262

  • Hannu K, Pallab P (2000) A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am J Psychol 113:387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoc JM, Leplat J (1983) Evaluation of different modalities of verbalization in a sorting task. Int J Man-Mach Stud 18:283–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper S, Herman RE, Lian CHT (2003) The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. Psychol Aging 18:181–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strain P, Shaikh AD, Boardman R (2007) Thinking but not seeing: think-aloud for non-sighted users. CHI ‘07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York

  • Takagi H, Saito S, Fukuda K, Asakawa C (2007) Analysis of navigability of web applications for improving blind usability. Comput-Hum Interact 14:13–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Giammario Mascolo—psychotechnologist and assistant chair of Psychotechnologies for Adaptation and Integration at “Sapienza” University of Rome—and Domenico Polimeno—web and software developer, expert in the usability evaluation and design research—for their participation to the video realization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Borsci.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 29934 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 35734 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MPG 43436 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MPG 59020 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MPG 59676 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Federici, S., Borsci, S. & Mele, M.L. Usability evaluation with screen reader users: a video presentation of the PCTA’s experimental setting and rules. Cogn Process 11, 285–288 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-010-0365-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-010-0365-9

Keywords

Navigation