Skip to main content
Log in

Topology Optimization Method for Microscale Structures Described with Integral Nonlocal Theory

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The integration of additive manufacturing and topology optimization makes it possible to fabricate complex configurations, especially for microscale structures, which can guarantee the realization of high-performance structural designs. However, topology results often contain microstructures (several multicellular scales) similar to the characteristic length of local macrostructures, leading to errors in structural performance analysis based on classical theories. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the size effect in topology optimization. In this paper, we establish a novel topology optimization model utilizing the integral nonlocal theory to account for the size effect. The approach consists of an integral constitutive model that incorporates a kernel function, enabling the description of stress at a specific point in relation to strain in a distant field. Topology optimization structures based on nonlocal theory are presented for some benchmark examples, and the results are compared with those based on classical medium theory. The material layout exhibits significant differences between the two approaches, highlighting the necessity of topology optimization based on nonlocal theory and the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S, Xu W, Leary M, Choong P, et al. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials. 2016;83:127–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schaedler TA, Jacobsen AJ, Torrents A, Sorensen AE, Lian J, Greer JR, et al. Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science. 2011;334(6058):962–5.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prathyusha ALR, Raghu BG. A review on additive manufacturing and topology optimization process for weight reduction studies in various industrial applications. Mater Today Proc. 2022;62:109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu S, Li Q, Liu J, Chen W, Zhang Y. A realization method for transforming a topology optimization design into additive manufacturing structures. Engineering. 2018;4(2):277–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1988;71(2):197–224.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu L, Yan J, Cheng G. Structure-Material concurrent optimization considering uniform material microstructure. Chin J Comput Mech. 2008;25(1):29–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bažant ZP. Size effect. Int J Solids Struct. 2000;37(1–2):69–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gu XW, Loynachan CN, Wu Z, Zhang YW, Srolovitz DJ, Greer JR. Size-dependent deformation of nanocrystalline Pt nanopillars. Nano Lett. 2012;12(12):6385–92.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun Q, Guo Q, Yao X, Xiao L, Greer JR, Sun J. Size effects in strength and plasticity of single-crystalline titanium micropillars with prismatic slip orientation. Scr Mater. 2011;65(6):473–6.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu S, Su W. Effective couple-stress continuum model of cellular solids and size effects analysis. Int J Solids Struct. 2009;46(14–15):2787–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Da D, Yvonnet J, Xia L, Le MV, Li G. Topology optimization of periodic lattice structures taking into account strain gradient. Comput Struct. 2018;210:28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li L, Zhang G, Khandelwal K. Topology optimization of structures with gradient elastic material. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2017;56(2):371–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Eringen AC, Edelen DGB. On nonlocal elasticity. Int J Eng Sci. 1972;10(3):233–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernández-Sáez J, Zaera R, Loya JA, Reddy JN. Bending of Euler-Bernoulli beams using Eringen’s integral formulation: a paradox resolved. Int J Eng Sci. 2016;99:107–16.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Polizzotto C. Nonlocal elasticity and related variational principles. Int J Solids Struct. 2001;38(42):7359–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Polizzotto C, Fuschi P, Pisano AA. A strain-difference-based nonlocal elasticity model. Int J Solids Struct. 2004;41(9–10):2383–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Polizzotto C, Fuschi P, Pisano AA. A nonhomogeneous nonlocal elasticity model. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2006;25(2):308–33.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pisano AA, Sofi A, Fuschi P. Nonlocal integral elasticity: 2D finite element based solutions. Int J Solids Struct. 2009;46(21):3836–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pisano AA, Sofi A, Fuschi P. Finite element solutions for nonhomogeneous nonlocal elastic problems. Mech Res Commun. 2009;36(7):755–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fuschi P, Pisano AA, De Domenico D. Plane stress problems in nonlocal elasticity: finite element solutions with a strain-difference-based formulation. J Math Anal Appl. 2015;431(2):714–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghosh S, Kumar A, Stindararaghavan V, Waas AM. Non-local modeling of epoxy using an atomistically-informed kernel. Int J Solids Struct. 2013;50(19):2837–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sundararaghavan V, Waas A. Non-local continuum modeling of carbon nanotubes: physical interpretation of non-local kernels using atomistic simulations. J Mech Phys Solids. 2011;59(6):1191–203.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2010;43(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sigmund O, Maute K. Sensitivity filtering from a continuum mechanics perspective. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2012;46(4):471–5.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support to this work by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12272076 and 11802164) and the 111 Project (B14013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JL provided all the data for this paper and contributed significantly to writing this paper. SL conceived the main idea of this paper and put forward valuable suggestions for revision. QL provided the large memory server needed for the calculation and modified the English.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shutian Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Consent for Publication

All authors have approved the final manuscript and its submission to the journal.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Li, Q. & Liu, S. Topology Optimization Method for Microscale Structures Described with Integral Nonlocal Theory. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 37, 63–71 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-023-00438-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-023-00438-4

Keywords

Navigation