Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imperfection Insensitivity of Origami-Inspired Tubular Structures

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Axially loaded tubular structures are known to be highly sensitive to initial geometric imperfections, which can significantly reduce their design bearing capacity. To address this issue, this study explores the potential of an origami-inspired design for tubular structures to achieve a lower sensitivity to imperfections. The study considers various designs, including diamond-shaped, pyramid-shaped, new Kresling, and pre-embedded rhombic origami tubes, and employs knockdown factors (KDFs) to illustrate the reduction of the design bearing capacity of these structures with initial geometric imperfections for safety purposes. Finite element analysis shows that some of the origami tubes have superior design bearing capacity, mass efficiency, and KDFs when compared to standard circular tubes. Among the origami tubes considered, the rhombic tube demonstrates the best performance and is further studied through parametric analyses of geometric design, aspect ratio, and wall thickness to achieve additional performance enhancements. Furthermore, the superior performance of the rhombic tube is evaluated and verified for various loading scenarios, including eccentric compression and compression-torsion combination. The findings of this study provide a promising approach to designing and fabricating imperfection-insensitive tubes using advanced processing technologies such as additive manufacturing. This work can potentially lead to the development of innovative tubular structures with enhanced safety and reliability in various engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

All data generated or analyzed used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

  1. Dou S, Stolpe M. Fail-safe optimization of tubular frame structures under stress and eigenfrequency requirements. Comput Struct. 2022;258:106684.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shen W, Cao Y, Jiang X, Zhang Z, Okudan Kremer GE, Qin H. Experimental and numerical investigation on radial stiffness of origami-inspired tubular structures. J Appl Mech. 2022;89:031001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fina M, Weber P, Wagner W. Polymorphic uncertainty modeling for the simulation of geometric imperfections in probabilistic design of cylindrical shells. Struct Saf. 2020;82:101894.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brush DO, Almroth BO. Buckling of bars, plates, and shells. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1975.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cederbaum G, Arbocz J. On the reliability of imperfection-sensitive long isotropic cylindrical shells. Struct Saf. 1996;18(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee TU, Yang X, Ma J, Chen Y, Gattas JM. Elastic buckling shape control of thin-walled cylinder using pre-embedded curved-crease origami patterns. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;151:322–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Von Kármán T, Tsein HS. The buckling of thin cylindrical shells under axial compression. J Spacecr Rocket. 1941;8(8):303–12.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Donnell LH. Effect of imperfections on buckling of thin cylinders and columns. J Appl Mech. 1950;17:73–83.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Koiter WT. The effect of axisymmetric imperfections on the buckling of cylindrical shells under axial compression. Proc K Ned Akad Wet. 1963;66:265–79.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Peterson JP, Seide P, Weingarten VI. NASA-SP-8007: buckling of thin-walled circular cylinders, Technical report. NASA Langley Research Center; 1965.

  11. Borri C, Spinelli P. Buckling and post-buckling behaviour of single layer reticulated shells affected by random imperfections. Comput Struct. 1988;30(4):937–43.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Winterstetter TA, Schmidt H. Stability of circular cylindrical steel shells under combined loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2002;40(10):893–910.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ifayefunmi O. Buckling behavior of axially compressed cylindrical shells: comparison of theoretical and experimental data. Thin-walled Struct. 2016;98:558–64.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mandal P. Artificial neural network prediction of buckling load of thin cylindrical shells under axial compression. Eng Struct. 2017;152:843–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cao X, Feng D, Wang Z, Wu G. Parametric investigation of the assembled bolt-connected buckling-restrained brace and performance evaluation of its application into structural retrofit. J Build Eng. 2022;48:103988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liang K, Sun Q, Liu X. Investigation on imperfection sensitivity of composite cylindrical shells using the nonlinearity reduction technique and the polynomial chaos method. Acta Astronaut. 2018;146:349–58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franzoni F, Degenhardt R, Albus J, Arbelo MA. Vibration correlation technique for predicting the buckling load of imperfection-sensitive isotropic cylindrical shells: an analytical and numerical verification. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;140:236–47.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ma X, Hao P, Wang F, Wang B. Incomplete reduced stiffness method for imperfection sensitivity of cylindrical shells. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;157:107148.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang B, Yang M, Zhang D, Liu D, Feng S, Hao P. Alternative approach for imperfection-tolerant design optimization of stiffened cylindrical shells via energy barrier method. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022;172:108838.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fajuyitan OK, Sadowski AJ. Imperfection sensitivity in cylindrical shells under uniform bending. Adv Struct Eng. 2018;21(16):2433–53.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Azizi E, Stranghöner N. Imperfection sensitivity of cylindrical shells under shear loading. Ce/Papers. 2022;5(4):685–92.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner HNR, Hühne C, Zhang J, Tang W. On the imperfection sensitivity and design of spherical domes under external pressure. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2020;179:104015.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maali M, Aydın AC, Showkati H, Sağıroğlu M, Kılıç M. The effect of longitudinal imperfections on thin-walled conical shells. J Build Eng. 2018;20:424–41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu Y, Yu J, Guan W, Tang W, Yue L, Zhang J. Effects of the geometrical shapes on buckling of conical shells under external pressure. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2022;196:104624.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mahidan FM, Ifayefunmi O. The imperfection sensitivity of axially compressed steel conical shells–lower bound curve. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021;159:107323.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ifayefunmi O, Mahidan FM. Collapse of cone-cylinder transitions having single load indentation imperfection subjected to axial compression. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2021;194:104506.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Card MF, Jones RM. Experimental and theoretical results for buckling of eccentrically stiffened cylinders. NASA TN D-3686; 1966.

  28. Sim CH, Park JS, Kim HI, Lee YL, Lee K. Postbuckling analyses and derivations of knockdown factors for hybrid-grid stiffened cylinders. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2018;82:20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Combescure A, Jullien JF. ASTER Shell: a simple concept to significantly increase the plastic buckling strength of short cylinders subjected to combined external pressure and axial compression. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci. 2015;2(1):1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ning X, Pellegrino S. Imperfection-insensitive axially loaded thin cylindrical shells. Int J Solids Struct. 2015;62:39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ning X, Pellegrino S. Experiments on imperfection insensitive axially loaded cylindrical shells. Int J Solids Struct. 2017;115:73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner HNR, Petersen E, Khakimova R, Hühne C. Buckling analysis of an imperfection-insensitive hybrid composite cylinder under axial compression–numerical simulation, destructive and non-destructive experimental testing. Compos Struct. 2019;225:111152.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wagner HNR, Köke H, Dähne S, Niemann S, Hühne C, Khakimova R. Decision tree-based machine learning to optimize the laminate stacking of composite cylinders for maximum buckling load and minimum imperfection sensitivity. Compos Struct. 2019;220:45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yadav KK, Gerasimidis S. Imperfection insensitive thin cylindrical shells for next generation wind turbine towers. J Constr Steel Res. 2020;172: 106228.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Meloni M, Cai J, Zhang Q, Lee DSH, Li M, Ma R, Parashkevov TE, Feng J. Engineering origami: a comprehensive review of recent applications, design methods, and tools. Adv Sci. 2021;8(13):2000636.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou Y, Zhang Q, Cai J, Zhang Y, Yang R, Feng J. Experimental study of the hysteretic behavior of energy dissipation braces based on Miura origami. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021;167: 108196.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang T, Kawaguchi K. Folding analysis for thick origami with kinematic frame models concerning gravity. Autom Constr. 2021;127: 103691.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kshad MAE, Naguib HE. Modeling and characterization of viscoelastic origami structures using a temperature variation-based model. Comput Struct. 2021;246: 106473.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshimura Y. On the mechanism of buckling of a circular cylindrical shell under axial compression. NACA-TM-1390; 1955.

  40. Miura K. Proposition of pseudo-cylindrical concave polyhedral shells. ISAS Report/Inst Space Aeronaut Sci Univ Tokyo. 1969;34(9):141–63.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kresling B. Plant, “design”: mechanical simulations of growth patterens and bionics. Biomimetics. 1996;3:105–20.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tachi T. One-DOF cylindrical deployable structures with rigid quadrilateral panels. Symposium of the international association for shell and spatial structures, evolution and trends in design, analysis and construction of shell and spatial structures: proceedings, editorial universitat Politècnica de València; 2010.

  43. Zhang X, Cheng G, You Z, Zhang H. Energy absorption of axially compressed thin-walled square tubes with patterns. Thin-Walled Struct. 2007;45(9):737–46.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ma J, You Z. A novel origami crash box with varying profiles. In: ASME 2013 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American society of mechanical engineers digital collection. 2013; 55942: V06BT07A048.

  45. Yang X, Zang S, Ma J, Chen Y. Elastic buckling of thin-walled cylinders with pre-embedded diamond patterns. In: Origami 7: 7th international meeting on origami in science, mathematics and education. 2018.

  46. Ramm E, Wall WA. Shell structures - a sensitive interrelation between physics and numerics. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 2004;60:381–427.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Hilburger MW, Nemeth MP, Starnes JH. Shell buckling design criteria based on manufacturing imperfection signatures. AIAA J. 2006;44:654–63.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jones RM. Buckling of bars, plates, and shells. Blacksburg: Bull Ridge Corporation; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Castro SGP, Zimmermann R, Arbelo MA, Khakimova R, Hilburger MW. Geometric imperfections and lower-bound methods used to calculate knock-down factors for axially compressed composite cylindrical shells. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014;74:118–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this article was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1937202) and Key Industrial Technology Research & Development Cooperation Projects of Jiangsu Province (BZ2021036), Basic Research Projects on Free Exploration of Funds for Local Scientific and Technological Development Guided by the Central Government (2021Szvup027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of C and PC Structures of Ministry of Education, National Prestress Engineering Research Center, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210096, China

    Qian Zhang, Chongyao Wang, Yan Li & Jianguo Cai

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Ahmad B. H. Kueh

Authors
  1. Qian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chongyao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmad B. H. Kueh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianguo Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QZ: Writing-original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, and Methodology; CW: Visualization, Software, and Validation; YL: Software, and Visualization; ABK: Writing-reviewing and editing; JC: Conceptualization, Supervision, and Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Wang, C., Li, Y. et al. Imperfection Insensitivity of Origami-Inspired Tubular Structures. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 36, 541–553 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-023-00402-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-023-00402-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation