Skip to main content
Log in

A Validated Quantification of Benzocaine in Lozenges Using TLC and a Flatbed Scanner

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a video-densitometric quantification method for benzocaine in lozenges. The quantification is based on a derivatisation reaction with 4-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde. Measurements were carried out using a 16-bit flatbed scanner. Benzocaine was separated to a distance of 50 mm in a vertical developing chamber without vapour saturation. We present an RP-18 phase separation on a cyanopropyl plate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using water, CH3CN, dioxane, ethanol, and NH3 (25 %) (8 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 0.05, v/v) as the mobile phase. We also separated benzocaine in a normal phase system on silica gel 60 LiChrospere® plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with the mobile phase MTBE/cyclohexane (1 + 1, v/v). The calibration functions for benzocaine in both separations were linear in the range from 1 to 1,000 ng per spot. The range of linearity covers two magnitudes of power because the Kubelka–Munk expression was used for data transformation. In the cyanopropyl-system, the benzocaine amount was quantified as 242.5 ± 18.2 ng in a spot or 6.86 ± 0.52 mg in a single lozenge. The amount of 7.0 mg benzocaine per lozenge was labelled. The combined uncertainty of sample and calibration measurements was statistically calculated using a significance level of α = 0.05 to a total relative uncertainty of 7.49 %. The separation method is inexpensive, fast and reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broszat M, Ernst H, Spangenberg B (2010) J liq chrom Rel Technol 33:948–956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martindale (1982) The Extra Pharmacopoeia, London: The Pharmaceutical Press 910

  3. Franke JP, Kruyt W, de Zeeuw RA (1983) Influence of development distance on resolution in TLC. J. High Resol Chromatogr 6:82–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wintersteiger R, Gübitz G, Hartinger A, (1979) Microchimica Acta 235–244

  5. Ali SL, Stüber W (1982) Pharmazeutische Zeitung 127:826–827

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wollmann H, Patrunky M (1982) Zbl Pharm 121:857–866

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stahl E (1969) Thin-layer chromatography. A laboratory handbook. Springer, Berlin, pp 551–552

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology, Q2 (R1), Geneva. http://www.ich.org/LOB/media/MEDIA417.pdf, 2005 (Parent Guideline dated 27 October 1994, Complementary Guideline on Methodology dated 6 November 1996, incorporated in November 2005)

  9. Spangenberg B (2006) J Planar Chromatogr 19:332–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Spangenberg B, Poole CF, Weins C (2010) Quantitative thin layer chromatography. A practical survey. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spangenberg B (1998) Fres Z Anal Chem 360:148–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spangenberg B (2012) J Planar Chromatogr 25:262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation to Merck-Company (Darmstadt, Germany), BioStep (Jahnsdorf, Germany) and DESAGA GmbH (Wiesloch, Germany) for their kind support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Spangenberg.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection Miniaturized and New Featured Planar Chromatography and Related Techniques with guest editor Paweł K. Zarzycki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Milz, B., Spangenberg, B. A Validated Quantification of Benzocaine in Lozenges Using TLC and a Flatbed Scanner. Chromatographia 76, 1307–1313 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2436-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2436-4

Keywords

Navigation