Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Diamine-Modified and Amine-Modified Silica Nanoparticles as Pseudo-Stationary Phases for CE Separation

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of silica nanoparticles with surface modification in different applications is a topic of growing interest. This article provides a systematic comparison of diamine-modified and amine-modified silica nanoparticles as pseudo-stationary phases (PSPs) in capillary electrophoresis. The different electrophoretic behavior of these PSPs was evaluated by analysis of four auxins, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (dCPAA), and 2-(1-naphthyl)acetic acid (NAA). As expected, fast separation of the auxins was achieved, because they migrate in the same direction as the electro-osmotic flow under the optimum experimental conditions. However, the two nanoparticles had different selectivity and efficiency in the separation of the auxins, which could be related to the primary and secondary amines in their structures. The results indicated that even slight structural changes of the functional groups of the nanoparticles have pronounced effect on the interactions between the pseudo-stationary phase and the analytes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asefa T, Maclachlan MJ, Coombs N, Ozin GA (1999) Nature 402:867–871

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Inagaki S, Guan S, Ohsuna T, Tersaki O (2002) Nature 416:304–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gan X, Liu T, Zhong J, Liu XJ, Li GX (2004) Chem BioChem 5:1686–1691

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Haruta M, Date M (2001) Appl Catal A 222:427–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahtab R, Harden HH, Murphy CJ (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:14–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruchez M, Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP (1998) Science 281:2013–2016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haes AJ, Van Duyne RP (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:10596–10604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamat PV (2002) J Phys Chem B 106:7729–7744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pretorius V, Hopkins BJ, Schieke JD (1974) J Chromatogr 99:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paik P, Gedanken A, Mastai Y (2009) Appl Mater Interface 1:1834–1842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang MF, Kuo YC, Huang CC, Chang HT (2004) Anal Chem 76:192–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson C, Becker K, Harwigsson I, Bulow L, Birnbaum S, Nilsson S (2009) Anal Chem 81:315–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang AJ, Xu JJ, Zhang Q (2006) Talanta 69:210–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohno T, Matsuda T, Suzuki H, Fujimoto M (2006) Adv Powder Technol 17:167–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valtcheva L, Mohammad J, Pettersson G, Hjertén S (1993) J Chromatogr 638:263–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Amini A, Paulsen-Sorman U, Westerlund D (1999) Chromatographia 50:497–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorgenson JW, Lukacs KD (1981) J Chromatogr 218:209–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nilsson C, Nilsson S (2006) Electrophoresis 27:76–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Neiman B, Grushka E, Lev O (2001) Anal Chem 73:5220–5227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bächmann K, Göttlicher B, Haag I, Han KY, Hensel W, Mainka A (1994) J Chromatogr A 688:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu ZJ, Xiang H, Kim T, Chun MS, Lee K (2006) J Colloid Interface Sci 304:119–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li SFY (1992) Capillary electrophoresis, principle, practical and application. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  23. Ding GS, Da ZL, Yuan RJ, Bao JJ (2006) Electrophoresis 27:3363–3372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yin XB, Liu DY (2008) J Chromatogr A 1212:130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu DN, Wang J, Guo YG, Yuan RJ, Wang HF, Bao JJ (2008) Electrophoresis 29:863–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin WD (2007) Electrophoresis 28:3017–3023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang YQ, Baeyens Willy RG, Huang CG, Fei GT, He L, Ouyang J (2009) Talanta 77:1667–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Key Laboratory Project of Department of Education of Liaoning Province (no. 2009s004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hui, LJ., Ma, Y. A Comparative Study of Diamine-Modified and Amine-Modified Silica Nanoparticles as Pseudo-Stationary Phases for CE Separation. Chromatographia 73, 507–515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-010-1904-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-010-1904-3

Keywords

Navigation