Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat partitioning in endangered Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endangered Cantabrian capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus cantabricus) lives at the southern edge of tetraonids’ distribution range, in entirely deciduous forests. Its conservation planning has been always lek-centred. There is very little information about the specific habitat requirements of hens and broods, even though reproductive success appears to be a limiting factor. We analysed summer surveys from 1997 to 2004, carried out to estimate the reproductive success of the population. We compared the habitat characteristics at different spatial scales of hens with broods, broodless hens, and cocks in summer, with the better known spring habitat in display areas. Summer habitat showed higher proportion of open areas and was associated with more rugged zones at moderate spatial scales (78 ha) than spring habitat at display areas. Cocks and hens showed summer habitat partitioning; hens were associated with higher proportions of open and shrubby habitats. Furthermore, broodless hens preferred areas with higher slope variability than the display and summer areas preferred by cocks. These differences may reflect the sexual dimorphism of the species in reproductive role, energetic demands and conspicuousness. At larger spatial scales a previously developed habitat suitability model performed well to predict good brood-rearing areas. Hens with broods were located in the best-preserved areas in the range, mainly characterized by higher proportion of forest cover at a large (50 km2) scale. We suggest that these characteristics indicate refuge habitats where Cantabrian capercaillie can still breed successfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ardia DR, Bildstein KL (2001) Sex-related differences in habitat use in wintering American kestrels. Auk 118:746–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlegrim O, Sjöberg K (1995) Lepidoptera larva as food for capercaillie chicks (Tetrao urogallus). Scand J For Res 10:278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergerud AT, Gratson MW (1988) Adaptive strategies and population ecology of northern grouse. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman AA, Hawkins BA, Hawkins BA (2006) The refuge as an integrating concept in ecology and evolution. Oikos 115:192–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleich VC, Bowyer RT, Wehausen JD (1997) Sexual segregation in mountain sheep: resources or predation? Wildl Monogr 134:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (2001) Spatial ecology and biological conservation. Biol Conserv 100:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-González TE, Vázquez A (2004) Guía de los bosques de Asturias. Trea, Gijón

    Google Scholar 

  • Durell S (2000) Individual feeding specialisation in shorebirds: population consequences and conservation implications. Biol Rev 75:503–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Calvo IC, Obeso JR (2004) Growth, nutrient content, fruit production and herbivory in bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus L. along an altitudinal gradient. Forestry 77:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García D, Quevedo M, Obeso J, Abajo A (2005) Fragmentation patterns and protection of montane forest in the Cantabrian range (NW Spain). For Ecol Manag 208:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob L (1987) Le régime alimentaire du Grand Tétras (Tetrao urogallus L.): synthèse bibliographique. Gibier Faune Sauvage 4:429–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus S, Andreev AV, Bergmann H-H, Müller F, Porkert J, Weisner J (1986) Die Auerhühner. Die neue Brehm-Bücherei. Ziemsen, Wittenberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez AM (1993) Contribución al conocimiento de la eco-etología del urogallo cantábrico. PhD thesis, Universidad de León, Spain

  • Menoni E (1990) Caquetements et territorialité des poules de grand tétras au printemps dans les Pyrenees. Acta Biol Mont 10:63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss R, Oswald J, Baines D (2001) Climate change and breeding success: decline of the capercaillie in Scotland. J Anim Ecol 70:47–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Naves J, Fernandez-Gil A, Rodríguez C, Delibes M (2006) Brown bear food habits at the border of its range: a long-term study. J Mammal 87:899–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picozzi N, Catt D, Moss R (1992) Evaluation of capercaillie habitat. J Appl Ecol 29:751–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picozzi N, Moss R, Kortland K (1999) Diet and survival of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus chicks in Scotland. Wildl Biol 5:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevedo M, Bañuelos MJ, Obeso JR (2006a) The decline of Cantabrian capercaillie: how much does habitat configuration matter? Biol Conserv 127:190–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quevedo M, Bañuelos MJ, Sáez O, Obeso JR (2006b) Habitat selection by Cantabrian capercaillie at the edge of the species distribution. Wildl Biol 12:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Mirol PM, Segelbacher G, Fernández A, Tregenza T (2007) Genetic differentiation of an endangered capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) population at the Southern edge of the species range. Conserv Genet 8:659–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolstad J, Wegge P (1987) Habitat characteristics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus display grounds in southeastern Norway. Holarct Ecol 10:219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolstad J, Wegge P, Larsen BB (1988) Spacing and habitat use of capercaillie during summer. Can J Zool 66:670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saniga M (1996) Distribution, habitat preferences and breeding biology of the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) population in the Velká Fatra mountains (West Carpathians). Biol Bratisl 51:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander RK (1966) Sexual dimorphism and differential niche utilization in birds. Condor 68:113–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch I (1993) Habitat selection by capercaillie in summer and autumn: is bilberry important? Oecologia 93:257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch I (1994) Habitat and survival of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus nests and broods in the Bavarian Alps. Biol Conserv 70:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch I, Bañuelos MJ, Fernández-Gil A, Obeso JR, Quevedo M, Rodríguez Muñoz R (2006) Subspecies Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus endangered according to IUCN criteria. J Ornithol 147:653–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegge P, Olstad T, Gregersen H, Hjeljord O, Sivkov AV (2005) Capercaillie broods in pristine boreal forest in northwestern Russia: the importance of insects and cover in habitat selection. Can J Zool 83:1547–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Asturian Environmental Agency (Consejería de Medio Ambiente del Principado de Asturias), and specifically Alejandro González and Orencio Hernández, for providing access to the original technical reports of the summer capercaillie drives. We also thank José Luis Benito, the coordinator of the summer drives and author of corresponding technical reports. Alberto Fernández-Gil, José Carral, Fernando Rodríguez Pérez and Victor Vega provided additional summer data. We are especially grateful to the forest rangers of the Asturian environmental authority with whom we have collaborated for several years. We also thank Fernando González Taboada, for statistical discussion, and Alberto Fernández-Gil, for a thoughtful review of the manuscript. Christine Francis edited the English. This study was funded by a grant (CN-05-018) from the Asturian Environmental Agency to J.R. Obeso.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Quevedo.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bañuelos, MJ., Quevedo, M. & Obeso, JR. Habitat partitioning in endangered Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus . J Ornithol 149, 245–252 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0267-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0267-5

Keywords

Navigation