Abstract
Objective
Wall shear stress (WSS) and its derived spatiotemporal parameters have proven to play a major role on intracranial aneurysms (IAs) growth and rupture. This study aims to demonstrate how ultra-high field (UHF) 7 T phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) coupled with advanced image acceleration techniques allows a highly resolved visualization of near-wall hemodynamic parameters patterns in in vitro IAs, paving the way for more robust risk assessment of their growth and rupture.
Materials and methods
We performed pulsatile flow measurements inside three in vitro models of patient-specific IAs using 7 T PC-MRI. To this end, we built an MRI-compatible test bench, which faithfully reproduced a typical physiological intracranial flow rate in the models.
Results
The ultra-high field 7 T images revealed WSS patterns with high spatiotemporal resolution. Interestingly, the high oscillatory shear index values were found in the core of low WSS vortical structures and in flow stream intersecting regions. In contrast, maxima of WSS occurred around the impinging jet sites.
Conclusions
We showed that the elevated signal-to-noise ratio arising from 7 T PC-MRI enabled to resolve high and low WSS patterns with a high degree of detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are characterized by an abnormal localized dilatation of a cerebral artery resulting in ballooning. They impact roughly 3% of the population [1] and their rupture causing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) carries a mortality risk of around 30–40% [2]. However, most aneurysms remain asymptomatic [3], and thus predicting their evolution with time is of a great interest. Apart from the classical morphological features (size, location, wall irregularity), it is widely believed that hemodynamics parameters, particularly wall shear stress (WSS) are directly related to IAs initiation, growth and rupture [4,5,6]. Therefore, their quantification deduced from knowledge of the blood velocity field, is necessary in clinics to prevent disastrous consequences for patients.
Wall shear stress, defined as the tangential stress exerted by the flowing blood on the vessel wall, is a known stimulus for arterial mechanotransduction, which can impact endothelial cells (ECs) function and result in vascular remodeling [7]. While high WSS has been demonstrated to initiate aneurysms formation [8,9,10], low WSS regions have been associated with aneurysm growth and rupture through arterial wall remodeling [3]. However, the impact of WSS is more subtle due to the heterogeneity of aneurysms size and morphology [11] and the possible patterns that could lead to symptoms [12]. In fact, there is still an important controversy about the effect of WSS, as both low and high WSS have been separately correlated with IAs growth and rupture [13]. To address both hypothesis, Cebral et al. [14] and Meng et al. [15] proposed to differentiate two distinct mechanobiological pathways for IAs growth and rupture, characterizing the complex pathophysiology involved. On the one hand, high WSS and positive wall shear stress gradient (WSSG) arising from fast flow impingement on the wall were found to enhance growth and rupture of small and thin-walled IA through mural-cell-mediated destructive remodeling. In this context, Blankena et al. [16] have shown an inverse correlation between wall shear stress and wall thickness. On the other hand, low WSS and high oscillatory shear index (OSI) arising in regions of slow and recirculating flow, were observed to promote the growth and rupture of large and thick-walled IAs through inflammatory-cell-mediated destructive remodeling.
Nowadays, phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) is widely used as a non-invasive and non-ionizing technique for in vivo blood flow measurements [7]. Nevertheless, this method was limited because of the inherent poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of low-field MRI, which hindered the improvement of spatial resolution, and the long scan time of 4D PC-MRI [17].
In the last few years, a lot of effort has been put into quantifying WSS on the basis of experimentally measured velocity data, acquired with PC-MRI either in intracranial aneurysms [12], carotid arteries [18], femoral arteries [19] or aorta [20]. However, as reported by Potters et al. [20] and Petersson et al. [21], WSS evaluation with PC-MRI can be hampered by multiple factors such as segmentation inaccuracies, low spatial resolution, low SNR, and choice of VENC. In fact, several works [12, 20, 22] confirmed that WSS estimate increases with improved 4D PC-MRI spatial resolution. The recent introduction of ultra-high field (UHF) 7 T MRI, combined with the development of image acceleration techniques, might allow to overcome these limitations through an increase of SNR [23]. The gain in SNR can be exploited to enhance the spatiotemporal resolution and/or reduce the scan time. This feature then serves for a better visualization and quantification of hemodynamic parameters, particularly needed in small intracranial vessels. Various groups performed 7 T PC-MRI measurements to show the impact of field strength on aortic flows [24, 25]. Besides, in a pioneering study, van Ooij et al. [26] used 7 T PC-MRI to assess the hemodynamics inside intracranial arteries and proved that higher fields lead to better visualization and quantification of flow patterns in small vessels. Since then, few authors [16, 27,28,29,30] have carried out 7 T PC-MRI experiments to quantify flows inside IAs. The most recent work [30], based on a cohort of 5 patients harboring IAs, demonstrated that higher OSI values are reached with an increased temporal resolution, but did not find a clear similar relationship for WSS.
The purpose of the present study is to demonstrate how 7 T PC-MRI can provide a detailed visualization and characterization of near-wall hemodynamic parameters (WSS and OSI) inside in vitro models of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms.
Material and methods
Patient-specific aneurysm models
The study was carried out on three saccular patient-specific IAs silicone models (see Fig. 1) based on two patient anatomies imaged with 3D rotational angiograms. The aneurysms were respectively located, for model 1: in the ophthalmic portion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) (IA1); for model 2: in the ophthalmic portion of the internal carotid artery (IA2) and in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) (IA3). Therefore, IA1 belonged to model 1 while IA2 and IA3 were both in model 2.
Patient-specific saccular aneurysms geometries obtained through segmentation of 3D TOF sequences’ images. a Carotid-ophtalmic aneurysm in model 1 (IA1), b carotid-ophtalmic aneurysm (IA2) and middle cerebral artery (IA3) in model 2. \(\mathrm{Q}(\mathrm{t})\) refers to the inlet physiological flow rate. The measurement regions (PC-MRI sequence slices) are shown in opaque grey, and aneurysm sacs are highlighted in orange
The geometrical characteristics of each aneurysm are given in Table 1.
For the calculation of these parameters, the neck plane was defined as the best fitting plane (in a non-linear least square sense) to the neck points coming from the sac extraction. Besides, the aneurysm sacs were semi-automatically isolated by removing all mesh cells within a diameter \({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{vessel}} + 1\mathrm{mm}\) around the center line [31].
PC-MRI and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) sequence
All the measurements were performed on a 7 T MR system (Magnetom Terra, Siemens Erlangen, Germany) using a 8TX/32RX head coil (Nova Medical, USA). The 3D time-resolved (CINE) PC-MRI sequence consisted of three-directional velocity encoding and Compressed Sensing (CS) reconstruction to achieve higher acceleration rates [32, 33]. To select the optimal VENC in each model, we computed a 2D sequence for one slice positioned perpendicular to the main flow direction and located where we expected the highest velocities. We then checked that no or only a few voxels were aliased on the phase image to validate its value. The acquisition was performed using a prospective internal trigger, generated at the main physiological frequency (1 Hz). The acquisition parameters of both 3D TOF and PC-MRI sequences are summarized in Table 2.
Fluid circulating system
The test bench was a closed circuit made of a controllable gear pump (MCP-Z-201, Ismatec) connected to a 5L tank. The blood analogue was a mixture of glycerine (59.4%) and water (40.6%), maintained at the physiological temperature of 37 °C with the help of an automated heater placed in the tank. The resulting fluid density \(\uprho =1142\mathrm{ kg}/{\mathrm{m}}^{3}\) and kinematic viscosity \(\upnu =4.67\cdot {10}^{-6}{\mathrm{ m}}^{2}/\mathrm{s}\) were similar to the ones of human blood at high shear rate [26, 27]. The generated flow rate had a typical ICA flow waveform [34] and was measured with an ultrasonic flowmeter (ME 6PXN, TS410, Transonic) located at the inlet of the model (see [35,36,37] for more details on the test bench).
To cope with the MRI requirements [29], we have placed the metallic components of the test bench outside the MRI room to avoid electromagnetic interferences. Therefore, we had to deploy a long plastic pipe of about 16 m length and 6 mm internal diameter to connect these components with the IA model, located in the MRI head coils (see Fig. 2). A special attention was paid to the issue of wave propagation within the long pipe and its reflection on the model, which might be responsible for a significant distortion of the flow rate in the model. This led to the design of a compliance chamber that drastically reduced this distortion when placed at the model outlet. Furthermore, additional boxes filled with a 2%wt water/agarose mixture were attached around the silicone models to increase the MR signal within the head coil and ensure a reliable background phase error correction [38].
Data pre- and post-processing
The image reconstruction procedure included a background phase error correction to correct phase distortions arising from magnetic field inhomogeneity, eddy currents effects and Maxwell term [39].
An in-house temporal aliasing correction method [40] was used to remove the remaining \(2\uppi\) phase jumps occurring around the systole. In fact, the phase was unwrapped by locally detecting the phase differences larger than +\(\uppi\) or smaller than -\(\uppi\) between two-time steps, using the diastolic velocity as the baseline. To accurately delineate the boundaries of the vessels, a 3D TOF sequence was first performed, which provided a higher spatial resolution compared to the PC sequence.
The vessel segmentation, based on 3D TOF images, was computed using geodesic active contour method implemented in ITK-SNAP software [41]. The surface was then smoothened using a low pass Taubin filter (vascular modeling toolkit, VMTK library) to reduce irregularities and discretization effects. Finally, the vessel centerline was again calculated in VMTK and served as reference for computing the orthogonal planes needed for flow rate assessment. Subsequently, a semi-automated rigid body co-registration was applied to the segmented vessel geometry to precisely delineate the fluid-circulating volume on the 3D PC-MRI data. The registration parameters (i.e. translation and rotation) were then optimized using a Quasi-Newton algorithm implemented in MATLAB (The Mathworks, Inc. Natick, USA) [40]. The remaining spurious vectors (i.e. outliers) found in the vicinity of the wall were corrected with a normalized median test [42] using 8 neighbor vectors and a detection threshold of 1. The 3D PC-MRI data (velocity field) and boundaries of the segmented vessel were interpolated with a spatial resolution of 0.1 mm onto measurement planes that were orthogonal to the centerline and equally spaced. All visualizations of the output parameters were carried out in ParaView (version 5.10.0; Kitware, Clifton Park, NY USA).
The SNR, which is a crucial quantitative indicator of an MRI system's performance, was calculated from the PC magnitude images following a “difference method” [43,44,45] that enabled estimation of the noise in the presence of the signal. The calculation was performed for each slice \(\mathrm{k}\) according to [26, 46] using the PC magnitude signals \(\mathrm{S}\left(\mathbf{r},{\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{i}}^{*},\mathrm{k}\right)\) and \(\mathrm{S}\left(\mathbf{r},{\mathrm{t}}_{\mathrm{i}+1}^{*},\mathrm{k}\right)\) of two consecutive cardiac phases of similar mean velocity magnitudes (relative difference \(\lesssim\) 1%). Since several pairs of cardiac phases met this criterion around diastole, we selected the one that showed the highest SNR. The chosen high signal region of interest (\({\mathrm{ROI}}_{\mathrm{vessel}}\)) corresponded to the vascular lumen. This SNR was then averaged over the number of slices \({\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{slices}}\) and took the following form:
where \(\mathbf{r}\) refers to the voxel position. Because the SNRs of the PC magnitude and phase images are proportional [46, 47], we did not estimate the SNR of the phase images separately. Moreover, the velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR) [48, 49] was calculated globally using the spatial average of the magnitude of the time-averaged velocity field as velocity signal:
Here, V corresponds to the total volume of fluid comprising the parent artery and the aneurysm, and \(\overline{\mathbf{v} }\) is the time-averaged velocity field.
Flow rate measurement in the parent vessel
The accuracy of the method, which is a crucial step, was conducted through (i) a verification of the mass conservation (incompressible flow with rigid boundaries assumption) along the artery and (ii) a comparison of the flow rate with the one measured with the ultrasonic flowmeter. At each time step, the flow rate was evaluated from the velocity field at the selected planes along the centerline using a partial volume correction method [40].
Wall shear stress and derived parameters on IAs sacs
The Cauchy stress tensor \({\varvec{\upsigma}}\) for a Newtonian fluid is defined as follows:
where \(\mathrm{p}\) is the hydrostatic pressure, \(\mathbf{I}\) is the identity matrix, \({\varvec{\uptau}}=2\upmu \mathbf{D}\) is the viscous stress tensor, \(\upmu\) is the dynamic viscosity, \(\mathbf{v}\) is the velocity field and \(\mathbf{D}=1/2\left(\nabla \mathbf{v}+\nabla {\mathbf{v}}^{\mathrm{T}}\right)\) is the rate of deformation tensor. The wall shear stress was computed according to Crosetto et al. [50] using the algorithm from Potters et al. [20] implemented in MATLAB. Its expression in the local basis \(\mathrm{B}=\left\{{\mathbf{t}}_{1},{\mathbf{t}}_{2},\mathbf{n}\right\}\) associated to each point on the wall is the following:
where \({\mathbf{t}}_{1},{\mathbf{t}}_{2}\) are the orthonormal vectors on the tangent plane, and \(\mathbf{n}\) is the normal vector. Besides, \(\left({\upxi }_{1},{\upxi }_{2},{\upxi }_{3}\right)\) is the coordinate system associated with basis \(\mathrm{B}\). The tangential derivatives were set to zero, \({\partial }_{{\upxi }_{1}}{\mathrm{v}}_{{\upxi }_{3}}={\partial }_{{\upxi }_{2}}{\mathrm{v}}_{{\upxi }_{3}}=0\), due to the non-slip condition at the fixed wall. In the computation procedure, 4 interpolation points were taken along the normal direction (including the wall point \({\mathbf{v}}_{\mathrm{wall}}=0)\), the length of which was set to 1.5 mm. In this method, the inward wall normal vectors were estimated from the scattered points delineating the sac wall thanks to a principal component analysis (PCA) using the twenty nearest neighbor points. Moreover, the time-averaged WSS, defined over one cardiac cycle of period T, was computed as:
Finally, the oscillatory shear index [51, 52], which accounts for the directional variations of WSS during a cardiac cycle, was calculated as follows:
Results
SNR and VNR
The SNR and VNR values for the three models are reported in the Table 3.
The average SNR and VNR over the three IA models were 117 and 59.05, respectively.
Validation of PC-MRI flow measurements
The pulsatile flow rates were computed across 16 to 18 normal planes along the parent artery by spatial integration of the normal component of velocity (see Fig. 3a–c) at each time step of the cardiac cycle. For each IA, the mean Reynolds number based on the time-averaged flow rate \(\overline{\mathrm{Q} }\) (4.38, 4.53, 2.55 ml/s) and on the proximal IA diameter \(\mathrm{D}\) (see Table 1) was \({\mathrm{Re}}_{\mathrm{m}}=4\overline{\mathrm{Q} }/\mathrm{\pi \nu D}=356, 360, 458,\) respectively. Moreover, the Womersley number derived from the main pulsation \({\upomega }_{0}=2\uppi {\mathrm{f}}_{0}\) (\({\mathrm{f}}_{0}=1\mathrm{Hz})\mathrm{ was} \mathrm{\alpha }=\mathrm{D}/2\sqrt{{\upomega }_{0}/\upnu }=1.94\), 1.99, 0.88, respectively. Since these two dimensionless numbers were relatively “low”, we particularly observed a parabolic-like profile on the planes located in the upstream straight section of IA2 (see Fig. 3b).
Systolic velocity profiles (normal component) on each measurement plane along the parent artery in a IA1, b IA2, c IA3. The velocity contours at the aneurysm inlet are highlighted (square box). Corresponding measured flow rates in d IA1, e IA2, f IA3. Red curve: flow rate measured from ultrasonic flowmeter. Black dots: inter-plane mean flow rate measured from PC-MRI. The part filled in grey represents the inter-plane flow rate standard deviation. Dashed lines: time-averaged flow rates
The time evolution of the inter-plane mean and standard deviation flow rates measured in each IA with PC-MRI is plotted in Fig. 3d–f. The flow rates measured with the ultrasonic flowmeter are shown in the same figure for comparison. However, this comparison was not performed for IA3 because this aneurysm was located downstream of a vessel bifurcation in model 2 (see Fig. 1b) and was consequently not accessible with our flowmeter. For the same reason, the flow rates measured after the bifurcation in IA2 were not included in the inter-plane mean. In addition, the flow rate in the adjacent branch of IA3 was not calculated because we could not segment the thinner part (see dashed curve in Fig. 1b) due to the low TOF signal (diameter smaller than voxel size). Still, the velocity field within the aneurysm in.
Figure 4c, f showed no flow entering this branch, confirming the validity of the omission of this region. It is worth underlining that the flow rate entering IA3, which depended on the relative hydraulic resistance of the two branches, was not specifically adjusted. Nevertheless, the time-averaged flow rate measured in the parent artery of IA3 (\(\sim 2.5\) ml/s) was close to in vivo MCA flow rates [28], supporting its physiological relevance.
Figure 3d, e shows that the mean inter-plane flow rates measured with PC-MRI (IA1 and IA2) were in good agreement with the flow rates obtained with the ultrasonic flowmeter. However, we observed that the peak systole flow rate was slightly lower when computed from PC-MRI. This partly resulted from the usual temporal filtering of PC-MRI sequences, which smoothened the peak systole because of the limited temporal resolution (\(\approx 20 \mathrm{Hz})\). The time-averaged difference was 4.2% at maximum while the largest systolic difference reached 11.1%, both in IA2. The highest inter-plane standard deviations were found in IA3, due to the smaller vessel diameter, which led to a more difficult segmentation and thus to an enhanced partial volume effect. For the other aneurysms, the maximum time-averaged inter-plane standard deviation was 9.4% in IA2, whereas the largest systolic inter-plane standard deviation reached 10.8% in IA1.
Aneurysms flow patterns
Figure 4 shows the systolic velocity field and streamlines inside the aneurysm sacs. We focused on the systolic phase, where the velocities are the highest and the noisy data minimized, to get a clear visualization of the characteristic flow patterns. For each IA, the velocity magnitude was in average higher in the parent artery than in the aneurysm sac. The maximum velocity was almost the same for IA1 and IA2, which have similar parent artery diameters. In contrast, despite the lower flow rate, this maximum velocity almost doubled for IA3 as a result of the smaller upstream vessel diameter.
The streamlines first showed how the flow velocity varied along its trajectory inside the aneurysm. For IA3, the resulting jet-like flow impinged on the aneurysm wall and decelerated sharply as it initiated the swirl inside the sac. For IA1 and IA2, the impingement was less significant, resulting in a smoother velocity decrease. The characteristic velocity magnitudes encountered in each IA are given in Table 4. The streamlines also highlighted the main flow rotating structures. We indeed clearly identified the core of these vortical structures, which extended from one side to the other side of the sac and took the form of curved vortex tubes. Spotting out the time evolution of these vortices, we observed that their core lines slightly moved and deformed throughout the cardiac cycle.
WSS and its temporal variations
Because WSS is considered as a major physiological parameter for IA rupture assessment, we illustrate in Fig. 5 its distributions at systole for the three IAs considered. We again focused on the systolic phase to quantify the WSS maxima and enhance the contrast between high and low WSS regions. Noticeably, the WSS distribution was highly correlated with the direction and magnitude of the near wall-velocity field represented by the streamlines in Fig. 4d–f.
In each case, the maximum WSS occurred in the neighborhood of the impinging zone of the inflow jet on the wall, and its amplitude was mainly influenced by the magnitude and direction of the incident flow velocity. In fact, for IA3, the high inflow velocity \(\sim 2.5\) m/s combined with the sharp incident angle led to a very concentrated and high WSS regions with a maximum around \(\sim 46\) Pa. For IA1 and IA2, we observed a more diffused WSS maxima region and a smoother diminution throughout the vortical path. In contrast, the locations of the WSS minima corresponded to the tips of the large vortical structures and were characterized by higher directional fluctuations over time. Table 4 contains the characteristic WSS values found on the walls of each IA.
To account for the WSS temporal variations, we present the OSI distribution in Fig. 6 overlayed with the TAWSS vector field. The maximum OSI values were similar for all IAs and respectively equal to 0.47, 0.48 and 0.45. In all cases, the large OSI values were encountered at the locations where the TAWSS was the lowest. As illustrated in Fig. 6, these regions corresponded to either (i) the inner part of vortical structures or (ii) the intersection of flow streams coming from different directions. In the first case, the vortical structures matched the two tips of the large vortex found inside each IA sac. In the second case, the intersection of the streams coincided with the merge of the upward/downward flows at the vortex start/end.
These two WSS patterns are emphasized in Fig. 6, in which high OSI regions are pointed out by points \({\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{ij}}\) (i = aneurysm number, j = point number). The points corresponding to pattern (i) were located either in the center of small and well-defined vortical structures (\({\mathrm{P}}_{11}\) and\({\mathrm{P}}_{33}\)) or inside large and fluctuating rotating flows (\({\mathrm{P}}_{13}\),\({\mathrm{P}}_{21}\),\({\mathrm{P}}_{23}\),\({\mathrm{P}}_{31}\)). \({\mathrm{P}}_{12}, {\mathrm{P}}_{14}, {\mathrm{P}}_{22 }, {\mathrm{P}}_{32}\) and \({\mathrm{P}}_{34}\) refer to pattern (ii). It should be noticed that there were regions where these two patterns combined (e.g. \({\mathrm{P}}_{13}\) and\({\mathrm{ P}}_{14}\)), since they both developed in a close neighborhood.
Discussion
In this study, we have presented quantitative measurements and a qualitative analysis of flow and WSS behavior in cerebral aneurysm models using 4D PC-MRI. The utilization of advanced image acceleration techniques in combination with 7 T MRI has resulted in an increase in SNR and an improvement in spatiotemporal resolution, all achievable within a reasonable acquisition time. This was demonstrated in one of the initial UHF studies on intracranial arteries by van Ooij et al. [26]. In our research, we integrated the accuracy of 7 T MRI acquisition with the post-processing methodology developed in prior works by Brina et al. [31] and Bouillot et al. [40, 53] to perform computations of velocity fields in the IAs. This allowed us to derive WSS and its temporal variations with improved accuracy.
We have shown that the gain in SNR and/or spatiotemporal resolution mainly enabled a detailed resolution of WSS patterns in two specific flow conditions. First, it allowed a precise visualization of WSS in low and noisy velocity regions through the gain of SNR. Second, the WSS estimation in high velocity gradient regions has been refined thanks to the enhanced spatial resolution.
Although the identification of high WSS magnitude regions is of great importance for the aneurysm rupture assessment, the gain in SNR and spatial resolution resulting from 7 T PC-MRI takes on its full meaning when characterizing low WSS patterns in regions of low and thus noisy velocity. Interestingly, we found a correspondence between regions of low WSS and sites of large WSS temporal variations characterized by an OSI above 0.2. In fact, regions of high OSI, were mainly found inside low WSS vortical structures at the tips of the vortex core line as well as at locations where two flow streams with different directions intersected. This statement was already reported by Cebral et al. [14] in a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study on multiple IAs and by DiCarlo et al. [54], where they used stereo-PIV to deduce hemodynamic parameters in a stenosed carotid artery bifurcation. The only difference with the latter study is that, in our case, we did not identify elevated OSI values near flow impingement sites.
Besides, our results have demonstrated that the maximum WSS occurred around the flow impingement region on the aneurysm wall and that its magnitude was largely influenced by the velocity magnitude in the proximal parent artery. This observation follows the conclusions of the work of Meng et al. [15], in which it was claimed that flow acceleration adjacent to impingement points produces high WSS and positive WSSG.
These important WSS patterns, namely circular and elevated near impingement zones, were already observed with PC-MRI at 3 T by van Ooij et al. [12] for a large range of spatial resolutions going from 0.2 mm to 1 mm, but no correlation was made between low WSS vortical structures and high OSI values.
It is also important to notice that the identification of WSS fixed points (points where the WSS vector field vanishes) could help highlight regions of flow impingement, areas where the vortex structures interact with the wall, and locations of vector field intersection (flow separation) [55,56,57], which are closely associated with high OSI values. In fact, it is mathematically clear that the fixed points of the TAWSS take the maximum OSI value of 0.5 [58]. The classification of these fixed points is based on the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix of WSS in their vicinity and could serve to rigorously identify the locations of aneurysm rupture.
Rupture risk assessment in clinical setting
The number of incidental findings of non-ruptured cerebral aneurysms has increased considerably in the last decade due to easier access to MRI in industrialized countries. The question of evaluating rupture risk versus treatment risk has become the subject of numerous hemodynamic research works, most notably numerical simulations [14, 59,60,61], but also with 4D PC-MRI [12, 40, 62, 63]. More recently, MR imaging of the aneurysm wall by suppression of the blood signal (black blood sequences) to detect wall enhancement after CA injection was reported as a biomarker of aneurysm instability [64, 65]. The ability to measure hemodynamic parameters at the wall level in the same acquisition modality, will provide complementary information about the wall morphology and will refine the risk of rupture. Local correlations of WSS and OSI with the vessel wall observations could also deliver relevant indications on the pathophysiology of growth and rupture of intracranial aneurysms, contributing substantially to the follow-up and management of such pathologies. Moreover, black blood sequences are prone to misinterpretation in regions of the aneurysm where velocity fields are slow or turbulent [64]. Coupling these sequences with accurate velocity field measurements, as proposed in our work, could help in carefully interpreting the vessel wall images by identifying sensitive areas.
However, despite an acceleration factor of 7.6 based on Compressed Sensing technique, the acquisition time of the PC-MRI sequences used in our study was still around 25 min, which is clinically impractical. For this experiment, the field of view was quite large, since it included a portion of parent artery before and after the aneurysm, in order to check the consistency of the PC-MRI measurements thanks to a flow rate validation at multiple vessel cross-sections (see Fig. 1). In combination with a smaller volume coverage in the slice direction (transversal orientation) and a reduction of the isotropic spatial resolution to about 0.75 mm, the scan time could be reduced to a clinically acceptable values of about 10 min. In addition, some 3 T PC-MRI studies have shown that the addition of a contrast agent (e.g. based on Gadolinium) to the fluid increases the SNR due to the shortening of T1 relaxation time [66, 67]. Here, to improve SNR, the imaging volume was positioned as perpendicular as possible to the flow direction to benefit from the inflow effect (thus using a relatively high flip angle regarding the high field strength of 7 T, see Table 2). Therefore, no contrast agent was used in our experiments since, in most cases, preparatory experiments did not reveal any further significant improvement in SNR with additional use of a Gadolinium based contrast agent (data not shown). However, for IA3, the slices could not be optimally positioned everywhere in the volume because multiple vessel branches spread in different directions. Thus, in that specific case, we encountered some difficulties in obtaining sufficient signal from TOF without contrast agent, especially in small vessels (see Fig. 1b).
SNR and VNR benefits from ultra-high field
As depicted in Table 3, an elevated averaged SNR of 117 was found over the three tested IAs with the help of a “difference method”. Using the same method, van Ooij et al. [26] reported an averaged SNR of 31.7 in the cerebral arteries of five volunteers with 7 T PC-MRI at a spatial resolution of 0.5 mm. However, a straightforward SNR comparison with the present work is delicate because of the different acceleration techniques utilized, both of which have a specific impact on the measured SNR. On the one hand, they used SENSE parallel imaging with R = 3, which produces noise amplification characterized by the g-factor [68]. On the other hand, we used compressed sensing with R = 7.6 to reconstruct the images, a technique in which the SNR is strongly affected by the choice of regularization parameters. In fact, Sandino et al. [69] demonstrated that the perceived SNR can be improved by increasing the regularization parameters, but at the cost of blurring the images. Nevertheless, according to this paper, we could expect an increase of SNR by a factor of 2.6 when raising the field strength from 3 to 7 T which is, on average, larger than moving from to 1.5 to 3 T [24]. Since we used the same voxel size as well as multi-channel head coils in both studies, we would expect a similar increase in SNR compared to 3 T. This enhanced SNR can then serve to improve the spatial resolution, which in turn is beneficial for WSS computation.
Moreover, our single VENC acquisitions resulted in an average VNR of 59.05, which is high compared with other PC-MRI studies at lower fields [70, 71]. Unfortunately, no direct comparison was made with other 7 T PC-MRI works, because of the lack of similar data. It is interesting to mention that the VNR could have been improved by using a dual-VENC 4D flow sequence [72,73,74] at the expense of a longer scan time, or, by varying the VENC over the cardiac cycle [75] according to the time-dependent velocities. Such VNR improvement could be used to enhance the flow patterns in the low velocity regions, especially around diastole.
Impact of field strength and sequence parameters on hemodynamic parameters
In the present case, apart from the VENC which varied according to the IA models, the sequence parameters were fixed for all experiments. However, numerous studies investigated the impact of the field strength and PC-MRI sequence type (spatiotemporal resolution, acceleration technique and factor) on near-wall hemodynamic parameters. First, Strecker et al. [76] compared systolic WSS at 1.5 T and 3 T but did not observe statistically different values. However, results from Wiesemann et al. [25] showed that WSS is significantly affected by field strength at 1.5, 3 and 7 T.
Second, Cibis et al. [22] demonstrated that OSI is dependent on both temporal and spatial resolution, while WSS is mostly dependent on spatial resolution. In the same trend, Gottwald et al. [30] showed that OSI increases with improved temporal resolution, but found no clear similar relationship for WSS in all aneurysms studied. Besides, in an in vitro IA study, van Ooij et al. [12] revealed that the spatially averaged WSS increases as the spatial resolution improves.
Third, Schnell et al. [77] observed that mean WSS obtained with k-t GRAPPA for acceleration factors R = 3, 5, 8 is significantly different from standard GRAPPA with R = 2 only when a 32-channel receiver coil is used. In addition, van Ooij et al. [46] demonstrated that SENSE acceleration produces more accurate results than k-t BLAST as a consequence of temporal blurring of the latter technique.
In vitro measurement method
Compared to conventional optical velocity measurement techniques such as particle image velocimetry (PIV) or laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), PC-MRI has the considerable advantage to work with opaque fluids like blood and to enable a straightforward computation of the 3D velocity field in complex vascular geometries. Moreover, it does not require any tracer particles that can alter fluid behavior. However, the major disadvantages compared to PIV are (i) a lower spatiotemporal resolution [78] with temporal filtering and (ii) the inability to perform statistics over multiple cardiac cycles [54], due to the already long scan time of the flow MRI sequences.
Limitations and improvements
-
1.
A limitation of the present study is the choice of a unique VENC, which must cover a large range of velocities in the aneurysm domain. This could lead to noisy velocity measurements in the near-wall low velocity regions. In addition, the limited temporal resolution due to the three-dimensional velocity encoding can filter the velocity values. Therefore, the high OSI values found in the low WSS regions could possibly be induced by noisy velocities (low SNR), which consequently represent unphysical temporal variations of WSS.
-
2.
Moreover, even if the UHF improves the data quality, the WSS derivation depends on the PC-MRI spatial resolution, on the segmentation accuracy, and on several other parameters used in the WSS computation algorithm (length of the normal direction, number of points taken in this normal, fitting technique…).
-
3.
This study was limited to three different aneurysms, which do not represent the full variability of geometries and hemodynamics [11] found in this pathology. However, the three geometries studied included two sidewalls (IA1 and IA2 are carotid ophthalmic aneurysms of different sizes) and one bifurcation (IA3 is a middle cerebral artery aneurysm), each of which exhibited different flow patterns.
-
4.
The goal of our experiment was to faithfully reproduce a typical physiological intracranial flow rate inside our models to precisely quantify the near-wall hemodynamic parameters inside the IA sac. However, a relevant improvement could be to use a more advanced blood analogue that considers the non-Newtonian shear thinning nature of blood. In fact, the non-Newtonian behavior cannot be neglected in situations where the shear rate is low (typically under 1 \({0\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\) [79]) such as pulsatile flows conditions [80], small vessels [81] and regions of arterial geometrical changes [82]. Indeed, various authors [54, 83, 84] used a solution of water, glycerine and xanthan gum in PIV experiments to better mimic these rheological features. For the time being, no PC-MRI flow study has been performed inside IAs models with this type of working fluid.
Finally, to realize the transition between in vitro and clinical measurements, further technical improvements are needed to be applied in clinical routines. This could be achieved mainly by further shortening the acquisition time, for example, by restricting the region of interest to the neighborhood of the aneurysm sac. In this work, we took advantage of the higher spatial resolution of the TOF sequence to segment the arteries on the PC images. However, this geometrical co-registration adds computational time and can lead to misalignment issues, especially in very small and tortuous vessels where the signal from TOF is not sufficient. Therefore, the use of PC magnitude to perform this task should be of great interest if the spatial resolution can be lowered to around 0.3–0.4 mm. Additionally, the entire post-processing pipeline should be automated and integrated to facilitate the procedure for rapid diagnosis.
Conclusion
We performed 7 T PC-MRI in in vitro experiments to evaluate the near-wall hemodynamic parameters in three patient-specific IAs. We developed an MRI-compatible test bench, which faithfully reproduced a typical physiological intracranial flow rate. We took advantage of recent developments of MR image acceleration techniques to derive highly resolved velocity field in a short scan time. Our results clearly demonstrate the remarkable ability of 7 T PC-MRI in identifying relevant WSS patterns, namely high WSS regions and low WSS vortical structures. We strongly believe that our study will pave the way for a better understanding of the role of WSS in IAs rupture, through systematic 7 T PC-MRI experimentations in a large cohort of patients.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on the request of corresponding author AS.
References
Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ (2011) Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 10:626–636
Frösen J et al (2012) Saccular intracranial aneurysm: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 123:773–786
Boussel L et al (2008) Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient-specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 39(11):2997–3002
Boussel L et al (2009) Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 61:409–417
Cebral JR, Mut F, Weir J, Putman C (2011) Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(1):145–151
Nixon AM, Gunel M, Sumpio BE (2010) The critical role of hemodynamics in the development of cerebral vascular disease: a review. J Neurosurg 12(6):1240–1253
Markl M et al (2016) Advanced flow MRI: emerging techniques and applications. Clin Radiol 71(8):779–795
Meng H et al (2007) Complex hemodynamics at the apex of an arterial bifurcation induces vascular remodeling resembling cerebral aneurysm initiation. Stroke 38(6):1924–1931
Metaxa E et al (2010) Characterization of critical hemodynamics contributing to aneurysmal remodeling at the basilar terminus in a rabbit model. Stroke 41(8):1774–1782
Dolan JM, Kolega J, Meng H (2013) High wall shear stress and spatial gradients in vascular pathology: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 41:1411–1427
Schnell S et al (2014) Three-dimensional hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms: influence of size and morphology. J Magn Reson Imaging 39(1):120–131
van Ooij P et al (2013) Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm: WSS in intracranial aneurysms. J Magn Reson Imaging 38(4):876–884
Cebral JR, Meng H (2012) Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics—closing the gap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(3):396–398
Cebral JR et al (2019) Local hemodynamic conditions associated with focal changes in the intracranial aneurysm wall. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40(3):510–516
Meng H, Tutino VM, Xiang J, Siddiqui A (2014) High WSS or low WSS? complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35(7):1254–1262
Blankena R et al (2016) Thinner regions of intracranial aneurysm wall correlate with regions of higher wall shear stress: a 7T MRI study. Am J Neuroradiol 37(7):1310–1317
Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, Hope M, Wieben O (2012) 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(5):1015–1036
Cibis M et al (2016) Relation between wall shear stress and carotid artery wall thickening MRI versus CFD. J Biomech 49(5):735–741
Frydrychowicz A et al (2007) Visualization of iliac and proximal femoral artery hemodynamics using time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 25(5):1085–1092
Potters WV, van Ooij P, Marquering H, van Bavel E, Nederveen AJ (2015) Volumetric arterial wall shear stress calculation based on cine phase contrast MRI: volumetric wall shear stress calculation. J Magn Reson Imaging 41(2):505–516
Petersson S, Dyverfeldt P, Ebbers T (2012) Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(1):128–138
Cibis M et al (2016) The effect of spatial and temporal resolution of cine phase contrast MRI on wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index assessment. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0163316
Krug JR et al (2020) Assessing spatial resolution, acquisition time and signal-to-noise ratio for commercial microimaging systems at 14.1, 17.6 and 22.3 T. J Magn Reson 316:106770
Hess AT et al (2015) Aortic 4D flow: quantification of signal-to-noise ratio as a function of field strength and contrast enhancement for 1.5T, 3T, and 7T: quantification of SNR in Aortic 4D Flow. Magn Reson Med 73(5):1864–1871
Wiesemann S et al (2021) Impact of sequence type and field strength (1.5, 3, and 7T) on 4D flow MRI hemodynamic aortic parameters in healthy volunteers. Magn Reson Med 85(2):721–733
van Ooij P et al (2013) Quantification and visualization of flow in the Circle of Willis: time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI at 7 T compared with 3 T. Magn Reson Med 69(3):868–876
Hosseini SA, Berg P, Huang F, Roloff C, Janiga G, Thévenin D (2021) Central moments multiple relaxation time LBM for hemodynamic simulations in intracranial aneurysms: An in-vitro validation study using PIV and PC-MRI. Comput Biol Med 131:104251
Rajabzadeh-Oghaz H, van Ooij P, Veeturi SS, Tutino VM, Zwanenburg JJM, Meng H (2020) Inter-patient variations in flow boundary conditions at middle cerebral artery from 7T PC-MRI and influence on computational fluid dynamics of intracranial aneurysms. Comput Biol Med 120:103759
Roloff C, Stucht D, Beuing O, Berg P (2019) Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD. J NeuroIntervent Surg 11(3):275–282
Gottwald LM et al (2020) High spatiotemporal resolution 4D flow MRI of intracranial aneurysms at 7T in 10 minutes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41(7):1201–1208
Brina O et al (2019) How flow reduction influences the intracranial aneurysm occlusion: a prospective 4D phase-contrast MRI study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40(12):2117–2123
Markl M et al (2003) Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 17(4):499–506
Ma LE et al (2019) Aortic 4D flow MRI in 2 minutes using compressed sensing, respiratory controlled adaptive k-space reordering, and inline reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 81(6):3675–3690
Reymond P, Merenda F, Perren F, Rüfenacht D, Stergiopulos N (2009) Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 297(1):H208–H222
Bouillot P, Brina O, Ouared R, Lovblad KO, Pereira VM, Farhat M (2014) Multi-time-lag PIV analysis of steady and pulsatile flows in a sidewall aneurysm. Exp Fluids 55:1–11
Bouillot P, Brina O, Ouared R, Lovblad K-O, Farhat M, Mendes Pereira V (2015) Hemodynamic transition driven by stent porosity in sidewall aneurysms. J Biomech 48(7):1300–1309
Bouillot P, Brina O, Ouared R, Lovblad K-O, Farhat M, Pereira VM (2014) Particle imaging velocimetry evaluation of intracranial stents in sidewall aneurysm: hemodynamic transition related to the stent design. PLoS ONE 9(12):e113762
Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, Waseleski G, Pohost GM, Yoganathan AP (1993) Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 3(3):521–530
Lorenz R, Bock J, Snyder J, Korvink JG, Jung BA, Markl M (2014) Influence of eddy current, Maxwell and gradient field corrections on 3D flow visualization of 3D CINE PC-MRI data: impact phase offset errors on particle traces. Magn Reson Med 72(1):33–40
Bouillot P et al (2018) 3D phase contrast MRI: Partial volume correction for robust blood flow quantification in small intracranial vessels: 3D phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 79(1):129–140
Yushkevich PA et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31(3):1116–1128
Westerweel J, Scarano F (2005) Universal outlier detection for PIV data. Exp Fluids 39:1096–1100
Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(2):375–385
Reeder SB et al (2005) Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil. Magn Reson Med 54(3):748–754
Price RR et al (1990) Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1: technical reports: quality assurance methods. Med Phys 17(2):287–295
van Ooij P et al (2013) k-t BLAST and SENSE accelerated time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI in an intracranial aneurysm. MAGMA 26:261–270
Conturo TE, Smith GD (1990) Signal-to-noise in phase angle reconstruction: dynamic range extension using phase reference offsets. Magn Reson Med 15(3):420–437
Lee AT, Pike GB, Pelc NJ (1995) Three-point phase-contrast velocity measurements with increased velocity-to-noise ratio. Magn Reson Med 33(1):122–126
Pelc NJ, Bernstein MA, Shimakawa A, Glover GH (1991) Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1(4):405–413
Crosetto P, Reymond P, Deparis S, Kontaxakis D, Stergiopulos N, Quarteroni A (2011) Fluid–structure interaction simulation of aortic blood flow. Comput Fluids 43(1):46–57
Arzani A, Shadden SC (2016) Characterizations and correlations of wall shear stress in aneurysmal flow. J Biomech Eng 138(1):014503
Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S (1985) Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 5(3):293–302
Bouillot P et al (2019) Neurovascular stent artifacts in 3D-TOF and 3D-PCMRI: influence of stent design on flow measurement. Magn Reson Med 81(1):560–572
DiCarlo AL, Holdsworth DW, Poepping TL (2019) Study of the effect of stenosis severity and non-Newtonian viscosity on multidirectional wall shear stress and flow disturbances in the carotid artery using particle image velocimetry. Med Eng Phys 65:8–23
Mazzi V et al (2020) A Eulerian method to analyze wall shear stress fixed points and manifolds in cardiovascular flows. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19(5):1403–1423
Mazzi V et al (2021) Wall shear stress topological skeleton analysis in cardiovascular flows: methods and applications. Mathematics 9(7):720
Gambaruto AM, João AJ (2012) Flow structures in cerebral aneurysms. Comput Fluids 65:56–65
Arzani A, Shadden SC (2018) Wall shear stress fixed points in cardiovascular fluid mechanics. J Biomech 73:145–152
Saqr KM et al (2020) What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 40(5):1021–1039
Steinman DA, Pereira VM (2019) How patient specific are patient-specific computational models of cerebral aneurysms? An overview of sources of error and variability. Neurosurg Focus 47(1):E14
Castro MA, Putman CM, Cebral JR (2006) Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(8):1703–1709
Pereira VM, Delattre B, Brina O, Bouillot P, Vargas MI (2016) 4D flow MRI in neuroradiology: techniques and applications. Top Magn Reson Imaging 25(2):81–87
Pereira VM et al (2015) Assessment of intra-aneurysmal flow modification after flow diverter stent placement with four-dimensional flow MRI: a feasibility study. J NeuroIntervent Surg 7(12):913–919
Santarosa C et al (2020) Vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging in intracranial aneurysms: principles and emerging clinical applications. Interv Neuroradiol 26(2):135–146
Liu P et al (2016) Relationship between aneurysm wall enhancement and conventional risk factors in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a black-blood MRI study. Interv Neuroradiol 22(5):501–505
Wassermann F, Hecker D, Jung B, Markl M, Grundmann S (2013) Phase-locked 3D3C-MRV measurements in a bi-stable fluidic oscillator. In: 51st AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), Texas
Jung B et al (2015) Investigation of hemodynamics in an in vitro system simulating left ventricular support through the right subclavian artery using 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150(1):200–207
Robson PM, Grant AK, Madhuranthakam AJ, Lattanzi R, Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA (2008) Comprehensive quantification of signal-to-noise ratio and g-factor for image-based and k-space-based parallel imaging reconstructions. Magn Reson Med 60(4):895–907
Sandino CM, Cheng JY, Chen F, Mardani M, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS (2020) Compressed sensing: from research to clinical practice with deep neural networks: shortening scan times for magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Signal Process Mag 37(1):117–127
Ha H, Park KJ, Dyverfeldt P, Ebbers T, Yang DH (2020) In vitro experiments on ICOSA6 4D flow MRI measurement for the quantification of velocity and turbulence parameters. Magn Reson Imaging 72:49–60
Castagna M et al (2021) Publisher Correction: An LDV based method to quantify the error of PC-MRI derived Wall Shear Stress measurement. Sci Rep 11(1):4112
Schnell S et al (2017) Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 46(1):102–114
Nett EJ et al (2012) Four-dimensional phase contrast MRI with accelerated dual velocity encoding. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1462–1471
Ha H et al (2016) Multi-VENC acquisition of four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI to improve precision of velocity field measurement. Magn Reson Med 75(5):1909–1919
Nilsson A, Markenroth Bloch K, Carlsson M, Heiberg E, Ståhlberg F (2012) Variable velocity encoding in a three-dimensional, three-directional phase contrast sequence: evaluation in phantom and volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(6):1450–1459
Strecker C, Harloff A, Wallis W, Markl M (2012) Flow-sensitive 4D MRI of the thoracic aorta: comparison of image quality, quantitative flow, and wall parameters at 1.5 T and 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(5):1097–1103
Schnell S et al (2014) k-t GRAPPA accelerated four-dimensional flow MRI in the aorta: effect on scan time, image quality, and quantification of flow and wall shear stress. Magn Reson Med 72(2):522–533
Yagi T et al (2013) Experimental insights into flow impingement in cerebral aneurysm by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry: transition from a laminar regime. J R Soc Interface 10(82):20121031
Ghigo AR, Lagrée P-Y, Fullana J-M (2018) A time-dependent non-Newtonian extension of a 1D blood flow model. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 253:36–49
Yilmaz F, Gundogdu MY (2008) A critical review on blood flow in large arteries; relevance to blood rheology, viscosity models, and phisiologic conditions. Korea-Austral Rheol J 20(4):197–211
Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ (2003) Blood rheology and hemodynamics. Semin Thromb Hemost 29:435–450
Sousa PC, Pinho FT, Oliveira MSN, Alves MA (2011) Extensional flow of blood analog solutions in microfluidic devices. Biomicrofluidics 5(1):014108
Deplano V, Knapp Y, Bailly L, Bertrand E (2014) Flow of a blood analogue fluid in a compliant abdominal aortic aneurysm model: experimental modelling. J Biomech 47(6):1262–1269
Moravia A et al (2022) In vitro flow study in a compliant abdominal aorta phantom with a non-Newtonian blood-mimicking fluid. J Biomech 130:110899
Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the Fondation De Reuter and by the Fondation Suisse de Cardiologie. The authors would like to thank Pierre Bouillot from the Department of Quantum Matter Physics of the University of Geneva for his contribution in the development of post-processing codes and for the initial design of the in vitro test bench. The authors are also grateful to Bénédicte Delattre from the Radiology department of the Geneva University Hospital for her valuable advice about PC-MRI sequences.
Funding
Open access funding provided by EPFL Lausanne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AS: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision. PR: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision. OB: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision. BJ: acquisition of data, critical revision. MF: study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision. MIV: study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors each declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sache, A., Reymond, P., Brina, O. et al. Near-wall hemodynamic parameters quantification in in vitro intracranial aneurysms with 7 T PC-MRI. Magn Reson Mater Phy 36, 295–308 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01082-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01082-2