Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields in Bangladesh compared to top twenty rice producing countries and emission reduction strategies

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture contribute to global warming. Total GHG emissions from paddy fields based on life cycle assessments are limited in developing countries because of data lacking. The amounts of carbon (C) emissions and GHG intensity have been evaluated for top 20 rice producing countries based on measured and review of literature for determining relative position of Bangladesh and delineating reduction strategies of GHG emissions from paddy fields. In 2018, the position of Bangladesh was 7th among top 20 rice producing countries in terms of methane (CH4) emission. Per capita CH4 emission because of rice cultivation was the highest in Cambodia followed by Thailand and 8th position for Bangladesh. The higher per capita GHG emissions were recorded in Thailand (1595.24 kg CO2 eq.) than in Cambodia (1517.21 kg CO2 eq.) and in Bangladesh, it was 706.72 kg CO2 eq. Greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) was the highest in China (5.87 kg kg−1) than in Thailand (3.91 kg kg−1) and in India (3.44 kg kg−1). Position of Bangladesh was 6th among top 20 rice producing countries in terms of total GHG emission for rice cultivation (9903.03 kg CO2 eq. ha−1). In Bangladesh, irrigation water management contributed about 30% of indirect GHG emission and that of fertilizers by about 6.5%. The balance between C inputs and outputs resulted in net emission by about 179.92 kg C ha−1 because of rice cultivation in Bangladesh. There were comparatively greater total GHG emissions from paddy fields in developed countries than in the least developed and developing countries. The GHG emissions could be minimized by adopting reduced tillage practices, alternate wetting and drying (AWD), fertilizer placement, suitable cropping patterns, high yielding short duration varieties, and integrated nutrient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam MM (2019) Study to find out extent and constraints of use of farm machineries developed by national institutes of Bangladesh to accelerate mechanization. Final Report, Krishi Gobeshona Foundation, Farmgate, Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • Arunrat N, Pumijumnong N (2017) Practices for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from rice production in northeast Thailand. Agriculture 7:4. https://doi.org/10.33990/agriculture7010004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber A (2004) Seven case study farms: total energy & carbon indicators for New Zealand arable & outdoor vegetable production. Agri LINK New Zealand Ltd, Pukekohe. http://www.agrilink.co.nz/Files/ArableVegetableEnergyUseMainReport.pdf

  • Baumert KA, Herzog T, Pershing (2005) Per capita emissions. Navigating the numbers: Greenhouse data and international climate policy. World Resources Inst., USA, pp. 21–24

  • Bautista EG, Saito M (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions from rice production in the Philippines based on life-cycle inventory analysis. J Food Agric Environ 13:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) (2020) Yearbook of agricultural statistics, 31st series, statistics and informatics division, Ministry of Planning. www.bbs.gov.bd

  • Begum K, Kuhnert M, Yeluripati JB, Ogle SM, Parton WJ, Williams SA, Pan G, Cheng K, Ali MA, Smith P (2019) Modelling greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potentials in fertilized paddy rice fields in Bangladesh. Geoderma 341:206–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braimoh A, Rawlins, Zhao Y, Loundu W (2017) Indicators for assessing policy and institutional frameworks for climate smart agriculture. Agriculture Global Practice Note, World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/28578/

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2011) Sustainable land management in practice: Guidelines and best practices for Sub-Saharan Africa. FAO, Rome, Italy

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2017) Global database of GHG emissions related to feed crops: a lifecycle inventory, version 1. Livestock environmental assessment and performance partnership. FAO, Rome, Italy

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2018) FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/

  • Farhad A (2020) Mechanising agriculture: Promise of better productivity. The Financial Express, 12 June, 2020.https://thefinancialexpress.co.bd/views/

  • FMECD (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2014) Post-harvest losses of rice in Nigeria and their ecological footprint. Deutsche Gesellschaftfür, Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Bon und Eschborn, Germany

  • Fraenkel PL (1986) Water lifting devices, FAO irrigation and drainage paper 43. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • Fuchs A, Lyaute E, Montuelle B, Casper P (2016) Effects of increasing temperatures on methane concentrations and methanogenesis during experimental incubation of sediments from oligotrophic and mesotrophic lakes. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 121:394–1406. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaihr YK, Singh U, Huda A, Islam SMM, Islam MR, Biswas JC, DeWald J (2016) Nitrogen use efficiency, crop productivity and environmental impacts of urea deep placement in lowland rice fields. In: Proceedings of international nitrogen initiative conference on solutions to improve nitrogen use efficiency for the world; 4–8 Dec 2016, Melbourne, Australia. www.ini2016.com

  • Gathorne-Hardy A, Reddy DN, Venkatanarayana M, Harris-White B (2013) A life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas emissions from SRI and flooded rice production in SE India. Taiwan Water Conser 61:110–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh I (2020) A global breakdown of greenhouse gas emissions by sector: Energy. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ Accessed 05 August 2021

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC (2021) Emission factors and global warming potential as influenced by fertilizer management for the cultivation of rice under varied growing seasons. Environ Res 197:111156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Kim GW, Kim PJ, Kim SY (2016a) Comparison of net global warming potential between continuous flooding and midseason drainage in monsoon region paddy during rice cropping. Field Crops Res 193:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC, Kim SY, Kim PJ (2016b) Suppressing methane emission and global warming potential from rice fields through intermittent drainage and green biomass amendment. Soil Use Manag 32:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC, Kim SY, Kim PJ (2017a) Intermittent drainage in paddy soil: ecosystem carbon budget and global warming potential. Paddy Water Environ 15:403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC, Maniruzzaman M, Choudhury AK, Naher UA, Hossain MB, Akhter S, Ahmed F, Kalra N (2017b) Greenhouse gas emissions from selected cropping patterns and adaptation strategies in Bangladesh. In J Develop Res 7:16832–16838

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC, Islam MR, Kabir MS (2019) Effect of long-term chemical and organic fertilization on rice productivity, nutrient use-efficiency, and balance under a rice-fallow-rice system. J Plant Nutri 42:2901–2914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC, Maniruzaman M, Akhter S, Kabir MS (2020a) Carbon sequestration in paddy soil as influenced by organic and inorganic amendments. Carbon Manag 11:231–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC, Hwang HY, Kim PJ (2020b) Annual net carbon budget in rice soil. Nutr Cyc Agroecosyst 116:31–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haque MM, Biswas JC, Maniruzzaman M, Hossain MB, Islam MR (2021) Water management and soil amendment for reducing emission factor and global warming potential but improving rice yield. Paddy Water Environ 19:515–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan K, Ali MR, Saha CK, Ala MM, Hossain MM (2019) Assessment of paddy harvesting practices of southern delta region in Bangladesh. Prog Agric 30:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasukawa H, Inoda Y, Toritsuka S, Sudo S, Oura N, Sano T, Shirato Y, Yanai J (2021) Effect of paddy-upland rotation system on the net greenhouse gas balance as the sum of methane and nitrous oxide emissions and soil carbon storage: A case in western Japan. Agric 11:52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman B (2016) Field to market: the alliance for sustainable agriculture. In: Environmental and socioeconomic indicators for measuring outcomes of on farm agricultural production in the United State, 3rd edn. ISBN: 978-0-692-81902-9

  • Hossain MB, Rahman MM, Biswas JC, Miah MMU, Akhter S, Maniruzzaman M, Choudhury AK, Ahmed F, Shiragi MHK, Kalra N (2017) Carbon mineralization and carbon dioxide emission from organic matter added soil under different temperature regimes. Intl J Recycl Organic Waste Agric 6:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou H, Peng S, Xu J, Yang S, Mao Z (2012) Seasonal variations of CH4 and N2O emissions in response to water management of paddy fields located in Southeast China. Chemosphere 89:884–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Zhang W, Sun WJ, Zheng XH (2007) Net primary production of Chinese croplands from 1950–1999. Ecol Appl 17:692–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Cao CG, Zhan M, Li CF, Iqbal J (2015) Changes of CO2 emission and labile organic carbon as influenced by rice straw and different water regimes. Intl J Environ Sci Tech 12:263–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ijaz M, Goheer MA (2021) Emission profile of Pakistan’s agriculture: past trends and future projections. Environ Dev Sust 23:1668–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1–151

  • Islam SMM, Gaihre YK, Biswas JC, Singh U, Ahmed MN, Sanabrina J, Saleque MA (2018a) Nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from lowland rice cultivation with urea deep placement and alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Sci Reports 8:17623

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam SF, van Groenigen JW, Jensen LS, Sander BO, de Neergaard A (2018b) The effective mitigation of greenhouse emissions from rice paddies without compromising yield by early-season drainage. Sci Total Environ 612:1329–1339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Islam SMM, Gaihre YK, Islam MR, Akter M, Mahmud AA, Singh U, Sander BO (2020) Effects of water management on greenhouse gas emissions from farmers’ rice fields in Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ 734:139382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimmy AN, Khan NA, Hossain MN, Sujauddin M (2017) Evaluation of the environmental impacts of rice paddy production using life cycle assessment: case study in Bangladesh. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:1691–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall BSA, Mohamadi Y, Arslan A, Yuan J, Lee I, Linquist B (2014) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in California rice production. Field Crops Res 169:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DG, Thomas AD, Rosenstock TS, Sanz-Cobena A (2015) Reviews and synthesis: Greenhouse gas emissions in natural and agricultural lands in sub-Saharan Africa: synthesis of available data and suggestions for further studies. Biogeosci Discuss 12:16479–16526

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M, Murase J, Lu Y (2004) Carbon cycling in rice field ecosystems in the context of input, decomposition and translation of organic materials and the fates of their end products (CO2 and CH4). Soil Biol Biochem 36:1399–1416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lean G (2008) Ancient skills “Cloud Reverse Global Warming”. The Indipendent, 7 Nov. 2008

  • Li CS (2000) Modeling trace gas emissions from agricultural ecosystems. Nutr Cyc Agroecosys 58:259–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental change. Biosci 61:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linquist B, van Groenigen KJ, Adviento-Borbe MA, Pittelkow C, van Kessel C (2012) An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Glob Change Biol 18:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Li Z, Zhang T, Liang Y (2004) CO2 emissions from subtropical arable soils of China. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1835–1842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma YC, Kong XW, Yang B, Zhang XL, Yan XY, Yang JC, Xiong ZQ (2012) Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity of annual rice-wheat rotations with integrated soil-crop system management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 164:209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal B, Majumder B, Adhya T, Bandyopadhay P, Gangopadhyay A, Sarker D, Kundu M, Choudhury SG, Hazra G, Kundu S (2008) Potential of double-cropped rice ecology to conserve organic carbon under subtropical climate. Glob Change Biol 14:2139–2151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Mushtaq S, Maroulis J (2009) Greenhouse gas emissions from rice farming inputs: a cross-country assessment. J Agril Sci 147:117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mungkung R, Sitthikitpanya S, Dangsiri S, Gheewala SH (2020) Life cycle assessment of Thai Hom Mali rice to support the policy decision on organic farming area expansion. Sustainability 12:6003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naher UA, Biswas JC, Maniruzzaman M, Khan FH, Sarker MIU, Jahan A, Hera MHR, Hossain MB, Islam A, Islam MR, Kabir MS (2021) Bio-organic fertilizer: a green technology to reduce synthetic N and P fertilizer for rice production. Front Plant Sci 12:602052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nasim M, Shahidullah SM, Saha A, Muttaleb MA, Aditya TL, Ali MA, Kabir MS (2017) Distribution of crops and cropping patterns in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Rice J 21:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCV (National Communication of Vietnam) (2021) Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Ministry of Natural resources and environment. https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/SubmissionsStaging/NationalReports/Documents/260315Viet%20Nam-NC3-2–Viet%20Nam%20-%20NC3.pdf

  • Oliver JGJ, Peters JAHW (2020) The trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2019 report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, PBL pub number: 4069, pp 1–70

  • Pandey S, Yadav S, Hellin J, Balié J, Bhandari H, Kumar A, Mondal MK (2020) Why technologies often fail to scale: Policy and market failures behind limited scaling of alternate wetting and drying in rice in Bangladesh. Water 12:1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathi T, Vanitha K, Mohandas S, Vered E (2019) Mitigation of methane gas emission in rice by drip irrigation. F1000 Res 9:2023

  • Parveen S, Nakagoshi N (2001) An analysis of pesticide use for rice pest management in Bangladesh. J Int Dev Coop 8:107–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak H, Li C, Wassmann R (2005) Greenhouse gas emissions from Indian rice fields: calibration and upscaling using the DNDC model. Biogeosci 2:113–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quddus A, Kropp JD (2020) Constraints to agricultural production and marketing in the lagging regions of Bangladesh. Sustainability 12:3956

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothausen SGSA, Conway D (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions from energy use in the water sector. Nature Clim Chan 1:210–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahakian AB, Jee SR, Pimentel M (2010) Methane and the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci 55:2135–2143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schonhardt S (2021) China’s greenhouse gas emissions exceed those al other developed countries combined: An ongoing build out of coal-fired power plants is one big reason. https://www.Scientificamerican.com. Accessed 15 May 2021

  • Shah T (2009) Climate change and ground water: India’s opportunities for mitigation and adaptation. Environ Res Lett 4:035005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh J, Kashyap A (1999) Methane flux from irrigated rice fields in relation to crop growth and N-fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1219–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Lanigan G, Kutsch WL, Buchmann N, Eugster W, Aubinet M, Ceschi E, Béziat P, Yeluripati JB, Osborne B, Moors EJ, Brut A, Wattenbach M, Saunders M, Jones M (2010) Measurements necessary for assessing the net ecosystem carbon budget of croplands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA et al (2014) Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K et al (eds) Climate change 214: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the 5th assessment report of the IPCC on climate change. Cambridge Univ Press, New York

  • Van Huang N, Migo MV, Quilloy R, Chivenge P, Gummert M (2020) Life cycle assessment applied in rice production and residue management. In: Gummert M, Hung N, Chivenge P, Douthwaite B (eds) Sustainable rice straw management, Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32373-8_10

  • Vetter SH, Sapkota TB, Hillier J, Stirling CM, Macdiamid JI, Aleksandrowicz L, Green R, Joye EJM, Dangoure AD, Smith P (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural food production to supply Indian diets: implications for climate change mitigation. Agric Ecosys Environ 237:234–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vo TBT, Wassmann R, Mai VT, Vu DQ, Bui TPL, Vu TH, Dinh QH, Yen BT, Asch F, Sander BO (2020) Climate 8:74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Xia X, Zhang Q, Liu J (2010) Life cycle assessment of rice production system in Taihu region, China. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 17:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Rothausen SGSA, Conway D, Zhang L, Xiong W, Holman IP, Li Y (2012) China’s water-energy nexus: greenhouse-gas emissions from groundwater use for agriculture. Environ Res Lett 7:014035 (10pp). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014035

  • WB (World Bank) (2021) CO2 emissions (metric tons per capita). https://data.Worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC

  • Win KT, Nonaka R, Win AT, Sasada Y, Toyota K, Motobayashi T (2013) Effects of water saving irrigation and rice variety on greenhouse gas emissions and water use efficiency in a paddy field fertilized with anaerobically digested pig slurry. Paddy Water Environ 13:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Win EP, Win KK, Bellingrath-Kimura SD, Oo AZ (2020) Greenhouse gas emissions, grain yield and water productivity: a paddy rice field case study based in Myanmar. Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol 10:884–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Data (2021) Greenhouse gas emissions by country. https://www.Worldata.Info/greenhouse-gas-by-country.php

  • WRI (World Resources Institute) (2021) Navigating the numbers: greenhouse gas data and international climate policy—part 1, Chapter 4-Per capita emissions. http://pdf.wri.org/navigating_numbers_chapter4.pdf

  • Zhang X, Fan C, Ma Y, Liu Y, Li L, Zhou Q, Xiong Z (2014) Two approaches for net ecosystem carbon budgets and soil carbon sequestration in a rice-wheat rotation system in China. Nutr Cyc Agroecosyst 100:301–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Shen J, Zhang F, Li Y, Zhang W (2017) Carbon footprint of grain production in China. Sci Reports 7:4126

    Google Scholar 

  • Zschornack T, da Rosa CM, Pedroso GM, Marcolin E, da Silva PRF, Bayer C (2016) Mitigation of yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions in subtropical paddy rice under alternative irrigation systems. Nutr Cyc Agroecosyst 105:61–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zschornack T, da Rosa CM, dos Reis CES, Pedroso GM, Camargo ES, dos Santos DC, Boeni M, Bayer C (2018) Soil CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddy fields in Souther Brazil as affected by crop management levels: a three-year field study. Rev Bras. Ciênc Solo 42. https://doi.org/10.1590/18069657rbcs20170306

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was supported by Krishi Gobeshona Foundation through CRP-II project, second phase, Bangladesh Rice Research Institute and Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Mozammel Haque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biswas, J.C., Mamiruzzaman, M., Haque, M.M. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields in Bangladesh compared to top twenty rice producing countries and emission reduction strategies. Paddy Water Environ 20, 381–393 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-022-00899-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-022-00899-2

Keywords

Navigation