Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Production efficiency of rice farms in Thailand and Cambodia: a comparative analysis of Ubon Ratchathani and Stung Treng provinces

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rice farmers in developing countries need to increase production efficiency in order to meet a growing rice demand. To identify and compare the determinants of rice production efficiency at different stages of economic development, a one-stage stochastic frontier model is applied to a cross-sectional dataset collected in 2013 of 623 households in Ubon Ratchathani (Thailand) and 407 households in Stung Treng (Cambodia). The results indicate that the average level of rice production efficiency is 72 % in Thailand and 64 % in Cambodia. There are a number of factors that commonly affect the production efficiency in both countries. These factors are the farm size, per capita income, amount of agricultural credit, degree of commercialization, and share of nonfarm income. However, there are also a number of country-specific factors that are unique to the respective environments. These factors are the distance to fields, mechanization, agricultural assets, share of remittances, education of household heads, and distance to town in Thailand, and household size in Cambodia. These findings suggest that promoting the development of household capital, access to rural infrastructure as well as the specialization and commercialization of rice production would contribute to increasing production efficiency of rice farms in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the original paper, Farrell (1957) refers to these concepts as technical, price, and overall efficiency.

  2. PPP: Purchasing Power Parity.

  3. In fact, the data show that villages in Stung Treng have less access to transport, water, and energy infrastructure.

References

  • Abdulai A, Eberlin R (2001) Technical efficiency during economic reform in Nicaragua: evidence from farm household survey data. Econ Syst 25:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger VN (2003) Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79:387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed MM, Gebremedhin B, Benin S, Ehui S (2002) Measurement and sources of technical efficiency of land tenure contracts in Ethiopia. Environ Dev Econ 7(3):507–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner D, Lovell CA, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley C, Carney D (1999) Sustainable livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. DFID, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman S, Islam KZ, Sumelius J (2011) Determinants of technical efficiency of rice farms in North-Central and North-Western regions in Bangladesh. J Dev Areas 45:73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir Econ 20:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger HP, Khandker SR, Rosenzweig MR (1993) How infrastructure and financial institutions affect agricultural output and investment in India. J Dev Econ 41:337–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler D, Grote U, Hartje R, Ker B, Do TL, Nguyen LD, Nguyen TT, Tong K (2015) Rural livelihood strategies in Cambodia: Evidence from a household survey in Stung Treng. ZEF Working Paper 137, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn

  • Chaovanapoonphol YK, Battese GE, Chang HS (2009) The impact of agricultural loans on the technical efficiency of rice farmers in the upper north of Thailand. In: Lee PJD, Heshmati PA (eds) Productivity, Efficiency, and Economic Growth in the Asia-Pacific Region. Physica-Verlag, HD, pp 279–295

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer, Newyork

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornia GA (1985) Farm size, land yields and the agricultural production function: an analysis for fifteen developing countries. World Dev 13:513–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doi R, Mizoguchi M (2013) Feasibility of system of rice intensification practices in natural and socioeconomic contexts in Thailand. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 20:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorward A, Kydd J, Morrison J, Poulton C (2005) Institutions, markets and economic co-ordination: linking development policy to theory and praxis. Dev Change 36:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duangbootsee U, Myers RJ (2014) Technical efficiency of Thai jasmine rice farmers: Comparing price support program participants and non-participants. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis

  • Ellis F (1998) Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. J Dev Stud 35:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015) The state of food insecurity in the World 2015. Taking stock of uneven progress, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc 120:253–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth T, Evans N (2013) What is autonomous adoption? Resource scarcity and smallholder agency in Thailand. World Dev 43:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat Med 27:2865–2873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giné X (2011) Access to capital in rural Thailand: an estimated model of formal vs. informal credit. J Dev Econ 96:16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorian D, Melkonyan TA (2008) Microeconomic implications of remittances in an overlapping generations model with altruism and self-interest. Rochester, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote U (2014) Can we improve global food security? A socio-economic and political perspective. Food Security 6:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR, Lien G (2004) Coping with risk in agriculture. CABI Publishing, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardeweg B, Klasen S, Waibel H (2013) Establishing a database for vulnerability assessment. In: Klasen S, Waibel H (eds) Vulnerability to poverty: Theory, measurement, and determinants. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 50–79

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa T, Sawano S, Goto S, Konghakote P, Polthanee A, Ishigooka Y, Kuwagata T, Toritani H, Furuya Y (2008) A model driven by crop water use and nitrogen supply for simulating changes in the regional yield of rainfed lowland rice in Northeast Thailand. Paddy Water Environ 6:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellin J, Lundy M, Meijer M (2009) Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food Policy 34:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang V, Nguyen TT (2013) Analyses of environmental efficiency variations: a nutrient balance approach. Ecol Econ 86:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoanh CH, Facon T, Thuon T, Bastakoti RC, Francois M, Phengphaengsy F (2009) Irrigation in the Lower Mekong Basin countries: The beginning of a new era? In: Molle F, Foran T, Kakonen M (eds) Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: hydropower, livelihoods and governance. Earthscan, London, pp 143–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda H, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J, Ouk M, Bunna L (2008) Assessment of management of direct seeded rice production under different water conditions in Cambodia. Paddy Water Environ 6:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam A, Ouch C, Smyth R, Wang LC (2014) The long-term effects of civil conflicts on education, earnings and fertility: Evidence from Cambodia. Monash University, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen HG, Rodriguez A, Damon A, Pender J, Chenier J, Schipper R (2006) Determinants of income-earning strategies and adoption of conservation practices in hillside communities in rural Honduras. Agric Syst 88:92–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janvry A, Sadoulet E (2001) Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: the role of off-farm activities. World Dev 29:467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen RT (2010) Information, efficiency, and welfare in agricultural markets. Agric Econ 41:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly V, Adesina AA, Gordon A (2003) Expanding access to agricultural inputs in Africa: a review of recent market development experience. Food Policy 28:379–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiatpathomchai S, Schmitz PM, Babu TA, Thongrak S (2008) Investigating external effects of shrimp farming on rice farming in southern Thailand: a technical efficiency approach. Paddy Water Environ 6:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klasen S, Waibel H (2015) Vulnerability to poverty in South-East Asia: drivers, measurement, responses, and policy issues. World Dev 71:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krongkaew M (2004) The development of the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS): real promise or false hope? J Asian Econ 15:977–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Wang HJ, Horncastle A (2015) A practitioner’s guide to stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakkakula P, Dixon BL, Thomsen MR, Wailes EJ, Danforth DM (2015) Global rice trade competitiveness: a shift-share analysis. Agric Econ 46:667–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambini CK, Nguyen TT (2014) A comparative analysis of the effects of institutional property rights on forest livelihoods and forest conditions: evidence from Ghana and Vietnam. For Policy Econ 38:178–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins RA (2002) Collective bargaining by farmers: time for a fresh look? Choices 16:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Limão N, Venables AJ (2001) Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Econ Rev 15:451–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ly S, Aldaz-Carroll E (2014) Cambodia economic update : Clear skies. The World Bank, Tamilnadu

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W, Van den Broeck J (1977) Technical efficiency and dimension of the firm: some results on the use of frontier production functions. Empirical Economics 2:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak Y, Larson DF, Butzer R (2004) Agricultural dynamics in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines. Aust J Agric Res Econ 48:95–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muto M, Yamano T (2009) The impact of mobile phone coverage expansion on market participation: panel data evidence from Uganda. World Dev 37:1887–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narh P, Lambini CK, Sabbi M, Pham VD, Nguyen TT (2016) Land sector reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: a comparative analysis of their effectiveness. Land 5:8. doi:10.3390/land5020008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT (2008) The impact of land reform on farm households in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam. Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT (2012) Land reform and farm production in the Northern Uplands of Vietnam. Asian Econ J 26:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen NV, Ferrero A (2006) Meeting the challenges of global rice production. Paddy Water Environ 4:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Koellner T, Le QB, Lambini CK, Choi I, Shin H, Pham VD (2014) An economic analysis of reforestation with a native tree species: the case of Vietnamese farmers. Biodivers Conserv 23:811–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Do TL, Bühler D, Hartje R, Grote U (2015) Rural livelihoods and environmental resource dependence in Cambodia. Ecol Econ 120:282–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Bauer S, Grote U (2016) Does land tenure security promote manure use by farm households in Vietnam? Sustainability 8(178):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen ØJ, Rayamajhi S, Uberhuaga P, Meilby H, Smith-Hall C (2013) Quantifying rural livelihood strategies in developing countries using an activity choice approach. Agric Econ 44:57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parente SL, Prescott EC (1994) Barriers to technology adoption and development. J Polit Econ 102:298–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali PL, Rosegrant MW (1995) Agricultural commercialization and diversification: processes and policies. Food Policy 20:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piya S, Kiminami A, Yagi H (2012) Comparing the technical efficiency of rice farms in urban and rural areas: a case study from Nepal. Trends Agric Econ 5:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman S, Hasan MK (2008) Impact of environmental production conditions on productivity and efficiency: a case study of wheat farmers in Bangladesh. J Environ Manage 88:1495–1504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renkow M, Hallstrom DG, Karanja DD (2004) Rural infrastructure, transaction costs and market participation in Kenya. J Dev Econ 73:349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JW (2011) Challenges of adopting the use of technology in less developed countries: the case of Cambodia. Comparative Education Review 55:8–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios AR, Shively GE (2005) Farm size and nonparametric efficiency measurements for coffee farms in Vietnam. American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI

  • Ruttan VW (2002) Productivity growth in world agriculture: sources and constraints. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16:161–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sam S, Shinogi Y (2015) Performance assessment of farmer water user community: a case study in Stung Chinit irrigation system, Cambodia. Paddy Water Environ 13:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel A, Giampietro M, Ramos-Martin J (2013) Self-sufficiency or surplus: conflicting local and national rural development goals in Cambodia. Land Use Policy 34:342–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Brighton

  • Seck PA, Diagne A, Mohanty S, Wopereis MCS (2012) Crops that feed the world 7: rice. Food Security 4:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RE (1980) Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. J Econ 13:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki K, Goto A, Mizutani M, Sriboonlue V (2003) Simulation model of rainfed rice production on sloping land in northeast Thailand. Paddy Water Environ 1:91–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teamsuwan V, Satoh M (2009) Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand. Paddy Water Environ 7:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanh Nguyen T, Hoang V, Seo B (2012) Cost and environmental efficiency of rice farms in South Korea. Agric Econ 43:369–378. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00589.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiam A, Bravo-Ureta BE, Rivas TE (2001) Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: a meta-analysis. Agric Econ 25:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian W, Wan GH (2000) Technical efficiency and its determinants in China’s grain production. J Prod Anal 13:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (The United Nations—Department of Economic and Social Affairs) (2005) Designing household survey samples: Practical guidelines. New York

  • UNDP (2014) Human Development Report 2014: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerability and building resilience. New York

  • Villano R, Fleming E (2006) Technical inefficiency and production risk in rice farming: evidence from Central Luzon Philippines. Asian Economic Journal 20:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Braun J, Bos SM (2005) The changing economics and politics of rice: Implications for food security, globalization and environmental sustainability.” In K. Toriyama, K.L. Heong, and B. Hardy (eds) Rice is life: scientific perspectives for the 21st century. http://www.irri.org/publications/wrrc/wrrcPDF/keynote07.pdf

  • Von Grebmer K, Saltzman A, Birol E, Wiesmann D, Prasai N, Yin S, Yohannes Y, Menon P (2014) Global hunger index: The challenge of hidden hunger., Washington, DC

  • Vong J, Fang J, Insu S (2012) Delivering financial services through mobile phone technology: a pilot study on impact of mobile money service on micro-entrepreneurs in rural Cambodia. Int J Inf Syst Change Manage 6:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HJ (2002) Heteroscedasticity and non-monotonic efficiency effects of a stochastic frontier model. J Prod Anal 18:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2015) Data: Thailand (http://data.worldbank.org/country/thailand) (accessed September 9, 2015)

  • Wouterse F (2010) Migration and technical efficiency in cereal production: evidence from Burkina Faso. Agric Econ 41:385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y (1995) Productivity growth, technological progress, and technical efficiency change in China: a three-sector analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics 21:207–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka K, Tomosho T, Mizoguchi M, Sugiura M (2008) Social capital accumulation through public policy systems implementing paddy irrigation and rural development projects. Paddy Water Environ, 6:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao S (1997) Comparative advantages and crop diversification: a policy analysis matrix for Thai agriculture. J Agric Econ 48:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu B, Fan S (2011) Rice production response in Cambodia. Agric Econ 42:437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the farmers in Ubon Ratchathani and Stung Treng for their support and cooperation and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments. We acknowledge the financial support of the German Research Foundation (DFG—FOR 756).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Leibniz University Hannover, Königsworther Platz 1, 30167, Hannover, Germany

    Axel Ebers, Trung Thanh Nguyen & Ulrike Grote

Authors
  1. Axel Ebers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Trung Thanh Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ulrike Grote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trung Thanh Nguyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebers, A., Nguyen, T.T. & Grote, U. Production efficiency of rice farms in Thailand and Cambodia: a comparative analysis of Ubon Ratchathani and Stung Treng provinces. Paddy Water Environ 15, 79–92 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0530-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-016-0530-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation