Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of steady- and unsteady-state drainage equations for determination of subsurface drain spacing in paddy fields: a case study in Northern Iran

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Northern Iran paddy fields, waterlogging is a serious problem. Provision of subsurface drainage seems to be a prerequisite for optimal crop production. Considering specific characteristics of the paddies, application of a suitable equation for planning of subsurface drainage systems is of great importance. In this study, five steady-state equations including Hooghoudt, Kirkham, Dagan, Ernst, and Ernst–Hooghoudt; and three unsteady-state equations including Glover–Dumm, Van-Shilfgard, and De-zeeuw–Hellinga were implemented to compute drain spacing. Required field data were obtained from 52 ha of paddy fields of “Haraz Human-Agriculture Resources Development Center,” located in Mazandaran province of Iran. The computed drain spacings were evaluated using dynamic equilibrium concept and DRAINMOD model. The minimum and maximum drain spacings were found to be 26 and 63 m corresponding to Glover–Dumm and Ernst equations, respectively. Based on the dynamic equilibrium concept, the averages of the computed water table depths for the drain spacings obtained by the unsteady-state equations were 0.5–0.63 m as compared with those obtained by the steady-state methods which were in the range of 0–0.43 m. According to the DRAINMOD model simulations, the maximum relative yield was 80.2 % which was obtained when the drain spacing was 26 m and it reduced to 73.5 % when the drain spacing was increased to 63 m. The computed drain spacings suggested by the unsteady-state equations were found to be more suitable than those obtained from the steady-state equations for the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ale S, Bowling LC, Brouder SM, Frankenberger JR, Youssef MA (2009) Simulated effect of drainage water management operational strategy on hydrology and crop yield for Drummer soil in the Midwestern United States. Agric Water Manag 96:653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayars JE, Christen EW, Hornbuckle JW (2006) Controlled drainage for improved water management in arid regions irrigated agriculture. Agric Water Manag 86:128–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JR, Fouss JL (1988) Rainfall probability forecasts used to manage a subdrainage-subirrigation system for watertable control. Agric Water Manag 15:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JW, McFarlane DJ, Skaggs RW (1994) Field evaluation of DRAINMOD for predicting waterlogging intensity and drain performance in South-Western Australia. Aust J Soil Res 32:653–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi A, Ejlali F, Ahmadi MZ, Najafi G (2007) The suitability of controlled drainage and subirrigation in paddy fields. Pak J Biol Sci 10(3):492–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garg KK, Das BS, Safeeq M, Bhadoria PBS (2009) Measurement and modeling of soil water regime in a lowland paddy field showing preferential transport. Agric Water Manag 96:1705–1714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbac-Cotoara R (2009) Results obtained in drainage arrangements designed by using drainspace application. Res J Agric Sci 41(1):426–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbaan RJ (1994) Agricultural drainage criteria. In: Ritzema HP (ed) Drainage principles and applications, ILRI publication 16, 2nd edn. Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbaan RJ (2002) Drainage research in farmer fields: analysis of data, part of project “Liquid Gold” of the International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI). Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzema HP (1994) Subsurface flows to drains. In: Ritzema HP (ed) Drainage principles and applications ILRI Publ. 16. Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 283–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar O, Wesstrom I, Youssef MA, Skaggs RW, Joel A (2009) Evaluation of the DRAINMOD–N II model for predicting nitrogen losses in a loamy sand under cultivation in south-east Sweden. Agric Water Manag 9(6):267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh PK, Singh OP, Jaiswal CS, Chauhan HS (1999) Subsurface drainage of a three layered soil with slowly permeable top layer. Agric Water Manag 42:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Helmers MJ, Qi Z (2006) Calibration and validation of DRAINMOD to design subsurface drainage systems for Iowa’s tile landscapes. Agric Water Manag 85:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Helmers MJ, Crumpton WG, Lemke DW (2007) Predicting effects of drainage water management in Iowa’s subsurface drained landscapes. Agric Water Manag 92:162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW (1980) Drainmod reference report, methods for design and evaluation of drainage water management systems for soils with high water tables. USDA, SCS, North Carolina State University, Raliegh, p 185

    Google Scholar 

  • USBR (US Bureau of Reclamation) (1978) Drainage manual. US Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • van Beers WFJ (1976) Computing drain spacing, a generalized method with special reference to sensitivity analysis and geo-hydrological investigations. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRI, Bulletin 15, p 32

  • Wang X, Mosley CT, Frankenberger JR, Kladivko EJ (2005) Subsurface drain flow and crop yield predictions for different drain spacings using DRAINMOD. Agric Water Manag 79:113–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X (2008) Evaluation and application of DRAINMOD in an Australian sugarcane field. Agric Water Manag 95:439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Iran–Japan project in northern Iran (CAPIC) for giving their site for the investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Darzi-Naftchally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darzi-Naftchally, A., Mirlatifi, S.M. & Asgari, A. Comparison of steady- and unsteady-state drainage equations for determination of subsurface drain spacing in paddy fields: a case study in Northern Iran. Paddy Water Environ 12, 103–111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-013-0364-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-013-0364-4

Keywords

Navigation