Skip to main content
Log in

In-crisis delivery rate: a novel measure of success in communal water management

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of the plethora of studies that discuss requirements for successful irrigation management, few pay close attention to what actually happens when the supply of water becomes extremely low. Such an oversight in the literature is unfortunate, because this is precisely when management matters. To understand what separates success from failure in irrigation management at times of critical water shortages, the authors conducted emergency fieldwork in February 2010 along four major irrigation channels in a drought-stricken rice-growing area within the Chinese province of Yunnan. Separately, satellite images of the four villages dated February 2009 and February 2010 were jointly analysed to produce a novel indicator for a village’s success in water management. Called the in-crisis delivery rate, this indicator compares water delivery between normal and drought years and directly evaluates performance in water management during crisis periods. The results led to an unexpected discovery that, contrary to common expectations, the only village of the present study that deployed a traditional earthen water channel secured substantially more water throughout the drought period than those with concrete-lined channels. It is hypothesised that the labour intensive, rather than capital intensive, nature of repair work of the earthen channel enabled flexible operations, and hence had the comparative advantage under a skilled management team. This result confirms the importance of daily maintenance work, which tends to occur less often after modernisation of water paths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal RM, Narayan TA (2004) Does inequality lead to greater efficiency in the use of local commons? The role of strategic investments in capacity. J Environ Econ Manag 47:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland JM, Platteau JP (1997) Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons. Part I: the unregulated case. Oxford Econ Pap 49:451–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland JM, Platteau JP (1998) Wealth inequality and efficiency in the commons. Part II: the regulated case. Oxford Econ Pap 50:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland JM, Platteau JP (1999) The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management. World Dev 27:773–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P (1993) Analytics of the institutions of informal cooperation in rural development. World Dev 21:633–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P (2000) Irrigation and cooperation: an empirical analysis of 48 irrigation communities in south India. Econ Dev Cult Change 48:847–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Broadcasting Corporation (2010) Severe drought hits south-west china. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7899086.stm. Accessed 1 Sept 2010

  • Dayton-Johnson J (2000) Determinants of collective action on the local commons: a model with evidence from Mexico. J Dev Econ 62:181–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton-Johnson J, Bardhan P (2002) Inequality and conservation on the local commons: a theoretical exercise. Econ J 112:577–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujiie M, Hayami Y, Kikuchi M (2005) The conditions of collective action for local commons management: the case of irrigation in the Philippines. Agr Econ 33:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspart F, Jabbar M, Melard C, Platteau JP (1998) Participation in the construction of a local public good with indivisibilities: an application to watershed development in Ethiopia. J Afr Econ 7:157–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton RQ (2000) Governance of the commons: a role for the state? Land Econ 76:504–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones EC (2004) Wealth-based trust and the development of collective action. World Dev 32:691–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam WF (1996a) Institutional design of public agencies and coproduction: a study of irrigation associations in Taiwan. World Dev 24:1039–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam WF (1996b) Improving the performance of small-scale irrigation systems: the effects of technological investments and governance structure on irrigation performance in Nepal. World Dev 24:1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam WF (2001) Coping with change: a study of local irrigation institutions in Taiwan. World Dev 29:1569–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather PM, Koch M (2011) Computer processing of remotely-sensed images: an introduction. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzen-Dick R, Raju KV, Gulati A (2002) What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Dev 30:649–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto K, Yamamoto T, Anyoji H (2004) Crisis management of water shortage in an irrigation area with a pipeline network system. Paddy Water Environ 2:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Climatic Data Center (2010) NNDC climate data online: global average of the day data series. http://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/CDO/cdodata.cmd. Accessed 1 Sept 2010

  • Ostrom E (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J Econ Perspect 14:137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ounvicht T (2011) Equal water sharing in scarcity conditions: the case of the Chaisombat Muang Fai irrigation systems in Thailand. Paddy Water Environ 9:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shioda K, Onimaru T (2007) Successful factors and activation theory/concept of water users’ organization: based on the MWMS project in Thailand. Paddy Water Environ 5:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R (1984) Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contributions. Econ J 94:772–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Y, Sato Y (2003) An institutional case study of Japanese water users association: towards successful participatory irrigation management. Paddy Water Environ 1:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teamsuwan V, Satoh M (2009) Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand. Paddy Water Environ 7:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade R, Seckler D (1990) Priority issues in the management of irrigation systems. In: Sampath RK, Young A (eds) Social, economic, and institutional issues in third world irrigation management. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • White TA, Runge CF (1995) The emergence and evolution of collective action: lessons from watershed management in Haiti. World Dev 23:1683–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuanyang County Government (2010) Outline of Yuanyang County. http://www.ynf.gov.cn/canton_model1/newsview.aspx?id=758879. Accessed 1 Sept 2010

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-aid (#21405025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taro Takahashi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 51842 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, T., Aizaki, H., Sato, T. et al. In-crisis delivery rate: a novel measure of success in communal water management. Paddy Water Environ 11, 503–511 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-012-0341-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-012-0341-3

Keywords

Navigation