Skip to main content
Log in

Helical CT findings and clinicopathologic features in malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the correlation between radiologic appearance and malignant potential

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

In this pictorial essay, we described the clinical, pathologic, and computed tomographic (CT) findings of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (MGISTs) and attempt to establish the correlation between radiologic appearance and malignant potential.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 20 patients receiving treatment for MGIST between 2008 and 2010. The diagnosis was established by pathology and immunohistochemistry. All these patients underwent preoperative CT. Clinical presentation, pathology and CT images were analyzed. Helical CT images were reviewed for morphologic features such as tumor size, number and location, tumor margins, necrosis, degree of enhancement and metastasis.

Results

Gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain and discomfort, and without clinical symptom were common findings and were observed in 9 (45%), 6 (30%), and 5 (25%) of the 20 patients. 8 (40%) tumors were located in stomach, and 10 (50%), 1 (5%) and 1 (5%) were located in small intestine, mesentery and peritoneum, respectively. Male to female ratio was about 1:2. The size of MGIST ranged from 2.6 cm to 17.5 cm with a mean of 8.7 cm. All tumors density was inhomogeneous and heterogeneous enhancement. MGISTs with highly malignant located in small intestine were about 30% higher than stomach. The “satellite” tumours were found in 6 cases with high malignant risk. 7 cases were suffered from liver metastasis, and 4 cases went with seeding into the abdominal cavity, 1 cases went with lymph node metastasis. Histologically, 19 cases (95%) were of spindle cell type. Immunohistochemical stains demonstrated a strong positivity for both c-kit (CD117) and CD34s enhancement in 19 (95%).

Conclusion

Clinical expression is varied in MGIST patients. Female might be predominance in MGIST. The GISTs located in small intestine would tend to be more aggressive. The satellite tumours, necrosis and cystic degeneration were strongly benefit for MGIST diagnosis. Furthermore, intestinal obstruction doesn’t support the diagnosis. Lymph node metastasis and calcification is rare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors — definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch, 2001, 438: 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. He ZH, Lv FJ, Cao ZF, et al. Value of Multi-slice spiral CT in diagnosis of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol, 2009, 8: 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sandrasegaran K, Rajesh A, Rushing DA, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: CT and MRI findings. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15: 1407–1414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanke C, Eisenberg BL, Heinrich M. Epidemiology of GIST. Am J Gastroenterol, 2005, 100: 2366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miettien M, Monihan JM, Sarlomo-Rikala M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors/smooth muscle tumors (GISTs) primary in the omentum and mesentery: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 26 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 1999, 23: 1109–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behranwala KA, Spalding D, Wotherspoon A, et al. Small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumours and ampullary cancer in Type I neurofibromatosis. World J Surg Oncol, 2004, 2: 1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Towu E, Stanton M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour presenting with severe bleeding: a review of the molecular biology. Pediatr Surg Int, 2006, 22: 462–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Du CY, Shi YQ, Zhou Y, et al. The analysis of status and clinical implication of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Surg Oncol, 2008, 98: 175–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lasota J, Miettinen M. Clinical significance of oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology, 2008, 53: 245–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ludwig DJ, Traverso LW. Gut stromal tumors and their clinical behavior. Am J Surg, 1997, 173: 390–394.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CM, Chen HC, Leung TK, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Computed tomographic features. World J Gastroenterol, 2004, 10: 2417–2418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, HL Sobin L, et al. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol, 2002, 33: 478–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal strumal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2006, 130: 1466–1478.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Egloff A, Lee EY, Dillon JE. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of stomach in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Radiol, 2005, 35: 728–729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DÍaz-Delgado M, Hernández-Amate A, Sánchez-León M, et al. Multiple non-metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Differential features. Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 2010, 102: 489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol, 2005, 29: 52–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stamatakos M, Douzinas E, Stefanaki C, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Surg Oncol, 2009, 7: 61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Terada T. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the digestive organs: a histopathologic study of 31 cases in a single Japanese institute. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2009, 3: 162–168.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, et al. PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science, 2003, 299: 708–710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim KM, Kang DW, Moon WS, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Koreans: it’s incidence and the clinical, pathologic and immunohistochemical findings. J Korean Med Sci, 2005, 20: 977–984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era—a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer, 2005, 103: 821–829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hirota S, Isozaki K. Pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Pathol Int, 2006, 56: 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Singer S, Rubin BP, Lux ML, et al. Prognostic value of KIT mutation type, mitotic activity and histological subtype in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20: 3898–3905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lasota J, Miettinen M. KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Semin Diag Pathol, 2006, 23: 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chourmouzi D, Sinakos E, Papalavrentios L, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a pictorial Review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2009, 3: 379–383.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. Immunohistochemical staining for KIT (CD117) in soft tissue sarcomas is very limited in distribution. Am J Clin Pathol, 2002, 117: 188–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless CL, et al. Diagnosis of grastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach. Hum Pathol, 2002, 33: 459–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kochhar R, Manoharan P, Leahy M, et al. Imaging in gastrointestinal stromal tumours: current status and future directions. Clin Radiol, 2010, 65: 584–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lau S, Tam KF, Kam CK, et al. Imaging of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). Clin Radiol, 2004, 59: 487–498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gupta P, Tewari M, Shulkla HS. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Surg Oncol, 2008, 17: 129–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Safdar A, Sher A. Role of c-kit/SCF in cause and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). GENE, 2007, 401: 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Conlon KC, Casper ES, Brennan MF. Primary gastrointestinal sarcomas: analysis of prognostic variables. Ann Surg Oncol, 1995, 2: 26–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ulusan S, Koc Z, Kayaselcuk F, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: CT findings. Br J Radiol, 2008, 81: 618–623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Suster S. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol, 1996, 13: 297–313.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tashiro T, Hasegawa T, Omatsu M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the stomach showing lymph node metastases. Histopathology, 2005, 47: 438–439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renhua Wu.

Additional information

Supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Key program, No. 30930027) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 8151503102000032).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Pan, A., Yong, F. et al. Helical CT findings and clinicopathologic features in malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the correlation between radiologic appearance and malignant potential. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 10, 643–649 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-011-0857-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-011-0857-9

Key words

Navigation