Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to analyze factors of psychological disorder experienced by 98 cancer patients and to probe into intervention measures in accordance with the corresponding bad psychological factors.
Methods
A questionnaire survey was conducted in the test group (n = 98) by filling out a symptom checklist 90 (SCL-90). And then the survey result was compared with the normal group (n = 1388) contained in relevant references.
Results
Except for hostile factor that was similar to normal level (P > 0.05), other 8 factors were higher than in normal group (P < 0.01). And the cancer patients were classified with the survey results.
Conclusion
Compared with normal persons, cancer patients have more psychological problems and related intervention measures are sought necessarily to improve the quality of life, to advance the immune function and to prolong the survival time of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sun Y, Gu WP. The guiding principle of cancer pain three-step analgesic ladder. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 1999.
Song HW. The cause of unhealthy psychological reactions in patients with cancer and nursing. J Snake (Chinese), 2005, 17: 71–72.
Mu XH, Liu XH, Deng GH, et al. A study and application of psychological and behavioral intervention in patients with cancer. Nurs J Chin PL A (Chinese), 2003, 20: 39–41.
Guan HM, Sun J, Li GM. Influence of psychological therapy on QOL and emotion in patients with cancer. Chin J Clinl Rehabi (Chinese), 2002, 6: 3088.
Wang XD. Mental health rating scale manual. Chin Ment Health J (Chinese), 1993: 31.
Jin H, Wu WY, Zhang MY. Preliminary analysis of the results of SCL-90 data statistics in normal persons in China. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Ouyang, X., Chen, Z. et al. Analysis on psychological disorder and related factors in 98 patients with cancer and intervention measures thereon. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 8, 488–491 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-009-0088-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-009-0088-5