Skip to main content
Log in

Critical disease components of common bacterial blight to effectively evaluate resistant genotypes of snap bean

  • Bacterial and Phytoplasma Diseases
  • Published:
Journal of General Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Common bacterial blight (CBB) caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli (Xap) is the main bacterial disease of snap bean. The present work aimed to select snap bean genotypes that are resistant to CBB based on three components of resistance: area under the disease progress curve, latent period, and lesion diameter on pods (DL). A completely randomized two-factor factorial design with six replications was used to evaluate leaves and pods of 14 snap bean and three common bean genotypes (PI 207262, BAC-6 and A-794) with high resistance to CBB. Two Xap isolates, 1394-98 and 775-90, were used to inoculate leaves and pods. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistics. Significant differences were observed among the evaluated genotypes for all of the components of resistance, except for DL. The snap bean UENF 1482 demonstrated good performance in two disease resistance components. For this reason, this genotype can be recommended for use in breeding programs that aim to generate snap bean genotypes resistant to Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu FB, Leal NR, Rodrigues R, Amaral Júnior AT, Silva DJH (2004) Divergência genética entre acessos de feijão-de-vagem de hábito de crescimento indeterminado. Hort Bras 22:547–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta-Gallegos JA, Kelly JD, Gepts P (2007) Prebreeding in common bean and use of genetic diversity from wild germplasm. Crop Sci 47:44–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud-Santana E, Coyne DP, Eskridge KM, Vidaver AK (1994) Inheritance, low correlations of leaf, pod, and seed reactions to common blight disease in common beans, and implications for selection. J Am Soc Hort Sci 119:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Asensio-S-Manzanera MC, Asensio C, Singh SP (2005) Gamete selection for resistance to common and halo bacterial blights in dry bean intergene pool populations. Crop Sci 46:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini A, Maringoni AC, Carneiro SMTPG (2005) Doenças do feijoeiro. In: Kimati H, Amorin L, Bergamin Filho A, Camargo LEA, Rezende JAM (eds) Manual de fitopatologia: doenças das plantas cultivadas, 4th edn. Editora Ceres, São Paulo, pp 376–399

  • Brunner E, Puri ML (2001) Nonparametric methods in factorial designs. Stat Pap 42:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner E, Dette H, Munk A (1997) Box-type approximations in nonparametric factorial designs. J Am Stat Assoc 92:1494–1502

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza MFM, Rodrigues R, Amaral Júnior AT, Sudré CP (2008) Resistance to Xanthomonas spp. in tomato: Diallel analysis and gene effects estimative in a breeding programme carried out in Brazil. J Phytopathol 156:660–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz CG, Bassanezi RB, Godoy CV, Lopes DB, Bergamin Filho A (2001) Quantificação do efeito do crestamento bacteriano comum na eficiência fotossintética e na produção do feijoeiro. Fitopatol Bras 26:71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erceg-Hurn DM, Mirosevich VM (2008) Modern robust statistical methods—an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. Am Psych 63:591–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira CF, Pereira MG, Santos AS, Rodrigues R, Bressan-Smith RE, Viana AP, Daher RF (2003) Resistance to common bacterial blight in Phaseolus vulgaris L. recombinant inbred lines under natural infection of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli. Euphytica 134:43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms J, Munzel U (2009) Package ‘npmc’: Nonparametric multiple comparisons. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 25 Aug 2011

  • Jacques MA, Josi K, Darrasse A, Samson R (2005) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli var. fuscans is aggregated in stable biofilm population sizes in the phyllosphere of field-grown beans. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2008–2015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeger MJ (2004) Analysis of disease progress as a basis for evaluating disease management practices. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:61–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JD, Gepts P, Miklas PN, Coyne DP (2003) Tagging and mapping of genes and QTL and molecular marker-assisted selection for traits of economic importance in bean and cowpea. Field Crop Res 82:135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause W, Rodrigues R, Gonçalves LSA, Bezerra Neto FV, Leal NR (2009) Genetic divergence in snap bean based on agronomic traits and resistance to bacterial wilt. Crop Breed Appl Biotech 9:246–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahuku GS, Jara C, Henriquez MA, Castellanos G, Cuasquer J (2006) Genotypic characterization of the common bean bacterial blight pathogens, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli var. fuscans by rep-PCR and PCR-RFLP of the ribosomal genes. J Phytopathol 154:35–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maringoni AC, Fregonese LH, Tófoli JG, Wa CK (1993) Reação foliar e da vagem de feijoeiro a Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli e transmissão da bactéria pelas sementes. Fitopatol Bras 18:412–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Márquez ML, Terán H, Singh SP (2007) Selecting common bean with genes of different evolutionary origins for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli. Crop Sci 47:1367–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklas PN, Coyne DP, Grafton KF, Mutlu N, Reiser J, Lindgren DT, Singh SP (2003) A major QTL for common bacterial blight resistance derives from the common bean great northern landrace cultivar Montana No. 5. Euphytica 131:137–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire ABC, Mabagala RB, Guzmán P, Gepts P, Gilbertson RL (2004) Genetic diversity and pathogenic variation of common blight bacteria (Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli and X. campestris pv. phaseoli var. fuscans) suggests pathogen co-evolution with the common bean. Phytopathology 94:593–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi K (2011) Package ‘nparLD’: Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 2 June 2011

  • Pastor-Corrales MA, Beebe SE, Correa, FJ (1981) Comparing two inoculation techniques for evaluating resistance in beans to Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli In: International conference on plant pathogenic bacteria. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, pp 493–503

  • Peixoto N, Braz LT, Banzatto DA, Oliveira AP (2002) Adaptabilidade e estabilidade em feijão-vagem de crescimento indeterminado. Hort Bras 20:616–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rava CA, Sartorato A, Romeiro RS (1990) Avaliação de cultivares de feijoeiro quanto à resistência a Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli em condições de campo e casa de vegetação. Summa Phytopathol 16:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues Neto J, Malavolta JR, Victor O (1986) Meio simples para o isolamento e cultivo de Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri tipo B. Summa Phytopathol 12:16

  • Rodrigues R, Leal NR, Lam-Sánchez A (1998) Análise dialélica de cinco cultivares de feijão para resistência ao crestamento bacteriano comum. Hort Bras 16:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues R, Leal NR, Pereira MG, Lam-Sánchez A (1999) Combining ability of Phaseolus vulgaris L. for resistance to common bacterial blight. Genet Mol Biol 22:571–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos ASS, Bressan-Smith RE, Pereira MG, Rodrigues R, Ferreira CF (2003) Genetic linkage map of Phaseolus vulgaris L. and identification of QTLs responsible for resistance to Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli. Fitopatol Bras 28:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2000) SAS online DOC, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary

  • Shah DA, Madden LV (2004) Nonparametric analysis of ordinal data in designed factorial experiments. Phytopathology 94:33–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva AS, Rava CA, Coster JGC, Morais OP (1999) Herança da resistência do feijoeiro ao crestamento bacteriano comum. Fitopatol Bras 24:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva A, Santos I, Balbinot AL, Matei G, Oliveira PH (2009) Reação de genótipos de feijão ao Crestamento Bacteriano Comum, avaliado por dois métodos de inoculação. Ciênc Agrotec 33:2019–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira AB, Amaral Júnior AT, Rodrigues R, Pereira TNS, Bressan-Smith RE (2004) Genetic divergence in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) evaluated by different methodologies. Crop Breed Appl Biotech 4:52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres JC, Ventura JÁ (1991) AVACPD: um programa para calcular a área e o volume abaixo da curva de progresso da doença. Fitopatol Bras 16:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres JP, Maringoni AC, Silva Júnior TAF (2009) Survival of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli var. fuscans in common bean leaflets on soil. J Plant Pathol 91:195–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilela FO, Amaral Júnior AT, Freitas Júnior SP, Viana AP, Pereira MG, Silva MGM (2009) Selection of snap bean recombined inbred lines by using EGT and SSD. Euphytica 165:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaumeyer WJ (1972) Genetic vulnerability of major crops. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 234–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto dos Santos Trindade.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

dos Santos Trindade, R., Rodrigues, R., do Amaral Júnior, A.T. et al. Critical disease components of common bacterial blight to effectively evaluate resistant genotypes of snap bean. J Gen Plant Pathol 78, 201–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-012-0374-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-012-0374-x

Keywords

Navigation