Skip to main content
Log in

Performance and cost of a new mini-forwarder for use in thinning operations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

Two tests were conducted with a new model of mini-forwarder, specifically designed for thinning operations. The tested machine resembles a conventional industrial forwarder, with tandem bogies and central articulation, but is much smaller and lighter. The machine was tested on forest plantations established on ex-farm land: such plantations offer favorable and homogeneous work conditions, which allowed reasonably accurate productivity figures to be obtained with a relatively small number of observation hours (about 10.5 h). Despite the relative inexperience of the driver, the tests indicated a productivity of between 3.1 and 3.8 m3 per scheduled machine hour (SMH) over an extraction distance of about 400 m. Extraction costs ranged from 12.4 to 15.1 € m−3 at the calculated machine rate of 47.6 € h−1. Compared to older models derived from recreation vehicles or tracked wheelbarrows, the machine tested in this study offers a better performance and a much more comfortable workplace, with the operator sitting inside an enclosed and insulated cab. Fitted with four bogies and provided with a much longer wheelbase, the new forwarder is likely to be safer than tracked machines when surmounting obstacles, and it certainly offers a much smoother ride to the operator. Nevertheless, the tested machine is still much narrower than industrial forwarders and does not enjoy the same lateral stability. Hence, the machine is ideal for sneaking between trees and climbing over obstacles, but once on a slope it must be driven straight along the grade and never across it, unless with much caution. Like all hydrostatically driven vehicles, the tested mini-forwarder is not suited to long-distance extraction (>1 km): if run at high speed for too long, its hydrostatic transmission tends to overheat, forcing the operator to make frequent stops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker P, Jensen J, Meinert D (2006) Conventional and mechanized logging compared for ozark hardwood forest thinning: productivity, economics, and environmental impact. Nort J Appl For 23:264–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrand KG (1991) Planning and analysis of forestry operation studies. Skogsarbeten Bull 17:63

    Google Scholar 

  • Björheden R, Apel K, Shiba M, Thompson MA (1995) IUFRO forest work study nomenclature. Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Department of Operational Efficiency, Garpenberg, p 16

  • Brinker R, Kinard J, Rummer B, Lanford B (2002) Machine rates for selected forest harvesting machines (Circular 295, revised). Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, p 32

  • De Lasaux M, Hartsough B, Spinelli R, Magagnotti N (2010) Small parcel fuel reduction with a low-investment, high-mobility operation. West J Appl For (in press)

  • Gullberg T (1995) Evaluating operator-machine interaction in comparative time studies. J For Eng 7:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullberg T (1997) A deductive time consumption model for loading shortwood. J For Eng 8:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsough B (2003) Economics of harvesting to maintain high structural diversity and resulting damage to residual trees. West J Appl For 18:133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwaoka M, Aruga K, Kobayashi H (1997) A line thinning operation with a crawler type harvester and forwarder combination and its impact on the residual stand. Bull Tokyo Univ For 98:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwaoka M, Aruga K, Sakurai R, Hyun Cho K, Sakai H, Kobayashi H (1999) Performance of small harvester head in a thinning operation. J For Res 1:95–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kärhä K, Rönkkö E, Gumse S (2004) Productivity and cutting costs of thinning harvesters. Int J For Eng 15:43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge D, Mauri M, McGuire E (1996) Decreasing woodlot size and the future of timber sales in Massachussets: when is an operation too small? Nort J Appl For 13:96–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman P (1995) Siwork 3: user guide. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Vejle, p 37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumakura Y, Tasaka T, Sakai H (1994) The influence of forest machines on soil compaction in logging operation. J Jpn For Soc 9:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V (1996) Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. For Sci 42:300–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitila J, Asikainen A, Nuutinen Y (2007) Forwarding of whole trees after manual and mechanized felling bunching in pre-commercial thinnings. Int J For Eng 18:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark R (2006) Cost structure and competition for forest-based biomass. Scand J For Res 21:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyata ES (1980) Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment (Gen Tech Rep NC-55). Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, p 14

  • Nåbo A, Yamada Y (1992) Accident analyses and capability to surmount obstacles of side-loaded mini-forwarders. J Jpn For Soc 74:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurminen T, Korpunen H, Uusitalo J (2006) Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fenn 40:335–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Park B, Oh J, Aruga K, Nitami T, Kobayashi H (2004) Examination of the index of fatigue for miniforwarder operators. J Jpn For Eng Soc 19:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickenbach M, Steele T (2006) Logging firms, nonindustrial private forests, and forest parcelization: evidence of firm specialization and its impact on sustainable timber supply. Can J For Res 36:186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999) StatView reference. SAS Publishing, Cary, pp 84–93

  • Scott A (1973) Work measurement: observed time to standard time. In: Wittering W (ed) Work study in forestry. For Commun Bull 47: 26–39

  • Shishiuchi M (1993) Optimal skid trail spacing for small vehicles in thinning. Int J For Eng 5:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Visser R (2008) Analyzing and estimating delays in harvester operations. Int J For Eng 19:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Owende PMO, Ward SM, Tornero M (2004) Comparison of short-wood forwarding systems used in Iberia. Silva Fenn 38:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • TDB Forest Research (2001) The Alstor mini-forwarder (Inform Note ODW 9.06). TDB Forest Research, Ae Village, p 4

  • TDB Forest Research (2002) The Scorpion 1205 mini-forwarder (Inform Note ODW 9.07). TDB Forest Research, Ae Village, p 4

  • Väätäinen K, Asikainen A, Sikanen L, Ala-Fossi A (2006a) The cost effect of forest machine relocations on logging costs in Finland. For Stud 45:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Väätäinen K, Ala-Fossi A, Nuutinen Y, Röser D (2006b) The effect of single grip harvester’s log bunching on forwarder efficiency. Baltic For 12:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada Y (1996) A comparison of six parallel levers and two joysticks for the maneuverability of forwarders. J For Res 1:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Regione del Veneto—Direzione Foreste ed Economia Montana. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the Servizio Forestale di Verona, and especially of Dr. G. Rivaben, A. Campedelli and D. Tancon. Thanks are also due to Hidrocom (Italian dealer for Entracon) who made the machine available for the tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaele Spinelli.

About this article

Cite this article

Spinelli, R., Magagnotti, N. Performance and cost of a new mini-forwarder for use in thinning operations. J For Res 15, 358–364 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-010-0193-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-010-0193-x

Keywords

Navigation