Advertisement

Journal of Forest Research

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 252–258 | Cite as

The changes of understory plant diversity in continuous cropping system of Eucalyptus plantations, South China

  • Yuanguang WenEmail author
  • Duo Ye
  • Fang Chen
  • Shirong Liu
  • Hongwen Liang
Original Article

Abstract

The assessment of biodiversity in managed plantations has become an important issue for long-term sustainability of the ecosystem. The continuous cropping system (CCS) is common practice in Eucalyptus plantations in southern China. In order to clarify the effects of such a practice on species compositions, species diversity, and functional type compositions of understory vegetation, a field trial was installed in the first and second rotations of Eucalyptus plantations. The treatments were replicated three times and arranged in a simple completely randomized design. Vegetation surveys were performed in 1998–2005 following the treatments. Although the CCS had no significant effect on the composition structures in terms of life-form, growth-form, seed dispersal strategies and breeding strategies, there were significant differences in percent coverages of shrub (SLC) and herbaceous layer (HLC) between two types of stand. The CCS reduced the species richness and species diversity remarkably, and was also particularly favorable for r-strategy herbaceous species at the expense of k-strategy woody species in understory vegetation. The repeated disturbances to soil and vegetation including clear-cutting followed by prescribed burning and mechanical plowing maybe the main factor which results in the negative change of understory plant diversity. Although more comprehensive studies on disturbance and a long-term monitoring of a broad-scale project will be required, we suggest that alternative silviculture, consisting of practices other than clear-cutting and prescribed burning, should be introduced to conserve species composition and diversity of Eucalyptus plantations.

Keywords

Continuous cropping system Eucalyptus plantation Functional types Species diversity Vegetation structure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Development Plan of the State Key Fundamental Research of China (No. 2002CB111504), the Foundation of Research Start-up for Returned Student from Abroad (1997-832), the Founding of Forestry Bureau of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Foundation of Research of Guangxi University. We thank Shanhua Wei, Hongwei Li, Bai Zheng, Dejie Liu, Guofu Zhou, Zaisheng Tang (Guangxi Dongmen State-owner Forest Farm), and our colleagues Taiping He, Minyi Zhou, Bin He, Chengbiao Huang, Lijun Zhao, Yulin Zhu, Yongping Sun, Haiqun Deng, Minyan Ying, and Hanling Cheng for their assistance with the field work.

References

  1. Archibold OW, Acton C, Ripley EA (2000) Effect of site preparation on soil properties and vegetation cover, and the growth and survival of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings, in Saskatchewan. For Ecol Manag 131:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton DH (1975) Studies of litter in Eucalyptusus regnans forests. Aust J Bot 23:413–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battles JJ, Shlisky AJ, Barrett RH, Heald RC, Allen-Diaz BH (2001) The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. For Ecol Manag 146:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binkley D, Stape JL (2004) Sustainable management of Eucalyptus plantations in a changing world. In: Barralho NMG, Pereira JS, Marques C, Coutinho J, Madeira M, Tomë M (eds) Eucalyptus in a changing world. Proceedings of IUFRO conference, Aveiro 11–15, 2004, pp 11–17Google Scholar
  5. Bowman DMJS, Panton WJ (1993) Factors that control monsoon-rainforest seedling establishment and growth in north Australian Eucalyptus savanna. J Ecol 81:297–304Google Scholar
  6. Calder IR, Hall RL, Adlard PG (eds) (1992) Growth and water use of forest plantations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Catterall CP, Kanowski J, Lamb D, Killin D, Erskine P, Wardell-Johnson GW (2005) Trade-offs between timber production and biodiversity in rainforest plantations: emerging issues and an ecological perspective. In: Erskine PD, Lamb D, Bristwo M (eds) Reforestation in the tropics and subtropics of Australia using rainforest tree species. RIRDC, Canberra/Rainforest CRC, CairnsGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen QB (2001) A review of researches on biodiversity in Eucalyptus plantations. Chin J Trop Crops 4:82–90Google Scholar
  9. Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance measure in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. da Silva Junior MC, Scarano FR, Souza Cardel F (1995) Regeneration of an Atlantic forest formation in the understory of a Eucalyptusus grandis plantation in south-eastern Brazil. J Trop Ecol 11:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dibble AC, Brissette JC, Hunter ML Jr (1999) Putting community data to work: some understory plants indicate red spruce regeneration habitat. For Ecol Manag 115:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grove TS (1988) Growth responses of trees and understory to applied nitrogen and phosphorus in Karri (Eucalyptusus diversicolor) forest. For Ecol Manag 23:87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haeussler S, Bedford L, Boateng JL, MacKinnon A (1999) Plant community responses to mechanical site preparation in northern interior British Columbia. Can J For Res 29:1084–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrington G, Sanderson K (1994) Recent contraction of wet sclerophyll forest in the wet tropics of Queensland due to invasion by rainforest. Pac Conserv Biol 1:319–327Google Scholar
  15. Harrison SR, Herbohn JL, Tisdell CA, Lamb D (2000) Timber production and biodiversity trade-offs in plantation forestry. In: Harrison SR, Herbohn JL, Herbohn KL (eds) Sustainable small-scale forestry. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 65–76Google Scholar
  16. Hartley MJ (2002) Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For Ecol Manag 155:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Foundation for Science (1988) Trees for development in sub-saharan Africa. In: Proceedings of seminar held at Nairobi (Kenya), 20–25 February 1989. IFS Publication, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 361Google Scholar
  18. Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW, Proctor H, Reis T (2003) Development of forest structure on cleared rainforest land in eastern Australia under different styles of reforestation. For Ecol Manag 183:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Wardell-Johnson GW (2005) Consequences of broadscale timber plantations for biodiversity in cleared rainforest landscapes of tropical and subtropical Australia. For Ecol Manag 208:359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindenmayer DB (1999) Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs. For Ecol Manag 115:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loumeto JJ, Huttel C (1997) Understory vegetation in fast-growing tree plantations on savanna soils in Congo. For Ecol Manag 99:65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) Biogeographie von Inseln. Goldmann Verl, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  23. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. McLachlan SM, Bazely DR (2001) Recovery patterns of understory herbs and their use as indicators of deciduous forest regeneration. Conserv Biol 15:98–110Google Scholar
  25. Michelsen A, Lisanework N, Friis I, Holst N (1996) Comparisons of understory vegetation and soil fertility in plantations and adjacent natural forests in the Ethiopian highlands. J Appl Ecol 33:627–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nagaike T (2002) Differences in plant species diversity between conifer (Larix kaempferi) plantations and broad-leaved (Quercus crispula) secondary forests in central Japan. For Ecol Manag 168:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagaike T, Hayashi A, Abe M, Arai N (2003) Differences in plant species diversity in Larix kaempferi plantations of different ages in central Japan. For Ecol Manag 183:177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parrotta JA (1995) Influence of overstory composition on understory colonization by native species in plantations on a degraded tropical site. J Veg Sci 6:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patrick NJ, Lane JM, Zhang NN, Zhou GY, Xu DP (2004) Water balance of tropical Eucalyptus plantations in south-eastern China. Agric For Meteorol 124:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peltzer DA, Bast ML, Welson SD, Gerry AK (2000) Plant diversity and tree responses following contrasting disturbances in boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 127:91–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pfadenhauer J (1997) Vegetations ǒkologie—ein Skriptum. IHW, Eching bei MünchenGoogle Scholar
  32. Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Roy DB, Warman L, Walker KJ, Rothery P (2003) Plant traits as predictors of performance in ecological restoration. J Appl Ecol 40:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramachandra SH (1992) Organic productivity, nutrient cycling and small watershed hydrology of natural forests and monoculture plantations in Chikmagalur District, Karnataka. In: Calder IR, Hall RL, Adlard PG (eds) Growth and water use of forest plantations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Raunkiaer C (1934) The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography, being the collected papers of C. Raunkiaer. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Semenova GV, van der Maarel E (2000) Plant functional type—a strategic perspective. J Veg Sci 11:917–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Song YC (2001) Vegetation ecology. East China Normal University Publishing House, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  37. Stape JL, Dan B, Michael GR (2004) Eucalyptus production and the supply, use and efficiency of use of water, light and nitrogen across a geographic gradient in Brazil. For Ecol Manag 193:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun GJ, Zhang R, Zhou L (2003) Trends and advances in researches on plant functional diversity and functional groups. Acta Ecol Sin 23:1430–1435Google Scholar
  39. Swindel BF, Conde LF, Smith JE (1986) Successional changes in Pinus elliottii plantations following two treatments. Can J For Res 16:630–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabarelli M, Peres CA (2002) Abiotic and vertebrate seed dispersal in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: implication for forest regeneration. Biol Conserv 106:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thomas SC, Halpern CB, Falk DA, Liguor DA, Austin KA (1999) Plant diversity in managed forests: understory response to thinning and fertilization. Ecol Appl 9:864–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wardell-Johnson GW, Kanowski J, Catterall C, Lamb D, Piper S (2005) Rainforest timber plantations and the restoration of plant biodiversity in tropical and subtropical Australia. In: Erskine PD, Lamb D, Bristwo M (eds) Reforestation in the tropics and subtropics of Australia using rainforest tree species. RIRDC, Canberra/Rainforest CRC, CairnsGoogle Scholar
  43. Wei J, Deng HB, Wu G (2004) Biological diversity in the coniferous forest on the northern slope of Changbai Mountains, northeastern China. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 11:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wen YG (2008) Eucalyptus ecological, social issues and scientific development. China Forestry Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  45. Wen YG, Li XX, He TP, Zhong JB (2000) Study on the functions of biodiversity conservation of the coast protection forest in Guangxi province. Prot For Sci Technol 1:1–4Google Scholar
  46. Wen YG, Liu SR, Chen F (2005a) The ecological problems and sustainable management of industrial Eucalyptusus plantation. J Guangxi Acad Sci 21:13–19Google Scholar
  47. Wen YG, Liu SR, Chen F (2005b) Effects of continuous cropping on understory species diversity in Eucalyptus plantations. Chin J Appl Ecol 16:1667–1671Google Scholar
  48. Wen YG, Liu SR, Chen F (2005c) Diversity and dynamics in industrial plantations of eucalyptus. J Beijing For Univ 27:17–22Google Scholar
  49. Wen YG, Chen F, Liu SR, Liang HW, Yuan CA, Zhu HG (2008) Relationship between species diversity and biomass of Eucalyptus plantation in Guangxi. Sci Silvae Sin 44:14–19Google Scholar
  50. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution of measurement of species diversity. Toxon 21:213–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yu XB, Li WG (1997) Ecological problems and its review of research in Eucalyptusus plantations. Chin J Trop Crops 18:60–68Google Scholar
  52. Yu XB, Zhong LS, Yang WD, Long T (1999) Structure of understory vegetation in Eucalyptusus plantations. Chin J Trop Crops 20:66–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Forest Society and Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuanguang Wen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Duo Ye
    • 2
  • Fang Chen
    • 3
  • Shirong Liu
    • 4
  • Hongwen Liang
    • 1
  1. 1.Forestry CollegeGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
  2. 2.Guangxi Institute of BotanyGuilinChina
  3. 3.College of Life ScienceSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  4. 4.The Chinese Academy of ForestryBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations