Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The EU’s Korea relationship: enlargement effects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asia Europe Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the EU was expanding in 2004, a phase of new development between the EU and North Korea could have been expected. However, it was argued that the EU’s position towards North Korea is likely to remain unchanged. Most of the existing studies ascribed the reactive attitude of the EU to the distinctiveness of the recent enlargement. The accession of a large number of new members, which are considered to have diverse foreign policy interests and perception, is likely to add up to the already overwhelming number of problems in the governance of the EU. Thus, the EU’s policy towards North Korea would rather concentrate on a soft security approach. However, this paper contends that the existing explanation is not exhaustive, but that the implications relating to the conception of smallness, which is relevant to most of the new member states, should be included in the parameters of analysis in order to generate a more comprehensive and balanced view where the future relationship between the EU and North Korea is concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a detailed argument about these distinctive features, see “Further implications if ‘smallness’ is taken into account.”

References

  • Aggestam L (2004) Role identity and the Europeanisation of foreign policy: a political–cultural approach. In: Tonra B, Christiansen T (eds) Rethinking European union foreign policy. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, pp 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstrup N (1976) The perennial problem of small state: a survey of research effort. Coop Confl 11(4):163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer C (2003) The European union as an international political actor. In: Nugent N (ed) European Union enlargement. Palgrave, New York, p 233

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer C (2004) The European union as an international political actor. In: Nugent N (ed) European union enlargement. Palgrave, Houndmills, pp 226–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Arter D (2000) Small state influence within the EU: The case of Finland’s northern dimension initiative. J Common Mark Stud 38(5):677–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkeofsky A (2003) EU’s policy towards the DPRK—engagement or standstill? The European Institute for Asian Studies, Brussels, pp 10–11

  • Bretherton C, Vogler J (2006) The European Union as a global actor, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, p 174

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (1998) Implications of enlargement. In: Laurent G (ed) Small states inside and outside the European union: interests and policies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 263

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M, White B (eds) (1989) Understanding foreign policy: the foreign policy systems approach. Edward Elgar, Aldershot

  • Commission of the EC (2002) The EC-Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Country Strategy Paper 2001–2004. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/external-relations/north-korea/CSP/01-04-en.pdf)

  • Council of Ministers (2002) Korean Peninsula—council conclusions, Nov. 19, 2002. European Commission, Brussels

  • Dinan D (1999) Ever closer union: an introduction to European integration. Macmillan, London, p 523

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne F (1972) Europe’s role in world peace. In: Mayne R (ed) Europe tomorrow: sixteen Europeans look ahead. Fontana, London, pp 32–47

    Google Scholar 

  • General Affairs and External Relations Council (2003) North Korea. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/north_korea/intro/gac.htm) (Jan. 27, 2003).

  • Goetschel L (1998) Foreign and security policy interests of small states in today’s Europe. In: Goetschel L (ed) Small states inside and outside the European union: interests and policies. Kluwer, Boston, pp 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen L (2003) Domestic opinion and identity politics. Coop Confl 38(3):314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey JAK (2003) Introducing small state foreign policy. In: Hey JAK (ed) Small states in world politics: explaining foreign policy behaviour. Lynne Rienner, London, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill C (1993) The capability–expectations gap, or conceptualising Europe’s international role. Int J Korean Unification Stud 31(3):305–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S (2000) Towards a common European foreign and security policy. J Common Mark Stud 38(2):192

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen KE (2002) Making the CFSP work. In: Peterson J, Shackleton M (eds.) The institutions of the European Union. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 164–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavan J (2003) EU enlargement and its implications for EU–Asia relations. Asia Europe Journal 1(1):13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keatinge P (1996). European security: Ireland’s choices. IEA, Dublin, p 77

  • Keohane RO (1969) Lilliputians dilemmas: small states in international politics. Int Organ 23(2):293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H (2003) Inter-Korean relations and the roles of the US and of the EU. Asia Europe Journal 1(4):507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk L (2006) EU condemns North Korea on missile test. Available via EUobserver. http://www.forum-europe.com/index.html?http://www.forum-europe.com/news.asp?frame=yes~main (July 05)

  • Kodama M (2005) The EU’s relations with the DPRK: involvement of the EU and its implications on the international politics over the Korean Peninsula. Paper presented at 2005 Autumn International Conference, The Korean Society of Contemporary European Studies, 25 Nov 2005, Seoul, South Korea

  • Lee M (2004) EU enlargement, a small-state dominated EU and challenges and opportunities to the CFSP. Curr Polit Econ Eur 13(1):77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J-S (2005) The two faces of EU–North Korea relations. Kor J Def Anal 17(1):33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee M (2006) How do small states affect the future development of the EU. Nova Science, New York, p 60–62, 148

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitzen J (2006) Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity: habits, capabilities and ontological security. J Eur Public Policy 13(2):271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik A (1993) Preferences and power in the European community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach. J Common Mark Stud 31(4):473–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritzen H (2003) Stifled by her own success?: a geopolitical perspective. Coop Confl 38(3):306–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Øhrgaard JC (2004) International relations or European integration: is the CFSP sui generis? In: Tonra B, Christiansen T (eds) Rethinking European union foreign policy. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • People’s Daily Online (2005) International community hails deal on Korean nuclear Issue. Available via People’s Daily Online. http://english.people.com.cn/200509/20/eng20050920_209661.html (Sept. 20, 2005)

  • Redmond J, Pace R (1996) European security in the 1990s and beyond: the implications of the accession of Cyprus and Malta to the European Union. Contemp Secur policy 17(3):441

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy D (1996) North Korea as an alienated state. Survival 38(4):32

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruediger F (2002) EU–North Korea relations: no effort without reason. Int J Korean Unification Stud 11(2):110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie JG (1998) Constructing the world polity: essays on internationalization. Routledge, London, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavone L (2005) The EU security strategy and the stabilization of the Korean Peninsula. Paper presented at 2005 Autumn International Conference, The Korean Society of Contemporary European Studies, 25 Nov 2005, Seoul, South Korea.

  • Tiilikainen T (2003) The Finnish presidency of 1999. In: Elgström O (ed) European council presidencies: a comparative perspectives. Routledge, London, p 115

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonra B, Christiansen T (2004) The study of EU foreign policy: between international relations and European studies. In: Tonra B, Christiansen T (eds) Rethinking European Union foreign policy. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, p 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace W (1999) Small European states and European policy-making: strategies, roles, possibilities. In: Wallace W et al (ed) Between autonomy and influence: small states and the European Union Arena report no. 1/99. European Union Arena, Oslo, p 15

  • Wiessala G (2002) The European union and Asian countries. Sheffield Academic, London, p 161

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science and Diplomacy, College of Social Sciences, University of Myongji, Social Science Campus: 50-3, Namjagwadong, Seodaemungu, 120-728, Seoul, South Korea

    Moosung Lee

Authors
  1. Moosung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moosung Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, M. The EU’s Korea relationship: enlargement effects. AEJ 5, 367–379 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-007-0123-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-007-0123-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation