Abstract
Background
Japan and the European Union (Reiterer (2004b) 2:33–42) are both interested in enhancing their international standing in order to overcome their perceived status as economic giants but political dwarfs. While the reasons for this endeavour as well as the inherent characteristics of the actors involved—a traditional nation state as compared to the most advanced integration structure world-wide—are quite different, both entities see themselves primarily as civilian powers (Whitman (2006) 11(1):1–15) without neglecting the need to endow themselves with a military capacity in order to be more effective and credible on a world-wide scale. The ‘EU is emerging as a key regional actor in certain global affairs, particularly in such areas as finance, trade, environment and development, and current policy is directed towards enhancing the role of the European Union in the global governance system. To this end, the European Commission is actively engaged in such issues as the global governance of trade, the protection of human rights, the promotion of democracy, strengthening of regional and global security communities, and encouraging regional integration in other parts of the world.’ (Farrel (2005) 10(4):452–453)—all areas, except the latter task, where the EU and Japan could potentially cooperate closely.
Objectives
Before identifying shared foreign policy interests between the EU and Japan, I will first bring to light some of the interests the EU has in East Asia in general; secondly I will chart the major Japanese foreign policy interests which will allow me to map out areas of potential common interest and concern.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“...the East Asia Summit will be an open, inclusive, transparent and outward-looking forum in which we strive to strengthen global norms and universally recognised values with ASEAN as the driving force working in partnership with the other participants of the East Asia Summit... The East Asia Summit will be hosted and chaired by an ASEAN Member Country that assumes the ASEAN Chairmanship and held back-to-back with the annual ASEAN Summit”.
All four adopted at the 13th Summit 2004, Tokyo.
‘Our history, geography and cultural ties, give us links with every part of the world: our neighbours in the Middle East, our partners in Africa, in Latin America and in Asia. These relationships are an important asset to build on. In particular we should look to develop strategic partnerships with Japan, China, Canada and India as well as with those who share our goals and values, and are prepared to act in their support.’
References
Asia–Europe Vision Group (1999) For a better tomorrow: Asia–Europe partnership in the 21st Century, pp. 5–6. See: http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/asem/asem_process/vg.pdf
Berger T (2004) Japan’s international relations: the political and security dimension. In: Kim SS (ed) The international relations of Northeast Asia (etc). Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, p 141
Commission of the European Communities (2001) Europe and Asia: a strategic framework for an enhanced partnership. http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/asia/doc/com01_469_en.pdf
Diplomatic Bluebook 2005, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan, pp 4–181
European Security Strategy (2003) A Secure Europe in a Better World, Brussels, 12 December. http://ue.eu.int/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf (emphasis added)
EUROSTAT (Comext, Statistical regime 4): Intranet DG Trade
Farrel M (2005) EU external relations: exporting the EU model of governance? Eur Foreign Aff Rev 10(4):452–453
Financial Times (2006) Rivals to succeed Koizumi mount criticism of China, 3 April, p 2
Gilson J (2005) Asia meets Europe: the view from Europe. In: Mantaha/Tanaka (eds) Enlarging European Union and Asia. Asia–Europe Foundation and Keio University, Tokyo, p 227
Godement F (2001) Une paix asiatique est-elle possible sans architecture régionale? politique étrangère 1-2001:92–93
Joint Statement by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, The European Parliament and the Commission (2005) ‘The European Consensus on Development’, November 2005, http://europa.eu.int/comm/development/body/development_policy_statement/docs/eu_dps_en.pdf#zoom=100
Kim CO (2004) Building a common knowledge society among the Asia-Pacific region and Europe: the role of EUSA Asia-Pacific, Asia-Pacific Journal of EU Studies 2(2):107 and Park SH, ASEM and the future of Asia–Europe relations: backgrounds, main characteristics and new challenges in enlarging European Union and Asia, Tokyo: Asia–Europe Foundation and Keio University 2005, p 213
Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the East Asia Summit (2005) Kuala Lumpur, 14 December 2005: http://www.aseansec.org/18098.htm
Landaburu E (2004) Une nouvelle direction pour les relations Union européenne avec l’Asie. In: Dumoulin/Duchenne (eds) L’Europe et l’Asie. P.I.E.-Peter Lang, Brussels, pp 17–21
Mahncke D (2004) The need for a common foreign policy. In: Mahncke D, Ambos A, Reynolds C (eds) European foreign policy: from rhetoric to reality? P.I.E.-Peter Lang, Brussels, pp 27–42
Maull H (2005) Europe and the new balance of global order. International Affairs 81(4):798–799
Niquet V (2005) La géopolitique de l’énergie en Extrême-Orient: un nouvel enjeu des relations sino-japonaises? politique étranger 4-2005, pp 867–879
Niquet V (2006) Les grands enjeux stratégiques en Asie. Defense Nationale 1:5–7
Oudjani R (2004) EU–ASIA relations. In: Mahncke D, Ambos A, Reynolds C (eds) European foreign policy: from rhetoric to reality? P.I.E.-Peter Lang, Brussels, pp 338–345
Park SH (2005) ASEM and the future of Asia–Europe relations: backgrounds, main characteristics and new challenges. In: Mantaha, Tanaka (eds) Enlarging European Union and Asia, Tokyo: Asia–Europe Foundation and Keio University, pp 197–206
Reiterer M (2004a) ASEM: value-added to international relations and to the Asia–Europe relationship. In: Stokhof, van der Velde, Hwee (eds) The Eurasian space: far more than two continents. Singapore: ISEAS, p 20
Reiterer M (2004b) Japan–EU relations after EU enlargement. Asia Europe J 2:33–42
Reiterer M (2005a) The new constitution for Europe: the European Union as global actor. EU Stud Jpn 25:55–84
Reiterer M (2006) Interregionalism as a new diplomatic tool: the EU and Asia, European Foreign Affairs Review 11:223–243
Serra R (2005a) L’évolution stratégique du Japon: un enjeu pour l’Union, Paris: Institute for Security Studies, Occassional Paper no. 59, p 31, p 34
Serra R (2005b) “Japon: l’héritage irakien”, politique étrangère, 1-2005, p 186
Söderbaum F, Stålgren P, van Langenhove L (2005) The EU as a global actor and the dynamics of interregionalism: a comparative analysis. J Eur Integr 27:365–380
Tanaka H (2006) Strategic challenges for Japanese diplomacy in the twenty-first century. Gaiko Forum, winter, p 6
Telò M (2004) L’Union européenne, la gouvernance mondiale et l’ordre international: Le cas des relations avec l’Asie de l’Est. In: Dumoulin/Duchenne (eds) L’Europe et l’Asie. P.I.E.-Peter Lang, Brussels, pp 81–92
The Japan Times (2006) Japan pitches 16-nation, ’08 talks to create FTA for Asia, April 5, pp 1, 8
Trustfund for Human Security (2005) p 3
Whitman R (2006) Road map for a route March? (De-) civilianizing through the EU’s security strategy. Eur Foreign Aff Rev 11(1):1–15
Yahuda M (2004) The international politics of the Asia-Pacific. Routledge Curzon, London and New York, pp 317–325
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Adjunct Professor for International Politics, University of Innsbruck; Minister and Deputy Head of the Delegation of the European Commission to Japan; the author expresses his own views which should not be attributed to the European Commission. The author whishes to recognize the research assistance of Ms. Sachi Claringbould.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reiterer, M. Japan and the European Union: shared foreign policy interests. AEJ 4, 333–349 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-006-0075-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-006-0075-1