Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient mechanical disruption of Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactococcus lactis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii by a new high-pressure homogenizer and recovery of intracellular aminotransferase activity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Microbiological studies often involve bacterial cell fractionation, which is known to be difficult for Gram-positive as compared to Gram-negative bacteria. Our purpose was to test the breaking efficiency of a new high-pressure pilot homogenizer for three Gram-positive species involved in dairy technology and to assess the activity of an intracellular aminotransferase. Varied pressures (50, 100 and 200 MPa) were applied to concentrated bacterial suspensions (1.2 mg dry weight/ml) of Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactococcus lactis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii. Breaking efficiency was estimated by decreases in optical density at 650 nm, cellular dry weight and viability. The proteins released were quantified and the residual intracellular aminotransferase activity was estimated using leucine as substrate. One run at 50 MPa was sufficient to break 80% of lactobacilli cells whereas 200 MPa were required for the same efficiency for L. lactis and P. freudenreichii. Whatever the pressure, leucine aminotransferase activity was recovered in the supernatant after cell breaking. This new high-pressure pilot homogenizer can allow rapid (20 s/run), easy, continuous and highly efficient cell breaking for intracellular enzyme recovery or other purposes. As the species tested were not phylogenetically related, and had different morphologies and cell wall compositions, we conclude that most Gram-positive bacteria may be broken efficiently by this new device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chassy BM, Giuffrida A (1980) Method for the lysis of Gram-positive, asporogenous bacteria with lysozyme. Appl Environ Microbiol 39:153–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Engler CR (1985) Disruption of microbial cells. In: Moo-Yoong M (ed) Comprehensive biotechnology, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 305–324

  4. Engler ER, Robinson CW (1979) New method of measuring cell-wall rupture. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:1861–1869

    Google Scholar 

  5. Follows MPJ, Hetherington P, Dunnill P, Lilly MD (1971) Release of enzymes from bakers' yeast by disruption in an industrial homogenizer. Biotechnol Bioeng 13:549–560

    Google Scholar 

  6. French CL, Milner HW (1955) Disintegration of bacteria and small particles by high pressure extrusion. Methods Enzymol 1:64–67

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray PP, Dunnill P, Lilly MD (1972) The continuous-flow isolation of enzymes. In: Terui G (ed) Fermentation technology today. Society of Fermentation Technology, Japan, pp 347–351

  8. Higgins JJ, Lewis DJ, Daly HW, Mosqueira FG, Dunnill P, Lilly MD (1978) Investigation of the unit operations involved in the continuous flow isolation of β-galoctosidase from Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 20:159–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hummel W, Kula MR (1989) Simple method for small-scale disruption of bacteria and yeasts. J Microbiol Methods 9:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein N, Maillard M-B, Thierry A, Lortal S (2001) Conversion of amino acids into aroma compounds by cell-free extracts of Lactobacillus helveticus. J Appl Microbiol 91:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinig AR, Middelberg APJ (1998) On the mechanism of microbial cell disruption in high-pressure homogenisation. Chem Eng Sci 53:891–898

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kula M-R, Schütte H (1987) Purifications of proteins and the disruption of microbial cells. Biotechnol Prog 3:31–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lanciotti R, Sinigaglia M, Angelini P, Guerzoni ME (1994) Effects of homogenization pressures on the survival and growth of some spoilage and pathogenic micro-organisms. Lett Appl Microbiol 18:319–322

    Google Scholar 

  15. Malik AC, Reinbold GW, Vedamuthu ER (1968) An evaluation of the taxonomy of Propionibacterium. Can J Microbiol 14:1185–1191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McIllwain H (1948) Preparation of cell-free bacterial extracts with powdered alumina. J Gen Microbiol 2:288–291

    Google Scholar 

  17. Middelberg APJ (1995) Process-scale disruption of microorganisms. Biotechnol Adv 13:491–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers HJ, Perkins HR, Ward JB (1980) The bacterial autolysins. In: Rogers HJ, Perkins HR, Ward JB (eds) Microbial cell walls and membranes. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 437–460

  19. Salton MRJ, Horne RW (1951) Studies of the bacterial cell wall. II. Methods of preparation and some properties of cell walls. Biochim Biophys Acta 7:177–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Siegel JL, Hurst SF, Liberman ES, Coleman SE, Bleiweis AS (1981) Mutanolysin-induced spheroplasts of Streptococcus mutans are true protoplasts. Infect Immunol 31:808–815

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Terzaghi BE, Sandine WE (1975) Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol 29:807–813

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thierry A, Maillard M-B, Yvon M (2001) Conversion of l-Leucine to isovaleric acid by Propionibacterium freudenreichii TL 34 and ITGP23. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valence F, Lortal S (1995) Zymogram and preliminary characterization of Lactobacillus helveticus autolysins. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3391–3399

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yokogawa K, Kawata T, Takesmura T, Yoshimura Y (1975) Purification and properties of lytic enzymes from Streptomyces globisporus 1829. Agric Biol Chem 39:1533–1543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yvon M, Thirouin S, Rijnen L, Fromentier D, Gripon JC (1997) An aminotransferase from Lactococcus lactis initiates conversion of amino acids to cheese flavor compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:414–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by CAPES (Brasília, Brazil), FAPESP (São Paulo, Brazil) and by the Laboratoire de Recherche de Technologie Laitière (INRA, France).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Lortal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saboya, L.V., Maillard, MB. & Lortal, S. Efficient mechanical disruption of Lactobacillus helveticus, Lactococcus lactis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii by a new high-pressure homogenizer and recovery of intracellular aminotransferase activity. J IND MICROBIOL BIOTECHNOL 30, 1–5 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-002-0011-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-002-0011-3

Keywords

Navigation