Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting Doppler positioning performance with LEO satellites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, the Doppler shifts from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites have been used to augment GNSS and provide navigation services. We propose a Doppler-only point-solution algorithm for GNSS-like navigation systems operated in LEO. The proposed algorithm can simultaneously estimate the receiver clock drift, position and velocity. Then, we analyze the main error sources in Doppler positioning. To achieve the meter-level positioning accuracy, the satellite position and velocity errors should be within several meters and several centimeters per second, respectively. The ionospheric delay rates of C-band signal will cause about 1 m error in Doppler positioning, which can be eliminated using the ionosphere-free combination. The Doppler positioning accuracy will deteriorate sharply by dozens of meters if there are no corrections for the tropospheric errors. Subsequently, we analyze the Doppler positioning performance. The undifferenced Doppler positioning accuracy is at meter level, which is comparable with the pseudorange-based positioning in GNSS. To ensure convergence in the LEO-based Doppler positioning, the initial receiver position error should be less than 300 km when the satellites orbit is at an altitude of 550 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All ephemeris and observations used in this study are simulated. The Starlink orbital parameters are obtained from the SpaceX non-geostationary satellite system Attachment A: technical information to supplement Schedule S (https://www.fcc.report/IBFS/SAT-MOD-20181108-00083/1569860.pdf.) and verified using TLE files and SGP4 model (https://celestrak.org/norad/elements/table.php?GROUP=starlink&FORMAT=tle) in our early work (Zhang et al. 2022). The ai0, ai1 and ai2 coefficients used in NeQuick-G model are obtained from the Galileo navigation broadcast message.

References

  • Anderle RJ (1979) Accuracy of geodetic solutions based on Doppler measurements of the Navstar global positioning system satellites. Bull Géod 53(2):109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aragon-Angel A, Zürn M, Rovira-Garcia A (2019) Galileo ionospheric correction algorithm: an optimization study of NeQuick-G. Radio Sci 54(11):1156–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardito CT, Morales JJ, Khalife JJ, Abdallah A, Kassas ZM (2019) Performance evaluation of navigation using LEO satellite signals with periodically transmitted satellite positions. In: Proc ION ITM 2019, Institute of Navigation, Reston, Virginia, USA, January 28–31, 306–318

  • Benzerrouk H, Nguyen Q, Fang X, Amrhar A, Rasaee H, Landry RJ (2019) LEO satellites based Doppler positioning using distributed nonlinear estimation. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(12):496–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger C, Biancale R, Ill M, Barlier F (1998) Improvement of the empirical thermospheric model DTM: DTM94: a comparative review of various temporal variations and prospects in space geodesy applications. J Geod 72:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolla P, Borre K (2019) Performance analysis of dual-frequency receiver using combinations of GPS L1, L5, and L2 civil signals. J Geod 93:437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braasch MS, Dierendonck AJ (1999) GPS receiver architectures and measurements. Proc IEEE 87(1):48–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakaj S (2021) The parameters comparison of the “Starlink” LEO satellites constellation for different orbital shells. Front Comms Net 2:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Gao W, Wan Y (2013) Revisiting the Doppler filter of LEO satellite GNSS receivers for precise velocity estimation. J Electron 30(2):138–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins JP (1999) An overview of GPS inter-frequency carrier phase combinations. Techn Memo 18:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhangian F, Landry R (2020) Multi-constellation software-defined receiver for Doppler positioning with LEO satellites. Sensors 20(20):5866–5883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziani A, Bertacin R, Tortora P, Schiavone A, Mercolino M, Budnik F (2009) A GPS based Earth troposphere calibration system for Doppler tracking of deep space probes. In: Proc ION GNSS 2009, Institute of Navigation, Savannah, GA, September 22–25, 2575–2583

  • Guan M, Xu T, Gao F, Nie W, Yang H (2020) Optimal walker constellation design of LEO-based global navigation and augmentation system. Remote Sens 12(11):1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulklett M (2003) Relativistic effects in GPS and LEO. University of Copenhagen, Department of Geophysics, The Niels Bohr Institute, Denmark

  • Irsigler M, Hein GW, Schmitz-Peiffer A (2004) Use of C-Band frequencies for satellite navigation: benefits and drawbacks. GPS Solut 8(3):119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayles C, Chauveau JP, Rozo F (2010) DORIS/Jason-2: better than 10 cm on-board orbits available for near-real-time altimetry. Adv Space Res 46(12):1497–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Qin H, Zhao C, Sun G (2022) LEO Doppler-aided GNSS position estimation. GPS Solut 26:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerger M, Gratton L, Pervan B, Cohen CE (2010) Analysis of Iridium-augmented GPS for floating carrier phase positioning. Navigation 57(2):137–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershner R, Newton R (1962) The transit system. J Navig 15(2):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalife JJ, Kassas ZM (2019a) Receiver design for Doppler positioning with LEO satellites. In: 2019a IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), Brighton, UK, May 12–17, 5506–5510

  • Khalife JJ, Kassas ZM (2019b) Assessment of differential carrier phase measurements from Orbcomm LEO satellite signals for opportunistic navigation. In: Proc ION GNSS+ 2019b, Institute of Navigation, Miami, Florida, USA, September 16–20, 4053–4063

  • Khalife JJ, Neinavaie M, Kassas ZM (2020) Navigation with differential carrier phase measurements from megaconstellation LEO satellites. In: Proc IEEE/ION PLANS 2020, Institute of Navigation, Portland, OR, USA, April 20–23, 1393–1404

  • Khalife JJ, Neinavaie M, Kassas ZM (2021) Blind Doppler tracking from OFDM signals transmitted by broadband LEO satellites. In: 2021 IEEE 93rd vehicular technology conference (VTC2021-Spring). IEEE, Helsinki, Finland, April 25–28, 1–5

  • Klobuchar JA (1996) Ionosphere effects of GPS. In: Parkinson B, Spilker JJ (Eds.) Global positioning system: theory and applications, Volume 1, pp 485–515

  • Kouba J (1983) A review of geodetic and geodynamic satellite Doppler positioning. Rev Geophys 21(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landskron D, Böhm J (2018) VMF3/GPT3: refined discrete and empirical troposphere mapping function. J Geod 92(4):349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence D, Cobb HS, Gutt G, Tremblay F, Laplante P, O’Connor M (2016) Test results from a LEO-satellite-based assured time and location solution. In: Proc ION GNSS+ 2016, Institute of Navigation, Monterey, California, USA, January 25–28, 125–129

  • Li Z, Huang J (2013) GPS surveying and data processing. Wuhan University Press, Wuhan

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Yuan Y, Wang N, Li Z, Huo X (2018) Performance of various predicted GNSS global ionospheric maps relative to GPS and JASON TEC data. GPS Solut 22:55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ma F, Li X, Lv H, Bian L, Jiang Z, Zhang X (2019) LEO constellation-augmented multi-GNSS for rapid PPP convergence. J Geod 93(5):749–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang L, Fu W, Han Y, Zhou H, Chen R (2022) Bottomside ionospheric snapshot modeling using the LEO navigation augmentation signal from the Luojia-1A satellite. GPS Solut 26:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Y, Bian L, Han L, Lei W, Yan T, He M, Li X (2018) A global navigation augmentation system based on LEO communication constellation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 European Navigation Conference (ENC), Gothenburg, Sweden, May 14–17, 65–71

  • Montenbruck O, Van Helleputte T, Kroes R, Gill E (2005) Reduced dynamic orbit determination using GPS code and carrier measurements. Aerosp Sci Technol 9(3):261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales JJ, Khalife JJ, Cruz US, Kassas ZM (2019) Orbit modeling for simultaneous tracking and navigation using LEO satellite signals. In: Proc ION GNSS+ 2019, Institute of Navigation, Miami, Florida, USA, September 16–20, 2090–2099

  • Morales-Ferre R, Lohan ES, Falco G, Falletti E (2020) GDOP-based analysis of suitability of LEO constellations for future satellite-based positioning. In: Proc of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Wireless for Space and Extreme Environments (WiSEE), Vicenza, Italy, October 12–14, 147–152

  • Neinavaie M, Khalife JJ, Kassas ZM (2021) Acquisition, Doppler tracking, and positioning with Starlink LEO satellites: first results. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 58(3):2606–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orabi M, Khalife JJ, Kassas ZM (2021) Opportunistic navigation with Doppler measurements from Iridium Next and Orbcomm LEO satellites. In: 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE, Big Sky, MT, USA, March 06–13, 1–9

  • Park B, Jeon S, Kee C (2011) A closed-form method for the attitude determination using GNSS Doppler measurements. Int J Control Autom Syst 9(4):701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS Conventions (2010). IERS technical note, vol 36. Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

  • Psiaki ML (2021) Navigation using carrier Doppler shift from a LEO constellation: transit on steroids. Navigation 68(3):621–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psiaki ML, Slosman BD (2019) Tracking of digital FM OFDM Signals for the determination of navigation observables. In: Proc. ION GNSS+ 2019, Institute of Navigation, Miami, Florida, USA, September 16–20, 2325–2348

  • Reid TG, Neish AM, Walter T, Enge PK (2018) Broadband LEO constellations for navigation. Navigation 65(2):205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid TG, Neish AM, Walter TF, Enge PK (2016) Leveraging commercial broadband LEO constellations for navigating. Proc. ION GNSS+ 2016, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, September 12–16, 2300–2314

  • Reigber C, Schmidt R, Flechtner F, König R, Meyer U, Neumayer KH, Schwintzer P, Zhu SY (2005) An earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S. J Geodyn 39(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybak MM, Axelrad P, Seubert J, Ely T (2021) Chip scale atomic clock-driven one-way radiometric tracking for low-earth-orbit cubesat navigation. J Spacecraft Rockets 58(1):200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standish EM (1998) JPL planetary and lunar ephemerides, DE405/LE405. JPL Interoffice Memorandum IOM 312. F-98-048

  • Tan Z, Qin H, Cong L, Zhao C (2019) Positioning using IRIDIUM satellite signals of opportunity in weak signal environment. Electronics 9(1):37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavella P (2008) Statistical and mathematical tools for atomic clocks. Metrologia 45(6):183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallado D, Crawford P (2008) SGP4 orbit determination. In: Proceedings of AIAA/AAS astrodynamics specialist conference and exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, August 18–21, pp 6770

  • Walker JG (1984) Satellite constellations. J Br Interplanet Soc 37(12):559–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Yuan Y, Li Z, Li Y, Huo X, Li M (2017) An examination of the Galileo NeQuick model: comparison with GPS and JASON TEC. GPS Solut 21:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Liu L, Kong J, Zhai C (2018) Global ionospheric modeling based on multi-GNSS, satellite altimetry, and formosat-3/COSMIC data. GPS Solut 22:104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng T, Sui L, Jia X, Lv Z, Ji G, Dai Q, Zhang Q (2018) Validation of enhanced orbit determination for GPS satellites with LEO GPS data considering multi ground station networks. Adv Space Res 63(9):2938–2951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Ou J, Yuan Y, Zhong S (2010) Precise point positioning algorithm based on original dual-frequency GPS code and carrier-phase observations and its application. Acta Geod Cartogr Sin 39(5):478–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Ding W, Qu X, Yuan Y (2023) Simulation analysis of LEO constellation augmented GNSS (LeGNSS) zenith troposphere delay and gradients estimation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 61:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Li Z, Shi C, Fang X (2022) Analysis of positioning performance and GDOP based on Starlink LEO constellation. In: Proceedings of the China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2022, Beijing, China, May 25, 47–55

  • Zhao Q, Wang C, Guo J, Yang G, Liao M, Ma H, Liu J (2017) Enhanced orbit determination for BeiDou satellites with FengYun-3C onboard GNSS data. GPS Solut 21(3):1179–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziebart M (2004) Generalized analytical solar radiation pressure modeling algorithm for spacecraft of complex shape. J Spacecr Rockets 41(5):840–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41931075, Grant No.42204033). The authors are grateful to CelesTrak for providing TLE files and the International GNSS Service (IGS) for providing Galileo navigation broadcast messages.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CS, YZ and ZL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YZ, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 9235 KB)

Supplementary file 2 (DOCX 1660 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, C., Zhang, Y. & Li, Z. Revisiting Doppler positioning performance with LEO satellites. GPS Solut 27, 126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01466-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01466-w

Keywords

Navigation