Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 264–270 | Cite as

Effect of Viewing Angle on Luminance and Contrast for a Five-Million-Pixel Monochrome Display and a Nine-Million-Pixel Color Liquid Crystal Display

  • Dipesh H. Fifadara
  • Alice Averbukh
  • David S. Channin
  • Aldo Badano
Original paper

Abstract

Digital imaging systems used in radiology rely on electronic display devices to present images to human observers. Active-matrix liquid crystal displays (AMLCDs) continue to improve and are beginning to be considered for diagnostic image display. In spite of recent progress, AMLCDs are characterized by a change in luminance and contrast response with changes in viewing direction. In this article, we characterize high pixel density AMLCDs (a five-million-pixel monochrome display and a nine-million-pixel color display) in terms of the effect of viewing angle on their luminance and contrast response. We measured angular luminance profiles using a custom-made computer-controlled goniometric instrument and a conoscopic Fourier-optics instrument. We show the angular luminance response as a function of viewing angle, as well as the departure of the measured contrast from the desired response. Our findings indicate small differences between the five-million-pixel (5 MP) and the nine-million-pixel (9 MP) AMLCDs. The 9 MP shows lower variance in contrast with changes in viewing angle, whereas the 5 MP provides a slightly better GSDF compliance for off-normal viewing.

Keywords

Active-matrix liquid crystal display (AMLCD) viewing angle gray-scale display function (GSDF) 

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Radiology/ National Electrical Manufacturers Association: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 3.14, Grayscale Standard Display Function. Technical report, ACR/NEMA, January 1998Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Averbukh, AN, Channin, DS, Flynn, MJ 2003Assessment of a novel, high resolution, color AMLCD for diagnostic medical image display. Luminance performance and DICOM calibrationJ Digital Imaging16270279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Badano, A, Flynn, MJ, Martin, S, Kanicki, J 2003Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displaysMed Physics3026022613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Badano, A, Fifadara, DH 2004Comparison of conoscopic, telescopic, and goniometric methods for measuring angular emissions from medical liquid-crystal displaysAppl Optics..Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Badano, A, Flynn, MJ 2000Method for measuring veiling glare in high performance display devicesAppl Optics3920592066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Samei A, Badano D, Chakraborty K, et al.: Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems. Draft Report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18. Technical report, AAPM, October 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SCAR (Society for Computer Applications in Radiology) 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dipesh H. Fifadara
    • 1
  • Alice Averbukh
    • 2
  • David S. Channin
    • 2
  • Aldo Badano
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Devices and Radiological HealthFood and Drug AdministrationRockville
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyNorthwestern University Medical SchoolChicago

Personalised recommendations