Abstract
The mandibular premolars can pose a significant challenge in root canal treatment due to their complex canal system. This study investigated the prevalence of multiple roots and complex canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a selected Egyptian sub-population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). 283 CBCT scans (131 males, 152 females, age 18–70) included 1132 mandibular premolars (566 first, and 566 second premolars) were viewed for incidences ofvariation in root numbers and canal configuration according to Vertucci’s classification. CBCT images were assessed by two endodontists, data were statistically analyzed using Fisher exact and Chi-square tests. The majority of first premolars (85.7%) exhibited a single root, whereas 14.7% had 2 roots with a significantly higher frequency in males (19.8%) than in females (9.5%) (P < .05). The most prevalent type was type I (57.8%), followed by type V (21.7%), while types II and VII made up only 1%. Types V and III were more prevalent among females, while males had a higher prevalence of types I and IV. In 2.5% of cases, mandibular second premolars were found to have 2 roots, with a higher incidence in males (P < .05). Type I canals were significantly more prevalent (90.8%) than other types, followed by type V (5.3%) (P < .05). A statistically significant gender correlation was found regarding root number and canal configuration. It is not uncommon to find mandibular first premolars with two roots in the southern Egyptian population, particularly in males. These observations may be valuable for dentists who treat Southern Egyptians, in Egypt and other countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In endodontic practice, it is essential for clinicians to have an understanding of root canal anatomical variations, as fully acquainting common root canal morphology enables the clinician to perform cleaning and shaping procedures more efficiently with fewer procedural errors [1]. Additionally, using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the pre-evaluation of root canal morphology provides a better understanding of the challenges that the clinician might encounter, which can ultimately lead to improved treatment outcomes and prognosis [2].
Owing to the disparity of root canal morphology among diverse populations, several studies [3, 4] have been conducted using various techniques to recognize and correlate these variations with different populations and ethnic groups. Techniques such as dye penetration, sectioning, electron microscopy, canal staining, tooth clearing [5], intra-radicular contrast medium radiography [6], and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), which has been referred to as the gold standard [7, 8], have been utilized in previous studies. These techniques are ex vivo and are only applicable to extracted teeth [9]. While other techniques such as conventional 2D radiography, operating microscope, and CBCT are reliable for clinical use [10].
Earlier studies [11,12,13], recognized high rates of morphological variations in mandibular premolars, this diversity of canal anatomy is genetically and ethnically based in the first place [14]. Few studies have examined the Egyptian population [15, 16], however, this is the first study to focus solely on the teeth morphology of a southern Egyptian subpopulation. Considering the anatomical variations during root canal treatment of southern Egyptians is of great significance and could improve treatment outcomes.
Materials and methods
The protocol of this retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee at Beni-Suef University, Egypt (# REC-FDBSU/03112022-01/EM). A power analysis was designed to have adequate power to apply statistical analysis regarding the prevalence of multiple roots of mandibular premolars in the southern Egyptian sub-population using CBCT. By adopting a confidence interval of 95%, a margin of error of 5% with finite population correction and by using a prevalence of multiple roots of mandibular premolars of 16%, based on the results of a pilot study, the predicted sample size (n) was 206 cases. Sample size calculation was performed using Epi info for Windows version 7.2 (CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA). A total of 561 CBCT scans that had been taken for diagnostic purposes between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively collected from radiology centers in the city of Assiut in southern Egypt.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria specified Egyptian patients aged between 18 and 70 years, whereas exclusion criteria involved scans with a missing mandibular premolar, internal resorption, root canal fillings, and post and crown restorations. A total of 283 scans (131 males, 152 females) were included in the study after the application of these criteria, encompassing 1132 mandibular premolars, evenly distributed between 566 mandibular first premolars and 566 mandibular second premolars.
Image acquisition and analysis
All scans were taken either by(Papaya X; GENORAY, Seoul, Korea) with a field of view (FOV) of 14 × 14 cm and voxel size ranging between 80 and 200 µm, or by (NewTom VGi evo; NewTom, Verona, Italy) with FOV of 24 × 19 cm, and voxel size ranged between 150 and 300 µm. Analysis of the CBCT scans was done distinctly twice by two endodontists with almost 10 years of experience using CBCT. In the beginning, both inter and intra-examiner reliability were determined by analyzing 20 scans, the value of Cohen’s kappa for the inter-observer agreement was 0.86. A code has been given for all scans, and any disagreement between the examiners (19 out of 283 cases) was discussed until a consensus was reached. To avoid any bias, all scans were consecutively numbered and that was the only information available for both examiners.
The CBCT images were viewed in three planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal) to assess the number of roots, root canal configuration, and bilateral symmetry (Figs. 1, 2). To assess the root numbers and canal configuration it was necessary to examine any tooth in different orientations and angles. However, the primary focus was on the axial view, which required a slow and gradual scrolling of the toolbar from the pulp chamber to the apex. Vertucci's classification was utilized to assess the root canal configuration. This classification system is designed to describe and classify the various morphological patterns of the root canal system into eight types to encompass complex configurations [5].
Statistical analysis
The frequency and percentage of additional roots and different types of canals in relation to gender were assessed, and the data were analyzed using the chi-square test. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using multiple Fisher’s exact tests with p-value adjustment through the false discovery rate (FDR) method. The statistical analysis was performed using R statistical analysis software version 4.1.3 for Windows (R Core, Vienna, Austria-https://www.R-project.org). P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
A total of 1132 mandibular premolars were assessed in this study. One-rooted mandibular first premolars occurred significantly more often in both genders (85.4%) than two-rooted ones (14.7%) (P < 0.05). In males, however, the most common canal configuration was type I, followed by type V and IV; on the other hand, females showed the highest incidence of type I canals followed by types V and III. Both genders rarely exhibited type II and type VII. The incidence of one root was significantly higher in females (90.5%) than in males (80.2%) (X2 = 12.19, P < 0.05). Conversely, the incidence of two roots was significantly lower (14.6%) with a greater frequency among males (19.8%) than in females (9.5%) (Table 1) (P < 0.05). The mandibular second premolar demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of single-rooted teeth (96.5%) than 2-roots (2.5%), while three rooted premolars were very rare (1%) (P < 0.05). A higher occurrence of single-rooted teeth was observed in females (98.7%) than in males (93.9%) (X2 = 10.09, P < 0.05). On the contrary, the frequency of two-rooted premolars was higher in males (4.6%) than in females (0.7%) (P < 0.05). Canal types I and V occurred more frequently than other canal configurations in both genders (Table 2). Mandibular first and second premolars showed bilateral symmetry regarding the number of roots and canal configurations (Table 3).
Discussion
Having a comprehensive understanding of the internal morphology of mandibular premolars and their anatomic variations is crucial for endodontic treatment. Earlier studies [17, 18] reported extremely variable and complex internal anatomy in mandibular premolars, with a high chance of extra canals. Racial and ethnic variations play a major role in the morphological complexities of teeth and previous studies observed substantial differences in the number of roots and internal morphology of premolars between different populations and ethnicities as in the Middle Eastern, Caucasian, Indian, and Chinese [5, 19, 20]. Complex root canal anatomy cannot be accurately detected through two-dimensional radiographic images, hence, it is essential to rely on more advanced tools such as CBCT, which provides three-dimensional images with a higher level of resolution. CBCT gives a more comprehensive understanding of the root canal anatomy while minimizing radiation exposure [21], and is a non-invasive alternative to traditional methods such as clearing and dye penetration techniques [22].
Using 283 CBCT scans, this study investigated the frequency of root numbers and root canal morphology in mandibular premolars among a selected southern Egyptian population according to Vertucci's classifications [5]. A total of 566 mandibular first and 566 mandibular second premolars were examined in the analysis. In the current study, single-rooted mandibular first premolars were found in 85.4% of the cases, which is in agreement with incidences ranging from 85.0 to 99.9% reported in a previous study [18], and values reported for Spanish [23], Turkish [24], and Korean populations [25]. However, the southern Egyptian population exhibited a higher prevalence of two-rooted mandibular first premolars (14.7%) compared to other ethnic groups, such as Saudi (3.1%) [12], German (8.6%) [26], western Chinese (2%) [27], Thai (4.87%) [28], Iranian (14.4%) [29], and Korean populations (0.1%) [25]. It is important to note that different techniques have produced varying results in determining the prevalence of the two-rooted mandibular first premolars. For example, in the Egyptian population [30], decalcifying and clearing techniques showed that only 3.2% of teeth had two roots, while two-dimensional radiography revealed a slightly higher incidence of 16.2% in the African American population [19]. These conflicting results may be attributed to differences in analysis techniques and various subpopulations.
When analyzing the canal configuration of mandibular first premolars, it was found that 57.8% of teeth had a single canal (Vertucci's type I), while type V and type III accounted for 21.7% and 9.5%, respectively. These results are consistent with a prior study conducted on the Egyptian population [30], and a recent meta-analysis [20]. Other CBCT analysis studies have shown that the Chinese population had 54% of first mandibular premolars with a single canal (type I) [31], the Thai population 63% [32], the South Indian population 83.81% [11], and the Turkish population [24] 93.5% mandibular first premolars with Vertucci's type I. A review [18] revealed that 75.8% of teeth had a single canal, while two or more canals were found in 24.2% of teeth. Trope et al. [19] reported that African Americans had a 32.8% occurrence of mandibular first premolars with two or more canals.
In the current study, the vast majority (96.5%) of mandibular second premolars had only one root, while 2.5% had two roots. These results are consistent with previous studies, conducted using CBCT, which found a high prevalence of single-rooted second premolars in Saudi (95.6%) [12], Turkish (98.5%) [24], German (98.16%) [26], and Korean populations (99.9%) [25]. Additionally, the most common canal configuration among mandibular second premolars was type I (90.8%), followed by type V and III with an incidence of 5.3% and 1.4%, respectively, which is corroborated by previous CBCT studies in German [26], Turkish [24], and Spanish populations [23]. Comparable percentages were found in the Jordanian population [33], utilizing the clearing technique. In the present study, types II, IV, and VIII were rarely observed (0.7%).
Gender differences regarding the canal morphology of mandibular premolars have been reported in several studies [12, 34, 35]. In the present study, an association was observed between gender and the number of roots, as a higher frequency of single-rooted teeth was particularly observed in females, which is consistent with a recent review [20]. Moreover, two-rooted mandibular premolars were more prevalent in the male than in the female population, this was similarly observed in a Portuguese subpopulation [36], as females had a lower number of roots per tooth in all teeth compared to males. However, in the present study, the occurrence of three roots was a rare finding in both genders, with marginal differences between males and females in the mandibular second premolars. On the other hand, the occurrence of two canals in the first premolars was more prevalent in females. In the current study, a bilateral symmetry was observed for mandibular first and second premolars in terms of the number of roots and canal configurations, and this is in agreement with a previous study in Norway [37]. On the contrary, another study in the Turkish population showed that the incidence of type I configuration was higher on the right compared to the left side [24].
This study has some limitations, including the small sample size and the use of CBCT records collected by different machines with varying image resolution and voxel sizes (ranging from 150 to 300 µm). Moreover, a selected population was used for this study. Diagnostic purposes were the indications for CBCT analysis. However, a cross-sectional distribution can be assumed as there was no focus on any endodontic treatment planning. These factors should be considered when interpreting the study results. Furthermore, there are limited published data on the teeth morphology of certain populations and geographic groups in Africa. Therefore, more studies are needed in this area using non-invasive methods to address these gaps in knowledge.
Conclusions
The findings of this study point out that in the southern Egyptian sub-population, there are variations in root number and canal morphology of mandibular premolars, predominated by one-rooted teeth. Two-rooted mandibular first premolars showed a significantly higher prevalence in males than in females. Vertucci’s type I succeeded by type V, and type III was most common in mandibular premolars.
Change history
26 February 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00919-z
References
Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top. 2005;10(1):3–29.
Kim Y, Lee S-J, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1063–8.
Ahmad IA. Root and root canal morphology of Saudi Arabian permanent dentition. Saudi Endod J. 2015;5(2):99–106.
Karobari MI, Noorani TY, Halim MS, Ahmed HMA. Root and canal morphology of the anterior permanent dentition in Malaysian population using two classification systems: a CBCT clinical study. Aust Endod J. 2021;47(2):202–16.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(5):589–99.
Fan B, Gao Y, Fan W, Gutmann JL. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars—part ii: the effect of bone image superimposition and intraradicular contrast medium on radiograph interpretation. J Endod. 2008;34(2):160–5.
Domark JD, Hatton JF, Benison RP, Hildebolt CF. An ex vivo comparison of digital radiography and cone-beam and micro computed tomography in the detection of the number of canals in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. J Endod. 2013;39(7):901–5.
Elnour M, Khabeer A, AlShwaimi E. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary second premolars in a Saudi Arabian sub-population: an in vitro microcomputed tomography study. Saudi Dent J. 2016;28(4):162–8.
Monsarrat P, Arcaute B, Peters OA, Maury E, Telmon N, Georgelin-Gurgel M, et al. Interrelationships in the variability of root canal anatomy among the permanent teeth: a full-mouth approach by cone-beam CT. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165329.
Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium–enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1547–51.
Shetty A, Hegde MN, Tahiliani D, Shetty H, Bhat GT, Shetty S. A three-dimensional study of variations in root canal morphology using cone-beam computed tomography of mandibular premolars in a South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(8):ZC22.
Alfawaz H, Alqedairi A, Al-Dahman YH, Al-Jebaly AS, Alnassar FA, Alsubait S, et al. Evaluation of root canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Saudi population using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(1):137–42.
Dou L, Li D, Xu T, Tang Y, Yang D. Root anatomy and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–7.
Corzon M. Miscegenation and the prevalence of three-rooted mandibular first molars in the Baffin Eskimo. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1974;2(3):130–1.
Ghobashy AM, Nagy MM, Bayoumi AA. Evaluation of root and canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars in an Egyptian population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1089–92.
Sharaan ME, Elrawdy AM. An evaluation of mandibular molars root canal morphology using cone-beam computed tomography in an Egyptian subpopulation. Tanta Dent J. 2017;14(4):220–4.
England MC Jr, Hartwell GR, Lance JR. Detection and treatment of multiple canals in mandibular premolars. J Endod. 1991;17(4):174–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(06)82012-1.
Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. The root and root canal morphology of the human mandibular first premolar: a literature review. J Endod. 2007;33(5):509–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.004.
Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod. 1986;12(8):343–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(86)80035-8.
Wolf TG, Anderegg AL, Wierichs RJ, Campus G. Root canal morphology of the mandibular second premolar: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):309–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01668-z.
Patel S, Patel R, Foschi F, Mannocci F. the impact of different diagnostic imaging modalities on the evaluation of root canal anatomy and endodontic residents’ stress levels: a clinical study. J Endod. 2019;45(4):406–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.12.001.
Martins JNR, Marques D, Silva E, Caramês J, Versiani MA. Prevalence studies on root canal anatomy using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: a systematic review. J Endod. 2019;45(4):372–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.12.016.
Llena C, Fernandez J, Ortolani PS, Forner L. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Spanish population. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(3):221–7. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.221.
Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Çolak M, Güngör E. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):701–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.898091.
Park JB, Kim N, Park S, Kim Y, Ko Y. Evaluation of root anatomy of permanent mandibular premolars and molars in a Korean population with cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(1):94–101.
Bürklein S, Heck R, Schäfer E. Evaluation of the root canal anatomy of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a selected german population using cone-beam computed tomographic data. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1448–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.044.
Yu X, Guo B, Li KZ, Zhang R, Tian YY, Wang H, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a western Chinese population. BMC Med Imaging. 2012;12:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-12-18.
Arayasantiparb R, Banomyong D. Prevalence and morphology of multiple roots, root canals and C-shaped canals in mandibular premolars from cone-beam computed tomography images in a Thai population. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.010.
Kazemipoor M, Poorkheradmand M, Rezaeian M, Safi Y. Evaluation by CBCT of root and canal morphology in mandibular premolars in an Iranian population. Chin J Dent Res. 2015;18(3):191–6.
Alhadainy HA. Canal configuration of mandibular first premolars in an Egyptian population. J Adv Res. 2013;4(2):123–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.03.002.
Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF. Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod. 2006;32(10):932–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.008.
Thanaruengrong P, Kulvitit S, Navachinda M, Charoenlarp P. Prevalence of complex root canal morphology in the mandibular first and second premolars in Thai population: CBCT analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):449–61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01822-7.
Awawdeh LA, Al-Qudah AA. Root form and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2008;41(3):240–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01348.x.
Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30(6):391–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00004.
Martins JNR, Ordinola-Zapata R, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Differences in root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth within different age groups. Int Endod J. 2018;51(8):931–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12896.
Martins JNR, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Gender influence on the number of roots and root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth of a Portuguese subpopulation. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(2):103–11. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a39508.
Johnsen GF, Dara S, Asjad S, Sunde PT, Haugen HJ. Anatomic comparison of contralateral premolars. J Endod. 2017;43(6):956–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.012.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MAE: Conceptualization, Design; MAE, MYE: Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Literature search, Data acquisition, Data analysis, Software; Supervision; Validation, Visualization; MAE, MYE, ES: Manuscript preparation, Manuscript editing, Manuscript review. All authors have made a substantive contribution to this manuscript, and all have reviewed the final paper prior to its submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Faculty of Dentistry Beni-Suef University Research Ethics Committee (FDBSU-REC) Number: # REC-FDBSU/03112022-01/EM.
Human and animal rights
No animals/humans were used for studies that are the basis of this research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised due to the title was published incorrectly and corrected in this version.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Elsayed, M.A., Elmesellawy, M.Y. & Schäfer, E. Prevalence of multiple roots and complex canal morphology in mandibular premolars among a selected Southern Egyptian sub-population: a CBCT-analysis. Odontology (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00903-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00903-7