Advertisement

Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 131, Issue 6, pp 891–894 | Cite as

Virtual issue: Alpine and subalpine plant communities: importance of plant growth, reproduction and community assemblage processes for changing environments

  • Koichi Takahashi
Editorial
  • 395 Downloads

Abstract

Natural plant communities are exposed to environmental changes such as global warming and increased human activities. It is thought that alpine and subalpine ecosystems with cool climatic conditions are sensitive to environmental changes. This virtual issue introduces multidisciplinary research at alpine and subalpine plant communities. The articles include research on (1) species diversity, vegetation and biomass, (2) species assembly, (3) climate and growth of alpine plants, (4) reproduction of alpine plants, (5) differences of growth traits among coexisting species, (6) vegetation changes by human activities and overgrazing of deer, and (7) differentiation of growth traits among ecotypes in relation to climatic conditions. These thirteen articles provide valuable information for future research on the effects of environmental changes on alpine and subalpine plant communities.

Natural plant communities are exposed to environmental changes such as global warming and increased human activities (Takahashi et al. 2011a; Takahashi and Hanyu 2015; Mietkiewicz et al. 2017). It is thought that alpine and subalpine ecosystems with cool climatic conditions are sensitive to environmental changes. Furthermore, deer have expanded their range and increased dramatically in abundance worldwide in recent decades through human activities, i.e., wide spread agricultural and silvicultural lands and reductions in hunting and natural predators (Côté et al. 2004; Takatsuki 2009). Overbrowsing of deer reduces plant cover and species diversity in natural plant communities. Therefore, it is necessary to consider effects of environmental changes, including human activities and overgrazing of deer, on plant distribution, species diversity and regeneration dynamics of plant communities at high altitudes.

Plant growth and reproduction are limited at higher altitudes due to low temperatures (Mäkinen et al. 2002; Takahashi et al. 2011b). For example, many studies, using open top chambers (OTC), showed that the growth of alpine plants was limited by low temperature during the growth period because plant growth often increased in the OTC (Arft et al. 1999; Takahashi 2005; Hoffmann et al. 2010; Klady et al. 2011). Global warming prolongs growth periods for plants, but the rate of increase of growth period is greater at higher altitudes with shorter growth periods if the growth period is determined by a certain threshold temperature, irrespective of altitude (i.e., the growth period becomes longer by the same number of days along altitudes). Therefore, the increase of plant growth due to global warming is greater at higher altitudes (Takahashi and Okuhara 2013). Furthermore, increases of growth and decomposition rates due to global warming would alter carbon cycling of ecosystems (Oechel et al. 1993; Hagedorn et al. 2010; Deslippe et al. 2011; Natali et al. 2011).

It is often reported that vegetation distribution changes due to global warming (Parmesan and Yohe 2003; Kelly and Goulden 2008; Parolo and Rossi 2008). For example, the distribution of alpine plants moved upward at the rate of 0–4 m per decade near summits of the Europe Alps (Pauli et al. 1996). In addition, some researchers predicted, using ecological niche models, that distribution area shrank in many plant species due to global warming (Thuiller et al. 2005; Casalegno et al. 2010; Sen et al. 2016). It is expected that the reduction of distribution area is more conspicuous for alpine and subalpine vegetation than lowland vegetation (Ishigami et al. 2003). Many researchers have examined the dynamics of treelines and timberlines because their upward shift means forest development and expansion (Kullman 2002; Walther et al. 2005; Danby and Hik 2007; Devi et al. 2008; Takahashi and Yoshida 2009; Takahashi et al. 2012; Takahashi 2014). However, some researchers reported that vegetation distribution did not change (Peñuelas and Boada 2003; Foster and D’Amato 2015). For example, Harsch et al. (2009) clarified that about half of treelines and timberlines had not move upward by the meta-analysis. Thus, effects of global warming on plant distributions are still unknown.

A plant community consists of many coexisting species. In general, the number of tree species monotonically decreases with altitude or shows hump-shaped patterns (Rahbek 1995), but herbaceous species often show different altitudinal distribution patterns (Miyajima et al. 2007; Tsujino and Yumoto 2013). This means that the number of plant species is not determined by temperature only. Plant species compete for light, soil water and nutrients among coexisting species, but facilitation is more important than interspecific competition for species assemblages at higher altitudes (Callaway et al. 2002). Therefore, examination of species coexisting mechanisms in plant communities along altitudinal gradients is necessary to clarify how environmental changes affect community structures of plants. Studies of plant community dynamics along altitudinal gradients would be also important for understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling because not only growth rates but also the nitrogen to phosphorus ratio of plants changes with altitude (Zhao et al. 2016). Plant morphological and physiolosical traits change plastically to environmental conditions (Cordell et al. 1998; Nicotra et al. 2010; Takahashi and Goto 2012). Thus, examination of plastic responses is crucial for understanding how plants adapt to environmental changes. Furthermore, each plant species is distributed in a wide geographical area along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients, so plant individuals experience different environmental conditions even within the same species. Plant species often differentiate into certain ecotypes to adapt to environmental conditions (Li et al. 1998; Martin et al. 2007; Hirano et al. 2017). Therefore, comparing growth traits among ecotypes of a species will provide valuable information when considering evolution and adaptation of the species.

I have compiled a virtual issue on the website of the Journal of Plant Research (https://www.springer.com/10265) with 13 articles published after 2010 for the following 7 subjects of alpine and subalpine plant communities.

  1. 1.

    Species diversity, vegetation and biomass: Namgail et al. (2012) revealed that hump-shaped patterns of biomass and species diversity along altitudinal gradients were caused by livestock grazing at low altitudes in the Indian Himalaya. Manish et al. (2017) also showed hump-shaped patterns of species diversity along altitudinal gradients in the Eastern Himalaya and the combination of ambient energy and water availability was the main driver of altitudinal plant species diversity. Zhu et al. (2010) showed that carbon storage and partitioning among vegetation, detritus and soil varied greatly with forest type and altitude in temperate forests in China. Hirota et al. (2010) revealed that gross primary production and ecosystem respiration rates positively correlated to species diversity and vegetation biomass, respectively, at a meadow in the Tibet Plateau. Sakio and Masuzawa (2012) suggested that the advancing timberline on Mt. Fuji in Japan is a recovery process after the volcanic eruption.

     
  2. 2.

    Species assembly: Takahashi and Tanaka (2016) clarified that habitat filtering was more important than interspecific competition for species assemblages of alpine and subalpine plant communities in Japan by examining functional traits.

     
  3. 3.

    Climate and growth of alpine plants: Yoshie (2010) examined the vegetative phenology of 29 alpine species in Japan, and showed the importance of early growth initiation for the increase of growth of alpine plants as the growth period of leaves and stems correlated with the time of growth initiation stronger than with the time of growth cessation. Takahashi and Aoki (2015) also showed that high temperatures at the beginning of the growth period increase the annual shoot length and tree-ring width of alpine dwarf pine Pinus pumila in central Japan.

     
  4. 4.

    Reproduction of alpine plants: Guerrina et al. (2016) examined reproductive traits of an ancient alpine plant species Berardia subacaulis that survived past climate changes in the European Alps, and showed that B. subacaulis assured reproduction under a pollinator decline because self-pollination was possible.

     
  5. 5.

    Differences of growth traits among coexisting species: Takahashi and Obata (2014) examined crown architecture and net production of understory saplings of four coexisting subalpine conifer species in Japan, and showed the interspecific differences closely related to their regeneration traits such as shade tolerance.

     
  6. 6.

    Vegetation changes by human activities and overgrazing of deer: Takahashi and Miyajima (2010) revealed that sunny lowland and montane herbaceous species increased along roadsides in the subalpine zone in Japan. Tsujino et al. (2013) reported that regeneration of subalpine coniferous forests was hindered by browsing of sika deer in Japan.

     
  7. 7.

    Differentiation of growth traits among ecotypes in relation to climatic conditions: Ozaki et al. (2018) studied how multiple climate variables influence trait values in 44 ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana grown under common conditions, and found that genetic variations in growth traits were associated with various climate variables in the original habitats, reflecting their evolutionary processes.

     

I hope these 13 articles provide valuable information for future research on the effects of environmental changes on alpine and subalpine plant communities.

References

  1. Arft AM, Walker MD, Gurevitch J, Alatalo JM, Bret-Harte MS, Dale M, Diemer M, Gugerli F, Henry GHR, Jones MH, Hollister RD, Jónsdóttir IS, Laine K, Lévesque E, Marion GM, Molau U, Mølgaard P, Nordenhäll U, Raszhivin V, Robinson CH, Starr G, Stenström A, Totland Ø, Turner PL, Walker LJ, Webber PJ, Welker JM, Wookey PA (1999) Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecol Monogr 69:491–511Google Scholar
  2. Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortiek CJ, Michalet R, Paolini L, Pugnaireq FI, Newingham B, Aschehoug ET, Armas C, Kikodze D, Cook BJ (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casalegno S, Amatulli G, Camia A, Nelson A, Pekkarinen A (2010) Vulnerability of Pinus cembra L. in the Alps and the Carpathian mountains under present and future climates. For Ecol Manage 259:750–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cordell S, Goldstein G, Mueller-Dombois D, Webb D, Vitousek PM (1998) Physiological and morphological variation in Metrosideros polymorpha, a dominant Hawaiian tree species, along an altitudinal gradient: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Oecologia 113:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay JP, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danby RK, Hik DS (2007) Variability, contingency and rapid change in recent subarctic alpine tree line dynamics. J Ecol 95:352–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deslippe JR, Hartmann M, Mohn WW, Simard SW (2011) Long-term experimental manipulation of climate alters the ectomycorrhizal community of Betula nana in Arctic tundra. Glob Change Biol 17:1625–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devi N, Hagedorn F, Moiseev P, Bugmann H, Shiyatov S, Mazepa V, Rigling A (2008) Expanding forests and changing growth forms of Siberian larch at the Polar Urals treeline during the 20th century. Glob Change Biol 14:1581–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster JR, D’Amato AW (2015) Montane forest ecotones moved downslope in northeastern USA in spite of warming between 1984 and 2011. Glob Change Biol 21:4497–4507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guerrina M, Casazza G, Conti E, Macrì C, Minuto L (2016) Reproductive biology of an Alpic paleo-endemic in a changing climate. J Plant Res 129:477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagedorn F, Martin M, Rixen C, Rusch S, Bebi P, Zürcher A, Siegwolf RTW, Wipf S, Escape C, Roy J, Hättenschwiler S (2010) Short-term responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to experimental soil warming at the Swiss alpine treeline. Biogeochemistry 97:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harsch MA, Hulme PE, McGlone M, Duncan RP (2009) Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecol Lett 12:1040–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hirano M, Sakaguchi S, Takahashi K (2017) Phenotypic differentiation of the Solidago virgaurea complex along an elevational gradient: insights from a common garden experiment and population genetics. Ecol Evol 7:6949–6962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirota M, Zhang P, Gu S, Shen H, Kuriyama T, Li Y, Tang Y (2010) Small-scale variation in ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an alpine meadow depends on plant biomass and species richness. J Plant Res 123:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffmann AA, Camac JS, Williams RJ, Papst W, Jarrad FC, Wahren CH (2010) Phenological changes in six Australian subalpine plants in response to experimental warming and year-to-year variation. J Ecol 98:927–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishigami Y, Shimizu Y, Omasa K (2003) Projection of climatic change effects on potential natural vegetation distribution in Japan. J Agric Meteorol 59:269–276 (in Japanese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly AE, Goulden ML (2008) Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:11823–11826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klady RA, Henry GHR, Lemay V (2011) Changes in high arctic tundra plant reproduction in response to long-term experimental warming. Glob Change Biol 17:1611–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kullman L (2002) Rapid recent range-margin rise of tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes. J Ecol 90:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li B, Suzuki J, Hara T (1998) Latitudinal variation in plant size and relative growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Oecologia 115:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mäkinen H, Nöjd P, Kahle HP, Newmann U, Tveite B, Mielikäinen K, Röhle H, Spiecker H (2002) Radial growth variation of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) across latitudinal and altitudinal gradients in central and northern Europe. For Ecol Manag 171:243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manish K, Pandit MK, Telwala Y, Nautiyal DC, Koh LP, Tiwari S (2017) Elevational plant species richness patterns and their drivers across non-endemics, endemics and growth forms in the Eastern Himalaya. J Plant Res 130:829–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin RE, Asner GP, Sack L (2007) Genetic variation in leaf pigment, optical and photosynthetic function among diverse phenotypes of Metrosideros polymorpha grown in a common garden. Oecologia 151:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mietkiewicz N, Kulakowski D, Rogan J, Bebi P (2017) Long-term change in sub-alpine forest cover, tree line and species composition in the Swiss Alps. J Veg Sci 28:951–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyajima Y, Sato T, Takahashi K (2007) Altitudinal changes in vegetation of tree, herb and fern species on Mount Norikura, central Japan. Veg Sci 24:29–40Google Scholar
  26. Namgail T, Rawat GS, Mishra C, van Wieren SE, Prins HHT (2012) Biomass and diversity of dry alpine plant communities along altitudinal gradients in the Himalayas. J Plant Res 125:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Natali SM, Schuur EAG, Trucco C, Pries CEH, Crummer KG, Lopez AFB (2011) Effects of experimental warming of air, soil and permafrost on carbon balance in Alaskan tundra. Glob Change Biol 17:1394–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, Poot P, Purugganan MD, Richards CL, Valladares F, van Kleunen M (2010) Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci 15:684–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oechel WC, Hastings SJ, Vourlitis G, Jenkins M, Riechers G, Grulke N (1993) Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source. Nature 361:520–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ozaki H, Oguchi R, Hikosaka K (2018) Dependence of functional traits related to growth rates and their CO2 response on multiple habitat climate factors across Arabidopsis thaliana populations. J Plant Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-018-1058-1 (in press) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parolo G, Rossi G (2008) Upward migration of vascular plants following a climate warming trend in the Alps. Basic Appl Ecol 9:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pauli H, Gottfried M, Grabherr G (1996) Effects of climate change on mountain ecosystems—upward shifting of alpine plants. World Res Rev 8:382–390Google Scholar
  34. Peñuelas J, Boada M (2003) A global change-induced biome shift in the Montseny Mountains (NE Spain). Glob Change Biol 9:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rahbek C (1995) The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography 18:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakio H, Masuzawa T (2012) The advancing timberline on Mt. Fuji: natural recovery or climate change? J Plant Res 125:539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sen S, Gode A, Ramanujam S, Ravikanth G, Aravind NA (2016) Modeling the impact of climate change on wild Piper nigrum (Black Pepper) in Western Ghats, India using ecological niche models. J Plant Res 129:1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Takahashi K (2005) Effects of artificial warming on shoot elongation of alpine dwarf pine (Pinus pumila) on Mt. Shogigashira, central Japan. Arct Antarct Alp Res 37:620–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Takahashi K (2014) Effects of wind and thermal conditions on timberline formation in central Japan: a lattice model. Ecol Res 29:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Takahashi K, Aoki K (2015) Effects of climatic conditions on annual shoot length and tree-ring width of alpine dwarf pine Pinus pumila in central Japan. J Plant Res 128:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takahashi K, Goto A (2012) Morphological and physiological responses of beech and oak seedlings to canopy conditions: why does beech dominate the understory of unmanaged oak fuelwood stands? Can J For Res 42:1623–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Takahashi K, Hanyu M (2015) Hybridization between alien species Rumex obtusifolius and closely related native vulnerable species R. longifolius in a mountain tourist destination. Sci Rep 5:13898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Takahashi K, Miyajima Y (2010) Effects of roads on alpine and subalpine plant species distribution along an altitudinal gradient on Mount Norikura, central Japan. J Plant Res 123:741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Takahashi K, Obata Y (2014) Growth, allometry and shade tolerance of understory saplings of four subalpine conifers in central Japan. J Plant Res 127:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Takahashi K, Okuhara I (2013) Forecasting the effects of global warming on radial growth of subalpine trees at the upper and lower distribution limits in central Japan. Clim Change 117:273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Takahashi K, Tanaka S (2016) Relative importance of habitat filtering and limiting similarity on species assemblages of alpine and subalpine plant communities. J Plant Res 129:1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Takahashi K, Yoshida S (2009) How the scrub height of Pinus pumila decreases at the treeline. Ecol Res 24:847–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Takahashi K, Kobori H, Seino T (2011a) Effects of temperature and light conditions on growth of current-year seedlings of warm-temperate evergreen species and cool-temperate deciduous species. In: Casalegno S (ed) Global warming impacts—Case studies on the economy, human health, and on urban and natural environments. InTech, Rijieka, pp 175–192Google Scholar
  49. Takahashi K, Okuhara I, Tokumitsu Y, Yasue K (2011b) Responses to climate by tree-ring widths and maximum latewood densities of two Abies species at upper and lower altitudinal distribution limits in central Japan. Trees 25:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Takahashi K, Hirosawa T, Morishima R (2012) How the timberline formed: altitudinal changes in stand structure and dynamics around the timberline in central Japan. Ann Bot 109:1165–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Takatsuki S (2009) Effects of sika deer on vegetation in Japan: a review. Biol Conserv 142:1922–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araujo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice C (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:8245–8250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsujino R, Yumoto T (2013) Vascular plant species richness along environmental gradients in a cool temperate to sub-alpine mountainous zone in central Japan. J Plant Res 126:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsujino R, Matsui K, Yamamoto K, Koda R, Yumoto T, Takada K (2013) Degradation of Abies veitchii wave-regeneration on Mt. Misen in Ohmine Mountains: effects of sika deer population. J Plant Res 126:625–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walther GR, Beibner S, Burga CA (2005) Trends in the upward shift of alpine plants. J Veg Sci 16:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yoshie F (2010) Vegetative phenology of alpine plants at Tateyama Murodo-daira in central Japan. J Plant Res 123:675–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao N, Yu G, He N, Xia F, Wang Q, Wang R, Xu Z, Jia Y (2016) Invariant allometric scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in leaves, stems, and fine roots of woody plants along an altitudinal gradient. J Plant Res 129:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhu B, Wang X, Fang J, Piao S, Shen H, Zhao S, Peng C (2010) Altitudinal changes in carbon storage of temperate forests on Mt Changbai, Northeast China. J Plant Res 123:439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceShinshu UniversityMatsumotoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Mountain ScienceShinshu UniversityMatsumotoJapan

Personalised recommendations