Abstract
In this paper, an index of domestic macroprudential policy tools is constructed and the effectiveness of these tools in controlling credit growth, managing GDP growth and steadying inflation is studied using a dynamic panel data model for the period between 2000 and 2017. The empirical analysis includes two panels namely an EU panel of 27 countries and a Latin American panel of 7 countries, the paper also looks at a case study of Japan, Portugal and the UK. Our main results show that a tighter overall macroprudential policy stance would result in lower credit growth as well as lower GDP growth while, a tighter overall macroprudential policy tool stance would lead to higher inflation in the majority of cases. Factors such as capital openness and the perception of global market risk play an important role in both the exigency of policy implementation as well as the success thereof.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Vice-President of the ECB between June 2010 and May 2018.
See Borio (2003).
Tovar et al. (2012) and Habermeier et al. (2011).
Baba and Kokenyne (2011) find that capital controls that do not cover the majority of inflows may not have the macroeconomic impact that is expected even if they are successful at reducing targeted flows.
See Peydró (2016).
Regression results of robustness checks available on request.
Higher perceived volatility in the markets which hence, results in investors becoming more risk averse.
References
Agénor PR, Alper K, Pereira da Silva L (2012) Sudden Floods. Macroprudential Regulation and Stability in an Open Economy, Banco Central do Brazil, p 267
Agur I, Demertzis M (2015) Will macroprudential policy counteract monetary policy’s effects on financial stability? IMF Working Paper WP/15/283, December
Ahmed S, Zlate A (2013) Capital flows to emerging market economies: a brave new world? Board of governors of the federal reserve system international discussion papers 1081, June
Ahuja A, Nabar M (2011) Safeguarding banks and containing property booms: cross country evidence on macroprudential policies and lessons from Hong Kong SAR. IMF Working Paper WP/11/284, December
Akinci O, Olmstead-Rumsey J (2015) How effective are macroprudential policies? An Empirical Investigation, International Finance Discussion Papers, p 1136
Alam Z, Alter A, Eiseman J, Gelos G, Kang H, Narita M, Nier E, Wang N (2019) Digging deeper – evidence on the effects of macroprudential policies from a new database. IMF Working Paper WP/19/66, March
Allen F, Gale D (2007) Understanding financial crises. Clarendon Lectures in Finance, http://www.sfu.ca/~dandolfa/Allen%20and%20Gale%202007.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2020
Allen WA, Wood G (2006) Defining and achieving financial stability. J Financ Stab. Elsevier 2(2) (June): 152–172
Baba C, Kokenyne A (2011) Effectiveness of capital controls in selected emerging markets in the 2000s. IMF Working Paper WP/11/281, December
Bazillier R, Hericourt J (2017) The circular relationship between inequality, leverage, and financial crises. J Econ Surv 31(2):463–496
Belkhir M, Naceur SB, Candelon B, Wijnandts JC (2020) Macroprudential policies, economic growth, and banking crises. IMF Working Paper No. 20/65, May
Borio C (2003) Towards a macroprudential framework for financial supervision and regulation? BIS Working Papers 128, February
Borio C (2018) Macroprudential frameworks: experience, prospects and a way forward. Speech by Mr Claudio Borio, Head of the Monetary and Economic Department of the BIS, on the occasion of the Bank's Annual General Meeting, Basel, 24 June 2018
Bruno V, Shim I, Shin HS (2015) Comparative assessment of macroprudential policies. BIS Working Paper 502, June
Caruana J (2010) Macroprudential policy: working towards a new consensus. Remarks at the high-level meeting on “The Emerging Framework for Financial Regulation and Monetary Policy” jointly organised by the BIS’s Financial Stability Institute and the IMF Institute, Washington DC, 23 April. https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp100426.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2020
Cerutti E, Dagher J, Dell’Ariccia G (2015) Housing finance and real-estate booms: a cross-country perspective. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/15/12, June 2015
Cerutti E, Claessens S, Laeven L (2017) The use and effectiveness ofmacroprudential policies: new evidence. J Financ Stab 28:203–224
Chinn MD, Ito H (2008) A new measure of financial openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10(3) (September): 309–322
Claessens S (2017) Macroprudential policies: Seven issues and seven questions. BIS, Session II: Macroprudential Policy Issues Banco de Portugal Conference on Financial Stability Lisbon, 17 October 2017. https://www.bportugal.pt/sites/default/files/ii_1_stijn_claessens.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2020
Committee on the Global Financial System (CGFS) (2010) Macroprudential Instruments and Frameworks: A Stocktaking of Issues and Experiences. CGFSPapers 38 (Basel: Bank for International Settlement)
Constâncio V (2017) Macroprudential policy in a changing financial system. Second ECB Macroprudential Policy and Research Conference in Frankfurt, European CentralBank, 11 May 2017. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/ecb.sp170511.en.html2017/html/ecb.sp170511.en.html. Accessed 8 April 2020
Crockett A (2000) Marrying the Micro- and Macro-prudential dimensions of financial stability. Eleventh International Conference of Banking Supervisors, held in Basel, 20–21 September 2000, https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp000921.htm. Accessed 8 April 2020
Crowe CW, Igan D, Dell’Ariccia G, Rabanal P (2011) How to deal with real estate booms, IMF Staff Discussion Note 11/02
Dell’Ariccia G, Igan D, Laeven L, Tong H. (with Bakker, B and Vandenbussche) (2012) Policies for macrofinancial stability: how to deal with credit booms. IMF Staff Discussion Note 12/06
Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund, and Bank for International Settlements. 2011: Macroprudential Tools and Framework. Update to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, February, https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/021411.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2020
Galati G, Moessner R (2011) Macroprudential policy - a literature review. BIS Working Papers 337, Bank for International Settlements
Gourinchas PO, Obstfeld M (2012) Stories of the Twentieth Century for the Twenty First. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4(1):226–265
Gupta S, Mulas-Granados C, Baldacci E (2009) How effective is Fiscal policy response in financial crises? Fiscal issues and central banking in emergingeconomies. IMF Working paper WP/09/160
Habermeier K, Kokenyne A, Baba C (2011) The effectiveness of capital controls and prudential policies in managing large inflows. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN11/14, August
Hong Kong Monetary Authority (2011) Loan-to-value ratio as a macroprudential tool Hong Kong SAR’s experience and cross-country evidence. BIS Research Papers, BIS, p 57
Houben A, Kakes J, Schinasi G (2004) Towards a framework for financial stability. DNB Occasional Studies 201, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department
IMF (2013) Key Aspects of Macroprudential Policy—Background Paper. IMF Policy Paper, June. http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/061013c.pdf
International Monetary Fund (2014) Staff Guidance Note on Macroprudential Policy. December 2014, https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2014/110614.pdf2014/110614.pdf. Accessed:8 April 2020
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2018) The IMF’s Annual Macroprudential Policy Survey— Objectives, Design, and Country Responses
Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2010) The worldwide governance indicators: summary of methodology, data and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5430, World Bank: Washington, D.C.
Kim C (2014) Macroprudential policies in Korea – Key measures and experiences. Financial Stability Review 18(April):121–130, Banque de France
Kim S, Mehrotra AN (2017) Effects of monetary and macro-prudential policies – evidence from inflation targeting economies in the asia-pacific region and potential implications for China. BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 4/2017, March
Kuttner KN, Shim I (2013) Can non-interest rate policies stabilise housing markets? Evidence from a panel of 57 economies. BIS Working Papers 433, November
Lim C, Columba F, Costa A, Kongsamut P, Otani A, Saiyid M, Wezel T, Wu X (2011) What instruments and how to use them? Lessons from country experiences. IMF Working Paper WP/11/238, October
Lopez C, Bruni F (2019) The macroprudential policy framework needs to be global. International financial architecture for stability and development/crypto assets and fintech, March 2019. https://t20japan.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/t20-japan-tf2-6-macroprudential-2019/03/t20-japan-tf2-6-macroprudential-policy-framework-needs-to-be-global.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2020
Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, special issue, 631–652
Nier EW, Kang E, Mancini T, Hesse H, Columba F, Tchaidze R, Vandenbussche J (2012) The interaction of monetary and macroprudential policies: background paper, International Monetary Fund, December
Peia O, Roszbach K (2015) Finance and growth: time series evidence on causality. J Financ Stab 19(C):105–118
Pesaran H (2007) A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.457280
Peydró JL (2016) Macroprudential Policy and Credit Supply. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 152(4):305–318
Reinhart C, Rogoff K (2009) This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly, In: economics books, Princeton University Press. https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/puppbooks/8973.htm. Accessed 8 April 2020
Schularick M, Taylor AM (2012) Credit booms gone bust: monetary policy, leverage cycles, and financial crises, 1870–2008. Am Econ Rev 102(1029):1061
Vandenbussche J, Vogel U, Detragiache E (2012) Macroprudential policies and housing prices – a new database and empirical evidence for Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe. IMF Working Paper Series 12/303 (December), IMF, Washington, D.C.
Zhang L, Zoli E (2014) Leaning against the wind: macroprudential policy in Asia. IMF Working Paper 14/22
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to a blind reviewer at the PEJ, Luis Costa, Ana Venâncio, Isabel Proença and André Teixeira for their useful comments. I am also grateful to António Afonso for his useful comments. Any omissions or exclusions are exclusively the author’s own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
1.1 Variable sources
1.2 Variable definitions
1.3 Summary statistics
Appendix B
2.1 Maddala and Wu Test (Maddala and Wu 1999) for the presence of panel unit roots
2.2 First generation fisher type tests (Phillips–Perron Test) for the presence of panel unit roots
2.3 Second generation pesaran test (Pesaran 2007) for the presence of panel unit roots
2.4 Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data and durbin watson test for autocorrelation:
2.5 Modified wald test for heteroskedasticity:
Appendix C
3.1 Additional regression results: sum of macroprudential policy choices with instrumental variables
Table C1 focuses on the sum of macroprudential policy choices and the value of the macroprudential policy choice index is therefore indicative thereof. An instrumental variable (Regulatory Quality) is included to account for any measurement error, omitted variable bias or simultaneity bias that may occur due to the endogeneity of the macroprudential policy tool index. The coefficient on lagged credit growth is positive and statistically significant for the first regression in the case of the Latin American panel and Japan, in the remaining cases the sign is positive with the exception of the negative sign in the case of Portugal. The coefficient on lagged GDP growth is positive and statistically significant for the second regression for the cases of the EU panel, the Latin American panel, Japan and Portugal while, in the case of the full sample, the sign is negative. Further, the coefficient on lagged inflation growth is positive and statistically significant in the all cases except that of the UK. In the remaining cases, the sign is positive with the exception of the first regression for the case of Portugal, the second regression for the full sample and the third regression for the case of the UK. When considering the full sample for the third regression, the coefficient on the macroprudential index is positive and statistically significant implying that a tighter macroprudential stance generally results in higher inflation when looking at the full sample.
Appendix D
4.1 Policy instruments
4.2 iMaPP database and other existing databases
Note (As Defined by Alam et al. 2019):
-
1)
The classification of instruments differs across databases. The column "Instruments" shows the number of categories, including subcategories, available in each dataset, without standardizing classification.
-
2)
"T/L indexes" is the dummy-type indexes for tightening and loosening actions of macroprudential policy measures.
About this article
Cite this article
Venter, Z. Macroprudential policy under uncertainty. Port Econ J 21, 161–209 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-021-00194-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-021-00194-8