Abstract
The collaborative work of team members has become a common occurrence in software development projects. Collaborative information systems (CIS), designed to facilitate and support teamwork, appear critical for software project success. However, the quality and convenience of the services and functions delivered by CIS have not received robust attention in academia. Hence, the current study investigates the role of the CIS service characteristics of service quality and service convenience in teamwork and software development project success using DeLone and McLean’s (D&M) Information System (IS) Success Model as the theoretical framework. This study incorporates the success indicators of teamwork quality, teamwork performance, and project success as measured by software quality and project performance. Data from 153 Indian software companies confirm that collaborative IS services, as well as teamwork quality/performance, are central to software development project success. We believe that the findings of this study will be helpful to project managers of software development firms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inf Syst Res 9(2):204–215
Bafoutsou G, Mentzas G (2002) Review and functional classification of collaborative systems. Int J Inf Manage 22(4):281–305
Bagheri E, Ghorbani AA (2009) A belief-theoretic framework for the collaborative development and integration of para-consistent conceptual models. J Syst Softw 82(4):707–729
Bernroider EWN (2008) IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone–McLean model of information systems success. Inf Manag 45(5):257–269
Berry LL, Seiders K, Grewal D (2002) Understanding service convenience. J Mark 66(3):1–17
Bhatnagar S (2006) India’s software industry. In: Chandra V (ed) Technology, adaptation, and exports: how some developing countries got it right. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 49–81
Bosch J, Bosch-Sijtsema P (2010) From integration to composition: on the impact of software product lines, global development and ecosystems. J Syst Softw 83(1):67–76
Bravo C, Duque R, Gallardo J (2013) A groupware system to support collaborative programming: design and experiences. J Syst Softw 86:7
Caniëls MC, Bakens RJ (2012) The effects of Project Management Information Systems on decision making in a multi project environment. Int J Project Manag 30(2):162–175
Chang M-Y, Chen K, Pang C, Chen C-M, Yen DC (2013) A study on the effects of service convenience and service quality on maintenance revisit intentions. Comput Stand Interfaces 35(2):187–194
Chatterjee C (2014) Innovation and internationalisation in the Indian software industry: Wipro-Going forward: interview with Rishad Premji, Chief Strategy Officer, Wipro Limited. IIMB Manag Rev 26(1):59–64
Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod Methods Bus Res 295(2):295–336
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside
Comry AL, Lee HB (1992) A first course in factor analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Cronin Jr JJ, Taylor SA (1992) Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J Mark 56(3):55–68
Dai H, Salam AF, King R (2008) Service convenience and relational exchange in electronic mediated environment: an empirical investigation. Paper presented at the 29th ICIS, Paris, France, 14–17 Dec 2008, AISeL, pp 1–20
DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 3(1):60–95
DeLone WH, McLean WR (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30
Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G (1991) The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Q 15(1):5–10
Durham M (2007) Distributed teams. http://www.spspro.com/brochures/guest/Distributed%20Teams%20070615%20-%20Michelle%20Durham.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2015
Easley RF, Devaraj S, Crant JM (2003) Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: an empirical analysis. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):247–268
Edvardsson B, Larsson G, Setterlind S (1997) Internal service quality and the psychological work environment: an empirical analysis of conceptual interrelatedness. Serv Ind J 17(2):252–263
Edwards HK, Sridhar V (2003) Analysis of the effectiveness of global virtual teams in software engineering projects. System Sciences, 2003. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii international conference on. IEEE, 9 pp
El-Bibany H, Katz G, Vij S (1991) Collaborative information systems: a comparison of the electronics and facility design industries. Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Technical Report # 48:1–15
Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ Sci 18(4):613–630
Fisher K, Fisher M (2000) The distance manager: a hands on guide to managing off-site employees and virtual teams. Mcgraw-Hill, NY
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50
Gallardo J, Bravo C, Redondo MA (2012) A model-driven development method for collaborative modeling tools. J Netw Comput Appl 35(3):1086–1105
Gorla N, Somers TM, Wong B (2010) Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. J Strateg Inf Syst 19(3):207–228
Hair JE, Black WC, Babin BC, Anderson RL (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2013) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks
Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG (2014) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev 26(2):106–121
Han W-M, Huang S-J (2007) An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. J Syst Softw 80(1):42–50
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv Int Mark 20:277–319
Herbsleb JD (2007) Global software engineering: the future of socio-technical coordination. In: Future of software engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 23–25 May 2007. IEEE Computer Society, pp 188–198
Heskett JL, Jonesw OT, Lovemen WG, Sasser E, Leonard AS (1994) Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harv Bus Rev 72(2):164–174
Highsmith J (2013) Adaptive software development: a collaborative approach to managing complex systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Hoegl M, Parboteeah P (2006) Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects. Hum Resour Manag 45(1):67–79
Hoegl M, Parboteeah KP (2007) Creativity in innovative projects: how teamwork matters. J Eng Tech Manag 24(1):148–166
Hoegl M, Proserpio L (2004) Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Res Policy 33(8):1153–1165
Jalote P (2008) A concise introduction to software engineering. Springer, New York
Jiang JJ, Klein G, Carr CL (2002) Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Q 26(2):145–166
Jiang L, Jiang N, Liu S (2011) Consumer perceptions of e-service convenience: an exploratory study. Procedia Environ Sci 11:406–410
Kang G, Jame J, Alexandris K (2002) Measurement of internal service quality: application of the SERVQUAL battery to internal service quality. Manag Serv Qual 12(5):278–291
Kannabiran G, Sankaran K (2011) Determinants of software quality in offshore development–An empirical study of an Indian vendor. Inf Softw Technol 53(11):1199–1208
Katzenbach JR, Smith DK (1993) The discipline of teams. Harv Bus Rev 71(2):111–120
Kettinger WJ, Lee CC (1994) Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services functions. Decis Sci 25(5/6):737–766
Kossler ME, Prestridge S (2004) Leading dispersed teams (ideas into action guidebooks). Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro
Lai J-Y, Wibowo S (2012) How service convenience influences information system success. Int J Future Comput Comm 1(3):217–220
Lai J-Y (2014) E-SERVCON and E-Commerce success: applying the DeLone & McLean Model. J Organ End User Comput 26(3):1–22
Lee J-N, Choi B (2011) Effects of initial and ongoing trust in IT outsourcing: a bilateral perspective. Inf Manag 48(2):96–105
Lee J, Park M-c (2013) Factors affecting the smartphone users to use the mobile portal services: focusing on Korean mobile portals. Inf Syst and eBus Manag 11(2):235–252
Lee S-K, Yu J-H (2012) Success model of project management information system in construction. Autom Constr 25:82–93
Li Y, Chang K-C, Chen H-G, Jiang JJ (2010) Software development team flexibility antecedents. J Syst Softw 83(10):1726–1734
Liu JY-C, Chen HH-G, Jiang JJ, Klein G (2010) Task completion competency and project management performance: the influence of control and user contribution. Int J Project Manag 28(3):220–227
Moe NB, Dingsøyr T, Dybå T (2010) A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: a case study of a Scrum project. Inf Softw Technol 52(5):480–491
Na K-S, Li X, Simpson JT, Kim K-Y (2004) Uncertainty profile and software project performance: a cross-national comparison. J Syst Softw 70(1):155–163
NASSCOM (2013) Annual report 2013–2014
Nguyen-Duc A, Cruzes DS, Conradi R (2015) The impact of global dispersion on coordination, team performance and software quality—a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 57:277–294
Pandey A, Aggarwal A, Devane R, Kuznetsov Y (2006) The Indian diaspora: a unique case? In: Kuznetsov Y (ed) Diaspora networks and the international migration of skills: how countries can draw on their talent abroad. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 71–97
Pantouvakis A (2011) Internal service quality and job satisfaction synergies for performance improvement: some evidence from a B2B environment. J Target Meas Anal Mark 19(1):11–22
Papaioannou E, Assimakopoulos C, Sarmaniotis C, Georgiadis CK (2015) Investigating customer satisfaction dimensions with service quality of online auctions: an empirical investigation of e-Bay. Inf Syst eBus Manag 11(2):313–330
Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) Servqual. J Retail 64(1):12–37
Pedrycz W, Russo B, Succi G (2011) A model of job satisfaction for collaborative development processes. J Syst Softw 84(5):739–752
Peng DX, Lai F (2012) Using partial least squares in operations management research: a practical guideline and summary of past research. J Oper Manag 30(6):467–480
Peng X, Babar MA, Ebert C (2014) Collaborative software development platforms for crowdsourcing. IEEE Softw 31(2):30–36
Pereira J, Cerpa N, Verner J, Rivas M, Procaccino JD (2008) What do software practitioners really think about project success: a cross-cultural comparison. J Syst Softw 81(6):897–907
Pitt LF, Watson RT, Kavan CB (1995) Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Q 19(2):173–189
Portillo-Rodríguez J, Vizcaíno A, Piattini M, Beecham S (2012) Tools used in global software engineering: a systematic mapping review. Inf Softw Technol 54(7):663–685
Powell A, Piccoli G, Ives B (2004) Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM Sigmis Database 35(1):6–36
Raymond L, Bergeron F (2008) Project management information systems: an empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success. Int J Project Manag 26(2):213–220
Reimers V, Chao F, Lee N, Dennis C (2014) The role of convenience in a recreational shopping trip. Eur J Mark 48(11/12):2213–2236
Robillard PN, Robillard MP (2000) Types of collaborative work in software engineering. J Syst Softw 53(3):219–224
Ruparelia NB (2010) Software development lifecycle models. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 35(3):8–13
Saeed KA (2012) Evaluating the value of collaboration systems in collocated teams: a longitudinal analysis. Comput Hum Behav 28(2):552–560
Saleh KA (2009) Software engineering. J. Ross Publishing, Fort Lauderdale, FL
Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 8(3):103–108
Seiders K, Voss GB, Godfrey AL, Grewal D (2007) SERVCON: development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale. J Acad Mark Sci 35(1):144–156
Steinfield C (2002) Realizing the benefits of virtual teams. IEEE Comput 35(3):104–106
Strode DE, Huff SL, Hope B, Link S (2012) Coordination in co-located agile software development projects. J Syst Softw 85(6):1222–1238
Subramanian GH, Jiang JJ, Klein G (2007) Software quality and IS project performance improvements from software development process maturity and IS implementation strategies. J Syst Softw 80(4):616–627
Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y-M, Lauro C (2005) PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal 48(1):159–205
Tian K, Cooper K (2006) Agile and software product line methods: are they so different. In: 1st international workshop on agile product line engineering
Tsai W-H, Shaw MJ, Fan Y-W, Liu J-Y, Lee K-C, Chen H-C (2011) An empirical investigation of the impacts of internal/external facilitators on the project success of ERP: a structural equation model. Decis Support Syst 50(2):480–490
Whitehead J (2007) Collaboration in software engineering: a roadmap. In: Future of software engineering, 2007. FOSE ‘07, 23–25 May 2007, pp 214–225. doi:10.1109/FOSE.2007.4
Zhang X, Prybutok VR (2005) A consumer perspective of e-service quality. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 52(4):461–477
Acknowledgments
The authors thank editor-in-chief Prof. Jörg Becker, and three anonymous reviewers for their assistance in editing and guiding this paper. The authors would also like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan for substantially supporting this paper under Contract Number: NSC 102-2420-H-005-004-DR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulhas, K.R., Lai, JY. & Wang, J. Impacts of collaborative IS on software development project success in Indian software firms: a service perspective. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 14, 315–336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0285-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0285-4