Abstract
Data on the safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in patients with renal impairment are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the safety of JAKis compared to biological (b) DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and renal impairment. We used a multi-centre observational registry of patients with RA in Japan (the ANSWER cohort). We assessed the drug retention rates of b/targeted synthetic DMARDs with different modes of action (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), immunoglobulins fused with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4-Ig), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris), and JAKis) in patients with RA stratified by pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The time to discontinuation of bDMARDs or JAKis was analysed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model This study included 3775 patients, who were classified into three groups (the normal group (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 2893 patients; CKDa group (eGFR 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 551; and CKDb group (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2): 331). In the CKDb group, the 12-month drug retention rate due to adverse events (AE) was the lowest in patients treated with JAKi (TNFi: 93.1%; IL-6Ri: 94.1%; CTLA-4-Ig: 92.3%; JAKi: 75.1%). In the normal and CKDa groups, drug retention rates due to AE were similar among patients treated with bDMARDs and JAKi. In contrast, drug retention rates due to inefficacy were similar between bDMARDs and JAKis in all groups. In the Cox-proportional model, in the CKDb group, TNFi, IL-6Ri, and CTLA-4-Ig showed lower incidence of drug discontinuation due to AE than JAKis (TNFi: hazard ratio = 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.09–0.61), IL-6Ri: 0.34 (0.14–0.81), CTLA-4-Ig: 0.36 (0.15–0.89)). JAKis showed the lowest drug retention due to AE in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe renal impairment (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Physicians should pay more attention to renal function when using JAKis than when using bDMARDs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
A decade ago, the first targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (tsDMARD), a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi), was approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In contrast, biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) have a longer history of clinical use in RA. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to treat RA in 1999, the first cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA-4-Ig) in 2005, and the first interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ris) in 2010. Currently, four JAKis are used for the treatment of RA: tofacitinib (TOF), baricitinib (BAR), upadacitinib (UPA), and filgotinib (FIL). In certain Asian countries, peficitinib (PEF) is also used in RA clinical practice. Although there have been several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and post-marketing surveillance, evidence on the safety of JAKis is relatively lacking compared to that on bDMARDs, owing to the shorter time since the approval of JAKis [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
Renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity that is estimated to affect 10–20% of patients with RA [8,9,10]. The causes of renal impairment include chronic inflammation, ageing, comorbidities, and medications used to treat RA [11]. Renal impairment limits the use of certain DMARDs, including methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and JAKis, in patients with RA, mainly due to adverse events (AEs). For example, cytopenia, an AE induced by methotrexate (MTX), occurs more frequently in patients with renal impairment. Therefore, careful attention to kidney function is crucial when administering medications for anti-RA drug therapy.
Among the five classes of JAKi, TOF, BAR, UPA, and FIL are mainly or partially excreted by the kidneys [12,13,14,15]. BAR undergoes almost complete renal excretion (approximately 75%) and may accumulate within the bodies of patients with renal impairment [13]. TOF also undergoes partial renal excretion (approximately 30%), and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) of this molecule is approximately 1.4-fold higher in patients with moderate renal impairment than in healthy volunteers (Supplementary Table S1) [12, 16, 17]. FIL is mainly excreted in the urine as the metabolite (approximately > 80%) and AUC24h is 1.4–1.7-fold higher in patients with moderate renal impairment than healthy individuals [14]. Thus, TOF, BAR, and FIL require dose reduction in patients with impaired kidney function, whereas BAR and FIL are contraindicated in patients with severe kidney dysfunction. Although the renal elimination rate of UPA is less than 20%, it has a 1.3-fold higher AUCinf in patients with moderate renal impairment [15, 18]. Therefore, although dose reduction is not required, it is recommended that UPA is cautiously used in patients with severe renal impairment. PEF is predominantly excreted in the faeces, and its mean urinary excretion rate is approximately 10%. Considering PEF, the AUCinf value is lower in patients with renal impairment than that in healthy volunteers [19].
In randomized controlled trials, patients with moderate renal impairment were excluded from the study population (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min for TOF and eGFR or estimated creatinine clearance < 40 mL/min for BAR and FIL) [1, 2, 20]. Although some post-marketing or cohort studies have reported the safety data of JAKi as real-world evidence, there has been no safety evidence focusing on patients with RA and kidney dysfunction [5, 21, 22]. This retrospective multi-centre study aimed to investigate the safety of JAKis compared to bDMARDs in patients with renal impairment in a real-world setting.
Methods
Patients
The Kansai Consortium for Well-Being of Rheumatic Disease Patients (ANSWER) cohort is a multi-centre registry of patients with RA in the Kansai District of Japan. Patients' data from nine institutes (Kyoto University, Osaka University, Osaka Medical College, Kansai Medical University, Kobe University, Nara Medical University, Osaka Metropolitan University, Kindai University, and Osaka Red Cross Hospital) were included [23,24,25]. Patient selection was based on the decision of the attending physician, and data were collected prospectively. The data for this cohort are available from 2009 onwards; however, data between 2013 and 2023 were used for the current analysis because TOF was approved in 2013.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients diagnosed with RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria [26] and initiated treatment with a bDMARD or JAKi. Patients in whom PEF was initiated were excluded, given that PEF is mainly metabolized in the liver and AUCinf in patients with renal impairment is even lower than that of healthy individuals (Supplementary Table S1) [19]. In the main analyses, given that the dosages of TOF, BAR, and FIL need to be adjusted based on renal function, we excluded patients with renal impairment in whom no dose reduction was performed for these drugs in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendation to elucidate the effect of renal impairment on JAKi in the standard care of RA. In the sub-analysis, we compared patients treated with TOF, BAR, and FIL with dose reduction and those without dose reduction according to renal function to determine whether dose reduction in patients with renal impairment is reasonable in real-world clinical practice.
The following data were collected: baseline demographic variables, such as age, sex, disease duration, titres of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, concomitant dosages and ratios of methotrexate and prednisolone, disease activity scores, the number of prior use of b/ts-DMARDs, and serum creatinine (SCr).
Patient stratification according to baseline eGFR
Patients were stratified according to their baseline eGFR. In the primary analysis, eGFR was calculated using an equation officially approved by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) based on SCr [27]. For sensitivity analyses, we calculated eGFR using the Japanese coefficient-modified modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study equation and the Japanese coefficient–modified Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) study equation [27].
JSN equation: 194 × (SCr)−1.094 × (Age)−0.287 × 0.739 (if female).
MDRD equation: 175 × (SCr)−1.154 × (Age)−0.203 × 0.742 (if female), Japanese Coefficient 0.808.
CKD-EPI equation: 141 × min (SCr/κ, 1)α × max (SCr/κ, 1)−1.209 × 0.993age × 1.018 (if female) (where κ is 0.9 for males and 0.7 for females, α is − 0.411 for males and − 0.329 for females, min is the minimum of SCr/κ or 1, and max is the maximum of SCr/κ or 1), Japanese coefficient 0.813,
Referring to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 CKD stage classification criteria, patients were stratified into the following three groups: ‘normal’ (GFR category G1 and G2; eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), ‘CKDa’ (GFR category G3a; eGFR 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and ‘CKDb’ (GFR category G3b, G4, and G5; eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2) [28].
Treatment groups, outcome measures, and covariates
TNFis included infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, golimumab, and biosimilars. The interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris) comprised tocilizumab and sarilumab. The cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA-4-Ig) used was abatacept, whereas JAKis included TOF, BAR, UPA, and FIL.
As dose adjustment is not required for UPA even in patients with renal impairment, we conducted sensitivity analyses after removing UPA from the JAKi treatment group. In these analyses, JAKis group included TOF, BAR, and FIL with appropriate dose reduction in patients with renal impairment.
The primary outcomes of interest were overall 12-month drug retention rates and 12-month cause-specific retention rates, owing to toxic AEs, both adjusted with potential confounders. The 12-month drug retention rate due to inefficacy was also assessed. The follow-up period was set by considering the number of patients at risk, given that a limited number of patients were treated with JAKi for more than 12 months. Treating physicians were asked to adopt the most appropriate reason for discontinuation from the following five categories: remission, inefficacy, AE, other reasons (e.g. patient preference or economic reasons), and loss to follow-up [21]. Regarding the cause-specific retention rate, we focused on the reasons for drug discontinuation due to inefficacy and AEs after the initiation of bDMARD or JAKi.
A priori confounders included age, RA disease duration, use of methotrexate, use of glucocorticoids, and the number of prior bDMARDs and JAKis.
Statistical analysis
Confounder-adjusted drug retention curves were generated based on the stratified groups (normal, CKDa, and CKDb). The time to discontinuation of bDMARDs or JAKis was analysed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model as a reference for JAKis to determine their safety compared with each bDMARD. A priori confounders included age, RA disease duration, use of methotrexate, use of glucocorticoids, and the number of prior bDMARDs and JAKis. All analyses were two-tailed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using R Statistical Software (v4.3.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Patient characteristics stratified by kidney function groups
This study included 3,775 patients with RA receiving treatment with bDMARDs or JAKis (normal group, 2,893 patients; CKDa group, 551; CKDb group, 331) (Fig. 1). The baseline patient characteristics of the three bDMARDs and JAKis in each kidney function group are shown in Table 1. The proportion of the different JAKis in each group were as follow: in the normal group, TOF 132 (28%), BAR 197 (43%), UPA 76 (17%), FIL 52 (11%); in the CKDa group, TOF 28 (29%), BAR 27 (28%), UPA 29 (30%), FIL 12 (13%); in the CKDb group, TOF 11 (20%), BAR 10 (19%), UPA 23 (43%), FIL 10 (19%). In all groups, JAKis were used less frequently in biologic-naïve patients. Baseline eGFR levels were higher in patients treated with JAKi in the CKDb group.
Drug retention rates of TNFi, IL-6Ri, CTLA-4-Ig, and JAKi in each eGFR group
We generated confounder-adjusted drug retention curves for bDMARD and JAKi in each kidney function group (Fig. 2). Adjusted overall 12-month drug retention rates are shown in Fig. 2A. In the CKDb group, the 12-month overall drug retention rate was the lowest in patients treated with JAKi, followed by those treated with TNFi, CTLA-4-Ig, and IL-6Ri (TNFi: 75.0%; IL-6Ri: 81.7%; CTLA-4-Ig: 76.2%; JAKi: 52.3%). In the normal group, patients treated with IL-6Ri showed the highest 12-month overall drug retention rate, whereas in the CKDa group, the four categories of DMARDs showed similar drug retention rates. The adjusted 12-month drug retention rates owing to AEs are shown in Fig. 2B. In the CKDb group, the 12-month drug retention rate due to AEs was lowest in patients treated with JAKi (TNFi: 93.1%; IL-6Ri: 94.1%; CTLA-4-Ig: 92.3%; JAKi: 75.1%). In the normal and CKDa groups, drug retention rates due to AEs were similar among patients treated with bDMARDs and JAKis. The adjusted 12-month drug retention rates owing to inefficacy are shown in Fig. 2C. In the CKDa and CKDb groups, patients treated with bDMARDs and JAKis showed similar drug retention rates due to inefficacy.
The results of the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis are presented in Table 2. In the CKDb group, IL-6Ri and CTLA-4-Ig showed significantly lower overall discontinuation rates than JAKi (IL-6Ri: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26–0.82; CTLA-4-Ig: HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.30–0.97) and TNFi, IL-6Ri, and CTLA-4-Ig showed lower incidence of drug discontinuation due to AE than JAKi (TNFi: 0.23 (0.09–0.61), IL-6Ri: 0.34 (0.14–0.81), CTLA-4-Ig: 0.36 (0.15–0.89)).
Sensitivity analyses after removing UPA from the JAKi treatment group showed similar findings (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Table S2). Renal-JAKis (defined as TOF, BAR, and FIL) demonstrated lower drug retention rates owing to AEs than bDMARDs in the CKDb group.
For additional sensitivity analyses, drug retention curves stratified by eGFR using the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations showed similar results (Supplementary Figs. S2, 3). Histograms of eGFR calculated using the three formulas are shown in Supplementary Fig. S4. In the normal and CKDa groups, adjusted drug retention rates owing to AEs were similar between bDMARDs and JAKi, whereas JAKi showed a lower drug retention rate than bDMARDs in the CKDb group.
The effect of TOF, BAR, and FIL dose reduction
Furthermore, we compared patients with renal impairment who received reduced doses of TOF, BAR, or FIL and those who received these drugs without dose reduction (Not reduced, TOF 10 mg/day, BAR 4 mg/day, FIL 200 mg/day; Reduced TOF 5 mg/day, BAR 2 mg/day, FIL 100 mg/day). The baseline characteristics are described in the Supplementary Table S3. We generated confounder-adjusted drug retention curves owing to AEs (Supplementary Fig. S5). In the CKDa group, there were no differences between patients with and without reduced doses. In the CKDb group, the 12-month drug retention rate due to AEs was lower in patients who received reduced doses than in those without dose reduction (Not reduced: 51.1%; reduced: 80.5%). In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, in the CKDb group, patients who received a reduced dose had a lower incidence of drug discontinuation due to AEs than those without dose reduction, although the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.016–1.38).
Discussion
In this study, we compared drug retention rates in patients with RA stratified by baseline eGFR levels. Regarding drug retention rates due to AE, JAKis showed a comparable retention rate with bDMARDs in patients with eGFR 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 while JAKis had a significantly lower retention rate in patients with eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Regarding retention rates due to inefficacy, JAKis showed a similar retention rate to that of bDMARDs in patients with kidney impairment.
From the viewpoint of pharmacokinetics, renal impairment reduces the excretion rate of JAKi with renal excretion properties and sustains higher concentrations of JAKi in the body. Therefore, for certain JAKis, dose reduction is required in patients with renal impairment [29]. In contrast, renal function did not influence the excretion of bDMARDs. Considering that patients with eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 who received JAKis showed lower drug retention rates due to AE than those with bDMARDs, even though the dose was reduced as indicated, drug concentrations of JAKis may increase and cause further AE. Meanwhile, drug discontinuation rates due to AE were comparable between JAKi and bDMARDs in patients with eGFR 45–60 mL/min/1.73 m2; therefore, the effect of renal impairment on drug concentrations of JAKis may be small, and drug concentrations may have not reached harmful levels.
The safety of different doses of JAKi was assessed in Phase II clinical trials [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In these trials, some patients received doses of JAKi that were higher than the approved standard dose. Patients who received 10 mg TOF twice a day showed a significantly higher rate of infection than those with placebo, while those who received ≤ 5 mg TOF twice a day had a similar rate of infection [31]. Regarding BAR, patients who received 8 mg/day showed more treatment-emergent AE than those who received lower doses [32, 33]. A similar dose-dependent effect was observed in patients administered different doses of UPA. Infection rates, although not serious, were higher in patients who received higher doses of UPA [34, 35]. The results of Phase II clinical trials suggest that higher concentrations of JAKis may increase AE rates.
A safety surveillance study comparing TOF with TNFi was reported in patients with RA who were aged ≥ 50 years and had at least one cardiovascular risk factor [5]. The most frequent AEs were infections. For serious infections, patients who received 10 mg TOF twice a day showed more events than those who received 5 mg TOF twice a day, and TOF had a significantly higher HR than TNFi [36]. In patients aged > 65 years, the HR of all infections and serious infections in patients receiving 10 mg TOF twice daily were higher than those in patients aged 50–65 years old. Since patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were excluded from the study, these results were based on patients with normal renal function. In our analysis, the ages of patients in the CKDa and CKDb groups were similar, but the discontinuation rate of JAKis compared to that of bDMARDs increased only in the CKDb group. Although age is associated with more AE, including infections, impaired renal function may also be associated with AE in JAKi compared with bDMARDs.
In Phase II trials of JAKi in patients with RA, drug efficacy was shown to be equivalent between approved and higher doses [30, 32, 35]. In our study, drug efficacy based on drug retention rates was similar between bDMARDs and JAKis in patients with renal impairment. These results imply that the drug concentration of standard-dose JAKis is sufficient in terms of efficacy, and no higher efficacy can be expected even if the JAKi concentration is further increased. Therefore, although the JAKi concentrations were expected to be high in patients with renal impairment, the efficacy of JAKis was unchanged and was comparable to that of bDMARDs in this study.
This study had some limitations. First, the details of hazardous AEs were not evaluated. The attending physicians in our study selected the most suitable grounds for stopping bDMARDs or JAKis from a list that included toxic AE, remission, inefficacy, and others; however, we did not record any particular AE. These may have included drug eruptions, infections, and abnormalities in the laboratory results. Second, as this was a retrospective study, the adjusted models may not have considered additional confounding factors that could affect the drug retention rate. Third, because of the small sample size and lack of significant differences at baseline, we did not include the disease activity index, anti-citrullinated peptide antibody, and rheumatoid factor in the Cox proportional hazards models. Fourth, the number of patients treated with JAKis was lower than those treated with bDMARDs, which could lead to apparently lower drug retention in this group. Fifth, we did not collect data regarding heart failure, renal amyloidosis, and other comorbidities in our cohort. Therefore, there may be insufficient data to identify the study population. Sixth, MTX doses in Japanese patients were lower than those in other countries, and the rate of MTX use may be lower than that in other countries in patients with renal impairment; this could impact the drug-retention rate, and therefore, we adjusted MTX use in our analyses.
Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the drug retention rates of bDMARDs and JAKis in patients with RA and pre-existing renal impairment. Compared with bDMARDs, physicians should pay attention to renal function when using JAKis because the AE rate may increase in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe renal impairment (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to assess the safety of JAKis in patients with renal impairment.
Data availability
The datasets used and analysed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AE:
-
Adverse event
- AUCinf :
-
Area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity
- BAR:
-
Baricitinib
- bDMARDs:
-
Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
- CKD-EPI:
-
Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration
- CTLA-4-Ig:
-
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 immunoglobulin
- EGFR:
-
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
- FIL:
-
Filgotinib
- IL-6Ris:
-
Interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors
- JAKis:
-
Janus kinase inhibitors
- MDRD:
-
Modification of diet in renal disease
- PEF:
-
Peficitinib
- RCT:
-
Randomized controlled trial
- RA:
-
Rheumatoid arthritis
- tsDMARD:
-
Targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
- TOF:
-
Tofacitinib
- TNFIs:
-
Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors
- UPA:
-
Upadacitinib
References
Lee EB, Fleischmann R, Hall S, Wilkinson B, Bradley JD, Gruben D, et al. Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2377–86. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1310476.
Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, Weinblatt ME, Del Carmen ML, Reyes Gonzaga J, et al. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:652–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1608345.
Genovese MC, Kalunian K, Gottenberg JE, Mozaffarian N, Bartok B, Matzkies F, et al. Effect of filgotinib versus placebo on clinical response in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy: the FINCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322:315–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9055.
Smolen JS, Pangan AL, Emery P, Rigby W, Tanaka Y, Vargas JI, et al. Upadacitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-monotherapy): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393:2303–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30419-2.
Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, Koch GG, Fleischmann R, Rivas JL, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:316–26. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2109927.
Takagi M, Atsumi T, Matsuno H, Tamura N, Fujii T, Okamoto N, et al. Safety and effectiveness of baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese clinical practice: 24-week results of all-case post-marketing surveillance. Mod Rheumatol. 2023;33:647–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roac089.
Wu XP, Lu XK, Wang ZT, Huang L, Cai RW, Yu HM, et al. Post-MARKETING safety concerns with upadacitinib: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2023;22:975–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2023.2223952.
Haroon M, Adeeb F, Devlin J, Gradaigh OD, Walker F. A comparative study of renal dysfunction in patients with inflammatory arthropathies: Strong association with cardiovascular diseases and not with antirheumatic therapies, inflammatory markers or duration of arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2011;14:255–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01594.x.
Couderc M, Tatar Z, Pereira B, Tiple A, Gilson M, Fautrel B, et al. Prevalence of renal impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a cross-sectional multicenter study. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68:638–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22713.
Giles JT, Simon LS, Pope J, Paik JS, Grabner M, Quebe A, et al. Prevalence of renal impairment in a US commercially insured rheumatoid arthritis population: a retrospective analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8:1383–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-021-00346-4.
Chiu HY, Huang HL, Li CH, Chen HA, Yeh CL, Chiu SH, et al. Increased risk of chronic kidney disease in rheumatoid arthritis associated with cardiovascular complications: a national population-based cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136508.
Krishnaswami S, Chow V, Boy M, Wang C, Chan G. Pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with impaired renal function and end-stage renal disease. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.178.
Shi JG, Chen X, Lee F, Emm T, Scherle PA, Lo Y, et al. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of baricitinib, an oral JAK 1/2 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54:1354–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.354.
Namour F, Fagard L, Van der Aa A, Harrison P, Xin Y, Tasset C. Influence of age and renal impairment on the steady state pharmacokinetics of filgotinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84:2779–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13726.
Mohamed M-EF, Trueman S, Feng T, Anderson J, Marbury TC, Othman AA. Characterization of the effect of renal impairment on upadacitinib pharmacokinetics. J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;59:856–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1375.
Tse S, Dowty ME, Menon S, Gupta P, Krishnaswami S. Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict drug exposure and support dosing recommendations for potential drug-drug interactions or in special populations: an example using tofacitinib. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;60:1617–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1679.
Dowty ME, Lin J, Ryder TF, Wang W, Walker GS, Vaz A, et al. The pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and clearance mechanisms of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42:759–73. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.113.054940.
Nader A, Stodtmann S, Friedel A, Mohamed M-EF, Othman AA. Pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib in healthy subjects and subjects with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or atopic dermatitis: population analyses of phase 1 and 2 clinical trials. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;60:528–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1550.
Miyatake D, Shibata T, Shibata M, Kaneko Y, Oda K, Nishimura T, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of a single oral dose of peficitinib (ASP015K) in Japanese subjects with normal and impaired renal function. Clin Drug Investig. 2020;40:149–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-019-00873-7.
Westhovens R, Rigby WFC, van der Heijde D, Ching DWT, Stohl W, Kay J, et al. Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:727–38. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219213.
Genovese MC, Smolen JS, Takeuchi T, Burmester G, Brinker D, Rooney TP, et al. Safety profile of baricitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a median of 3 years of treatment: an updated integrated safety analysis. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e347–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30032-1.
Lauper K, Iudici M, Mongin D, Bergstra SA, Choquette D, Codreanu C, et al. Effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors, abatacept, IL6-inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in 31 846 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 registers from the ‘JAK-pot’ collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:1358–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222586.
Nakayama Y, Watanabe R, Yamamoto W, Ebina K, Hirano T, Kotani T, et al. IL-6 inhibitors and JAK inhibitors as favourable treatment options for patients with anaemia and rheumatoid arthritis: ANSWER cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024;63:349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead299.
Ebina K, Etani Y, Maeda Y, Okita Y, Hirao M, Yamamoto W, et al. Drug retention of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study. RMD Open. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003160.
Jinno S, Onishi A, Dubreuil M, Hashimoto M, Yamamoto W, Murata K, et al. Comparison of the drug retention and reasons for discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors in Japanese patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis-the ANSWER cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02496-w.
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American college of rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2569–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584.
Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.034.
Stevens PE, Levin A, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:825–30. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00007.
Veeravalli V, Dash RP, Thomas JA, Babu RJ, Madgula LMV, Srinivas NR. Critical assessment of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction potential of tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib, the three approved Janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Drug Saf. 2020;43:711–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00938-z.
Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, Coombs JH, Fletcher MP, Gruben D, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP-690,550 versus placebo. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1895–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24567.
Tanaka Y, Suzuki M, Nakamura H, Toyoizumi S, Zwillich SH, Tofacitinib Study Investigators. Phase II study of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) combined with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:1150–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20494.
Keystone EC, Taylor PC, Drescher E, Schlichting DE, Beattie SD, Berclaz PY, et al. Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:333–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206478.
Tanaka Y, Emoto K, Cai Z, Aoki T, Schlichting D, Rooney T, et al. Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate therapy: a 12-week, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43:504–11. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150613.
Kremer JM, Emery P, Camp HS, Friedman A, Wang L, Othman AA, et al. A Phase IIb study of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:2867–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39801.
Genovese MC, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME, Burmester GR, Meerwein S, Camp HS, et al. Efficacy and safety of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in a phase IIb study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:2857–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39808.
Balanescu A-R, Citera G, Ramos VP, Bhatt DL, Connell CA, Gold D, et al. Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the open- label, randomised controlled ORAL Surveillance trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222405.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
Funding
The study reported in this publication uses ANSWER Cohort supported by grants from 12 pharmaceutical companies (AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei, Ayumi, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan K.K, Janssen K.K, Ono, Sanofi K.K, Taisho, Teijin Healthcare, and UCB Japan). This study is conducted as investigator initiated study. These companies have no roles in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YNakayama and AO contributed to the study conception and design. YNakayama, AO, WY, AY, HS, NY, YS, IS, TM, MK, MH, YE, TI, YNozaki, HO, TF, KMurakami, KMurata, MT, SM, and AM acquired the data. YNakayama and AO were involved in the analysis and interpretation of data. YNakayama and AO have drafted the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
YNakayama received speaker fees from Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., and AbbVie Inc. AO received research grants and speaker fees from Pfizer Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Advantest, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K. K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., UCB Japan Co., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Eisai Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd. YS has received speaking fees from Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., and AbbVie G.K. TM received speaker fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Asympti, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sanofi, Taisho, and UCB, Japan. MH received research grants and/or speaker fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Brystol Meyers, Chugai, EA Pharma, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Novartis Pharma, Taisho Toyama, and Tanabe Mitsubishi. YE received research grants and/or speaker fees from Asahi Kasei, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Ono Pharmaceuticals, and Taisho. YE is affiliated with the Department of Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, supported by Taisho. YNozaki has received research grants from AbbVie Japan GK, Eisai Co., and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. and speaker fees from AbbVie Japan GK, Astellas Pharma, Asahi Kasei, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Eisai Co., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Novartis Japan, Takeda, Ono, Otsuka Co., Pfizer, Janssen, and UCB Japan. TF has received speaker fees from AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., and Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. KMurakami received research grants and/or speaker fees from Eisai Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., and Astellas Pharma Inc. KMurata received speaking and/or consulting fees from AbbVie GK, Eisai Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. MT belongs to the department financially supported by two local governments in Japan (Nagahama City, Shiga and Toyooka City, Hyogo) and two pharmaceutical companies (Ayumi Pharmaceutical Corp. and Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp.). MT has received research grants and/or speaker fees from AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., Astellas Pharma Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tanabe Mitsubishi Pharma Corp., Teijin Pharma, Ltd., UCB Japan Co., Ltd.SM received research grants and/or speaker fees from Takeda, Eisai, Asahi-Kasei, Astellas, Pfizer, Taisho, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and Chugai. AM received honorarium and research grants from AbbVie G.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Eisai Co. Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp., and Gilead Sciences Japan. WY, AY, HS, NY, IS, MK, TI, and HO have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose concerning this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All study participants provided written informed consent and the study design was approved by the appropriate ethics review board. The representative facility of this registry is Kyoto University. This observational study (not a clinical trial) was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of Kyoto University (approval number R0357).
Consent to participate
All study participants provided written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nakayama, Y., Onishi, A., Yamamoto, W. et al. Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors compared to biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and renal impairment: the ANSWER cohort study. Clin Exp Med 24, 97 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01360-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-024-01360-w