Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mapping of biomechanical properties of cell lines on altered matrix stiffness using atomic force microscopy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding nanomechanical properties such as elastic modulus, cell adhesion force and stiffness of healthy-, cancerous- and drug-treated cancer cells under varying matrix microenvironment have great roles in cellular processes like morphogenesis, mechanotransduction, focal adhesion, motility, metastasis and drug delivery. AFM is an important technique to depict nanomechanical properties and mechanoadaptation response of cell lines in different microenvironment. In the present study, two different cell categories, i.e. healthy and cancerous, having two different types in each category, i.e. 3T3 fibroblast, HaCaT keratinocyte, untreated and drug-treated MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 were chosen for cell culture on PDMS matrix of different stiffness without any prior protein layer to facilitate unbiased cell growth. Subsequently cell mechanics response was evaluated by AFM technique and correlated with immunofluorescence assay. Furthermore, cell culture was performed to stiffer matrix after initial incubation on soft matrix and analysed the cell mechanics using AFM and fluorescence assay to understand cell adaptation with matrix stiffness. Results demonstrate deviations in elastic modulus, stiffness and adhesion force induced by matrix stiffness in all four cell lines. Study revealed the doxorubicin drug can significantly influence the cell mechanics and disease state of cancer cells. Variation of cytoskeleton structure, actin fibre and focal adhesion primarily accounts for cell mechanics response in terms of elastic modulus, stiffness and adhesion of cell under varying matrix stiffness. Experimental evidence demonstrates that a greater understanding of the mechanics in terms of cellular deformability and its interactions with extracellular environments offer enormous potential for new advances in disease diagnostics, therapeutics and influence of drug treatment in several complex processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AbuHammad S, Zihlif M (2013) Gene expression alterations in doxorubicin resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line. Genomics 101:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibert C, Goud B, Manneville J-B (2017) Are cancer cells really softer than normal cells? Biol Cell 109:167–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh AM, Shiri S, Farsinejad S (2014) Metastasis review: from bench to bedside. Tumor Biol 35:8483–8523

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoudjit F, Vuori K (2012) Integrin signaling in cancer cell survival and chemoresistance. Chemother Res Pract 2012:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandin A-F, Renner G, Lehmann M, Lelong-Rebel I, Martin S, Dontenwill M (2015) β1 integrins as therapeutic targets to disrupt hallmarks of cancer. Front Pharmacol 6:279

    Google Scholar 

  • Calzado-Martín A, Encinar M, Tamayo J, Calleja M, San Paulo A (2016) Effect of actin organization on the stiffness of living breast cancer cells revealed by peak-force modulation atomic force microscopy. ACS Nano 10:3365–3374

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavo M, Fato M, Peñuela L, Beltrame F, Raiteri R, Scaglione S (2016) Microenvironment complexity and matrix stiffness regulate breast cancer cell activity in a 3D in vitro model. Sci Rep 6:35367

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl KN, Kalinowski A (2011) Nucleoskeleton mechanics at a glance. J Cell Sci 124:675

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Trepat X, Butler JP, Millet E, Morgan KG, Weitz DA, Fredberg JJ (2006) Fast and slow dynamics of the cytoskeleton. Nat Mater 5:636–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Desouza M, Gunning PW, Stehn JR (2012) The actin cytoskeleton as a sensor and mediator of apoptosis. Bioarchitecture 2:75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria EC, Ma N, Gazi E, Gardner P, Brown M, Clarke NW, Snook RD (2008) Measurement of elastic properties of prostate cancer cells using AFM. Analyst 133:1498–1500

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessel A, Döbereiner H-G (2017) Nonlinear compliance of elastic layers to indentation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17:419–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavara N (2017) A beginner’s guide to atomic force microscopy probing for cell mechanics. Microsc Res Tech 80:75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges PC, Janmey PA (2005) Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials. J Appl Physiol 98:1547–1553

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillou L, Babataheri A, Puech PH, Barakat AI, Husson J (2016) Dynamic monitoring of cell mechanical properties using profile microindentation. Sci Rep 6:21529

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase K, Pelling AE (2015) Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy. J R Soc Interface 12:20140970

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall A (1998) Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279:509

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz P, Sarna M, Burda K, Gabryś H (2014) AtomicJ: an open source software for analysis of force curves. Rev Sci Instrum 85:063703

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Anvari B, Torres Jorge H, Lebaron Richard G, Athanasiou Kyriacos A (2006) Temporal effects of cell adhesion on mechanical characteristics of the single chondrocyte. J Orthop Res 21:88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter JL, Chen J, Wan WK, Uniyal S, Leabu M, Chan BMC (2005) Atomic force microscopy investigation of the dependence of cellular elastic moduli on glutaraldehyde fixation. J Microsc 219:61–68

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Infanger DW, Lynch ME, Fischbach C (2013) Engineered culture models for studies of tumor-microenvironment interactions. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingber DE (1997) Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol 59:575–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Jyoti W, Debashis M, Soumen D (2017) Influence of physico-mechanical properties of elastomeric material for different cell growth. Biomed Mater 12:065002

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-O, Kim J, Okajima T, Cho N-J (2017) Mechanical properties of paraformaldehyde-treated individual cells investigated by atomic force microscopy and scanning ion conductance microscopy. Nano Converg 4:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau AWC, Hoffman BD, Davies A, Crocker JC, Lubensky TC (2003) Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. Phys Rev Lett 91:198101

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee GYH, Lim CT (2007) Biomechanics approaches to studying human diseases. Trends Biotechnol 25:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekka M (2016) Discrimination between normal and cancerous cells using AFM. Bionanoscience 6:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Levental I, Levental KR, Klein EA, Assoian R, Miller RT, Wells RG, Janmey PA (2010) A simple indentation device for measuring micrometer-scale tissue stiffness. J Phys: Condens Matter 22:194120

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Yang J, Chu TT, Naidu R, Lu L, Chandramohanadas R, Dao M, Karniadakis GE (2018) Cytoskeleton remodeling induces membrane stiffness and stability changes of maturing reticulocytes. Biophys J 114:2014–2023

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem AA, Appleyard MVCL, O’Neill MA, Hupp TR, Chamberlain MP, Thompson AM (2003) Doxorubicin and vinorelbine act independently via p53 expression and p38 activation respectively in breast cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer 88:1281–1284

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovitt CJ, Shelper TB, Avery VM (2018) Doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cells is mediated by extracellular matrix proteins. BMC Cancer 18:41

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney JM, Nikova D, Lautenschläger F, Clarke E, Langer R, Guck J, Van Vliet KJ (2010) Mesenchymal stem cell mechanics from the attached to the suspended state. Biophys J 99:2479–2487

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason BN, Califano JP, Reinhart-King CA (2012) Matrix stiffness: a regulator of cellular behavior and tissue formation. In: Bhatia SK (ed) Engineering biomaterials for regenerative medicine: novel technologies for clinical applications. Springer, New York, pp 19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael KE, Dumbauld DW, Burns KL, Hanks SK, García AJ (2009) Focal adhesion kinase modulates cell adhesion strengthening via integrin activation. Mol Biol Cell 20:2508–2519

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell M, Oakes PW, Lenz M, Gardel ML (2015) Forcing cells into shape: the mechanics of actomyosin contractility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:486

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi T, Ishii Y, Ishikawa Y, Matsumoto T, Sato M (2002) Experimental and numerical analyses of local mechanical properties measured by atomic force microscopy for sheared endothelial cells. Biomed Mater Eng 12(3):319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachenari M, Seyedpour SM, Janmaleki M, Shayan SB, Taranejoo S, Hosseinkhani H (2014) Mechanical properties of cancer cytoskeleton depend on actin filaments to microtubules content: investigating different grades of colon cancer cell lines. J Biomech 47:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson G, Robinson F, Beers Gibson T, Xu B-e, Karandikar M, Berman K, Cobb MH (2001) Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. Endocr Rev 22:153–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Porteiro B, Fondevila MF, Buque X, Gonzalez-Rellan MJ, Fernandez U, Mora A, Beiroa D, Senra A, Gallego R, Fernø J, López M, Sabio G, Dieguez C, Aspichueta P, Nogueiras R (2018) Pharmacological stimulation of p53 with low-dose doxorubicin ameliorates diet-induced nonalcoholic steatosis and steatohepatitis. Mol Metab 8:132–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman A, Trigueros S, Cartagena A, Stevenson APZ, Susilo M, Nauman E, Contera SA (2011) Mapping nanomechanical properties of live cells using multi-harmonic atomic force microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol 6:809

    Google Scholar 

  • Rico F, Roca-Cusachs P, Gavara N, Farré R, Rotger M, Navajas D (2005) Probing mechanical properties of living cells by atomic force microscopy with blunted pyramidal cantilever tips. Phys Rev E 72:021914

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotsch C, Radmacher M (2000) Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys J 78:520–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas PJ, Forteza R, Mashukova A (2016) Multiple roles for keratin intermediate filaments in the regulation of epithelial barrier function and apico-basal polarity. Tissue Barriers 4:e1178368

    Google Scholar 

  • Sancho A, Vandersmissen I, Craps S, Luttun A, Groll J (2017) A new strategy to measure intercellular adhesion forces in mature cell–cell contacts. Sci Rep 7:46152

    Google Scholar 

  • Sit S-T, Manser E (2011) Rho GTPases and their role in organizing the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci 124:679

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith L, Watson MB, Kane SL, Drew PJ, Lind MJ, Cawkwell L (2006) The analysis of doxorubicin resistance in human breast cancer cells using antibody microarrays. Mol Cancer Ther 5:2115

    Google Scholar 

  • Solon J, Levental I, Sengupta K, Georges PC, Janmey PA (2007) Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J 93:4453–4461

    Google Scholar 

  • Staunton JR, Doss BL, Lindsay S, Ros R (2016) Correlating confocal microscopy and atomic force indentation reveals metastatic cancer cells stiffen during invasion into collagen I matrices. Sci Rep 6:19686

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Villa-Diaz LG, Lam RHW, Chen W, Krebsbach PH, Fu J (2012) Mechanics regulates fate decisions of human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 7:e37178

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappmann B, Chen CS (2013) How cells sense extracellular matrix stiffness: a material’s perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol 24:948–953

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nimwegen MJ, Huigsloot M, Camier A, Tijdens IB, van de Water B (2006) Focal adhesion kinase and protein kinase B cooperate to suppress doxorubicin-induced apoptosis of breast tumor cells. Mol Pharmacol 70:1330

    Google Scholar 

  • Vousden KH, Lane DP (2007) p53 in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:275

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi H, Condeelis J (2007) Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research. 1773:642–652

  • Yamazaki D, Kurisu S, Takenawa T (2005) Regulation of cancer cell motility through actin reorganization. Cancer Sci 96:379–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu M, Strohmeyer N, Wang J, Müller DJ, Helenius J (2015) Increasing throughput of AFM-based single cell adhesion measurements through multisubstrate surfaces. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6:157–166

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the cell culture laboratory of ATDC for providing cell culture facilities. The authors would also like to thank CRF of School of Medical Science and Technology, IIT Kharagpur, for providing the facilities for AFM imaging and also Microscale Transport Process and Microfluidic laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering for providing the facilities for confocal fluorescence imaging.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumen Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 4502 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wala, J., Das, S. Mapping of biomechanical properties of cell lines on altered matrix stiffness using atomic force microscopy. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19, 1523–1536 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01285-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01285-4

Keywords

Navigation