Abstract
The initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, which is the main cause of cardiovascular diseases, correlate with local haemodynamic factors such as wall shear stress (WSS). Numerical simulations such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on medical imaging have been employed to analyse blood flow in different arteries with and without luminal stenosis. Patient-specific CFD models, however, have assumptions on blood rheology. The differences in the calculated haemodynamic factors between different rheological models have not been fully evaluated. In this study, carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on six patients with different degrees of carotid stenosis and two healthy volunteers. Using the 3D reconstructed carotid geometries and the patient-specific boundary conditions, CFD simulations were performed by applying a Newtonian and four non-Newtonian models (Carreau, Cross, Quemada and Power-law). WSS descriptors and pressure gradient were analysed and compared between the models. The differences in the maximum and the average oscillatory shear index between the Newtonian and the non-Newtonian models were lower than 12.7% and 12%, respectively. The differences in pressure gradient were also within 15%. The differences in the mean time-averaged WSS (TAWSS) between the Newtonian and Cross, Carreau and Power-law models were lower than 6%. In contrast, a higher difference (26%) was found in Quemada. For the low TAWSS, the differences from the Newtonian to the non-Newtonian models were much larger, in the range of 0.4–31% for Carreau, 3–22% for Cross, 5–51% for Quemada and 10–41% for Power-law. The study suggests that the assumption of a Newtonian model is reasonable when the overall flow pattern or the mean values of the WSS descriptors are investigated. However, the non-Newtonian model is necessary when the low TAWSS region is the focus, especially for arteries with severe stenosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambrosi D, Rozza G, Quarteroni A (2006) Modeling of Physiological Flows. Springer, Berlin
Augst AD, Ariff BMCG, Thom SAG et al (2007) Analysis of complex flow and the relationship between blood pressure, wall shear stress, and intima-media thickness in the human carotid artery. Am J Physiol Circ Physiol 293:H1031–H1037. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00989.2006
Berger SA, Jou L (2000) Flows in Stenotic Vessels. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122124
Bozzi S, Morbiducci U, Gallo D et al (2017) Uncertainty propagation of phase contrast-MRI derived inlet boundary conditions in computational hemodynamics models of thoracic aorta. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 20:1104–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2017.1334770
Brust M, Schaefer C, Doerr R et al (2013) Rheology of human blood plasma: viscoelastic versus Newtonian behavior. Phys Rev Lett 110:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078305
Chen J, Lu XY (2004) Numerical investigation of the non-Newtonian blood flow in a bifurcation model with a non-planar branch. J Biomech 37:1899–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.030
Cho YI, Kensey KR (1991) Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: steady flows. Biorheology 28:241–262. https://doi.org/10.3233/BIR-1991-283-415
Cross MM (1965) Rheology of non-Newtonian fluids: a new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems. J Colloid Sci 20:417–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(65)90022-X
DiCarlo AL, Holdsworth DW, Poepping TL (2019) Study of the effect of stenosis severity and non-Newtonian viscosity on multidirectional wall shear stress and flow disturbances in the carotid artery using particle image velocimetry. Med Eng Phys 65:8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.023
Dong J, Wong KKL, Tu J (2013) Hemodynamics analysis of patient-specific carotid bifurcation : A CFD model of downstream peripheral vascular impedance. 476–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm
Eshtehardi P, Brown AJ, Bhargava A et al (2017) High wall shear stress and high-risk plaque: an emerging concept. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-1055-1
Evju Ø, Valen-Sendstad K, Mardal KA (2013) A study of wall shear stress in 12 aneurysms with respect to different viscosity models and flow conditions. J Biomech 46:2802–2808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.004
Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HWK et al (1999) Surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke 30:1751–1758
Gallo D, Steinman DA, Morbiducci U (2014) An insight into the mechanistic role of the common carotid artery on the hemodynamics at the carotid bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 43:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1119-0
Gallo D, Bijari PB, Morbiducci U et al (2018) Segment-specific associations between local haemodynamic and imaging markers of early atherosclerosis at the carotid artery: an in vivo human study. J R Soc Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0352
Gao H, Long Q, Graves M et al (2009) Carotid arterial plaque stress analysis using fluid-structure interactive simulation based on in vivo magnetic resonance images of four patients. J Biomech 42:1416–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.010
Gao H, Long Q, Das SK et al (2011) Stress analysis of carotid atheroma in transient ischemic attack patients: evidence for extreme stress-induced plaque rupture. Ann Biomed Eng 39:2203–2212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0314-5
Gharahi H, Zambrano BA, Zhu DC et al (2017) Computational fluid dynamic simulation of human carotid artery bifurcation based on anatomy and volumetric blood flow rate measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math 8:40–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12572-016-0161-6.Computational
Huh HK, Ha H, Lee SJ (2015) Effect of non-Newtonian viscosity on the fluid-dynamic characteristics in stenotic vessels. Exp Fluids 56:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2037-0
Hussain MA, Kar S, Puniyani RR (1999) Relationship between power law coefficients and major blood constituents affecting the whole blood viscosity. J Biosci 24:329–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02941247
Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK et al (1985) Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Ateriosclerosis 5:293–302
LaDisa JF, Olson LE, Molthen RC et al (2005) Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. Am J Physiol Circ Physiol 288:H2465–H2475. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01107.2004
Lee S-W, Steinman DA (2007) On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng 129:273. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2540836
Lee S-W, Antiga L, Steinman DA (2009) Correlations among indicators of disturbed flow at the normal carotid bifurcation. J Biomech Eng 131:061013. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3127252
Li MX, Beech-Brandt JJ, John LR et al (2007) Numerical analysis of pulsatile blood flow and vessel wall mechanics in different degrees of stenoses. J Biomech 40:3715–3724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.06.023
Li ZY, Tan FPP, Soloperto G et al (2015) Flow pattern analysis in a highly stenotic patient-specific carotid bifurcation model using a turbulence model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18:1099–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2013.873033
Long Q, Xu XY, Ariff B et al (2000) Reconstruction of blood flow patterns in a human carotid bifurcation: a combined CFD and MRI study. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200003)11:3%3c299:AID-JMRI9%3e3.0.CO;2-M
Malek AM, Alper SL (1999) Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. Stress Int J Biol Stress 282:2035–2042
Mehri R, Mavriplis C, Fenech M (2018) Red blood cell aggregates and their effect on non-Newtonian blood viscosity at low hematocrit in a two-fluid low shear rate microfluidic system. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199911
Moradicheghamahi J, Sadeghiseraji J, Jahangiri M (2019) Numerical solution of the Pulsatile, non-Newtonian and turbulent blood flow in a patient specific elastic carotid artery. Int J Mech Sci 150:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.046
Morbiducci U, Gallo D, Massai D et al (2010) Outflow conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: implications for indicators of abnormal flow. J Biomech Eng 132:091005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001886
Morbiducci U, Gallo D, Massai D et al (2011) On the importance of blood rheology for bulk flow in hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation. J Biomech 44:2427–2438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.028
Morbiducci U, Ponzini R, Gallo D et al (2013) Inflow boundary conditions for image-based computational hemodynamics: impact of idealized versus measured velocity profiles in the human aorta. J Biomech 46:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.012
Osinnski JN, Ku DN, Mukundan S et al (1995) Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta with the use of MR phase velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 5:640–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880050605
Pirola S, Jarral OA, O’Regan DP et al (2018) Computational study of aortic hemodynamics for patients with an abnormal aortic valve: the importance of secondary flow at the ascending aorta inlet. APL Bioeng 2:026101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011960
Polanczyk A, Podyma M, Stefanczyk L et al (2015) A 3D model of thrombus formation in a stent-graft after implantation in the abdominal aorta. J Biomech 48:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.033
Polanczyk A, Wozniak T, Strzelecki M et al (2016) Evaluating an algorithm for 3D reconstruction of blood vessels for further simulations of hemodynamic in human artery branches. Signal Process Algorithms Archit Arrange Appl Conf Proc SPA. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPA.2016.7763595
Polanczyk A, Podgorski M, Wozniak T, Stefanczyk L (2018) Computational fluid dynamics as an engineering tool for the reconstruction of hemodynamics after carotid artery stenosis operation : a case study. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina54030042
Polanczyk A, Podgorski M, Polanczyk M et al (2019) A novel method for describing biomechanical properties of the aortic wall based on the three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction model. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 28:306–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy252
Quemada D (1978) Rheology of concentrated disperse systems III. General features of the proposed non-newtonian model. Comparison with experimental data Rheologic. Rheology 653:643–653
Razavi A, Shirani E, Sadeghi MR (2011) Numerical simulation of blood pulsatile flow in a stenosed carotid artery using different rheological models. J Biomech 44:2021–2030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.023
Robertson AM, Owens RG (2009) Rheology of blood. In: Cardiovascular mathematics. Springer, Berlin, pp 211–242
Schirmer CM, Malek AM (2012) Computational fluid dynamic characterization of carotid bifurcation stenosis in patient-based geometries. Brain Behav. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.25
Skiadopoulos A, Neofytou P, Housiadas C (2017) Comparison of blood rheological models in patient specific cardiovascular system simulations. J Hydrodyn 29:293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60739-4
Soulis JV, Lampri OP, Fytanidis DK, Giannoglou GD (2011) Relative residence time and oscillatory shear index of non-Newtonian flow models in aorta. In: 10th international workshop on biomedical engineering, pp 0–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/iwbe.2011.6079011
Steinman DA, Thomas JB, Ladak HM et al (2002) Reconstruction of carotid bifurcation hemodynamics and wall thickness using computational fluid dynamics and MRI. Magn Reson Med 47:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10025
Yang C, Tang D, Yuan C et al (2007) In vivo/ex vivo MRI-based 3D non-newtonian FSI models for human atherosclerotic plaques compared with fluid/wall-only models. C Comput Model Eng Sci 19:233–245. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmes.2007.019.233
Youssefi P, Gomez A, He T et al (2017) Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics—assessment of aortic hemodynamics in a spectrum of aortic valve pathologies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 153:8–20.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjtcvs.2016.09.040
Youssefi P, Gomez A, Arthurs C et al (2018) Impact of patient-specific inflow velocity profile on hemodynamics of the thoracic aorta. J Biomech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037857
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from PA Research Foundation (PARF) and Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT140101152, DP200103492], as well as the support provided by the clinical team at the PA Hospital, especially Gillian Jagger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendieta, J.B., Fontanarosa, D., Wang, J. et al. The importance of blood rheology in patient-specific computational fluid dynamics simulation of stenotic carotid arteries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19, 1477–1490 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01282-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01282-7