Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Towards the prediction of flow-induced shear stress distributions experienced by breast cancer cells in the lymphatics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tumour metastasis in the lymphatics is a crucial step in the progression of breast cancer. The dynamics by which breast cancer cells (BCCs) travel in the lymphatics remains poorly understood. The goal of this work is to develop a model capable of predicting the shear stresses metastasising BCCs experience using numerical and experimental techniques. This paper models the fluidic transport of large particles (\(\eta =d_{\mathrm{p}}/W=0.1-0.4\) where \(d_{\mathrm{p}}\) is the particle diameter and W is the channel width) subjected to lymphatic flow conditions (\({ Re}=0.04\)), in a \(100\times 100\,\upmu \hbox {m}\) microchannel. The feasibility of using the dynamic fluid body interaction (DFBI) method to predict particle motion was assessed, and particle tracking experiments were performed. The experiments found that particle translational velocity decreased from the undisturbed fluid velocity with increasing particle size (5–14% velocity lag for \(\eta =0.1-0.3\)). DFBI simulations were found to better predict particle behaviour than theoretical predictions; however, mesh restrictions in the near-wall region (\(0.2\,\mathrm{W}>y>0.8\,\mathrm{W}\)) result in computationally expensive models. The simulations were in good agreement with the experiments (\(<12\%\) difference) across the channel (\(0.2\,\mathrm{W}\le y\le 0.8\,\mathrm{W}\)), with differences up to 25% in the near-wall region. Particles experience a range of shear stresses (0.002–0.12 Pa) and spatial shear gradients (\(0.004-0.137\,\hbox {Pa}/\upmu \hbox {m}\)) depending on their size and radial position. The predicted shear gradients are far in excess of values associated with BCC apoptosis (\(0.004-0.023\,\hbox {Pa}/\upmu \hbox {m}\)). Increasing our understanding of the shear stress magnitudes and gradients experienced by BCCs could be leveraged to elucidate whether a particular BCC size or location exists that encourages metastasis within the lymphatics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akl TJ et al (2011) Mesenteric lymph flow in adult and aged rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 301(5):H1828–H1840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruus H (2008) Theoretical microfluidics. Oxford University Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdick MM et al (2003) Colon carcinoma cell glycolipids, integrins, and other glycoproteins mediate adhesion to HUVECs under flow. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284(4):C977–C987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang S-F et al (2008) Tumor cell cycle arrest induced by shear stress: roles of integrins and Smad. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105(10):3927–3932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper LJ et al (2015) An image-based model of fluid flow through lymph nodes. Bull Math Biol 78(1):52–71

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JB et al (2006) Lymph flow, shear stress, and lymphocyte velocity in rat mesenteric prenodal lymphatics. Microcirculation 13(7):597–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ene-Iordache B et al (2015) Disturbed flow in a patient-specific arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: multidirectional and reciprocating near-wall flow patterns. J Biomech 48:2195–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarnejad M et al (2015) Modeling lymph flow and fluid exchange with blood vessels in lymph nodes. Lymphat Res Biol 13(4):234–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamińska M et al (2015) Menopausal Review. Breast cancer risk factors. 3(3):196–202. http://www.termedia.pl/doi/10.5114/pm.2015.54346

  • Kim YW et al (2011) Inertial-microfluidic radial migration in solid/liquid two-phase flow through a microcapillary: particle equilibrium position. Exp Fluids 51(3):723–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YW, Yoo JY (2008) The lateral migration of neutrally-buoyant spheres transported through square microchannels. J Micromech Microeng 18(6):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HJ et al (2017) Fluid shear stress activates YAP1 to promote cancer cell motility. Nat Commun 8:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH, Nan A (2012) Combination drug delivery approaches in metastatic breast cancer. J Drug Deliv 2012:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu H et al (2004) Microfluidic shear device for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion. Anal Chem 76(18):5257–5264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margaris KN et al (2016) Microparticle image velocimetry approach to flow measurements in isolated contracting lymphatic vessels. J Biomed Opt 21(2):25002-1–25002-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcpherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM (2000) Breast cancer–epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ Br Med J 321:624–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MJ, King MR (2013) Computational and experimental models of cancer cell response to fluid shear stress. Front Oncol 3(March):44

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MJ, King MR (2013) Fluid shear stress sensitizes cancer cells to receptor-mediated apoptosis via trimeric death receptors. New J Phys 15(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley ST, Walsh MT, Newport DT (2017) The advection of microparticles, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in response to very low Reynolds numbers. Biomicrofluidics 11(3):34105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson SD (2003) Insights into the mechanisms of lymph node metastasis. Cancer 98(2):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nipper ME, Dixon JB (2011) Engineering the lymphatic system. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2(4):296–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahbar E, Moore JE Jr (2011) A model of a radially expanding and contracting lymphangion. J Biomech 44(6):1001–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi S, Fu A, Luo KQ (2017) High shear stresses under exercise condition destroy circulating tumor cells in a microfluidic system. Sci Rep 7:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roache PJ (1994) Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J Fluids Eng 116(3):405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens (2017) Star CCM+ User guide. https://stevedocs.cd-adapco.com/starccmplus_latest_en/index.html?param=ZbynB#page/STARCCMP%2FGUID-7484F748-3ECE-4216-9D53-06E0B9B4191A%3Den%3D.html

  • Staben ME, Zinchenko AZ, Davis RH (2003) Motion of a particle between two parallel plane walls in low-Reynolds-number Poiseuille flow. Phys Fluids 15(6):1711–1733

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J et al (2013) Size-based hydrodynamic rare tumor cell separation in curved microfluidic channels. Biomicrofluidics 7(1):11802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz MA (2001) The physiology of the lymphatic system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 50(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka T et al (2012) Inertial migration of cancer cells in blood flow in microchannels. Biomed Microdevices 14(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafillu U et al (2017) Fluid shear stress induces cancer stem cell-like phenotype in MCF7 breast cancer cell line without inducing epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Int J Oncol 50:993–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JT et al (2013) Confocal image-based computational modeling of nitric oxide transport in a rat mesenteric lymphatic vessel. J Biomech Eng 135(5):51005-1–51005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JT et al (2015) Determining the combined effect of the lymphatic valve leaflets and sinus on resistance to forward flow. J Biomech 48(13):3584–3590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer MH, Ahmadi A, Cheung KC (2014) Application of a three-dimensional (3D) particle tracking method to microfluidic particle focusing. Lab Chip 14:1443–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Irish Research Council and the Mid-Western Cancer Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. Walsh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to state.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morley, S.T., Newport, D.T. & Walsh, M.T. Towards the prediction of flow-induced shear stress distributions experienced by breast cancer cells in the lymphatics. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 16, 2051–2062 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0937-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0937-z

Keywords

Navigation