Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical behavior of human embryonic stem cell pellet under unconfined compression

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a prelude to the understanding of mechanotransduction in human embryonic stem cell (hESC) differentiation, the mechanical behavior of hESCs in the form of cell pellet is studied. The pellets were tested after 3 or 5 weeks of cell culture in order to demonstrate the effect of the duration of cell culture on the mechanical properties of the pellets. A micromechanical tester was used to conduct unconfined compression on hESC pellet, and experimental, numerical, and analytical methods were combined to determine the mechanical properties of hESC pellet. It is assumed that the mechanical behavior of hESC pellets can be described by an isotropic, linear viscoelastic model consisting of a spring and two Maxwell units in parallel, and the Poisson’s ratio of the hESC pellet is constant based on pellet deformation in the direction perpendicular to the compression direction. Finite element method (FEM) simulation was adopted to determine the values of Poisson’s ratio and the five parameters contained in the viscoelastic model. The variations of Poisson’s ratio and the initial elastic modulus are found to be larger compared with those of the four other parameters. Results show that longer duration of cell culture leads to higher modulus of hESC pellet. The effect of pellet size error on the values of mechanical parameters determined is studied using FEM simulation, and it is found that the effect of size error on Poisson’s ratio and initial elastic modulus is much larger than that on the other parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexopoulos LG, Williams GM, Upton ML, Setton LA, Guilak F (2005) Osteoarthritic changes in the biphasic mechanical properties of the chondrocyte pericellular matrix in articular cartilage. J Biomech 38(3): 509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates JHT (1998) A micromechanical model of lung tissue rheology. Ann Biomed Eng 26(4): 679–687

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buschmann MD, Gluzband YA, Grodzinsky AJ, Hunziker EB (1995) Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture. J Cell Sci 108(4): 1497–1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Caille N, Thoumine O, Tardy Y, Meister J-J (2002) Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J Biomech 35(2): 177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Hammond H, Ye Z, Zhan X, Dravid G (2003) Human adult marrow cells support prolonged expansion of human embryonic stem cells in culture. Stem Cells 21(2): 131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen RM (1982) Theory of viscoelasticity: an introduction, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder SH, Goldstein SA, Kimura JH, Soslowsky LJ, Spengler DM (2001) Chondrocyte differentiation is modulated by frequency and duration of cyclic compressive loading. Ann Biomed Eng 29(6): 476–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilak F (1995) Compression-induced changes in the shape and volume of the chondrocyte nucleus. J Biomech 28(12): 1529–1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilak F, Mow VC (2000) The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J Biomech 33(12): 1663–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe JM, van Campen DH, Arts T, Heethaar RM (1991) The constitutive behavior of passive heart muscle tissue: a quasi-linear viscoelastic formulation. J Biomech 24(9): 841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones WR, Ting-Beall HP, Lee GM, Kelley SS, Hochmuth RM, Guilak F (1999) Alterations in the Young’s modulus and volumetric properties of chondrocytes isolated from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. J Biomech 32(2): 119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers BS, McElhaney JH, Doherty BJ (1991) The viscoelastic responses of the human cervical spine in torsion: Experimental limitations of quasi-linear theory, and a method for reducing these effects. J Biomech 24(9): 811–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasseri S, Bilston LE, Phan-Thien N (2002) Viscoelastic properties of pig kidney in shear, experimental results and modelling. Rheol Acta 41(1–2): 180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofek G, Willard VP, Koay EJ, Hu JC, Lin P, Athanasiou KA (2009) Mechanical characterization of differentiated human embryonic stem cells. J Biomech Eng 131(6): 061011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan-Thien N, Nasseri S, Bilston LE (2000) Oscillatory squeezing flow of a biological material. Rheol Acta 39(4): 409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto JG, Fung YC (1973) Mechanical properties of heart muscle in passive state. J Biomech 6(6): 597–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong C-Y, Trounson A, Bongso A (2000) Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 18(4): 399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Ji L, de Pablo JJ, Palecek SP (2008) TGF beta/Activin/Nodal pathway in inhibition of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by mechanical strain. Biophys J 94(10): 4123–4133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanjeevi R (1982) A viscoelastic model for the mechanical properties of biological materials. J Biomech 15(2): 107–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato M, Theret DP, Wheeler LT, Ohshima N, Nerem RM (1990) Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 112(3): 263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan SCW, Pan WX, Ma G, Cai N, Leong KW, Liao K (2008) Viscoelastic behaviour of human mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Cell Biol 9: 40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terraciano V, Hwang N, Moroni L, Park HB, Zhang Z, Mizrahi J, Seliktar D, Elisseeff J (2007) Differential response of adult and embryonic mesenchymal progenitor cells to mechanical compression in hydrogels. Stem Cells 25(11): 2730–2738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282(5391): 1145–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickey WR, Baaijens FPT, Laursen TA, Alexopoulos LG, Guilak F (2006) Determination of the Poisson’s ratio of the cell: recovery properties of chondrocytes after release from complete micropipette aspiration. J Biomech 39(1): 78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JZ, Herzog W (2006) Analysis of the mechanical behavior of chondrocytes in unconfined compression tests for cyclic loading. J Biomech 39(4): 603–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    Gang Ma

  2. Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169547, Singapore

    Erik Petersen & Kam W. Leong

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA

    Kam W. Leong

  4. School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    Kin Liao

Authors
  1. Gang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erik Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kam W. Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kin Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kin Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, G., Petersen, E., Leong, K.W. et al. Mechanical behavior of human embryonic stem cell pellet under unconfined compression. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11, 703–714 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0344-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0344-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation