Skip to main content
Log in

Weakly compressible SPH simulation of cnoidal waves with strong plunging breakers

  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydrodynamics of highly nonlinear cnoidal waves and their subsequent strong plunging breakers are among the least understood and most significant issues in coastal engineering. In this work, a weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) formulation is used for the study of the generation and propagation of cnoidal waves and investigation of the characteristics of the induced strong plunging breakers. Numerical results show the capability of the SPH scheme for properly simulating the cnoidal waves. For the case of strong plunging breakers, dynamic and kinematic features of the flow are computed and compared with certain implementations of other numerical techniques. SPH is shown to be more accurate compared with other numerical techniques. Power spectral density of both horizontal and vertical dynamic velocities at still water level demonstrates existing of 2D isotropy of dynamics for a typical beach profile with cross-section of slowly varying bottom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alshaer AW, Rogers BD, Li L (2017) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) modelling of transient heat transfer in pulsed laser ablation of Al and associated free-surface problems. Comput Mater Sci 127:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altomare C, Crespo AJC, Rogers BD, Domínguez JM, Gironella X, Gómez-Gesteira M (2014) Numerical modelling of armour block sea breakwater with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Comput Struct 130:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altomare C, Crespo AJC, Domínguez JM, Gómez-Gesteira M, Suzuki T, Verwaest T (2015a) Applicability of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for estimation of sea wave impact on coastal structures. Coast Eng 96:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altomare C, Domínguez JM, Crespo AJC, Suzuki T, Caceres I, Gómez-Gesteira M (2015b) Hybridization of the wave propagation model SWASH and the Meshfree particle method SPH for real coastal applications. Coast Eng J 57:1550024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altomare C, Domínguez JM, Crespo AJC, González-Cao J, Suzuki T, Gómez-Gesteira M, Troch P (2017) Long-crested wave generation and absorption for SPH-based DualSPHysics model. Coast Eng 127:37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristodemo F, Tripepi G, Meringolo DD, Veltri P (2017) Solitary wave-induced forces on horizontal circular cylinders: laboratory experiments and SPH simulations. Coast Eng 129:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet J, Lok TSL (1999) Variational and momentum preserving aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamics formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 180:97–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen ED (2006) Large eddy simulation of spilling and plunging breakers. Coast Eng 53:463–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clavero M, Longo S, Chiapponi L, Losada MA (2016) 3D flow measurements in regular breaking waves past a fixed submerged bar on an impermeable plane slope. J Fluid Mech 802:490–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colagrossi A, Landrini M (2003) Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 191:448–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo AJC, Gómez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA (2007) Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods. C Sci Press 3:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo AJC, Altomare C, Domínguez JM, Suzuki T, Verwaest T, Gomez-Gesteira M (2015a) SPH modelling in coastal engineering. In: 36th IAHR World Congress. pp 1–10

  • Crespo AJC, Domínguez JM, Rogers BD, Gómez-Gesteira M, Longshaw S, Canelas R, Vacondio R, Barreiro A, García-Feal O (2015b) DualSPHysics: open-source parallel CFD solver based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Comput Phys Commun 187:204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple RA, Rogers BD (2006) Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method. Coast Eng 53:141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhti M, Kirby JT, Shi F, Ma G (2016) Wave breaking in the surf zone and deep-water in a non-hydrostatic RANS model. Part 2: turbulence and mean circulation. Ocean Model 107:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, J., 2018. Evaluation of SPH for hydrodynamic modeling, using DualSPHysics

    Google Scholar 

  • Farahani RJ, Dalrymple RA, Hérault A, Bilotta G (2012) Turbulent coherent structures under breaking water waves. In: Proc. 7th International SPHERIC Workshop. pp 171–178

  • Fenton JD (1990) Nonlinear wave theories. In: The Sea, Vol9: Ocean Engineering Science. John Wiley and Sons

  • González-Cao J, Altomare C, Crespo AJC, Domínguez JM, Gómez-Gesteira M, Kisacik D (2019) On the accuracy of DualSPHysics to assess violent collisions with coastal structures. Comput Fluids 179:604–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goring DG (1978) Tsunamis-the propagation of long waves onto a shelf. California Institute of Technology

  • Gotoh H, Khayyer A (2018) On the state-of-the-art of particle methods for coastal and ocean engineering. Coast Eng J 60:79–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh H, Shibahara T, Sakai T (2001) Sub-particle-scale turbulence model for the MPS method-Lagrangian flow model for hydraulic engineering. Comp Fluid Dyn J 9:339–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh H, Khayyer A, Ikari H, Arikawa T, Shimosako K (2014) On enhancement of incompressible SPH method for simulation of violent sloshing flows. Appl Ocean Res 46:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayatdavoodi M, Ertekin RC, Valentine BD (2017) Solitary and cnoidal wave scattering by a submerged horizontal plate in shallow water. AIP Adv 7

  • Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shao SD (2008) Corrected incompressible SPH method for accurate water-surface tracking in breaking waves. Coast Eng 55:236–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khayyer A, Gotoh H, Shao S (2009) Enhanced predictions of wave impact pressure by improved incompressible SPH methods. Appl Ocean Res 31:111–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Méhauté B, Divoky D, Lin A (1968) Shallow water waves a comparison of theories and experiments. In: Coastal Engineering 1968

  • Leimkuhler BJ, Reich S, Skeel RD (1996) Integration methods for molecular dynamics. In: Mathematical approaches to biomolecular structure and dynamics. Springer, pp 161–185

  • Lesieur M (2008) Turbulence in fluids, 4th edn. Springer

  • Lind SJ, Xu R, Stansby PK, Rogers BD (2012) Incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics for free-surface flows: a generalised diffusion-based algorithm for stability and validations for impulsive flows and propagating waves. J Comput Phys 231:1499–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GR, Liu MB (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a meshfree particle method. World Scientific

  • Lubin P, Glockner S (2015) Numerical simulations of three-dimensional plunging breaking waves: generation and evolution of aerated vortex filaments. J Fluid Mech 767:364–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen OS (1971) On the generation of long waves. J Geophys Res 76:8672–8683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makris CV, Krestenitis YN, Memos CD (2010) SPHysics code validation against a near-shore wave breaking experiment. In: Proceedings of 5th SPHERIC-International SPH European Research Interest Community Workshop. pp 245–252.

  • Makris CV, Krestenitis YN, Memos CD (2012) SPH modeling of plunging wave breaking, surf zone turbulence and wave-induced currents. In: The Twenty-Second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference

  • Makris CV, Memos CD, Krestenitis YN (2014) On SPH modelling of surf zone turbulence under weak plungers. In: Proc. of 3rd International Association of Hydraulic Research Europe Congress

  • Makris CV, Krestenitis YN, Memos CD (2015) SPH modelling of coherent structures and intermittent events in the surf zone of weak plungers. In: Proc. of 36th IAHR World Congress

  • Makris CV, Memos CD, Krestenitis YN (2016) Numerical modeling of surf zone dynamics under weakly plunging breakers with SPH method. Ocean Model 98:12–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjani A (2013) Advancement in smoothed particle hydrodynamics for applying to ocean wave energy conversion. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University

  • Meringolo DD, Colagrossi A, Marrone S, Aristodemo F (2017) On the filtering of acoustic components in weakly-compressible SPH simulations. J Fluids Struct 70:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meringolo DD, Liu Y, Wang X-Y, Colagrossi A (2018) Energy balance during generation, propagation and absorption of gravity waves through the δ-LES-SPH model. Coast Eng 140:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 110:399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadaoka K, Hino M, Koyano Y (1989) Structure of the turbulent flow field under breaking waves in the surf zone. J Fluid Mech 204:359–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasar A (2016) Eulerian and Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics as models for the interaction of fluids and flexible structures in biomedical flows. PhD thesis, University of Manchester

  • Neves D, Pires-Silva AA, Fortes C, Matos JSG et al (2016) A comparison of wave breaking with RANS and SPH numerical models. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece

  • Ni X, Feng WB, Wu D (2014) Numerical simulations of wave interactions with vertical wave barriers using the SPH method. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 76:223–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira TCA, Sanchez-Arcilla A, Gironella X, Madsen OS (2017) On the generation of regular long waves in numerical wave flumes based on the particle finite element method. J Hydraul Res 1–19

  • Rienecker MM, Fenton JD (1981) A Fourier approximation method for steady water waves. J Fluid Mech 104:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers BD, Mokos A, Fourtakas G, Crespo AJC, Domínguez JM, Altomare C, Canelas R (2015) Developing SPH simulations for coastal applications accelerated on GPUs using dualsphysics. Hydrolink 3:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfaraz M, Pak A (2017a) An integrated SPH-polyhedral DEM algorithm to investigate hydraulic stability of rock and concrete blocks: application to cubic armours in breakwaters. Eng Anal Bound Elem 84:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarfaraz M, Pak A (2017b) SPH numerical simulation of tsunami wave forces impinged on bridge superstructures. Coast Eng 121:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarfaraz M, Pak A (2018) Numerical investigation of the stability of armour units in low-crested breakwaters using combined SPH–Polyhedral DEM method. J. Fluids Struct 81:14–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiffert BR, Hayatdavoodi M, Ertekin RC (2015) Experiments and calculations of cnoidal wave loads on a coastal-bridge deck with girders. Eur J Mech - B/Fluids 52:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadloo MS, Zainali A, Yildiz M, Suleman A (2012) A robust weakly compressible SPH method and its comparison with an incompressible SPH. Int J Numer Methods Eng 89:939–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S (2006) Simulation of breaking wave by SPH method coupled with k-∊ model. J Hydraul Res 44:338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Ji C (2006) SPH computation of plunging waves using a 2-D sub-particle scale (SPS) turbulence model. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 51:913–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stansby PK, Feng T (2005) Kinematics and depth-integrated terms in surf zone waves from laboratory measurement. J Fluid Mech 529:279–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staroszczyk R (2011) Simulation of solitary wave mechanics by a corrected smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. Arch Hydro-Eng Environ Mech 58:23–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven AH (1993) Physical models and laboratory techniques in coastal engineering. World Sci Ser Ocean Eng 7

  • Sutti M (2014) SPH treatment of boundaries and application to moving objects. Msc. Thesis, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

  • Ting FCK (2013) Laboratory measurements of large-scale near-bed turbulent flow structures under plunging regular waves. Coast Eng 77:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting FCK, Kirby JT (1994) Observation of undertow and turbulence in a laboratory surf zone. Coast Eng 24:51–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting FCK, Kirby JT (1995a) Dynamics of surf-zone turbulence in a strong plunging breaker. Coast Eng 24:177–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting FCK, Kirby JT (1995b) Dynamics of surf-zone turbulence in a spilling breaker. Coast Eng 27:131–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violeau D, Rogers BD (2016) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) for free-surface flows: past, present and future. J Hydraul Res 54:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Z, Dalrymple RA, Hérault A, Bilotta G, Rustico E, Yeh H (2015) SPH modeling of dynamic impact of tsunami bore on bridge piers. Coast Eng 104:26–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Z, Li C, Dalrymple RA, Derakhti M, Katz J (2018) Chaos in breaking waves. Coast Eng 140:272–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenakis AM, Lind SJ, Stansby PK, Rogers BD (2015) An incompressible SPH scheme with improved pressure predictions for free-surface generalised Newtonian flows. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 218:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Z (2013) Two-phase flow modelling of spilling and plunging breaking waves. Appl Math Model 37:3698–3713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Teng B (2017) Numerical study on cnoidal wave run-up around a vertical circular cylinder. Appl Ocean Res 63:276–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng K, Sun Z, Sun J, Zhang Z, Yang G, Zhou F (2009) Numerical simulations of water wave dynamics based on SPH methods. J Hydrodyn Ser B 21:843–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The experimental data used in the Section 3.2 of this study has been provided by Professor Francis Ting, which is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to the high performance computing center of Sharif University of Technology, and also the parallel processing center of the civil engineering department for providing computer facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Sarfaraz.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Bruno Castelle

Appendix (fifth-order cnoidal wave theory and its generation)

Appendix (fifth-order cnoidal wave theory and its generation)

Cnoidal wave theory by Fenton (1990) makes no approximation based on the wave height. The solution displays that the free surface elevation contains cn(X, m), which is a Jacobian elliptic function of argument X and modulus m. m can be computed using the following equation:

$$ \frac{4K(m)}{\sqrt{\frac{3H}{d}}}\left\{\begin{array}{l}1+\frac{H}{d}\left(\frac{5}{8}-\frac{3}{2}\varDelta \right)+{\left(\frac{H}{d}\right)}^2\left(-\frac{21}{128}+\frac{1}{16}\varDelta +\frac{3}{8}{\varDelta}^2\right)\\ {}-{\left(\frac{H}{d}\right)}^3\left(\frac{20127}{179200}-\frac{409}{6400}\varDelta +\frac{7}{64}{\varDelta}^2+\frac{1}{16}{\varDelta}^3\right)\\ {}-{\left(\frac{H}{d}\right)}^4\left(\frac{1575087}{28672000}+\frac{1086367}{1792000}\varDelta -\frac{2679}{25600}{\varDelta}^2+\frac{13}{128}{\varDelta}^3+\frac{3}{128}{\varDelta}^4\right)\end{array}\right\}=\frac{L}{d} $$
(15)

where, K(m) is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, H is the wave height, d is the still water depth, L is the wavelength (Fig. 15), \( \varDelta =\frac{E(m)}{K(m)} \), and E(m) is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Spatial definition of a cnoidal wave

The free surface elevation (η) can be specified by:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}\frac{\eta }{h_t}=1+\frac{H}{h_t}{\mathrm{cn}}^2\left(\alpha \frac{\left(x- ct\right)}{h_t},m\right)+{\left(\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^2\left(-\frac{3}{4}{\mathrm{cn}}^2+\frac{3}{4}{\mathrm{cn}}^4\right)\\ {}+{\left(\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^3\left(\frac{5}{8}{\mathrm{cn}}^2-\frac{151}{80}{\mathrm{cn}}^4+\frac{101}{80}{\mathrm{cn}}^6\right)\\ {}+{\left(\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^4\left(-\frac{8209}{6000}{\mathrm{cn}}^2+\frac{11641}{3000}{\mathrm{cn}}^4-\frac{112393}{24000}{\mathrm{cn}}^6+\frac{17367}{8000}{\mathrm{cn}}^8\right)\\ {}+{\left(\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^5\left(\frac{364671}{196000}{\mathrm{cn}}^2-\frac{2920931}{392000}{\mathrm{cn}}^4+\frac{2001361}{156800}{\mathrm{cn}}^6-\frac{17906339}{1568000}{\mathrm{cn}}^8+\frac{1331817}{313600}{\mathrm{cn}}^{10}\right)\end{array}} $$
(16)

where, c is the wave celerity, ht is the distance between the bottom to the wave trough (Fig. 15), and α is given by:

$$ \alpha ={\left(\frac{3}{4}\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(1-\frac{5}{8}\frac{H}{h_t}+\frac{71}{128}{\left(\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^2-\frac{100627}{179200}{\left(\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^3+\frac{16259737}{28672000}{\left(\frac{H}{h_t}\right)}^4\right) $$
(17)

Horizontal fluid velocity (u) is calculated by:

$$ \frac{u}{\sqrt{g{h}_t}}=\frac{c}{\sqrt{g{h}_t}}-1+\sum \limits_{i=1}^5{\delta}^i\sum \limits_{j=0}^{i-1}{\left(\frac{z}{h_t}\right)}^{2j}\sum \limits_{l=0}^i{\mathrm{cn}}^{2l}\left(\alpha \frac{\left(x- ct\right)}{h_t},m\right){\varPhi}_{ijl} $$
(18)

where, \( \delta =\frac{4}{3}{\alpha}^2 \). Φijl depends on i, j, and k, and can be found in Table 3 of Fenton (1990).

To generate cnoidal waves in a flume, Goring (1978) equated the velocity of the wave-maker plate (/dt), with the corresponding velocity of the water particles. So, on the face of the wave-maker:

$$ \frac{d\xi}{d t}=\overline{u}\left(\xi, t\right)=\frac{c\eta \left(\xi, t\right)}{d+\eta \left(\xi, t\right)} $$
(19)

Goring (1978) assumed that η(ξ, t) can be written as:

(20)

where, k is the wave number. Based on this, the following implicit equation can be written as:

$$ \xi (t)=\frac{H}{kd}\underset{0}{\overset{\theta }{\int }}f\left(\chi \right) d\chi $$
(21)

Now, ξ(t) can be computed by numerical method, such as Newton’s rule. The function F is defined as:

$$ F=\theta - kct+\frac{H}{d}\underset{0}{\overset{\theta }{\int }}f\left(\chi \right) d\chi =0 $$
(22)

By solving the above equation using the Newton’s rule, one can compute θ, that is used to solve for \( \xi (t)= ct-\frac{\theta }{k} \).

Application of the Goring’s method to generate the cnoidal theory is limited to 10 ≤ Ur ≤ 1230 (Steven 1993).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarfaraz, M., Pak, A. Weakly compressible SPH simulation of cnoidal waves with strong plunging breakers. Ocean Dynamics 69, 657–678 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-019-01266-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-019-01266-2

Keywords

Navigation