On the parameters of absorbing layers for shallow water models
- 234 Downloads
Absorbing/sponge layers used as boundary conditions for ocean/marine models are examined in the context of the shallow water equations with the aim to minimize the reflection of outgoing waves at the boundary of the computational domain. The optimization of the absorption coefficient is not an issue in continuous models, for the reflection coefficient of outgoing waves can then be made as small as we please by increasing the absorption coefficient. The optimization of the parameters of absorbing layers is therefore a purely discrete problem. A balance must be found between the efficient damping of outgoing waves and the limited spatial resolution with which the resulting spatial gradients must be described. Using a one-dimensional model as a test case, the performances of various spatial distributions of the absorption coefficient are compared. Two shifted hyperbolic distributions of the absorption coefficient are derived from theoretical considerations for a pure propagative and a pure advective problems. These distribution show good performances. Their free parameter has a well-defined interpretation and can therefore be determined on a physical basis. The properties of the two shifted hyperbolas are illustrated using the classical two-dimensional problems of the collapse of a Gaussian-shaped mound of water and of its advection by a mean current. The good behavior of the resulting boundary scheme remains when a full non-linear dynamics is taken into account.
KeywordsBoundary condition Absorbing layer Sponge layer Shallow water model
EJMD and ED are, respectively, Honorary Research Associate and Research Associate at the National Fund for Scientific Research (Belgium). This work was supported by the French Community of Belgium (RACE, ARC-05/10-333) and by the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme TIMOTHY-P6/13 (Belgian Science Policy). This paper is MARE publication n°181.
- Berenger JP (2007) Perfectly matched layer (PML) for computational electromagnetics. Morgan and Claypool, San RafaelGoogle Scholar
- Darblade G, Baraille R, Le Roux AY, Carton X, Pinchon D (1997) Conditions limites non réfléchissantes pour un modùle de Saint-Venant bidimensionnel barotrope linéarisé. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris 324:485–490Google Scholar
- Davies HC (1976) A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Q J R Meteorol Soc 102:405–418Google Scholar
- Engquist B, Majda A (1977) Absorbing boundary conditions for numerical simulation of waves. Math Comput 139:629–651Google Scholar
- Flather R (1976) A tidal model of the north-west european continental shelf. Mémoires Société Royale des Sciences de Liège 10:141–164Google Scholar
- Holthuijsen LH (2007) Waves in oceanic and coastal waters. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- LeBlond PH, Mysak LA (1978) Waves in the ocean. Elsevier oceanography series 20. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Morse PM, Feshbach H (1999) Methods of theoretical physics. International series in pure and applied physics. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Røed L, Cooper C (1986) Open boundary conditions in numerical ocean models. In: O’Brien JJ (ed) Advanced physical oceanography numerical modelling, vol 186. NATO ASI Series C, pp 411–436Google Scholar
- Ruddick KG, Deleersnijder E, De Mulder T, Luyten PJ (1994) A model study of the rhine discharge front and downwelling circulation. Tellus 46A:149–159Google Scholar
- Sommerfeld A (1949) Partial differential equations in physics. Academic PressGoogle Scholar