Skip to main content
Log in

Properties of suspended sediment in the estuarine turbidity maximum of the highly turbid Humber Estuary system, UK

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Ocean Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurements are presented of the properties of suspended particulate matter (SPM) in the estuarine turbidity maximum (ETM) of the upper Humber and Ouse estuaries during transient, relatively low freshwater inflow conditions of September 1995. Very high concentrations of near-bed SPM (more than 100 g l−1) were observed in the low-salinity (less than 1), upper reaches. SPM within the ETM consisted largely of fine sediment (silt and clay) that existed as microfloc and macrofloc aggregates and individual particles. Primary sediment particles were very fine grained, and typically, about 20–30% was clay-sized at high water. The clay mineralogy was dominated by chlorite and illite. There was a pronounced increase in particle size in the tidal river, up-estuary of the ETM. The mean specific surface area (SSA) of near-bed SPM within the ETM was 22 m2 g−1 on a spring tide and 24 m2 g−1 on a neap tide. A tidal cycle of measurements within a near-bed, high concentration SPM layer during a very small neap tide gave a mean SSA of 26 m2 g−1. The percentage of silt and clay in surficial bed sediments along the main channel of the estuary varied strongly. The relatively low silt and clay percentage of surficial bed sediments (about 10–35%) within the ETM’s region of highest near-bed SPM concentrations and their low SSA values were in marked contrast to the overlying SPM. The loss on ignition (LOI) of near-bed SPM in the turbid reaches of the estuary was about 10%, compared with about 12% for surface SPM and more than 40% in the very low turbidity waters up-estuary of the ETM. Settling velocities of Humber–Ouse SPM, sampled in situ and measured using a settling column, maximized at 1.5 mm s−1 and exhibited hindered settling at higher SPM concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ATT (2005) Admiralty tide tables, vol 1. UK Hydrographic Office, Taunton, UK, p 354

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale AJ, Morris AW (1987) In-situ measurement of particle size in estuarine waters. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 24:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale AJ, Kenny AJ (2005) Sediment analysis and seabed characterisation. In: Eleftheriou A, McIntyre AD (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 43–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale AJ, Barrett CD, West JR, Oduyemi KOK (1989) Use of in-situ laser diffraction particle sizing for particle transport studies in estuaries. In: McManus J, Elliott M (eds) Developments in estuarine and coastal study techniques. Olsen and Olsen, Denmark, pp 133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller AT, McManus J (1979) Sediment sampling and analysis. In: Dyer KR (ed) Estuarine hydrography and sedimentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 87–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchard H, Baumert H (1998) The formation of estuarine turbidity maxima due to density effects in the salt wedge. A hydrodynamic process study. J Phys Oceanogr 28:309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt NT (1986) Field settling velocities of estuary muds. In: Mehta AJ (ed) Estuarine cohesive sediment dynamics. Lecture notes on estuarine and coastal studies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 126–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Delo EA (1988) Estuarine muds manual. Report SR 164. Hydraulics Research, Wallingford, UK, 31 pp + figures and tables

  • Fugate CF, Friedrichs CT (2002) Determining concentration and fall velocity of estuarine particle populations using ADV, OBS and LISST. Cont Shelf Res 22:1667–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gameson ALH, Bell SM (1977) Routine surveys of the tidal waters of the Humber Basin, 2—particulate matter. Report ILR 622. Water Research Centre, Stevenage Laboratory, Elder Way, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 1TH, UK, 31 pp

  • Holtz RD, Kovacs WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 733 pp (ISBN 0-13-484394-0)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp SJ, Hards VL (1996) Mineralogical analysis of suspended sediment from the River Ouse. British Geological Survey (Mineralogy and Petrology Group), Keyworth, Nottingham, UK. Report No. MPSR/96/41R, 3 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby R (1986) Suspended fine cohesive sediment in the Severn Estuary and inner Bristol Channel, UK. Report No. ETSU-STP-4042 to the UK Atomic Energy Authority. Ravensrodd Consultants, Taunton, UK, 243 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby R, Parker WR (1983) Distribution and behaviour of fine sediment in the Severn Estuary and Inner Bristol Channel, UK. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40(Suppl 1):83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Law DJ (1998) Optical characterization of suspended particulate matter in estuaries and near coastal waters. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales, Bangor, UK, 169 pp

  • Law DJ, Bale AJ, Jones SE (1997) Adaptation of focused beam reflectance measurement to in-situ particle sizing in estuaries and coastal waters. Mar Geol 140:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wan X, He Q, Ying M, Shi L, Hutchinson SM (2004) In-situ observation of fluid mud in the North Passage of Yangtze Estuary, China. China Ocean Eng 18:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning AJ (2004) The observed effects of turbulence on estuarine flocculation. J Coast Res Spec Issue 41:90–104

    Google Scholar 

  • McCave IN (1979) Suspended sediment. In: Dyer KR (ed) Estuarine hydrography and sedimentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 131–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta AJ (1986) Characterisation of cohesive sediment properties and transport processes in estuaries. In: Mehta AJ (ed) Estuarine cohesive sediment dynamics. Lecture notes on estuarine and coastal studies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 290–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward GE, Turner A, Glasson DR, Glegg GA (1990) Intra- and inter-estuarine variability of particle microstructure. Sci Total Environ 97–98:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SB (2005) Discussion on “The effect of fresh water flow on siltation in the Humber estuary, Northeast UK” by Pontee NI, Whitehead PA, Hayes CM (ECSS 60:241–249). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 62:725–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SB, West JR, Arundale AMW, Guymer I, Couperthwaite JS (1998) Dynamics of the turbidity maxima in the Upper Humber Estuary System, UK. Mar Pollut Bull 37:190–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SB, Lawler DM, West JR, Couperthwaite JS (2003) Use of continuous turbidity sensor in the prediction of fine sediment transport in the turbidity maximum of the Trent Estuary, UK. Sci Total Environ 58:645–652

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen MW (1976) Determination of the settling velocity of cohesive muds. Hydraulics Research Station, Wallingford, England. Report No. IT 161, 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontee NI, Whitehead PA, Hayes CM (2004) The effect of freshwater flow on siltation in the Humber Estuary, north east UK. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 60:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RMBC (1986) Cruising guide to the North East waterways. Ripon Motor Boat Club, North Yorkshire, UK, 120 pp (contact: Mr. E.A. Taylor, Tel.: +44-1642-475922, http://www.waterwaysguides.co.uk/reviews/noreast.htm)

  • Shi Z, Zhou HJ (2004) Controls on effective settling velocities of mud flocs in the Changjiang Estuary, China. Hydrol Process 18:2877–2892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivakugan N (2004) http://eng.jcu.edu.au/research/compgeo/claymin.pps (Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia. Tel: +61-7-47814290; fax: 61-7-47751184)

  • Townend I, Whitehead P (2003) A preliminary sediment budget for the Humber Estuary. Sci Total Environ 314–316:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner A, Millward GE, Tyler AO (1994) The distribution and chemical composition of particles in a macrotidal estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 38:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles RJ, Stephens JA (1999) Suspended sediment fluxes in the tidal Ouse, UK. J Hydrol Process 13:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles RJ, Easton AE, Griffiths ML, Harris C, Howland RJM, King RS, Morris AW, Plummer DH (1998a) Seasonality of the turbidity maximum in the Humber–Ouse Estuary. Mar Pollut Bull 37:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles RJ, Joint IR, Stephens JA (1998b) Transport and retention of suspended particulate matter and bacteria in the Humber–Ouse Estuary, United Kingdom, and their relationship to hypoxia and anoxia. Estuaries 21(4A):597–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles RJ, Frickers PE, Easton AE, Griffiths ML, Harris C, Howland RJM, King RS, Morris AW, Plummer DH, Tappin AD (2000) Concentrations of suspended particulate organic carbon in the tidal Yorkshire Ouse River and Humber Estuary. Sci Total Environ 251–252:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uncles RJ, Stephens JA, Harris C (2006a) Runoff and tidal influences on the estuarine turbidity maximum of a highly turbid system: the upper Humber and Ouse Estuary, UK. Mar Geol (in press)

  • Uncles RJ, Stephens JA, Law DJ (2006b) Turbidity maximum in the macrotidal, highly turbid Humber estuary, UK: flocs, fluid mud, stationary suspensions and tidal bores. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 67:30–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leussen W (1994) Estuarine macroflocs and their role in fine-grained sediment transport. Cip-Gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag, The Netherlands, 84 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling DM, Owens PN, Waterfall BD, Leeks GJL, Wass PD (2000) The particle size characteristics of fluvial suspended sediment in the Humber and Tweed catchments, UK. Sci Total Environ 251/252:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse R, Soulsby R, Roberts W, Mitchener H (2000) Dynamics of estuarine muds: a manual for practical applications. Thomas Telford, London, 210 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlow R (1995) Basic soil mechanics, 3rd edn. Longman, Harlow, Essex, UK, 559 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterwerp JC (1999) On the dynamics of high concentrated mud suspensions. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 171 pp

  • Winterwerp JC (2001) Stratification effects by cohesive and noncohesive sediment. J Geophys Res 106(C10):22559–22574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterwerp JC (2002) On the flocculation and settling velocity of estuarine mud. Cont Shelf Res 22:1339–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr. Bob Clifton (PML Scientist, retired) for his assistance with surface area analysis and Mr. Norman Bowley (PML Technician and Coxswain, retired) for invaluable assistance and support during the fieldwork. The analyses of these data were undertaken with the aid of a grant from the EstProc research programme (http://www.estproc.net). EstProc is funded within the joint DEFRA/EA (UK) Flood and Coastal Defence R&D Programme of Fluvial, Estuarine and Coastal Processes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reginald James Uncles.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Paulo Salles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uncles, R.J., Stephens, J.A. & Harris, C. Properties of suspended sediment in the estuarine turbidity maximum of the highly turbid Humber Estuary system, UK. Ocean Dynamics 56, 235–247 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-005-0053-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-005-0053-y

Keywords

Navigation