Skip to main content
Log in

Complete and computable orbit invariants in the geometry of the affine group over the integers

  • Published:
Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The subject matter of this paper is the geometry of the affine group over the integers, \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Z}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Z}}^n\). Turing-computable complete \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Z}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Z}}^n\)-orbit invariants are constructed for rational affine spaces, angles, segments, triangles and ellipses. In rational affine \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Q}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Q}}^n\)-geometry, ellipses are classified by the Clifford–Hasse–Witt invariant, via the Hasse–Minkowski theorem. We classify ellipses in \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Z}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Z}}^n\)-geometry combining results by Apollonius of Perga and Pappus of Alexandria with the Hirzebruch–Jung continued fraction algorithm. We then consider rational polyhedra, i.e., finite unions of simplexes in \({\mathbb {R}}^n\) with rational vertices. Markov’s unrecognizability theorem for combinatorial manifolds states the undecidability of the problem whether two rational polyhedra P and \(P'\) are continuously \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Q}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Q}}^n\)-equidissectable. The same problem for the continuous \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Z}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Z}}^n\)-equidissectability of P and \(P'\) is open. We prove the decidability of the problem whether two rational polyhedra P and \(P'\) in \({\mathbb {R}}^n\) have the same \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Z}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Z}}^n\)-orbit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See page 219 in his paper “A comparative review of recent researches in geometry,” Bull. New York Math. Soc., 2(10) (1893) 215–249, https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183407629.

  2. For background on decidable (= recursive = computable = Turing-decidable) sets and problems we refer to [7] and [23].

  3. In the sense that two objects have the same invariant iff they have the same \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Z}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Z}}^n\)-orbit.

  4. Regular simplexes are said to be “unimodular” in [12, Sect. 7] and [17].

  5. Regular cones are said to be “nonsingular” in [9, p. 29] and [19, p. 15].

  6. If indeed arc length or the circular functions are more elementary than the invariant \({\mathsf {angle}}\) in \({\mathsf {GL}}(n,{\mathbb {Z}})\ltimes {\mathbb {Z}}^n\)-geometry.

  7. This follows from the positive solution of the low-dimensional strong Oda conjecture on the decomposition of birational toric maps. See [8, Sect. 6, pp. 181–183] for a formulation in terms of two-dimensional fans. Passing to affine correspondents we immediately obtain (15).

  8. Also known as an “axial affine transformation.”

  9. Pappus [21, Book VIII, Sect. XVII, Proposition 14] constructs the axes of an ellipse from any given pair of conjugate semi-diameters. For more recent constructions see [20, p. 69 ff].

References

  1. Apollonius of Perga, Heath, T.L.: Treatise on Conic Sections. Cambridge University Press (1896)

  2. Auel, A.: Remarks on the Milnor conjecture over schemes, Galois-Teichmüller theory and arithmetic geometry, Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, 63, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, pp. 1–30 (2012)

  3. Barvinok, A.: A course in convexity, Graduate studies in mathematics, vol. 54, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island (2002)

  4. Cabrer, L.M., Mundici, D.: Classifying orbits of the affine group over the integers. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 37, 440–453 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chernavsky, A.V., Leksine, V.P.: Unrecognizability of manifolds. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 141, 325–335 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cremona, J.E., Rusin, D.: Efficient solution of rational conics. Math. Comput. 72(243), 1417–1441 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, M., Sigal, R., Weyuker, E.J.: Computability, Complexity, and Languages: Fundamentals of Theoretical Computer Science, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ewald, G.: Combinatorial Convexity and Algebraic Geometry. Springer, New York (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Fulton, W.: Introduction to Toric Varieties, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 131. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentili, G., O’Connor, M.A.: On rational geometry of conic sections. J. Symb. Comput. 29, 459–470 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Glass, A.M.W., Madden, J.J.: The word problem versus the isomorphism problem. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 30, 53–61 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodman, J.E., O’Rourke, J. (eds.): Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hudson, J.F.P.: Piecewise Linear Topology. W.A. Benjamin Inc., New York (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ireland, K., Rosen, M.: A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory. Springer, Berlin (1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitaoka, Y.: Arithmetic of Quadratic Forms. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Mundici, D.: Farey stellar subdivisions, ultrasimplicial groups, and \(K_0\) of AF C*-algebras. Adv. Math. 68, 23–39 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mundici, D.: The Haar theorem for lattice-ordered abelian groups with order-unit. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 21, 537–549 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Mundici, D.: Word problems in Elliott monoids. Adv. Math. 335, 343–371 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Oda, T.: Convex Bodies and Algebraic Geometry. An Introduction to the Theory of Toric Varieties. Springer, New York (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ostermann, A., Wanner, G.: Geometry by its History. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Pappus of Alexandria, Collection (\(\Sigma \upsilon \nu \alpha \gamma \omega \gamma \acute{\eta }\)). First Latin translation by F. Commandino, Bologna, 1588, 1660. Greek-Latin edition by F. Hultsch, Berlin, 1876, 1878. French translation by P. Ver Eecke, Paris, Bruges, 1933, Paris, 1959

  22. Sendra, J.R., Winkler, F., Perez-Diaz, S.: Rational Algebraic Curves. A Computer Algebra Approach. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Shoenfield, J.R.: Mathematical Logic, Association for Symbolic Logic, 2001. Originally published by Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1967, (reprinted, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, 2018)

  24. Shtan’ko, M.A.: Markov’s theorem and algorithmically non-recognizable combinatorial manifolds, Izvestiya RAN. Ser. Math. 68, 207–224 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simon, D.: Solving quadratic equations using reduced unimodular quadratic forms. Math. Comput. 74(251), 1531–1543 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Stallings, J.R.: Lectures on Polyhedral Topology, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbay (1967)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the referee for many valuable insights and suggestions which led to a thorough revision of the original manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Mundici.

Additional information

In memoriam Roberto Cignoli.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mundici, D. Complete and computable orbit invariants in the geometry of the affine group over the integers. Annali di Matematica 199, 1843–1871 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-020-00945-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-020-00945-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation