Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of flock size and human presence on vigilance and feeding behavior in the Eurasian Coot (Fulica atra L.) during breeding season

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group size influences individual vigilance in different bird species. Most studies have shown that animals spend more time for feeding and less time on vigilance when in groups. Apart from group size, additional factors, such as group density, age, sex, and season, are considered to influence vigilance behaviors. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of flock size and human presence on vigilance and feeding in the Eurasian Coot (Fulica atra) during the breeding season. This work was performed in Yorukkirka Lake (Eskisehir, Turkey) from March to August 2005. No correlation was found between flock size and vigilance rates during either human absence or presence. On the other hand, when comparing behavioral differences between human presence and absence, humans appeared to have an important negative effect on vigilance rates, vigilance duration, and feeding behavior, regardless of flock size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avilés JM, Bednekoff PA (2007) How do vigilance and feeding by Common Cranes Grus grus depend on age, habitat, and flock size? J Avian Biol 38:690–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa A (2002) Does vigilance always covary negatively with group size? Effects of foraging strategy. Acta Ethol 5:51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (1998) The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds. Biol Rev 73:449–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (2001) Should vigilance always decrease with group size? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (2003) Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms. Behav Process 63:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (2005) Low foraging success of Semipalmated Sandpipers at the edge of groups. Ethology 111:785–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp G (2007) Effect of group size on feeding rate when patches are exhaustible. Ethology 113:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (2002) Why are scanning patterns so variable? An overlooked question in the study of anti-predator vigilance. J Avian Biol 33:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (2005) Testing for peripheral vigilance: do birds value what they see when not overtly vigilant? Anim Behav 69:1165–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M (1995) Vigilance, flock size, and flock geometry: information gathering by evening grosbeaks (Aves, Fringillidae). Ethology 99:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Fernández-Juricic E, Zollner PA, Garity SC (2005) Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbances. J Appl Ecol 42:943–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boukhriss J, Selmi S, Bechet A, Nouira S (2007) Vigilance in Greater Flamingos wintering in Southern Tunisia: age-dependent flock size effect. Ethology 113:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen AF, Lima SL, Bakken GS (2001) Does the thermal environment influence vigilance behavior in Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis)? An approach using standard operative temperature. J Therm Biol 26:605–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds) (1996) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 3. Hoatzin to Auks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona

  • Dias RI (2006) Effects of position and flock size on vigilance and foraging behaviour of the Scaled Dove Columbina squammata. Behav Process 73:248–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez J (2002) Biotic and abiyotic factors affecting the feeding behavior of the Black-tailed Godwit. Waterbirds 25(4):393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukas R, Kamil AC (2000) The cost of limited attention in Blue Jays. Behav Ecol 11:502–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Tellería JL (2000) Effects of human disturbance on Blackbird Turdus merula spatial and temporal feeding patterns in urban parks of Madrid, Spain. Bird Study 47:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Siller S, Kacelnik A (2004) Flock density, social foraging, and scanning: an experiment with Starlings. Behav Ecol 15:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Beauchamp G, Bastain B (2007a) Group-size and distance-to-neighbour effects on feeding and vigilance in Brown-Headed Cowbirds. Anim Behav 73:771–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Zollner PA, LeBlanc C, Westphal LM (2007b) Responses of nestling black-crowned night herons (Nycticorax nycticorax) to aquatic and terrestrial recreational activities: a manipulative study. Waterbirds 30:554–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Gall MD, Dolan T, Tisdale V, Martin GR (2008) The visual fields of two ground-foraging birds, House Finches and House Sparrows, allow for simultaneous foraging and anti-predator vigilance. Ibis 150:779–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid A, Dill LM (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6(1):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemain M, Duncan P, Fritz H (2001) Switching to a feeding method that obstructs vision increases head-up vigilance in dabbling ducks. J Avian Biol 32:345–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill D, Hocking D, Price D, Tucker P, Morris R, Treweek J (1997) Bird disturbance: improving the quality and utility of disturbance research. J Appl Ecol 34:275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüner G (2003) Türkmen Dagi, Kalabak su toplama havzası (Eskisehir) florası. Dissertation, University of Osmangazi, Eskişehir, Turkey

  • Ikuta LA, Blumstein DT (2003) Do fences protect birds from human disturbance? Biol Conserv 112:447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight RL, Grout DJ, Temple SA (1987) Nest-defense behavior of the American Crow in urban and rural areas. Condor 89:175–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krams I (1998) Dominance-specific vigilance in the great tit. J Avian Biol 29:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus J (2003) Vigilance and group size: early studies, the edge effect, secondary defences, the double advantage trade-off and the future. Behav Process 63:129–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus J, Symonds M (1992) Contrasting effects of protective and obstructive cover on avian vigilance. Anim Behav 43:519–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1987) Distance to cover, visual obstruction, and vigilance in House Sparrows. Behaviour 102:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Bednekoff PA (1999) Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? Anim Behav 58:537–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Zollner PA (1996) Anti-predatory vigilance and the limits of collective detection: visual and spatial separation between foragers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Zollner PA, Bednekoff PA (1999) Predation, scramble competition, and the vigilance group size effect in Dark-eyedJjuncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manor R, Saltz D (2003) Impact of human nuisance disturbance on vigilance and group size of a social ungulate. Ecol Appl 13(6):1830–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechacek P (2006) Foraging behavior of Eurasian Tree-toed Woodpeckers (Picoides tridactylus alpinus) in relation to sex and season in Germany. Auk 123(1):235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow MR, Schutten H, Howes JR, Holzer T, Madgwick J, Jowitt AJD (1997) Interactions between Coot (Fulica atra) and submerged macrophytes: the role of birds in the restoration process. Hydrobiologia 342(343):241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post P, Götmark F (2006) Foraging behavior and predation risk in male and female Eurasian Blackbirds (Turdus merula) during the breeding season. Auk 123(1):162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöysä H (1987) Feeding–vigilance trade-off in the teal (Anas crecca): effects of feeding method and predation risk. Behaviour 103:108–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöysä H (1994) Group foraging, distance to cover and vigilance in the Teal, Anas crecca. Anim Behav 48:921–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor CJ, Broom M, Ruxton GD (2003) A communication based spatial model of antipredator vigilance. J Theor Biol 220:123–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1973) On the advantages of flocking. J Theor Biol 38:419–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Randler C (2003) Vigilance in urban Swan Geese and their hybrids. Waterbirds 26(3):257–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler C (2004) Coot benefit from feeding in close proximity to geese. Waterbirds 27:240–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler C (2005) Coots Fulica atra reduce their vigilance under increased competition. Behav Process 68:173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler C (2006a) Feeding bout lengths differ between terrestrial and aquatic feeding Coots Fulica atra. Waterbirds 29(1):95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler C (2006b) Disturbances by dog barking increase vigilance in coots Fulica atra. Eur J Wildl Res 52:265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reboreda JC, Fernandez GJ (1997) The effect of sex and group size on individual vigilance in the Greater Rhea, Rhea americana. Ethology 103:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieucau G, Giraldeau LA (2009) Persuasive companions can be wrong: the use of misleading social information in nutmeg manikins. Behav Ecol 20(6):1217–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinette RL, James CHA (2001) Social and ecological factors influencing vigilance by northwestern Crows, Corvus caurinus. Anim Behav 62:447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansom A, Cresswell W, Minderman J, Lind J (2008) Vigilance benefits and competition costs in groups: do individual Redshanks gain an overall foraging benefit? Anim Behav 75:1869–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotow R, Coumi N (2000) Vigilance in bronze mannikin groups: the contributions of predation risk and intra-group competition. Behaviour 137:565–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow DW, Perrins CM (1998) The birds of the Western Palearctic. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B, van Perlo B (1998) Rails: a guide to the rails, crakes, gallinules and coots of the world. Pica, Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebbich S, Taborsky M, Fessl B, Dvorak M, Winkler H (2004) Feeding behavior of four arboreal Darwin's finches: adaptations to spatial and seasonal variability. Condor 106:95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treves A (2000) Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation. Anim Behav 60:711–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treves A (2003) The group-size effect in non-feeding animals. Behav Process 63:127–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valcarcel A, Fernández-Juricic E (2009) Anti-predator strategies of house finches: are urban habitats safe spots from predators even when humans are around? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hout PJ (2006) Dense foraging flotillas of Eurasian Coots Fulica atra explained by predation by Ganges soft-shell turtle Aspideretus gangeticus. Ardea 94(2):271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward S (1996) Energy expenditure of female Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica during egg formation. Physiol Zool 69:930–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Warkentin IG, Morton ES (2000) Flocking and foraging behavior of wintering Prothonotary Warblers. Wilson Bull 112(1):88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tolga Celik who helped with monitoring in the field. We also thank Associate Professor Dr. Berna Yazıcı for helping in data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Anadolu University, 26470, Eskisehir, Turkey

    Çınar Severcan & Elif Yamaç

Authors
  1. Çınar Severcan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elif Yamaç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elif Yamaç.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Severcan, Ç., Yamaç, E. The effects of flock size and human presence on vigilance and feeding behavior in the Eurasian Coot (Fulica atra L.) during breeding season. acta ethol 14, 51–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0089-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0089-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation