Skip to main content
Log in

Sex-specific aggression and sex ratio in wintering finch flocks: serins and siskins differ

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males are dominant over females in many bird species. This may lead to male monopolisation of resources whenever food is scarce or clumped and secondarily to lower female survival rates. As a result of the consequent male-biased sex ratio in the adult population, competition may arise either (1) between males and females, as males attempt to exclude females from feeding patches, or (2) between males because females do not pose a competitive threat. We recorded agonistic interactions between males and females in wintering foraging flocks of serins (Serinus serinus) and siskins (Carduelis spinus) to test for inter-specific differences. Most of the aggressive interactions in serins were between males and females, whereas in siskins they were between males. We also compared sex ratios for each species during the winter, determined from separate trapping efforts over an 11-year period, to test whether the direction of aggression by males (i.e. male/male; male/female) relates to variations in female survival rates. The proportion of females was smaller in winter than in autumn for serins, but differences in siskins were negligible. Results are interpreted in relation to the social organization displayed by both species studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann SA, Altmann J (1977) On the analysis of rates of behaviour. Anim Behav 25:364–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Balph MH, Balph DF, Romesburg HC (1979) Social status signalling in winter flocking birds: an examination of a current hypothesis. Auk 96:78–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Barta Z, Liker A, Möckel R (2004) The effects of predation risk on the use of social foraging tactics. Anim Behav 67:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff M, Scott AC (1989) Aggression, dominance, and social organization in evening grosbeaks. Ethology 83:177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkman CW (1997) Feeding behavior, flock-size dynamics, and variation in sexual selection in crossbills. Auk 114:163–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitwisch R (1989) Mortality patterns, sex ratios, and parental investment in monogamous birds. Curr Ornithol 6:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse P (1984) Key to sexing and ageing of European passerines. Beitr Naturk Niedersachsens 37:1–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher GS, Rohwer SA (1989) The evolution of conspicuous and distinctive coloration for communication in birds. Curr Ornithol 6:51–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1986) Sex ratio variation in birds. Ibis 128:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Amer Stat 35:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy MJ, Senar JC, Domènech J (2002) Analysis of individual and time-specific covariate effects on survival and movements of Serinus serinus in northeastern Spain. J appl Stat 29:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domènech J, Senar JC (1998) Trap type can bias estimates of sex ratio. J Field Ornithol 69:380–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Domènech J, Senar JC (1999) Are foraging serin Serinus serinus females more vigilant than males?: the effect of sex ratio. Ardea 87:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF (2007) Adult sex ratios in wild bird populations. Ibis 149:671–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1995) Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in mating behavior. In: Gowaty PA (ed) Feminism and evolutionary biology. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 351–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty PA (1996) Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp 21–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE, Montgomerie R, Roeder C, Boag P (1994) Sexual selection and cuckoldry in a monogamous songbird: implications for sexual selection theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys GC, Rothstein SI (1991) Benefits and costs of dominance and subordinance in white-crowned sparrows and the paradox of status signalling. Anim Behav 42:899–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsten P, Vedder O, Szentirmai I, Komdeur J (2007) Absence of status signalling by structurally based ultraviolet plumage in wintering blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1933–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton JD, Pradel R, Clobert J (1993) The statistical analysis of survival in animal populations. Trend Ecol Evol 8:91–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcelli M, Fusillo R, Boitani L (2003) Sexual segregation in the activity patterns of European polecats (Mustela putorius). J Zool 261:249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB (1986) Variation in winter flocking associations and dispersion patterns in the turnstone Arenaria interpres. J Zool 209:385–403, Lond

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB, Thomson BC (1995) Fish recognize and prefer to shoal with poor competitors. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payevsky VA (1994) Age and sex structure, mortality and spatial winter distribution of siskins (Carduelis spinus) migrating through eastern Baltic area. Vogelwarte 37:190–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Payevsky VA, Vysotsky VG, Yefremov VD, Markovets MY, Morozov YG, Shapoval AP (1997) Sex-specific survival rates in birds. Zh Obshch Biol 58:5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp JW (1988) Scanning behavior of finches in mixed-species groups. Condor 90:510–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll J, Saldaña J, Senar JC (2004) Evolutionary stable transition rates in a stage-structured model. An application to the analysis of size distributions of badges of social status. Math Biosci 190:145–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S (2004) Using age ratios to infer survival and despotic breeding dispersal in hybridizing warblers. Ecology 85:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer SA, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution 35:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruckstuhl KE (2007) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: proximate and ultimate causes. Integr Comp Biol 47:245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC (1985) Interactional rules in captive siskins (Carduelis spinus). Misc Zool 9:347–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC (1994) Vivir y convivir: la vida en grupos sociales. In: Carranza J (ed) Etología: Introducción a la ciéncia del comportamiento. Univ. of Extremadura, Cáceres, pp 205–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Camerino M, Metcalfe NB (1989) Agonistic interactions in siskin flocks: why are dominants sometimes subordinate? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Camerino M, Metcalfe NB (1990a) Familiarity breeds tolerance: the development of social stability in flocking siskins (Carduelis spinus). Ethology 85:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Copete JL, Metcalfe NB (1990b) Dominance relationships between resident and transient wintering siskins. Ornis Scand 21:129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Camerino M, Metcalfe NB (1992) Fighting as a subordinate in finch flocks: escalation is effective but risky. Anim Behav 43:862–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Camerino M, Metcalfe NB (1997) A comparison of agonistic behaviour in two Cardueline finches: feudal species are more tolerant than despotic ones. Etología 5:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreeve DF (1980) Differential mortality in the sexes of the Aleutian gray-crowned rosy finch. Am Midl Nat 104:193–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotow R, Rothstein SI (1995) Importance of dominance status and distance from cover to foraging white-crowned sparrows: an experimental analysis. Auk 112:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. Svensson, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (2008) Analyzing animal societies. Quantitative methods for vertebrate social analyses. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (1990) Prior-residency and coat-tail effects in dominance relationships of male dark-eyed juncos Junco hyemalis. Anim Behav 40:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger LL (1999) Is red coloration of male Northern Cardinals beneficial during the nonbreeding season?: a test of status signaling. Condor 101:655–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zschille J, Stier N, Roth M (2010) Gender differences in activity patterns of American mink Neovison vison in Germany. Eur J Wildl Res 56:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Alex Middleton and Lluïsa Arroyo for suggestions to improve the paper. We are also grateful to José Luis Copete and Didac Valera for their help in field work, Lluïsa Arroyo for her help in the laboratory and Hermanitas de la Asunción for allowing us to work in their property. This is a contribution to research project CGL 2009-10652 from Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Spanish Research Council. Birds were handled with the permission of the Catalan Ringing Office (ICO) and the Departament de Medi Ambient, Generalitat de Catalunya.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Senar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senar, J.C., Domènech, J. Sex-specific aggression and sex ratio in wintering finch flocks: serins and siskins differ. acta ethol 14, 7–11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0084-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0084-3

Keywords

Navigation