Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual selection and cuckoldry in a monogamous songbird: implications for sexual selection theory

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual selection is generally assumed to be weaker in monogamous than in polygynous animals. Recently, though, extra-pair fertilizations have been hailed as an important force in generating variance in reproductive success among males in socially monogamous species, thereby increasing the intensity of sexual selection. To see if extra-pair copulations contribute to variance in male reproductive success in the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), we used DNA fingerprinting to determine the paternity of chicks from 35 nests. This species is a socially monogamous passerine in which plumage brightness serves as a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Out of 119, nestlings 10 (8.3%) were fathered by a male other than the attending male, but cuckoldry occurred randomly with respect to the plumage colouration, size, or age of the attending male. Thus extra-pair fertilizations do not generate variance in male reproductive success with respect to plumage colour. On the other hand, a strongly male-biased sex ratio and asynchronous breeding by females may generate substantial variance in male reproductive success and could explain the evolution of ornamental colouration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1986) Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ (1983) Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 67–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Stutchbury BJ, Walsh PD (1990) Choice of colony size in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 5:398–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush AH, Power DM (1976) House finch pigmentation: carotenoid metabolism and the effect of diet. Auk 93:725–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke T, Bruford M (1987) DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature 327:149–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1991) Mate selection by multiple criteria in a monogamous species. Am Nat 117:515–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominey WJ (1983) Sexual selection, additive genetic variance and the ‘phenotypic handicap’. J Theor Biol 101:495–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith DA, Boag PT, Gibbs HL, White BN (1991) Sizing bands on autoradiograms: a study of precision for scoring DNA fingerprints. Electrophoresis 12:210–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges M, Lequarré A-S, Castelli M, Hanset R, Vassart G (1988) DNA fingerprinting in domestic animals using four different minisatellite probes. Cytogen Cell Gen 47:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990) Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol 144:473–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton TR (1991) Seasonal movement of house finches in the midwest. N Am Bird-Bander 16:119–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1990) Female house finches prefer colorful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Anim Behav 40:563–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1991) Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350:337–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1992) The proximate basis of variation in carotenoid pigmentation in male house finches. Auk 109:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1993a) Geographic variation in carotenoid plumage pigmentation of house finches. Biol J Linn Soc 49:63–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1993b) House finch. In: Poole A, Gill F (ed) Birds of North America, no. 46. American Ornithologists' Union, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1993c) The proximate basis of inter- and intea-population variation in female plumage coloration in the House Finch. Can J Zool 71:619–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (1994) Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav Ecol 5:20–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzer G (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1078

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoysak DJ, Weatherhead PJ (1991) Sampling blood from birds: a technique and an assessment of its effect. Condor 93:746–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Van den Broeck M, Burke T, Van Broeckhoven C, Dhondt AA (1992) Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Price T, Arnold SJ (1990) The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution 44:180–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornerup A, Wanscher JH (1983) Methuen handbook of colours. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener H, Michener JR (1931) Variation in color of male house finches. Condor 33:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1988) Female choice selects for male sexual trait ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 322:640–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur N, Hasson O (1984) Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. J Theor Biol 110:275–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Oring LW, Fleischer RC, Reed JM, Marsden KE (1992) Cuckoldry through stored sperm in the sequentially polyandrous spotted sandpiper. Nature 359:631–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne R (1984) Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithol Monogr 33:1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Montgomerie R, Põldmaa T, White BN, Boag PT (1991) DNA fingerprinting reveals relation between tail ornaments and cuckoldry in barn swallows,Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol 2:90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WL (1960) Agonistic behavior of the house finch. I. Annual cycle and display patterns. Condor 62:245–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Heinemann, London, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (1987) Extra-pair fertilizations in a predominantly monogamous bird. Anim Behav 35:877–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (1993) Polygyny and extra-pair fertilizations in eastern red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol 4:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Noon WA, Reeve HK, Aquadro CF (1989) Improved hybridization conditions for DNA “fingerprints” probed with M13. Nucleic Acids Res 16:4161

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetton JH, Carter RE, Parkin DT, Walters D (1987) Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 327:147–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1977) The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67:603–605

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, G.E., Montgomerie, R., Roeder, C. et al. Sexual selection and cuckoldry in a monogamous songbird: implications for sexual selection theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35, 193–199 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167959

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167959

Key words

Navigation