Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors characterizing phosphate oxygen isotope ratios in river water: an inter-watershed comparison approach

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Phosphorus cycle in watersheds
  • Published:
Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the oxygen isotope ratio of dissolved phosphate \(\left( {\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }} } \right)\) in two rivers with different land-cover and geological features (Ado River and Yasu River) within Lake Biwa basin, central Japan, to explore what factor primarily characterizes the \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\). Mean values of \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) in river water were 19.0 ± 2.4‰ (n = 7) in Ado River and 13.1 ± 2.3‰ (n = 15) in Yasu River, which were significantly different. Comparisons of \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) between river water and potential sources of phosphate revealed that in the Ado River, the \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) was similar to that in rocks from the accretionary complex and decreased with increasing sedimentary rock coverage. In the Yasu River, the \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) was low in the upper forested areas, but increased with paddy field coverage. These results demonstrate that river \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) strongly reflects inputs from geological substances, but is also impacted by land-use activities and varies with anthropogenic land coverage in the watershed. Thus, river \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) relates to land or bedrock coverage differentially in each river. Regression analysis showed that residuals of the \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) tended to converge to zero with increasing drainage area, suggesting that river \(\delta^{{{18}}} {\text{O}}_{{{\text{PO}}_{{4}} }}\) more explicitly reflects land-cover and geological features on a larger watershed scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by RIHN Project (Grant No. #D06-14200119), the River Foundation (Grant Nos. #28-5211-047 & 261211010), and the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Grant Nos. #JP24370010; #JP15K16115; #JP18K11623) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. We also thank Ms. Ijin Kang for helping our field survey. Sampling of riverbed rocks was conducted with the permission of Kinki Regional Development Bureau Office, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of Japan. Public sewage division of Koka and Yasu in Shiga Prefecture provided monitoring data on small-scale WWTPs and logistic support for the sampling of their effluents. Central Glass Co., Ltd. and the public sewage division of Shiga Prefecture provided the stock solution of manufactured chemical fertilizers and annual report of the public sewage program in Shiga Prefecture, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun’ichiro Ide.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Shin-ichi Onodera.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ide, J., Ishida, T., Cid-Andres, A.P. et al. Factors characterizing phosphate oxygen isotope ratios in river water: an inter-watershed comparison approach. Limnology 21, 365–377 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-020-00610-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-020-00610-6

Keywords

Navigation